Re: Modules without modularity

V Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 03:31:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 06:32:45PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > I spent some time thinking how to approximate the nice features with current > > state of RPM, Koji, and DNF and come up with this approach > >

Re: Modules without modularity

V Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 03:47:13PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Il 20/06/23 17:31, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto: > > > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/postgresql/pull-request/59 > > > > Zbyszek > > Isn't the package name required to match the name of specfile? >

Re: Releasing package updates in multiple Fedora releases

On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 21:01 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > You're addition of git pull is a good thing. It's based on unfortunate experience. :D Using ; not && (as some others suggested) is bad, though, I'll have to change that (would save me some panicked ctrl-c'ing). I'm just somehow used

Re: New look for Koji Web

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 6:31 AM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > The Koji web front end is now running a new theme that brings it into > line with the majority of our other devel focused web applications: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ Love it, thank you. P

Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200 Sandro wrote: > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix > > to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be > > compliant with the official versioning, but just

Re: PR #47: binutils: drop gold

(I realized I hadn't subscribed to f-devel with this email ID, and this message didn't make it to devel. Resending.) On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 13:59 +0200, Amit Shah wrote: > Hey Nick, > > I submitted > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/binutils/pull-request/47 > > yesterday to not build gold

Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm

Hi, Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against Rawhide. ETA 2 hours. For updates watch: https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/ Best regards, /M -- Miroslav Vadkerti

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230621.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230620.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230621.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 97 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 11.69 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Modules without MBS

V Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:52:36AM +0200, Remi Collet napsal(a): > Le 13/06/2023 à 18:32, Petr Pisar a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > as it seems that module build infrastructure isn't getting any better, as > > modular YUM repositories are going to be deconfigured > >

Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:24:53 +0200 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:18 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200 > > Sandro wrote: > > > > > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and

%autorelease and arbitrary suffix

Hi, I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar suffices. It looks to

[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230621.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230621.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix

On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote: Hi, I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim builds. It's quite common to append eg.

Re: %autorelease and arbitrary suffix

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:18 PM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200 > Sandro wrote: > > > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix > > > to the release for my local test build that

Re: New look for Koji Web

On 21/06/2023 06:30, Ryan Lerch wrote: The Koji web front end is now running a new theme that brings it into line with the majority of our other devel focused web applications: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ Looks very good, great work! -- Arthur Bols fas/irc: principis

Re: Modules without MBS

Le 13/06/2023 à 18:32, Petr Pisar a écrit : Hello, as it seems that module build infrastructure isn't getting any better, as modular YUM repositories are going to be deconfigured , there is a time to look at different ways

Re: Red Hat Stream ONLY, Orphaning packages

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 12:33 -0500, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote: > If you'll add me as admin/owner on the packages I'll continue to maintain > them. FAS jonathanspw > > Especially interested in remmina since I use it nearly every day. > > Hi, I have added you with commit access for now

Re: What is Fedora?

> I see an impasse here. Why contribute to fedora when Red Hat will lock it down in other products? They literally cannot "Lock it down" due to the GPL. Anyone using RHEL binaries has legal right to the code. What they seem to have done is limit source code access to those who are actually using

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:10 -0400, JT wrote: > > I see an impasse here. Why contribute to fedora when Red Hat will lock it > > down in other > products? > > They literally cannot "Lock it down" due to the GPL. Anyone using RHEL > binaries has legal right > to the code. > What they seem to

What is Fedora?

Hi all, Obviously many will have seen: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/EPEL) have been knocked down: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215299 Let us face it our efforts with the Fedora project are

Re: Red Hat Stream ONLY, Orphaning packages

If you'll add me as admin/owner on the packages I'll continue to maintain them. FAS jonathanspw Especially interested in remmina since I use it nearly every day. On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:27 PM Philip Wyett wrote: > Hi all, > > After the announcement below today. > >

Re: Fedora-Rawhide testing blocked in Testing Farm

Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked again \o/ Thanks to all who helped! /M On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: > Hi, > > Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm. > > We are trying to hotpatch the problems

