I would be even -1 for any other solution than D. Especially since, if we
do it with C, I don't know when we will come back and redo the
functionality.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:18 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
wrote:
> I don't like solution C. It will not be consistent with anything and will
>
I don't like solution C. It will not be consistent with anything and will
look horrible.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:38 AM Simon Urli wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> thanks for your answers.
> I'll do solution C for the next release then, we can continue discuss
> about D in the dedicated issue.
>
>
This is what the recycle bin of a Macintosh looks like:
https://image.ibb.co/nBjh8L/Recycle-Bin.png
I think many users think this "clean" button is usefull, even if it is
unconsistent with what all other places look like in the Finder. Same with
Gmail. And I miss this feature in the Apple "Mail"
Hi,
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 12:22, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
>
> I would be even -1 for any other solution than D. Especially since, if we
> do it with C, I don't know when we will come back and redo the
> functionality.
AFAIK, there’s definitely no time to implement D in XWiki 10.10 and
+ 1 to have:
Tomcat 8.5.x
Jetty 9.x
Not sure why we have 2 entries for Jetty. If we want to provide 2
Installation links, then we should have 2 links inside the "Installation
Instructions" column, but not sure we need 2 rows for Jetty. It's confusing.
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:57
Clearly, the way it looks like could be improved, but it does not dismiss
the principle.
Le mer. 31 oct. 2018 à 14:00, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
a écrit :
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:35 PM Guillaume Delhumeau <
> guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
>
>> This is what the recycle bin of a
IMO we should just write we support:
* HyperSQL 2.x Latest
* MySQL 5.x Latest
* PostgreSQL 9.x Latest
* Oracle 11.x Latest
not sure what help would do to have the explicit 2.4.1, 5.7.24, 9.6.10,
11.2.0.4.0 versions.
Also I'm sure we won't keep up with the versions, so they won't mean
latest.
When
Hi Caty,
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 14:43, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
>
> IMO we should just write we support:
> * HyperSQL 2.x Latest
> * MySQL 5.x Latest
> * PostgreSQL 9.x Latest
> * Oracle 11.x Latest
> not sure what help would do to have the explicit 2.4.1, 5.7.24, 9.6.10,
> 11.2.0.4.0
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 3:53 PM Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Caty,
>
> > On 31 Oct 2018, at 14:43, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> wrote:
> >
> > IMO we should just write we support:
> > * HyperSQL 2.x Latest
> > * MySQL 5.x Latest
> > * PostgreSQL 9.x Latest
> > * Oracle 11.x Latest
> > not sure
Another top
https://www.eversql.com/most-popular-databases-in-2018-according-to-stackoverflow-survey/
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:45 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 3:53 PM Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> Hi Caty,
>>
>> > On 31 Oct 2018, at 14:43, Ecaterina Moraru
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 16:27, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 16:19, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:12 PM Vincent Massol wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Caty,
>>>
>>> Thanks but I think we should focus on the databases that our users use for
>>>
Hi Caty,
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 14:59, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
>
> + 1 to have:
> Tomcat 8.5.x
> Jetty 9.x
>
> Not sure why we have 2 entries for Jetty. If we want to provide 2
> Installation links, then we should have 2 links inside the "Installation
> Instructions" column, but not
Hi Caty,
Thanks but I think we should focus on the databases that our users use for
XWiki. We have that info already with the active installs.
It’s already a lot of work :)
My goal with this thread was not fully review the list of supported databses,
just to make it more clear the versions of
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 1:35 PM Guillaume Delhumeau <
guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com> wrote:
> This is what the recycle bin of a Macintosh looks like:
> https://image.ibb.co/nBjh8L/Recycle-Bin.png
>
The button you are referencing is not floating in the middle of the page or
after a 10 items
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:12 PM Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Caty,
>
> Thanks but I think we should focus on the databases that our users use for
> XWiki. We have that info already with the active installs.
>
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ActiveInstalls/
k, I understand, with the note that
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:28 PM Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
> > On 31 Oct 2018, at 16:19, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:12 PM Vincent Massol
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Caty,
> >>
> >> Thanks but I think we should focus on the databases that our users use
> for
>
If you are curious about the trends:
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?cat=13=%2Fm%2F01chz8,%2Fm%2F01b55d,%2Fm%2F0cdjtt,%2Fm%2F08pwxx,%2Fm%2F037njz
https://plumbr.io/blog/java/most-popular-java-application-servers-2017-edition
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:14 PM Vincent Massol
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 16:19, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:12 PM Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> Hi Caty,
>>
>> Thanks but I think we should focus on the databases that our users use for
>> XWiki. We have that info already with the active installs.
>>
>
>
Hi devs,
We currently have
https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DatabaseSupportStrategy
However, it doesn’t say explicitly which versions we officially support:
* For HSQLDB it says 2.3.3 which is wrong since the latest version is 2.4.1
* For MySQL it says 5.x but doesn’t specify
Hi everyone,
thanks for your answers.
I'll do solution C for the next release then, we can continue discuss
about D in the dedicated issue.
Simon
On 29/10/2018 16:23, Guillaume Delhumeau wrote:
+1 for C.
D could be nice but from the user perspective, I think a big button like
"clear the
Hi,
On 31/10/2018 09:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
We currently have
https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DatabaseSupportStrategy
However, it doesn’t say explicitly which versions we officially support:
* For HSQLDB it says 2.3.3 which is wrong since the latest version is
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:15, Simon Urli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 31/10/2018 09:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>> We currently have
>> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DatabaseSupportStrategy
>> However, it doesn’t say explicitly which versions we officially support:
>> *
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:07 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> Hi devs,
>
> We currently have
> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DatabaseSupportStrategy
>
> However, it doesn’t say explicitly which versions we officially support:
> * For HSQLDB it says 2.3.3 which is wrong since
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:28, Adel Atallah wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:07 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> We currently have
>> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DatabaseSupportStrategy
>>
>> However, it doesn’t say explicitly which versions
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:28, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:15, Simon Urli wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 31/10/2018 09:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>> We currently have
>>> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DatabaseSupportStrategy
>>> However, it
Actually there is another very important thing missing in that page:
we should also indicate explicitly the minimum version of the Servlet
API required by XWiki (currently 3.0.1).
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:30 AM Adel Atallah wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Adel
>
> On Wed, Oct 31,
Hi devs,
We now have
https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrategy/
but it’s not precise enough.
I’m proposing the following:
* Mention the supported version cycle and mention that we support the latest
version of the cycle.
* For Tomcat, I propose to say we
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:44, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:42, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>
>> Actually there is another very important thing missing in that page:
>> we should also indicate explicitly the minimum version of the Servlet
>> API required by XWiki
I know but it should also be on the support page IMO.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:44 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:42, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> >
> > Actually there is another very important thing missing in that page:
> > we should also indicate explicitly the minimum
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> We now have
> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrategy/
> but it’s not precise enough.
>
> I’m proposing the following:
>
> * Mention the supported version cycle and
Hi Vincent,
+1
Thanks,
Adel
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:07 AM Marius Dumitru Florea
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > We now have
> >
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:42, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
> Actually there is another very important thing missing in that page:
> we should also indicate explicitly the minimum version of the Servlet
> API required by XWiki (currently 3.0.1).
This is listed on
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:28 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:15, Simon Urli wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 31/10/2018 09:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
> >> Hi devs,
> >> We currently have
> >> https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DatabaseSupportStrategy
> >>
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:53, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>
> I know but it should also be on the support page IMO.
I prefer to have it in a single place (no dup). We could link to it though.
Right now the flow is that you find the requirements first and then this is
from there that you find the
On 31/10/2018 10:52, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:28 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:15, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi,
On 31/10/2018 09:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
We currently have
35 matches
Mail list logo
