On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:35 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Meeting at our regular time and location!
>
> When: 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)
> Where: irc.freenode.net #fedora-bugzappers
>
> Please join us. Here are the bugs we'll look at and discuss:
I won't be able to make the meeting either due
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thanks, Andre! Everyone please note we have the go/no-go meeting for
> Alpha release tomorrow afternoon at 5pm Eastern time, so we really
> *really* need as much testing as possible by then.
I have the Go/No-Go meeting in my calendar as Th
Today we held our readiness meeting for the Alpha release of Fedora
14. As you may know, this is a meeting with representatives from the
Development, Release Engineering, and Quality Assurance teams. In
these meetings, we evaluate the list of blocker bugs and give a "go"
or "no go" signal on the
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Since 2006 I counted 18 slips (I think one or two of those may just be a
> single slip listed twice). Lets not yell, lets not flame war, lets not
> point fingers. How can we fix this?
[snip]
> This is a collective failure.
While I agree t
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> However, as others have pointed out, the only reason the start page is
> using google right now is a old historical accident. We should change
> it.
>
> There was a thread on the advisory board list not long back about
> doing that... changing
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> Do any of you use _. to match e.g. the h extension?
>
> Right now _[a-z] does not match the special h extension but does match
> someone explicitly dialling "h". Would it make sense to extend this
> behaviour to the . and ! patterns, so they
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
> ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
> Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
> before the freeze ... any volunt
It is once again time to choose the release name for the next Fedora
release. Potential names will be accepted for consideration beginning
September 13th (in other words, NOW) through September 10. Please
submit your best ideas to the Fedora wiki at the address below:
https://fedoraproject.org/w
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> It is once again time to choose the release name for the next Fedora
> release. Potential names will be accepted for consideration beginning
> September 13th (in other words, NOW) through September 10.
Sorry for the typo ther
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:55 PM, David Airlie wrote:
>> > The Glibc package maintainer. I'm pretty sure he understands
>> > upstream, and FESCo should probably start the discussion with him
>> > first anyway.
I've started a dialog with the glibc packager and explained the
concerns I'm seeing.
-
One of the things I like most about Fedora is the orderly way in which
people are able to move in and out of leadership positions within our
community. Each development cycle, we have a set of elections for the
steering committees and for the Fedora Board. The next election cycle
is nearly upon u
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/682
I've made another attempt to reach out the the glibc maintainer
directly again this morning to hopefully answer the questions in that
ticket as soon as possible, and remind him of the seriousne
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams
wrote:
> is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking LibreOffice java
> detection?
Sounds like it might be related to bug 748585.
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
The Fedora 15 development cycle is well under way, and making good
progress. Yesterday I met[1] with Release Engineering, QA, the Fedora
Program Manager, and we decided that in order to accommodate some
late-breaking changes, we're going to need to slip the Fedora 15
release schedule by a week in
2011/4/1 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> So please try to be constructive and respectful in your responses.
Let me step in here as the Fedora Project Leader and end this thread.
If you've got legitimate technical concerns with the implementation of
the /run directory, please open another thread and ke
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> 2011/4/1 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
>> So please try to be constructive and respectful in your responses.
>
> Let me step in here as the Fedora Project Leader and end this thread.
Please note that I quoted Jóhann h
The time has come to vote for the release name for Fedora 16. The
Fedora community has submitted quite a few suggestions for the Fedora
16 release name, and that list has been narrowed down to the final
nine candidates. Now you can vote on these names and assist in the
final selection for the succe
The Fedora Board consists of five elected seats and four appointed
seats. In this elections cycle, there will be two openings for
appointed Board seats and three opening for elected Board seats. As
part of the normal Board succession process[0], one Board appointment
is made before Board election
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> Greetings. I'm Michael, a Ph.D student in human-computer interaction at
> the University of Minnesota researching recommender systems (and working
> on an open source recommender toolkit). In my spare time I engage in
> recreational OCam
I'm happy to announce the results of our recent round of elections for
at-large seats on the Fedora Board and FESCo, and FAmSCo. The results
are as follows:
FESCo
There were five FESCo seats up for election this cycle. A total of
200 ballots were cast in the FESCo election. Each of the
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> What is the status of the MultiLiveCD,
> that was being mooted last year.
