Marc Grimme (gri...@atix.de) said:
I've done this but could not take over the ownership for Fedora-devel. It's
still orphaned there.
Correct, because the packages have already been blocked as stated in the
mail.
I also got reminders from rawhide that the dependent packages could not be
Chris Tyler (ch...@tylers.info) said:
I just found out about the package brandy and was saddened to realize
that I missed the orphan-deprecation announcement. I'd like to take this
one.
Oddly, I see that the dead.package file states that:
This package was retired on 2011-07-25
Honza Horak (hho...@redhat.com) said:
Hm, a bad thing has happened during my vacation, I haven't noticed my
package cdrdao/gcdmaster is in the list and now I have a FTBFS problem.
So I can take these packages if it's not too late yet:
libgnomeuimm26
libgnomemm26
gnome-vfsmm26
Is it
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
Oh, I just noticed this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd#Socket_activation
Since Fedora currently doesn't want any services to do on-demand
loading, all socket activated services must autostart.
Uh, oh. I
Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said:
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 10:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:28:38AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello,
You may have noticed a lot of packaging activity on the fedora-medical
front[1]. There are still quite a few
Ankur Sinha (sanjay.an...@gmail.com) said:
I agree - Medical Software or Medical Applications is better. After all,
other derived distributions might pull from the repository or comps file.
Description, if included, should end with a period.
Other than that, looks OK.
Bill
Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) said:
On 08/22/2011 01:29 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I'm pretty sure that we kicked this up to FESCo and they decided to treat
them the same (although the latter may not have come to a formal vote and
only been discussed during their IRC meetings on the
Stephen John Smoogen (smo...@gmail.com) said:
A socket-activated service is much the same as a non-socket-activated
service, in that installing the unit won't activate the service unless
something calls for it, or the admin/rpm scripts run 'systemctl enable'. So
A couple of questions:
Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) said:
Some of the argument here is that it is difficult to do this from a remote
host. You'd have to engage in remote execution of software, e.g. using
nagios nrpe to remotely (from the nagios system) execute commands on the
database system to call
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be?
We should get that corrected. notting has ben
Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) said:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 02:50:10PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 30/08/11 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'll need to test it. Right now I use explicit modprobe commands in
rc.local, which isn't good for packages. I looked at modprobe.conf
Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said:
I'm migrating quota_nld service (provided by quota_nld subpackage of
quota spec) to systemd.
Offical howto
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Packages_migrating_to_a_systemd_unit_file_from_a_SysV_initscript
recommends:
Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said:
Then why does migration how-to use triggerun instead of triggerpostun?
I cannot see reason why the code should be executed on downgrade.
%triggerpostun runs after the old version is uninstalled - you can't
save any state then.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) said:
We have a number of options here which vary in implementation effort and
how much burden they impose on user and/or maintainer to get what they
want from an inadequate representation:
1. Status quo: hard to distinguish expired from WONTFIX.
2a.
Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said:
the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
should have been done for F15
Perhaps the feature owner should update it, as per the policy.
How
Jens Petersen (peter...@redhat.com) said:
yum-langpacks has been working pretty well now for a while in Fedora,
but all langpacks are still listed conditionally in comps' language support
groups
in addition to the langpacks meta-section.
So for F17 I'd like to remove them all from comps,
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
Well we never had upstart (it was just a renamed sysvinit i.e we
didn't use any of its parallel startup stuff).
hum, I thought we were using its ability to parallel start things based
on LSB deps. oh well. it's certainly *capable* of that,
Steve Clark (scl...@netwolves.com) said:
Is there a reason Fedora starts a bunch of stuff that pretty much nobody
would use in a typical desktop system ?
