On 20/03/2015 04:12, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 07:12, Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 18/03/2015 00:12, Trent Forkert wrote:
Unless something has changed recently, it shouldn't require dub. Last
time I
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6756
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3141
John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 19/03/2015 15:55, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 15:14:09 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 19/03/2015 14:45, Trent Forkert wrote:
It seems you are right that it *is* limited, but it shouldn't be. CMake
emits include/import paths into the project structure. I had thought it
On 20/03/2015 05:30, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 20 March 2015 at 01:14, Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 19/03/2015 14:45, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 11:18:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Semantics
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:51:36 +, Bruno Medeiros via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
At the time of this message of yours, you didn't offer any concrete,
*technical* reasons of why dub shouldn't be used. Saying one doesn't
*want* to use dub is not a valid reason at all. Saying you can't,
On 2015-03-23 10:47, bearophile wrote:
See:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7176
Exactly.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
Issue ID: 14322
Summary: Menu on downloads.dlang.org is completely broken
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
On 20/03/2015 18:07, Trent Forkert wrote:
And I don't understand why it is not acceptable.
* Because it is not guaranteed to be there. For instance, I don't have
dub on my system
That's the lamest reason ever. Why is that an issue? Just install it if
it is not installed. To me, that's
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 15:29:00 UTC, Koi wrote:
thank you Etienne, after i replaced dmd's link.exe my project
compiles successfully in debug-mode again.
i'll add this info in my todo-after-installing-DMD.txt just
in case.
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 14:29:14 UTC, Etienne wrote:
This
On 2015-03-23 at 00:15, krzaq wrote:
Something like
while (n != EOF) {
n = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
if (n==-1) throw(...);
if (strcmp(buf, PREFIX) == 0) {
return buf;
}
}
return NULL;
Requires no prior knowledge, and have similar
Well, things like std::string are not cooperative in this regard.
Though, it's copied only to be instantly destructed,
theoretically it should be elided if the involved constructors
are annotated with sufficient purity or complementary operators.
Also the iterator pretends to be copyable, but
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
Issue ID: 14321
Summary: No postblit call with struct and AA's
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P1
On Tuesday, 20 May 2014 at 18:13:36 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
Hello!
I would like to announce my project, DlangUI library -
cross-platform GUI for D.
https://github.com/buggins/dlangui
License: Boost License 1.0
Native library written in D (not a wrapper to other GUI
library) - easy to
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 11:31:16 UTC, FG wrote:
And honestly, compared to
File(/tmp/a).byChunk(4096).joiner.startsWith(s)
you can *easily* guess that you have a file - do some
nonobvious magic on it - and check if *it* starts with `s`
just by reading it as plain English.
Now you've
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14317
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 12:10:32 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Well, things like std::string are not cooperative in this
regard. Though, it's copied only to be instantly destructed,
theoretically it should be elided if the involved constructors
are annotated with sufficient purity or complementary
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 19:20:18 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 15:51:38 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I don't expect programming will remain so low level in the
future. We are at the infancy of our skills, when comparing
with engineerings with a fee centuries of progress.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
--- Comment #1 from rswhi...@gmail.com ---
Forget to mention, my compiler is DMD v2.067.0-rc1
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14317
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14317
--- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/0a4928f382d167e221667910bec3abd8bd48d84d
fix
Issue 14317 -
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 14:04:30 +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
If you mean separate compilation with different flags per module
and linking into same binary - it is pretty much illegal in D and
can only be done at own risk. I don't know if it is mentioned
anyway on
On 3/23/15 4:59 AM, krzaq wrote:
File(path).data.startswith(s)
We could define File.byByte, but that's minor. I appreciate the ability
to decide on the buffering strategy. -- Andrei
On 3/23/15 7:52 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* assumeSafeAppend() was unnecessarily used once per line read. Its
removal led to a whopping 35% on top of everything else. I'm not sure
what it does, but boy it does takes its sweet time. Maybe
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:03:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I just took a look at making byLine faster. It took less than
one evening:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3089
I confess I am a bit disappointed with the leadership being
unable to delegate this task
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 07:37:04 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
An example that stuck with me was that languages that follow
Algol/Pascal syntax lead themselves to less bugs, than those
that follow C like syntax.
There are quite a few other examples. Also the mention that as
far as the
On 23/03/2015 13:39, Ben Boeckel via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:51:36 +, Bruno Medeiros via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
At the time of this message of yours, you didn't offer any concrete,
*technical* reasons of why dub shouldn't be used. Saying one doesn't
On 3/22/15 3:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* assumeSafeAppend() was unnecessarily used once per line read. Its
removal led to a whopping 35% on top of everything else. I'm not sure
what it does, but boy it does takes its sweet time. Maybe someone should
look into it.