We were able to work through all the technical issues with the
proposal, and Release Engineering has created Multi-Desktop LiveDVD
images for Fedora 15. They even auto
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> because your fukcing holy cow
This type of language is inappropriate for a Fedora mailing list.
Please tone down the language.
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> With Gnome3 you 1stly have to tick on "Applications" (located left top
> on the screen), then hit this tiny scroll bar located ca. 1 in/2cm left
> of the right screen (not an easy task - Requires travelling almost the
> whole screen), then t
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Domingo Becker wrote:
>> What key between Ctrl & Alt?
>
> The key that can not be named!
It can be named... it's called the "Super" key. Well, at least mine
is super, as it has a Fedora logo on it :-)
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
d
As of today (24 June 2011), Fedora 13 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 13. A previous reminder was sent on June
12th [0].
Fedora 14 will continue to receive updates until approximately one
month after
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> I guess we have to agree to disagree on this.
There are enough replied to this thread that I think it's time for me
to step in here, and ask the thread to please focus on the technical
details of how to make NFS work well under systemd
I wanted to pass along a quick update on upcoming Fedora elections for
seats on FAmSCo, FESCo, and the Fedora Board.
Candidate answers the election questionnaire have been posted at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F17_elections_questionnaire. Responses
are divided by elected body and then appear i
I want to remind everyone of the upcoming FESCo town hall meeting today,
Monday November 21st at 18:00 UTC. For more details, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections#IRC_Town_Halls.
If you have questions you'd like to ask the candidates but can't
attend the meeting, please email them to me d
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> In the future, can we ensure that the FESCo town hall doesn't directly
> conflict with a FESCo meeting? (Alternatively, we could take the FESCo
> meeting slot for the week.)
Sure... I didn't realize the conflict until I saw the FESCo meeti
If you haven't yet taken the time to vote in the current Fedora
elections, I encourage you to take the time to vote before the voting
period ends at the end of the day (UTC time) on December 5th. This
election cycle has elections for open positions on the Ambassadors
steering committee (FAmSCo), t
The latest round of Fedora Elections has concluded, and I am pleased
to announce the results for elected seats on the Fedora Board and
FESCo and FAmSCo. The results are as follows:
Fedora Board
---
There were two open seats on the Fedora Board this election cycle. A
total of 224 b
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Mark R Bannister
wrote:
> I note from this posting:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-July/153665.html
>
> And this one:
>
> http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=2666d441c2d8107b1987b869714189af64b954c6
>
> that the nss_db package
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> That reminds me that you were talking to the glibc upstream about their
> sometimes cavalier attitude to significant changes. How did that go? Did you
> get a sense that they understood where we're coming from?
My discussion with the gli
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Mark R Bannister
wrote:
> But I think in Fedora perhaps you should consider the repercussions of this
> change yourselves, and try to deal with the compatibility issues it raises.
> For
> a start, perhaps you should reverse the decision to deprecate your separate
2012/2/6 Michał Piotrowski :
> I noticed that F17 is based on the latest stable glibc realease.
> Previously development Fedora version was based on development glibc.
> Was there a change of some Fedora glibc policy? If it is no
> coincidence, but the new policy - many thanks for the change :)
Ye
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> IMO, Fedora has obvious problems with its
> - work-flow (Too immature SW migrates/sneaks through from Alpha/Beta to
> Final)
If you feel this is the case, feel free to help improve the work-flow,
or at a minimum help write better Alpha/Beta
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:26 AM, FlorianFesti wrote:
> This is now implemented as "show-installed" which is part of
> yum-utils-1.1.29-2.fc15 found in Fedora devel.
Awesome! I'm very happy to see this!