Re: F39 Change Proposal: No fedora-repos-modular in default installation (System Wide Change)

On 5/18/23 05:12, Aoife Moloney wrote: > == Summary == > No longer include `fedora-repos-modular` in default installations. > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:Petersen| Jens Petersen]] > * Email: > > > > == Detailed Description == > The main motivation for this change is to improve the everyday

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-06-21

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-06-21/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-06-21-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-06-21/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-06-21-16.30.txt Log:

Red Hat Stream ONLY, Orphaning packages

Hi all, After the announcement below today. https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream I will be in 5 days detaching myself and orphaning all packages I have involvement with. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote: >Hi all, > >Obviously many will have seen: > >https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream > >and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/EPEL) have been knocked >down: >

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:23 -0400, JT wrote: > Red Hat doesn't need to mention it. It's a legal requirement of the GPL... > anyone using the > binaries has legal right to the source code. > > As for Red Hat cancelling users accounts who pull the source build binaries > and share it... >

Re: What is Fedora?

> I believe the GPL asks you never have to make agreement to access GPL code. Correct. Per the GPL if you have the binary you have a legal right to the code. Also the GPL does contain clauses that stipulate that outside agreements cannot excuse anyone from the conditions of the license, see the

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:49 -0400, JT wrote: > > I believe the GPL asks you never have to make agreement to access GPL code. > > Correct. Per the GPL if you have the binary you have a legal right to the > code. > Also the GPL does contain clauses that stipulate that outside agreements >

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:07 -0400, JT wrote: > > Who says that developer account will be available soon, Have Red Hat made > > a commitment to keep > it? > > People want to update a system and not fart about, updating via ISO or > > installing a new > system every 6 months is a joke. > > You

Re: What is Fedora?

There are mirrors online that you can pull from as well if you dont have an account or know someone who has an account. Or you can create a dev account with a throw away email to get the ISOs. I'll happily download any ISO you want. :P I know several people that their dev account is linked with

Re: What is Fedora?

Red Hat doesn't need to mention it. It's a legal requirement of the GPL... anyone using the binaries has legal right to the source code. As for Red Hat cancelling users accounts who pull the source build binaries and share it... that'd probably land them in a lawsuit, because as long as that

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:26 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Obviously many will have seen: > > > > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream > > > > and see, where EL (contributors like you of

Re: What is Fedora?

> Who says that developer account will be available soon, Have Red Hat made a commitment to keep it? > People want to update a system and not fart about, updating via ISO or installing a new system every 6 months is a joke. You can download ISOs without a dev account. Someone could easily get

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:09 PM Philip Wyett wrote: > It has much to do. Fedora is a community apparently Red Hat no longer needs. > The now ELN backend > can satisfy pre testing and could make fedora redundant. ELN is a build of (some) Fedora packages with EL-specific options, so it requires

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:39 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:09 PM Philip Wyett > wrote: > > > It has much to do. Fedora is a community apparently Red Hat no longer > > needs. The now ELN > > backend > > can satisfy pre testing and could make fedora redundant. > > ELN is a

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:49 -0400, JT wrote: > > I believe the GPL asks you never have to make agreement to access GPL code. > > Correct. Per the GPL if you have the binary you have a legal right to the > code. > Also the GPL does contain clauses that stipulate that outside agreements >

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:07 PM Philip Wyett wrote: > > Let us face it our efforts with the Fedora project are not valued and it is a > means nothing to the > new corporate IBM/Red Hat enterprise systems that we have to struggle to get > access to srpms, to > make a community. What is community

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:58 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:07 PM Philip Wyett > wrote: > > Let us face it our efforts with the Fedora project are not valued and it is > > a means nothing to > > the > > new corporate IBM/Red Hat enterprise systems that we have to struggle

Re: What is Fedora?

