t; added to Qt.
>
> Let me know your opinion on that.
>
> BR
> Hamed Masafi
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
>
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
> interaction between the new flag and TapHandler.gesturePolicy is tricky
> though. One will have to override the other. I suppose maybe blocking
> should override gesturePolicy because blocking is the geekier flag, you
> probably know what you’re doing if you use it? But I didn’t try yet; maybe
> something would go wrong with that.
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
That said if something like that exists it means that given a chain of
QProperties it need just one "immediate" observers to break all the
"benefits" of lazy evaluation(given that it causes all the chain to
recompute).
This obviously is not worse tha
end an email/message after an alarm has been triggered
That said yes, you can can workaround this limitation through polling
be it a QTimer(0) or whatever
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists
ibly
> along the lines of QSingleShot(0))?
>
> This assumes part of the intent is to enable QObjects with derived properties
> at an interface level...
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Brett
> _____
to display that value on a
QQuick Text item
and someone change the height or the width? Who is in charge to
triggered the "read"
of the property?
Alternative solution with Qt5 tech: use QSize and change both
width/height atomically.
--
Filippo Cucchetto
t; Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho. Sitz der
> Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331
> B
> ___
> Qt-creator mailing list
> qt-crea...@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-proje
this is not how it works.
I'm talking for myself. I wouldn't pay more that $600 yearly (per dev). Again
the announced offer (500$) is not very different from my conclusion.
--
Filippo Cucchetto
Il giorno mer 29 gen 2020 alle ore 23:37 Konstantin Shegunov
ha scritto:
>
>
>
>
ess in
backporting.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Volker
>
>
Thank you for the explanations
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
n rare cases; and we don't handle
> > hot-fixes any differently than change files. Simple rules are easy to
> follow.
> >
> > Eddy.
>
>
>
> Updating the JIRA ticket with this concise summary from Eddy, we can start
> implementing the tooling su
want
speed? use plain C++.
Il giorno lun 25 nov 2019 alle ore 22:06 Filippo Cucchetto <
filippocucche...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> @Ekke
> I think you should redesign your qml the other way around. For your
> problem there're multiple solutions
> 1) Use some sort of StackView.view
__
> > Development mailing list
> > Development@qt-project.org
> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
>
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
I would like to thank you for all your hard work and reviews.
F.
Il giorno Mer 19 Dic 2018, 16:51 Tobias Hunger ha
scritto:
> Hello everybody,
>
> not having lived up to the role of maintainer of the project management
> code in Qt Creator for a while now, I would like to formally step down.
>
ts. Maybe I'm really missing something
> obvious that I couldn't find in the online documentation.
>
> Cheers,
> Massimo
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
2017-04-21 9:13 GMT+02:00 Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com>:
> On Friday 21 April 2017 08:42:37 Filippo Cucchetto wrote:
> > Is there any plan to enhance the QModelIndex interface by adding support
> to
> > std::weak_ptr<void?
> > I know that is not necessary si
nokia.com>
>
> Yeah sounds like I’d better look at a few of those.
>
> _______
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Does this relates to moving Qt main loop to a different thread other than
the main thread? Cause currently creating the QtApp from a different thread
causes problems. In particular the plugins static objects are destroyed at
app exit and thus on the main thread (and this causes problems because
(imho this could be
harder by email).
Given that i'm ok in both codereview or email...maybe i'm too biased
by github :)
2016-09-20 21:26 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> On terça-feira, 20 de setembro de 2016 19:04:07 PDT Filippo Cucchetto wrote:
>> Reall
ftware Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
g/tunneling and who raised the event.
> Aha… so bubbling doesn’t always occur:
For what i see bubbling always happen if the event has not been pre
filtered by tunneling. In this case the event bubble up until it gets
accepted. After being accepted the bubbling continue iff there'are
items who wha
ndling (like is done with the Keys
attached objects). In this
way we can disable the item default event handling with already handled
events (that bubbled up from a delegate).
Thank you again for the answer
F.
2016-06-27 10:39 GMT+02:00 Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutle...@qt.io>:
>
>
t is recommended for us users: better starting off with widgets
> for new desktop applications ?
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/de
ent@qt-project.org>:
>
> This can also be reproduced with ListView instead of TreeView:
>
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53263
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
>
> On 18/05/16 12:21, Filippo Cucchetto wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> i would like to warn a
fix is a no go.
Furthermore
some knownledge of the internals of QtDeclarative are needed.
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Yep correct
2016-05-06 1:01 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> On quinta-feira, 5 de maio de 2016 22:21:08 PDT Filippo Cucchetto wrote:
> > void invokeDeleteLater(QObject* other) {
> > other->deleteLater();
> > emit aboutToBeDel
ay our UI Inventory could be updated to
> ignore these objects.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
>
-
Maybe https://git-scm.com/docs/git-archive
Il 16/mar/2016 19:54, "René J.V." ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to do tarball fetches from code.qt.io that correspond to a
> specific commit, tag or release (for QtWebKit; purely for convenience in a
> distribution/packaging
+1
Il 16/mar/2016 16:14, "Koehne Kai" ha scritto:
> Hi there,
>
> We have had quite some discussions about the use of C++11 features and
> right API in the past on this mailing list - but if there has been a
> consensus (which is sometimes hard to find out), it was
iling list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
+1
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
for the click event. Most of the times the
user just need to know that an item delegate has been clicked without
swallowing it. But for receiving the click event he must swallow (accept)
the press event.
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing
Hi Alberto,
i think that QModelIndex has been brought in for dealing with TreeViews
and hierachical item models.
To be honest AFAIK you can manipulate QModelIndexes from QML.
You can test for validity or obtaining its row or column and model.
The implementation should be here
for the spacing
property.
For example Layout { spacing: Layout.UniformSpacing } or something like
that.
In this way we can get the best of both worlds: old behaviour, new
behaviour and no dummy items.
What do you think?
--
Filippo Cucchetto
seems
pretty easy to reproduce them.
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
heir copy of the
> application source code, try the app and see if there are any property
>
> conflicts that needs resolving. Then he can commit that version bump,
> possibly together with files to .qml files that resolve conflicts.
>
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> ---
ossible to implement already in Qt 5,
> or is this Qt 6 material? Does someone strongly oppose the idea? How often
> do we release new major versions of QML modules? I don't see why QML
> modules couldn't follow the same practices than the rest of Qt follows.
> Ironically, we've been working on this thing called Qt Quick Controls
> 2.0... :P
> >
> > So what's not possible is the conceptual conflict between arbitrary
> > and semantic version numbers.
>
> Qt, as a whole, uses semantic versioning. I wish that was that only
> version number that users had to remember.
>
> --
> J-P Nurmi
>
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
I totally agree with the solution proposed by mitch c. With the only
exception that i would add a DialogButtonGroup qml element into which put
the buttons. This allows us to add functions and logic without clutturing
the Dialog component. Furthermore it matches the widget implementation.
F.
Il
[mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=
theqtcompany@qt-project.org] *On Behalf Of *Filippo Cucchetto
*Sent:* Wednesday, 29 July 2015 9:53 PM
*To:* development@qt-project.org
*Subject:* [Development] QtQuick TestCase with other top windows
Hi everyone this is my first post on the mailing list
yes i'm
2015-07-30 8:49 GMT+02:00 Curtis Mitch mitch.cur...@theqtcompany.com:
I thought that you were writing tests within Qt?
*From:* Filippo Cucchetto [mailto:filippocucche...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, 30 July 2015 8:41 AM
*To:* Curtis Mitch mitch.cur...@theqtcompany.com
*Cc
would go with the option (1)
since i don't want to break everyone's code.
--
Filippo Cucchetto
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
39 matches
Mail list logo