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
Over the past few months, the Fedora Board has focused on coming up
with two or three overarching goals that can be accomplished over the
next few release cycles. We've got a fairly healthy list of goals at
this point, and welcome your input in helping us decide which two or
three goals are most i
Summary: Fedora infrastructure intrusion but no impact on product integrity
On January 22, 2011 a Fedora contributor received an email from the Fedora
Accounts System indicating that his account details had been changed. He
contacted the Fedora Infrastructure Team indicating that he had received
Quick Summary
---
The Fedora translation workflow has changed. If you are a developer
of a package being translated by the Fedora Translation (L10n)
Project, you must change your workflow slightly if you want translated
strings to appear in your software package. Tools and assistance are
available
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> The above link gives 404 error, I guess the correct link is:
> http://help.transifex.net/user-guide/client/index.html
Thanks! The subject should have mentioned "changes" instead of
"hanges" as well...
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leade
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:57 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> After having migrated our project (FreeIPA) I thought I would share some
> info which might help others.
> Any way, hope this helps others who follow, some of this should probably be
> on a wiki page and/or FAQ.
Thanks for your input John -- I
In the past, the planning and execution of FUDCon events was handled
completely by a few Red Hat employees. This seemed out of alignment
with the principles of Fedora, so in late January of this year, we
kicked off an effort to fix that issue. We wanted to increase the
effectiveness and transpare
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> if you read lennart mail you can see "it's a step back" which is an
> idealism and which is what i really replying.
>
Whether or not you read it that way, it's not appropriate in a Fedora
mailing list to attack another person. Sure, we ca
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> You are wasting your time. Lennart and his bunch proved to be impervious
> to any pleas to stop mad feature creep.
>
> They WANT to extend systemd in every imaginable way to scratch their
> favorite itch of the week. It's not a coincidence
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> The "update stability policies" enforced by Bodhi simply need to be
> repealed.
>
I completely disagree... the checks and balances that are in place are
there for a reason, and aren't too difficult to satisfy in the case of a
security update
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
> So... this is a lot of node.js packages, and I haven't really seen any
> discussion of this on the lists. And at least some of these are possibly
> important for other nodejs packages-- notably "mocha", which I suspect is
> used in at least some
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:29 AM Ben Rosser wrote:
> However... what should we do in the meantime to stop further nodejs
> software from being orphaned and retired?
>
>From my standpoint, the answer to this is around tooling to
built/test/audit NodeJS applications with bundled dependencies. Eas
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:55 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I need some help from a SELinux guru. TL;DR, I've developed a small
> service. An app talks to this service, the service does some stuff
> and, in the meanwhile, it reports the progress to the app user by
> writing some messages into the stderr
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 8:34 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I'd like be joined to NodeJS group to be able to fix some nodejs FTBFS
> packages.
>
I have added you to the NodeJS SIG group in FAS. Welcome to the SIG!
-Jared
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Similarly, I don't want to replace my 13.3" notebook with a 7-10" tablet or
> netbook, even if the performance were the same. 13.3" fits nicely in my
> backpack, which fits my needs for mobility.
I think this conversation has gone wildly off-
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if this ever happens anaconda has to be considered as
> broken by design
Harald, I've tried to be patient with your recent posts to the devel
list, but you don't seem to get the message (or you're actively
choosing to ignore it), so I'm goin
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> sorry but WHY do you strip the context of my message
Because my reply wasn't about the content of your message. My reply
was all about the *tone* of your email. I know that language barrier
is part of the problem here, but the tone of you
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:23 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> I for one would think the project could be categorized as not for profit
> organization.
I'm not an attorney, and don't play one on the Internet, and I don't
pretend to have a completely understanding of all the nuances and
details,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> Could you clarify whether the problem is that there is no way to donate at
> all, or that the donors cannot write the donations off their taxes?
Both. Red Hat has no way to accept outside money on behalf of Fedora,
and since Red Hat is a
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Eelko Berkenpies wrote:
> Besides that I'm taking a step back from Fedora and Fedora Development for
> multiple reasons. Two (and most important) of them being lack of time and
> switching operating systems at work.
Thank you for your efforts on behalf of Fedora, a
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> Does that mean the only cold hard cash Fedora receives is from Redhat? Ie.
> all travel allownaces etc cmoe from that support?
Yes. We've had other companies help sponsor FUDCon events (thank
you!) and donate equipment, bandwidth, etc., but
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:40 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> So between sponsoring cons, travel, hardware, etc... what can *only*
> be done with Red Hat Cash? Is there anything that an individual
> cannot say "I'll pay for that (and/or buy that) for you" ?
Absolutely. An individual or organization can s
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:01 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> Perhaps we need to separate all ( legal? ) connections to Red Hat ( Red Hat
> would then just donate via the same method than anyone else ) to make this
> work or directly donate money/hw/stuff directly to each individual SIG's
> rep
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> Does Fedora exist outside of the US (on the books)? Surely there must be a
> way to dissociate Redhat US sponsorship to an international non-profit that
> represents Fedora?
Been there, tried that... still have the scars. I'm happy to share
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I am wondering why fixes of broken dependencies are not automatically tagged
> into F17 (of course after staging in Bodhi), when the situation couldn't be
> worse by such fix. If F17 is supposed to stabilize during freeze, such fix
> is definite
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:11 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Do we have a schedule for Fedora 18 yet?
Robyn is great at keeping the scedules updated -- they're typically in
her directory on fedorapeople.org. Here are the key dates for F18:
http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-key-task
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming I was indeed
> running an older kernel when kernel compiles shut down my machine for
> overheating. I've updated the bugzilla item to reflect this.
Suspend is no longer working for m
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is there any interest in putting this in the Fedora wiki somewhere? Am
> I late to the party and everyone already knows how to do this?
It's a wiki. Be bold!
--
Jared Smith
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Because if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda and you don't
> support installing via Anaconda, you're not Fedora.
Just for the sake of argument, our Amazon EC2 images aren't using
Anaconda for installation, but they're still c
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Fesco is saying that if you have hardware that can install via Anaconda,
> you must support installing via Anaconda. It's legitimate for you to
> also have other install mechanisms, and hardware that's incapable of
> supporting Anaconda ins
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> That's why I recently added EC2 support to livemedia-creator. Since I
> don't have an EC2 account it is untested -- help would be appreciated.
Awesome. I'll try to check it out in the next week or so.
> We should be able to make images usi
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> The whole thing is clearly a mess that needs some high level
> streamlining, from the entire process of download from web page (or
> receive CD from friend) to the on-disk install first boot.
While I certainly wouldn't disagree with this sta
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I don't know how proposing and implementing a notification method of doing
> the same isn't providing a solution, but you're welcome to your own cross.
Sorry Bill -- I'm confused here. Was a notification method actually
implemented? Was
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> I finished up the work on the notification and landed it in
> spin-kickstarts, so it should be available with the next media compose
> for both F17 and rawhide:
Cool, thanks.
> This is how it currently looks after booting up the Desktop Live
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 29.05.2012 22:45, schrieb Roberto Ragusa:
> i think i have to mention taht VT-d is active in the BIOS and
> i was wondering that it was stable because the combination of the
> i915 options with VT-d (hardware supported virtualization IO) i
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if this is what you call "development" then YES we should
> stop development now until we have ideas for real
> improvements instead wasting time by making steps backward
Language like this isn't helpful. Might I suggest that if you're
goin
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
I imagine (and this is pure speculation) that in some perfect future,
when dnf is considered mature, that it will probably be renamed to
yum. In other words, I think this fork o
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> F18 is already using grub2 for EFI. I think we can remove grub-legacy
> now.
What about the Fedora images for Amazon EC2? I seem to recall that
because of pvgrub use they can't use grub2 yet. (I don't claim to be
an expert on the cloud im
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> -- Running report_uReport ---
> Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: Element 'frames' is
> missing'
> reporter-ureport failed with exit code 1
> ('report_uReport' exited with 1)
>
I'm seeing the same, and have been for several
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF faster it's just a lie
>
This is not the only thing that DNF does differently to try to make package
installations and updates go faster (or appear to go faster). Calling the
developers liers doesn
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> I'm putting up another pass at the proposal, as there were some
> critical typographical errors in the last one that caused confusion
> (there were a couple places where I wrote "bundled" and meant
> "unbundled" and the reverse). This rev
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
> I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror
> just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions (via pull
> requests).