One example of a synchronization point is the LVM/dmraid/etc. startup. If
we were able to conclusively determine that there weren't any of
Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) said:
Any system service that today relies in its core on 'udevadm settle'
or scsi-wait-scan module, or any of the other bad hacks in that
category, anything that uses these barriers as a checkpoint to block
on, to do its synchronous actions, should be
Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) said:
My main use case here is video projectors, and in that case there is no
way on earth you'll ever know the DPI as it depends on the distance from
the wall, and again even if you knew the distance from the wall you'd
know nothing because the optimal DPI will
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable directly
like it was without the forced period in updates-testing or a
Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
If the required updates are due to version checks in the extensions,
it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency generator that
checks these and outputs the appropriate Requires/Conflicts lines,
such that this could be easily caught by
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-17)
===
Meeting started by notting at 17:01:09 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-17/fesco.2011-10-17-17.01.log.html
Meeting summary
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747459
If you have hardware that starts GNOME 3 in compatibility mode there
is no install icon on the desktop.
Example:
Jack is local Fedora and Linux evangelist, he explains to his friend
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
FWIW, I'm totally on board with the idea of not switching to systemd in
F15 --- and even if I wanted to do that, it's pure luck that the problem
doesn't apply to F14-F15 upgrades as well, where such an option is
certainly not available. The reason F14 escapes
Alexander Kurtakov (akurt...@redhat.com) said:
Someone would have to find a killer feature to justify touching this amount
of packages :). Not to mention that such changes should happen upstream and I
(probably a number of other maintainers too) would not maintain local patches
for smth
Jos Vos (j...@xos.nl) said:
I just installed F16 RC5 in a VM and I see the GNOME (foot) logo
in the gdm login window, i.s.o. the Fedora logo. Is this correct?
IIRC the Fedora logo was still there in an earlier beta...
This is the fallback GDM, correct?
Bill
--
devel mailing list
Jos Vos (j...@xos.nl) said:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:10:10PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
This is the fallback GDM, correct?
Yes it is (in a KVM console). I now realize that it looks different
from the GDM I saw when I tested an earlier beta on a real PC.
This is a result of fixing
Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) said:
I know I just opened a couple of other features on Fedora 17. I just
wanted to open discussion on this about what would be the best way to
do this.
* Make it default in systemd
I think that would be problematic if it's applied to all units; it's a
Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said:
At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The
libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want version 3 for the
enhanced capabilities like bonding, bridging, vlan, etc. This *does*
mean an API break, so packages will need
Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said:
I believe libnl3 *might* be parallel installable; I've had conversations
with tgraf about how to make it so. I'll investigate once the upstream
git repo comes back online. In the past the problem was mainly with the
devel package and the location of the
Jared K. Smith (jsm...@fedoraproject.org) said:
I want to remind everyone of the upcoming FESCo town hall meeting today,
Monday November 21st at 18:00 UTC. For more details, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections#IRC_Town_Halls.
In the future, can we ensure that the FESCo town hall
Ken Dreyer (ktdre...@ktdreyer.com) said:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote:
Hm. The list of (implicitly labeled) critpath packages seems to have
proliferated recently
Why not impose a self-restriction on the number of critpath packages?
Make a rule
Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said:
Dear Fedorians,
goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What
is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my
knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the
time Fedora 17
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said:
Hi - is an iscsi root device a supported configuration setup with F16 and
systemd? I asked on #systemd, and got pointed here.
We're using dracut to boot diskless systems with root devices on iscsi. This
works fine for booting using Fedora 16
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said:
What are you using for networking - the old network service or
NetworkManager?
The old network service. The root device is cloned from a non-iscsi
installation, however, as kickstart didn't like to install onto a non-
partitioned iscsi
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said:
Your patch does
-bash-4.2# findmnt -m -n -o fstype,options /
ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=0,data=ordered
Which doesn't show the _netdev option. If I change this to
-bash-4.2# findmnt -s -n -o fstype,options /
ext4
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said:
Jeremy Sanders (jer...@jeremysanders.net) said:
Your patch does
-bash-4.2# findmnt -m -n -o fstype,options /
ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=0,data=ordered
Which doesn't show the _netdev option. If I change this to
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
The fedora project has no control about this repos use at your own
risk etc. pp ?
No. Not even with a note like that.
Instead of a static list of preincluded repos, would it be possible to
discover repos automatically from a neutral domain and
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
dramatically. Even in this thread, I have talked about a standard way of
accessing repositories to make it easier for users, asking remi to make
Firefox 4 available in repo etc which has nothing to do with RPM Fusion.