That's not expected.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
rswhi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|No postblit call with |2.067.0-rc1 - No postblit
On 20/03/2015 05:04, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 07:49, Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 17/03/2015 23:45, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I just checked out DDT, and I noticed it seems to use DUB...
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 15:19:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/19/2015 08:02 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
The COFF32 lib is built through win64.mak. This is an excerpt
from my
build script to create lib32\phobos32mscoff.lib:
set dm_make=c:\l\dmc\bin\make
set vs=vs12
set vcdir=c:\l\%vs%\vc
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 13:40:04 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Different flags to
different source files?
If you mean separate compilation with different flags per module
and linking into same binary - it is pretty much illegal in D and
can only be done at own risk. I don't know if it is
On 03/23/2015 10:55 AM, Casper =?UTF-8?B?RsOmcmdlbWFuZCI=?=
shortt...@hotmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it's too much to wish for, but I think the editor would be the
better place for this. IntelliJ IDEA can display short methods as single
line. They're still multiline in the source, but on screen
On 19/03/2015 16:02, Ben Boeckel via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
It might force to think of your build components in a more
structured/componentized way, instead of the paradigm of building on a
file by file basis, the `make` way. (I've only used make though, not
cmake, so dunno how much this
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 13:49:53 +, Szymon Gatner via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Been waiting for this for almost 2 years, might as well wait for
another release. Seriously tho, it is surprising how much little
attention is put into C++/D integration considering all the
recent fuss
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 14:25:22 +, Bruno Medeiros via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Yes - use DUB sub-packages.
Ah, had missed this.
Different flags to different source files?
What dicebot said.
That looks like an invalid, abstraction-breaking thing to do
Not all flags are
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14300
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|DMD |Phobos
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14317
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/c6b489b4cde70ec194fde21c2603b3e127f51479
Merge pull request #4511 from
On 03/22/2015 08:56 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
If you could write a brief article about it, that would be great! I
think there's a lot of potential for D in that space, and having such
articles will help promulgate the idea.
An article would exceed the amount of code I wrote, but I did read up
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 14:19:34 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 13:49:53 +, Szymon Gatner via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Been waiting for this for almost 2 years, might as well wait
for another release. Seriously tho, it is surprising how much
little attention is
On 03/23/2015 02:49 PM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Been waiting for this for almost 2 years, might as well wait for another
release. Seriously tho, it is surprising how much little attention is
put into C++/D integration considering all the recent fuss about this.
And yes, I've tried mixed C++/D app
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 15:30:43 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 14:04:30 +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
If you mean separate compilation with different flags per
module and linking into same binary - it is pretty much
illegal in D and can only be done at
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14280
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to 2.067 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/ffaef43bfcb8b984e5ef58976ed00f3eeabfdf09
Merge pull
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14321
--- Comment #2 from rswhi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to rswhite4 from comment #1)
Forget to mention, my compiler is DMD v2.067.0-rc1
Seems to produce an ICE in 2.065:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/362689545fb6
--
Hi.
struct RawGoogleResults
{
string version_;
string status;
string sig;
string[string][][string] table;
}
enum json =
{version:0.6,status:ok,sig:717451517,table:{cols:[{id:date,label:Date,type:date,pattern:},{id:query0,label:euro
I'd suspect stdc.math to be SSE3/SSE4 optimised assembly, where as std.math
uses a very generic (works on almost every float format) implementation
that is at least 'pure'.
Iain.
On 24 Mar 2015 00:30, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at
Thanks a lot.
I read it in the D Cookbook from Adam D. Ruppe.
In the chapter of memory management there is a topic,
how to build reference counted objects. Here this
construct is explained.
Kind regards
André
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 20:58:48 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Something like that?
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 04:53:39 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Hi.
struct RawGoogleResults
{
string version_;
string status;
string sig;
string[string][][string] table;
}
enum json =
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:14:15AM +0100, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 2015-03-22 02:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I've left a comment recently at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3087.
So what's the deal with that? Whenever a new tool leaves some trash,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14313
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/9bd7c7c24c5d30db21520d5edf8bf4433164a8e8
Fix Issue 14313 - [ld.gold]
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 13:49:55 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 15:19:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/19/2015 08:02 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
The COFF32 lib is built through win64.mak. This is an excerpt
from my
build script to create lib32\phobos32mscoff.lib:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 15:36:42 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/23/2015 02:49 PM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Been waiting for this for almost 2 years, might as well wait
for another
release. Seriously tho, it is surprising how much little
attention is
put into C++/D integration considering all
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 16:01:51 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 13:49:55 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 15:19:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/19/2015 08:02 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
The COFF32 lib is built through win64.mak. This is an
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 16:05:55 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
i am typing from my phone so hard to find but i did post it on
forums some time ago
Posting about something on the forums won't get it fixed, make a
bug report if you're encountering a bug.
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 16:05:55 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 16:01:51 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 13:49:55 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 15:19:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/19/2015 08:02 AM, Rainer Schuetze
Dconf 2015's programme is on! http://dconf.org/2015/index.html
I would like to thank everyone who submitted a proposal. We've had very
strong proposals this year and a 50% acceptance rate, which made it very
difficult to only choose half.
Submitters are encouraged to join the conference;
On 3/18/15 2:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every day.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particularly difficult.
If the idea is to force it on all users, I'm with deadalnix 100%.
But
Hi folks.
I just recently started to discovered the D language,
I watched some videos about patterns, but I havent really
something that comes close to the pattern I'm going to present.
I hope the format of this post is correct.If so, I'm sorry to
have wasted your time. The idea behind this
I made the same test in C# using a 30MB plain ASCII text file.
Compared to fastest method proposed by Andrei, results are not
the best:
D:
readText.representation.count!(c = c == '\n') - 428 ms
byChunk(4096).joiner.count!(c = c == '\n') - 1160 ms
C#:
File.ReadAllLines.Length - 216 ms;
Win64,
On 2015-03-23 13:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
There's no plans ATM to integrate with CDT itself. (I don't even know
what integration with java tools would mean here) Even for CDT, I don't
see what much would there be to integrate, other than the build system.
I would guess he means using C(++)
Anyone want to do a rough draft version of a script to build with some
version of what Walter has suggested that produes just a simple number
for each of druntime and phobos that are the number of undocumented
functions?
Bonus points for generating a output doc (preferably json) that contains
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 21:21:59 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i believe that both ways is right (i.e. both generating error
and not
generating error).
I am sorry but, this is not an helpful answer.
I will stick to my callgraph analysis for now.
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 12:58:25 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
dmd infers function closures impure if impure functions are
defined within them.
even if those are never called and can never be accessed
outside of the closure.
Example :
int a;
void closure() pure {
impure_function() {
a++;
On 2015-03-22 02:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I've left a comment recently at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3087.
So what's the deal with that? Whenever a new tool leaves some trash, do
we chalk a circle on the pavement around it?
Not sure what you're complaining
Jacob Carlborg:
Although I would like that the D syntax allowed to drop the
curly braces, like with if-satements. That would result
in much nicer one-liner functions.
See:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7176
Bye,
bearophile
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14320
Issue ID: 14320
Summary: Improve diagnostic message for undefined identifier
error
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14320
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 08:20:59 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 16:59:05 UTC, welkam wrote:
In C++ world always writing ++var can save some perf when
using with overloaded operators.
Do you have an example?
The compiler cannot optimize away calls to external functions
On 2015-03-22 15:41, romain wrote:
Hi. I think i might be interested in helping porting from d1 to d2 as
far as the Os x version is concerned, even though i don't really know
how i could go about that. Any pointer or help would be appreciated.
I'm not sure if that's a good idea before the
On Sunday, March 22, 2015 02:32:36 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I actually think that there are two
On Saturday, March 21, 2015 22:56:58 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 3/21/15 8:54 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:mel52r$252b$1...@digitalmars.com...
I've left a comment recently at
bOn Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 21:08:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/22/15 1:37 PM, Mengu wrote:
while we're at it, let's add D to this list:
https://github.com/github/gitignore
That's be cool, any takers? -- Andrei
btw, i think it'd be good if dub would automatically include this
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 17:05:27 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I think there should be an option (even default on) to allow
small
single line functions. (snip)
Perhaps it's too much to wish for, but I think the editor would
be the better place for this. IntelliJ IDEA can display short
On 2015-03-22 18:05, Martin Nowak wrote:
Sorry haven't read the whole thread.
I think there should be an option (even default on) to allow small
single line functions.
This can sometimes be fairly annoying. For example when writing range
adapters, see
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 16:59:05 UTC, welkam wrote:
In C++ world always writing ++var can save some perf when using
with overloaded operators.
Do you have an example?
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 16:58:49 UTC, Andre wrote:
Hi,
(needed for specifying reference behavior in a type tuple).
I need exactly that behavior. I am currently unsure whether it
is possible at all to have such a construct which works at user
side exactly like a boolean (booleans can be
On 3/23/15 2:13 PM, rumbu wrote:
Since this code is clearly not the best for this task, as I suspected, I
looked into jitted code and it seems that the .net runtime is smart
enough to recognize this pattern and is doing the following:
- file is mapped into memory using CreateFileMapping
- does
No issue for the past week? -- Andrei
Something like that?
struct PrimitiveRef(T)
{
private T* _value;
@property
ref inout(T) get() inout pure nothrow {
assert(_value);
return *_value;
}
alias get this;
this(T val) {
If D had an ide that could do the following I think development
and testing could be better managed.
1. IDE that works with a centralized server to be able to change
D versions at a drop of a time. e.g., click Master and it
checks to see if you have the latest, if not it downloads it,
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:01:03 +, rumbu wrote:
I'm trying to construct a struct template where one of the template
parameters is passed by reference (as option)
struct S(T, U)
{
void opCall(T t, U u) { }
}
alias X = S!(T, U);
alias RX = S!(T, ref U); //not working
The
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 19:25:08 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I made the same test in C# using a 30MB plain ASCII text file.
Compared to fastest method proposed by Andrei, results are not
the best:
D:
readText.representation.count!(c = c == '\n') - 428 ms
byChunk(4096).joiner.count!(c = c
I'm trying to construct a struct template where one of the
template parameters is passed by reference (as option)
struct S(T, U)
{
void opCall(T t, U u) { }
}
alias X = S!(T, U);
alias RX = S!(T, ref U); //not working
The objective is to call X(t, u) or RX(t, u), but in second case
I
On 3/23/15 10:59 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/23/15 7:52 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* assumeSafeAppend() was unnecessarily used once per line read. Its
removal led to a whopping 35% on top of everything else. I'm not sure
what it
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 16:11:12 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 16:05:55 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
i am typing from my phone so hard to find but i did post it on
forums some time ago
Posting about something on the forums won't get it fixed, make
a bug report if you're
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 15:00:07 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
What would be really great would be a performance test suite
for phobos.
I'm working on it
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2995
Hi,
I read that if a structure only contains a reference, it will
behave like a reference type in function calls (needed for
specifying reference behavior in a type tuple).
I need exactly that behavior. I am currently unsure whether it is
possible at all to have such a construct which works
Please help us spread the word on DConf 2015. We have a strong schedule
this year. Share with your coworkers and friends. Talk to your manager
about attending. Be there!
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/1037831199563894
On 2015-03-23 at 12:59, krzaq wrote:
I'd argue that joiner is intuitive enough, but I agree on byChunk. I am also
baffled why this byLine/byChunk madness is necessary at all, it should be
something like
File(path).startsWith(s)
or
File(path).data.startswith(s)
Yeah, that would be useful for
On 3/23/15 10:43 AM, rumbu wrote:
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 15:00:07 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
What would be really great would be a performance test suite for
phobos. D is reaching a point where It'll probably be fast because we
did it right or I remember it being fast-ish 3 years ago when i
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14317
--- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e52968b55483de0ae2867ca13855e957cb4be5ba
fix
Issue 14317 -
On 3/22/15 6:32 AM, anonymous wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 09:42:41 UTC, Ozan Süel wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on a Big Data project, where a huge amount of RAM is
needed. Using D I've run into a - let's called it - memory leak. I
tested this with following code:
foreach(i; 0..1000) {
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 17:17:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please help us spread the word on DConf 2015. We have a strong
schedule this year. Share with your coworkers and friends. Talk
to your manager about attending. Be there!
On 3/20/15 7:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/19/2015 3:13 PM, Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d wrote:
A valid reason for doing things like this is future-proof
encapsulation. You
can change the internal foo to be something entirely different, and
the external
api never changes (assuming 'foo'
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 15:00:07 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
What would be really great would be a performance test suite
for phobos. D is reaching a point where It'll probably be fast
because we did it right or I remember it being fast-ish 3
years ago when i wrote a small toy test isn't
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 10:40:12 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 19:20:18 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 15:51:38 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I don't expect programming will remain so low level in the
future. We are at the infancy of our skills, when
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 21:34:09 UTC, Jake The Baker wrote:
If D had an ide that could do the following I think development
and testing could be better managed.
1. IDE that works with a centralized server to be able to
change D versions at a drop of a time. e.g., click Master and
it
On 3/23/15 2:42 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/23/15 10:59 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 3/23/15 7:52 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/22/15 3:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* assumeSafeAppend() was unnecessarily used once per line read. Its
removal led to a whopping 35% on
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14323
Issue ID: 14323
Summary: Bad code generation in dfmt
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 12:32:39 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
Hi,
A Perlin noise benchmark was quoted in this reddit thread:
http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/289enx/c0de517e_where_is_my_c_replacement/cibn6sr
It apparently shows the 3 main D compilers producing slower
code than Go, Rust,
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