>
While I like the idea of making it easier for people to submit patches, I'm
n
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> So, after almost 10 years, it's time to find someone else to take over the
> Asterisk packages. If you're interested, reply to the list. I'd prefer if
> someone with proven packaging skills would step up - Asterisk has several
> security-r
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> You forgot primary selection/middle click paste, which was what made me go
> back to X when I tried it in F23.
I've been testing Wayland myself since around the F22 time period, but
"middle click paste" and the occasional odd bug keep annoyi
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I've been looking at ways to expand on the fedrtc.org service and would
> like to start creating a team around the service just as we did in
> Debian[1].
>
Ordinarily I'd probably be the first to encourage this, but having done a
lot of th
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Ray Strode wrote:
> And we provide a config option to turn wayland off explicitly for
> cases where users just want or need
> to use X.
>
Can you please tell me where to find this config option, as I can't seem to
find it -- and I'm getting annoyed with Wayland
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report <
rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> [nodejs-mime-types]
> nodejs-mime-types-2.1.7-1.fc24.noarch requires npm(mime-db) <
> 0:1.20
>
I've fixed this in Rawhide.
--
Jared Smith
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> we have two counters, one when upstream change the source
> other when we rebuild the package, it will be better readable, to
> understand if the upstream had updates or not.
>
Maybe I'm not understanding you well, but we *do* have two coun
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> am not even mentioning that gnome-shell now consumer like 18% of my
> CPU, probably due to the constant spamming of my journal:
>
> Jan 22 10:29:26 localhost org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2270]:
> (gnome-shell:2270): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk-frame-clock:
(Apologies for the late schedule.)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-01-29 17:00
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-01-29)
===
Meeting started by jsmith at 17:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-01-29/fesco.2016-01-29-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:54 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 11:42 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> It's already been pushed back once, the first iteration of newui was
>> attempted to land in F-17 and was pushed back to F-18 if my memory
>> serves me correctly.
>
>
> Dont think
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Maybe we should think again about switching to a roling release models
> for Fedora stable. This would IMHO have some benefits to the whole
> community.
I'm afraid a rolling release model would make it *harder* to make
major changes to Fedora,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> So, some Red Hat folks have developed an idea called Software Collections
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/Software_Collections_Guide/index.html
> which is aimed at this problem -- it lets you ins
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I think this tells us more about puppet than Fedora actually. ;(
I couldn't have said it better than this myself.
The biggest reason people are really pushing for software collections
(at least from what little I've seen them discussed publicl
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
> I used to use Fedora as my primary OS (Now I use a Mac). The major issue
> which drove me away and which I believe SC would help to solve is that with
> the current dependency model is that it becomes I want a new version of
> Libreoffice so
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm not sure if I'm missing anything here, but is it intended that
> webapps should not be accessible from anywhere but localhost by default?
>
That's my understanding, yes. It follows from the general understanding
that network-accessib
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Brendan Long wrote:
> Is there a wiki page on supporting new boards? I have a BeagleBone Black
> that I'd prefer to use Fedora on, but the instructions on the wiki all
> seem to be about how to install pre-made images, not how to create new
> images. Is there ins
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i think you misread the post - IMHO the intention was that once again
> a feature with zero benefit was acknowledged without caseful think about
> the negative impact
>
And I think you once again exaggerate, Harald. Just because the feature
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:27PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that
> > the the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an utter and
> > total sheninagan on RH
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> To be able to drop this package, we need
>
> 1/ php-pecl-zendopcache, the Zend OPcache for php 5.3 / 5.4
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91
>
> Target version is EPEL-6 and Fedora <= 18 as Fedora >= 19 already have
>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> in my life i make descisions and follow them straight
>
If you're one person, it's fairly easy to make a decision and follow it
straight through to completion. If you're a Linux distribution, it's a bit
harder to make radical shifts -- and
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> In particular, the GNOME image is missing. I would not say it has all
> the features of the primary architectures when it doesn't include the
> Fedora default desktop.
>
This is mostly because of a lack of video drivers on ARM hardware, as I
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-06-10 16:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below c
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