Example 1:
Warning -
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
More seriously, can you please stop these constant pleas of 'how can I
make Fedora do contributory infringement'? It's getting tiresome to have
new 'can we do this? how about this? maybe this?' ideas every couple
of weeks.
That's just twisting
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command
when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide:
# systemctl enable graphical.target
This makes sure the default.target link is created properly
I still
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
Unblocked orphan librsvg2
What's going on here?
The procedure used to be for various gnome-y packages in the days
before provenpackager to just assign a single maintainer and
a whole slew of co-maintainers, so anyone in the Desktop SIG could
Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said:
I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an
older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network
transparency, which is just one of the things PulseAudio does), it is not
compatible with
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
* LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/MERGE.html
(nirik, 19:59:05)
* AGREED: : encourage provenpackagers to commit to rawhide fixes for
merge reviews. said pp's should not be the reviewer.
Pardon? What exactly is
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be
newer than anything coming up from f14.
Can I undo such a build? I did that mostly because I forgot that the
branching already happened when I built systemd the first time
Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) said:
So users of absent or dysfunctional DDC and/or EDID should be committed to
800x600 or 1024x768 @96DPI until they replace their (quality, antique, still
working just fine) displays
Just as a point, if the EDID/DDC is dysfunctional, then I don't think
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
I disagree that a clockwork release schedule is required for quality, or
even perceived quality. If that's the sort of metric being looked at,
the user is probably best suited to RHEL, CentOS, etc.
It would be interesting to look at RHEL/CentOS to see
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
So I've kept my voice out of this... and hopefully, now that you know that
it's not just hte KDE SIG, I can go back to doing so again.
... how does that help?
You've mentioned that you don't like 'this change' ... which part of it are
you referring
Ryan Rix (r...@n.rix.si) said:
available (sometimes in front of it)... Yet even now, we can't keep up with
what (some of) our users want: the latest KDE, on KDE's release day, whether
it's a major release, or a point release. Yes, not every one of our users is
this way, but many are, and
The attached list shows currently orphaned packages in F-14. If they are
not claimed by the end of next week, they will be blocked, potentially
breaking dependencies (and causing more things to be blocked...)
If you already co-maintain the package, please step up and take it.
(If you don't, it
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
So, to turn this around. Do you think this behaviour is problematic? Can
you make a good case for dropping this automatism? If so I'd be willing
to do so.
Yes, 'noauto' has defined semantics of 'not automatically mounted at boot';
breaking that
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
So, I'm honestly asking: what are the odds that these few things are the
only improvements that cause a disruptive change to user interaction? I
don't think it's unreasonable to wonder if there are other changes which fit
this category.
My concern
Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
My concern with this line of thinking is that you're asking us to quantify
the unknown unknown, and define a time period of testing which is
'long enough' for us to catch all the unknown unknowns. This seems
impractical, in as much as it doesn't
(intentionally breaking thread)
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
Maybe I should start a new thread since this isn't really a bug, but it is
a blocker -- we need to get some packaging guidelines out for systemd.
I think that the last message on the subject was this one:
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
I'm not a Thunderbird maintainer, so I don't know how feasible this is,
but perhaps we could create a subpackage like
'thunderbird-sound-support' that has the appropriate dependencies on it.
Then at least someone doing a yum search on thunderbird
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
Bodhi updates can have multiple packages associated with a single update
as long as they are on different branches. Why this restriction?
At least in the case of something like a security update, I would think
that it would be beneficial to be
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
How about:
- If /etc/inittab exists and contains an initdefault line, the default
target will be set accordingly.
- any other non-comment, non-blank lines in /etc/inittab will be logged as
warnings.
This leaves a migration path (ditch the
seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
You mean 'being passed on the kernel cmdline', I assume ?
Do we consider interactive boot essential (I think not) ?
Should mention something about forced fsck, maybe.
What about selinux relabeling ?
I can't remember interactive boot
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
I did not want to imply that PulseAudio is useless. I doubt that you
would have implemented it, if you did not have any use for it. Probably
a lot of people who bought their soundcard without considering to buy
one capable of hardware mixing will also
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
The intent is not to do so in the final release, AIUI. We're only
keeping it around during pre-release, so that if we decide we need to
fall back to upstart for final release, it's easy to do. As far as I
know, the plan is to decide later
seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said:
I'll test it in rhel6 in just a sec.
Doesn't work in rhel6 :(
If you hold down the key long enough at the right time, it sort of works.
That's not really how we want to have it going forward, for obvious reasons.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
- init shall support a mechanism to re-exec itself to not cause dirty
inodes on shutdown; initscripts will use this method on shutdown.
This is bad. While we support this just fine I think it is a really bad
idea to reexec init at
Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) said:
This is a very big change. chkconfig has worked for a long, long time. Its
elegance and simplicity is one of the nice administrative features of Red
Hat based distributes. People like it.
Yes, and they should continue to use it -- for sysv
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said:
Hmm, so this is about files that are deleted but still mapped by init,
and which can only be deleted when init stops referencing them, but that
is required to remount the fs r/o? Did I get this right?
Correct.
I am not really convinced that
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
I'm not saying that systemctl's syntax needs to be changed. I am saying,
however, that it's important to get the service command working with
systemctl so that people can use that instead.
FYI, this is done in git, will be built today/tomorrow.
Bill
dr johnson (d...@www.uk.linux.org) said:
That would be all grand and spiffy if it were actually faster bootup.
Bootchart here reports that systemd is 8 seconds *SLOWER* than upstart. No
idea why, but systemd just hangs for 8 seconds doing nothing that I can
see. No logs anywhere that are
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:58:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sorry for breaking this (again), but with this in place things should be
at the appropriate places now for F14.
What about for Rawhide, where I'm testing all of this? It looks like
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
What about for Rawhide, where I'm testing all of this? It looks like the
update was just built on F14.
rawhide's currently inheriting systemd from F-14; it will get the new
version when it gets to the stable tree.
Really? I haven't been paying
M A Young (m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk) said:
Note that version 8-2 waiting in bodhi should now handle upgrades from
the alpha without problems.
Does it cope with the shutdown problem? After I updated systemd to 8 I
couldn't shut the computer down, because (if I am remembering
correctly) it
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
I'm willing to sacrifice my stable rawhide desktop system in the name of
getting Fedora more testing. Where should this discussion be had?
FESCo. rel-eng will implement it (it's a one-line koji command), but the
decision isn't really rel-eng's to make
Petrus de Calguarium (kwhisk...@gmail.com) said:
1. I noticed that one can no longer (with v8-2) turn off the computer by
clicking the
'turn off computer' button in KDE. I figured out, with help of recent
threads, that one
has to run: systemctl isolate poweroff.target. It worked. Is this
Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) said:
Once upon a time, Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org said:
While it may be debatable what benefit one might get from removing it
from the default install, can we at least remove MTAs from @core to help
make things easier for appliance folks?
Petrus de Calguarium (kwhisk...@gmail.com) said:
So, the problem reduces to the Shut Off Computer button in KDE not working.
OK. So the question is ... what does this button do? Invoke 'halt'?
Invoke 'shutdown -h now'? Invoke ConsoleKit's Stop() method?
Bill
--
devel mailing list
In accordance with the normal process, the following packages have been
orphaned for Fedora 14 and rawhide.
JSDoc
bzr-gtk
cdf
crun
django-authopenid
drpython
fedora-security-guide-en-US
fet
fish
gg2
gnomecatalog
gperiodic
impressive
kasablanca
kflickr
lazygal
libmspack
mapbender
mediawiki-HNP
Gerard Braad (gbr...@fedoraproject.org) said:
aggressively
I do not agree this strategy is wise or even the correct way. Certain
Fedora versions dropped hardware support. We can't dictate people wht
they can or can not do. I still know people who run old redhat
releases (5.x) as there was
Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) said:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Emmanuel Seyman
emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr wrote:
Same goes for programs that scrape web pages (I'm thinking of gcstar but
I'm sure there are others). If the page layout changes, the page scraper
needs to be
Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) said:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
That's gross. (I realize you're blocked on the sites you rely on, but
geez, can't you find sites with real APIs?)
It is what it is. Though I do like being given credit
Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
Agenda TBD, but for now the idea is to:
* go through Tasks listed on [1]
Can non-SIG members add tasks? If we have a Java SIG, I'd like there
to be some agreement on how to handle orphaned packages - right
now, we've got about 30 java
Ben Boeckel (maths...@gmail.com) said:
I actually have a bug to file about that. The setting for NM_CONTROLLED
is still set even if NetworkManager isn't installed. It (or Ananconda)
should scrub the configs before installing the settings used during the
install.
IMO, NM_CONTROLLED should
Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
I believe most of them have already been taken (by me, Alexander
Kurtakov or someone else). But a list of the remainining would be nice
of course.
Sure, here you go (obviously, some of this is more eclipse-focused rather
than core java):
Gianluca Sforna (gia...@gmail.com) said:
Most FOSS client developers have simply chosen to embed their keys in
their source code with the hope that Twitter won't notice. I was about
to give up on Gwibber, but Canonical intervened on my behalf (special
thanks to Ken VanDine) and negotiated a
Alex Hudson (fed...@alexhudson.com) said:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629192
I read through my archive and all I can see is a short discussion
proposing changing to gwibber.
Is anyone actively trying to get an exception for pino a la gwibber? Or
should someone be
Arun SAG (saga...@gmail.com) said:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629192https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
This bug is now a F14 blocker.
Nomintated as one; it needs to go through the normal review process.
And the fix for this may not involve
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
The other option would be to switch to gwibber (which has been
un-desktop-couched in Fedora 14, so it theoretically won't bring in
nearly as much to the live image.
So, actual testing - building a livecd with gwibber instead of pino
brings
Ric Wheeler (rwhee...@redhat.com) said:
Can we use the firmware that they have for the existing broadcom wireless
driver?
'No' is what I've been told.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Máirín Duffy (du...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted,
even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily have
enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions for you,
FESCo, since I honestly don't
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
The only real issues pointed out where lack of documentation and
system-config-service integration for native services.
Neither that we have with upstart so not really a regression and thus
warrant a reject.
system services have not been migrated to upstart.
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
On 14 September 2010 23:01, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
21:33:35 nirik The other 2 items I had were:
21:33:56 nirik application installer issues
21:33:57 nirik https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968
21:34:04 nirik and
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
Actually, iiuc, tomasz is talking about migrating sysv-init scripts to
systemd unit files. There is a blocker to doing that in F15 which is that
lennart, notting, and walters (that I remember) are against doing a mass
migration to unit files until
Arthur Pemberton (pem...@gmail.com) said:
Can someone please elaborate a bit what pieces of information are really
needed? The .desktop files as a whole?
Wouldn't that require the tool to download every package just to get
the embedded information.
Not if it's provided in the RPM header
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) (fo...@hubbitus.com.ru) said:
16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably
against F15?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14
Please excuse me what I did
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
It's not some random day - it's when you actually accept an update! It's
not
easy to estimate impact of update - but banning completely is not a solution
neither.
We do not give nearly enough information in our updates for the user to
make any
Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
Orcan Ogetbil (oget.fed...@gmail.com) said:
What I am trying to say is, a redesign of an interface _usually_ have
valid reasons. Those users who don't want their menu items moving
around want to live like automated machines. Forbidding such changes
promotes lazyness.
If the update removes
Neal Becker (ndbeck...@gmail.com) said:
FAILED: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with
status 30; see root.log for more information
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506706
DEBUG util.py:260: Error: Package: 4:perl-5.12.2-137.fc15.x86_64
Neal Becker (ndbeck...@gmail.com) said:
Thanks, what should I do next?
Wait for the build repo to regenerate and then resubmit.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) said:
But I cannot list all the RHEL6 bugs.
Why not? Strip partner names if necessary, but please make it possible
for people to decide whether a given update is a benefit to them.
Well, he could list them in the bug field, but bodhi would elide
them
1 - 100 of 872 matches
Mail list logo