> How are you downloading RHEL ISO images? I already sent you the URL in a prior response: https://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/download > Please do not tell me to take a deep breath and relax. Show some respect. I am being respectful, I've been trying to explain to you that this isn't

fuse3 allows differing NVR subpackages to be installed

It's possible to create this situation: fuse3-libs-3.13.1-1.fc38.x86_64 fuse3-devel-3.13.1-1.fc38.x86_64 fuse3-3.14.1-1.fc39.x86_64 fuse3-devel correctly requires the exact version of fuse3-libs. However there doesn't seem to be any similar requirement connecting fuse3 & fuse3-libs. Is this a

Re: What is Fedora?

On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:18 -0400, JT wrote: > > > How are you downloading RHEL ISO images? > > I already sent you the URL in a prior response: > https://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/download > > > Please do not tell me to take a deep breath and relax. Show some respect. > > I am

Re: What is Fedora?

On 2023-06-21 13:06, Philip Wyett wrote: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream ... I see an impasse here. Why contribute to fedora when Red Hat will lock it down in other products? I don't think this is a major change from the status quo. In the past, Red Hat has

Re: What is Fedora?

On 2023-06-21 13:26, Gerald Henriksen wrote: My interpretation of the blog post, combined with recent actions towards Fedora by Red Hat, is that Red Hat now views CentOS Stream as the new "Fedora" for basing future versions of RHEL. I think that's ... kind of true, in a good way. I don't

[rpms/perl-File-Inplace] PR #2: Rebuilding the Fedora package

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Inplace` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Rebuilding the Fedora package `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Inplace/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable] PR #2: 0.31 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 0.31 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable] PR #2: 0.31 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable` that you are following: `` 0.31 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing

[rpms/perl-Devel-CheckLib] PR #2: Package tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Devel-CheckLib` that you are following: `` Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CheckLib/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[rpms/perl-File-Inplace] PR #2: Rebuilding the Fedora package

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Inplace` that you are following: `` Rebuilding the Fedora package `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Inplace/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel

[Bug 2216294] perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216294 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable] PR #3: 0.31 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 0.31 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-File-Inplace] PR #3: Rebuilding the Fedora package

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Inplace` that you are following: `` Rebuilding the Fedora package `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Inplace/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom] PR #2: 1.23 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom` that you are following: `` 1.23 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable] PR #3: 0.31 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable` that you are following: `` 0.31 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing

[Bug 2216486] New: Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.636

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216486 Bug ID: 2216486 Summary: Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.636 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Proc-ProcessTable Status: NEW

[Bug 2216487] New: Upgrade perl-SNMP_Session to 1.16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216487 Bug ID: 2216487 Summary: Upgrade perl-SNMP_Session to 1.16 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/SNMP_Session Status: NEW Component:

[rpms/perl-File-Inplace] PR #3: Rebuilding the Fedora package

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-File-Inplace` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Rebuilding the Fedora package `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-Inplace/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #7: 6.23 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.23 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/7 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #6: 6.23 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following: `` 6.23 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/6 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #6: 6.23 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.23 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/6 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #7: 6.23 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following: `` 6.23 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/7 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2212782] perl-HTTP-OAI-4.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212782 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2214989] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-48ee77349e has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2215546] perl-Net-HTTP-6.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215546 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-380b6ad4f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2212782] perl-HTTP-OAI-4.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212782 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-HTTP-OAI-4.13-1.fc39 |perl-HTTP-OAI-4.13-1.fc39

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1fa35650e4 chromium-114.0.5735.133-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing apptainer-1.2.0~rc.1-1.el7

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #8: 6.23 bump

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following: `` 6.23 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Net-HTTP] PR #8: 6.23 bump

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-HTTP` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.23 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-HTTP/pull-request/8 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2215546] perl-Net-HTTP-6.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215546 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2214989] perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.084 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214989 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2216582] New: perl-MCE-1.888 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216582 Bug ID: 2216582 Summary: perl-MCE-1.888 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MCE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2215546] perl-Net-HTTP-6.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215546 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2215546] perl-Net-HTTP-6.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215546 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-380b6ad4f5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-380b6ad4f5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[rpms/perl-Devel-CheckLib] PR #2: Package tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Devel-CheckLib` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Package tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Devel-CheckLib/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --