On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 17:19 Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Having keywords makes the search functionality much
better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown
in the software center.
- Original Message -
On 27 May 2015 at 16:19, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Richard, sorry for the dumb question, but is there a path to pull in
keywords from https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger/? Or, going the
other way, can we get the Fedora apps team to
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:38:58PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 15:57, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I was thinking of something periodic
rather than just once, though.
Does anybody know the URL to get the tags for all
On 27 May 2015 at 16:19, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Richard, sorry for the dumb question, but is there a path to pull in
keywords from https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger/? Or, going the
other way, can we get the Fedora apps team to highlight/prioritize
packages which
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:45:51PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
Richard, sorry for the dumb question, but is there a path to pull in
keywords from https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger/? Or, going the
other way, can we get the Fedora apps team to highlight/prioritize
packages which match
On 29 May 2015 at 15:57, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I was thinking of something periodic
rather than just once, though.
Does anybody know the URL to get the tags for all packages?
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
Quite a few people are going to be installing Fedora 22 in the coming
days, searching for things in the software center and not finding
their esoteric GUI tool. This is because some applications still don’t
ship AppData files, which have become compulsory in the
On 27 May 2015 at 09:32, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Is it GUI only or is there any chance to get at least TUI apps? Some
as mc are pretty popular even in the group of GUI only users.
I think mc fails quite a few of the criteria:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 16:33:19 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f22/matrix.html
It kinda sucks that you list a No keywords in .desktop file warning
for almost all packages even if they meet the packaging guidelines and
the specific requirements of the
On 27 May 2015 at 11:57, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
It kinda sucks that you list a No keywords in .desktop file warning
for almost all packages even if they meet the packaging guidelines and
the specific requirements of the F22 development cycle, i.e. running
appstream-util
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Having keywords makes the search functionality much
better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown
in the software center.
What would they add that's not found within the RPM package %description
and
Crazy idea...
Could keywords be pulled from tagger which have been upvoted to a specific
level?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wed, 27 May 2015 12:47:04 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
It's not only the green applications that make the cut, the amber
ones go in too.
Okay. Glad to hear we're not supposed to fix something like that
post release.
Having keywords makes the search functionality much
better, but isn't
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:11:55AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
Crazy idea...
Could keywords be pulled from tagger which have been upvoted to a
specific level?
Hah, yes, this. :)
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
On 05/26/2015 05:33 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
Quite a few people are going to be installing Fedora 22 in the coming
days, searching for things in the software center and not finding
their esoteric GUI tool. This is because some applications still don’t
ship AppData files, which have become
On 26 May 2015 at 19:56, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
What does dead in that table mean? I see a lot of games marked this way,
and yes many games see little upstream activity, because once a game is
finished it typically really is finished.
Dead means no upstream release in 5
Am 26.05.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Richard Hughes:
On 26 May 2015 at 19:56, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
What does dead in that table mean? I see a lot of games marked this way,
and yes many games see little upstream activity, because once a game is
finished it typically really is
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:10:55PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Yes, that shows you care as a packager and allows you to rescue
otherwise unloved applications
who are you to define if an application is loved
I think there is a language / cultural barrier here — I don't think
Richard at all
On 26 May 2015 at 22:10, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
you need learn to accept that software reaches the point where iot is just
*read yand finished* just because it does what it is supposed to do and
needs ntohing fixed or changed all the time
I assume you can point to several
19 matches
Mail list logo
