On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 15:31:40 UTC, Brian Rogoff wrote:
Notice that in his post and the comments, a recurring
(negative) issue is garbage collection. This is pretty common
with mentions of D on reddit too, always a few posters
mentioning D's GC as a negative. So many of those comments
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 16:30:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Leverage - my talk at Lang.NEXT.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/27sp6r/langnext_2014_leverage_by_andrei_alexandrescu/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 06:13:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Of possible interest.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/278twt/panel_systems_programming_in_2014_and_beyond/
Andrei
IMHO, the coolest thing was when Rob Pike told about the tool
they made for automatically
On Saturday, 31 May 2014 at 13:59:17 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
I'm wondering what's the Linux 32 bit usages - embedded I
guess. 64 bits seems to dominate in general. A couple of linux
users seem not to know if they are 32 or 64 bit?
On many laptops there's no extra benefit from running 64 bits.
I
On Saturday, 26 April 2014 at 18:11:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/26/2014 4:57 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Necessity to define namespaces for
interfacing with C++ must not result in usage of namespaces of
pure D code.
Why?
I don't see much of any use for namespaces in pure D code,
though I
On Saturday, 26 April 2014 at 20:16:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/26/2014 12:27 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
We already have a feature to manage conflicts and organisation
in D code -
modules!
True. But what D doesn't have is a global namespace. I don't
propose one for D, but C++ symbols
You may be on to something here.
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 22:27:53 UTC, John Carter wrote:
I was contemplating why languages explode on to the scene or
not, and often
it comes down to a so called Killer App.
For Ruby, it was Rails.
The ability to construct optimally fast typesafe tuples
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 17:01:38 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP60
Walter, the DIP has a funny creation date.
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 00:09:34 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I think that's pretty wasteful, why won't you just use clang?
What's the
point of competing with another opensource project (a very good
one,
that took a lot of men-hour to do a good C/C++ compiler,
including the
Nekuromento Wrote:
Simen kjaeraas Wrote:
Kevin Bealer kevinbea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious if the multi-pivot quicksort (I think everyone gets what I
mean by this? Divide by more than one pivot on each pass? I can give
details if you like ...) has been tried out much.
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:36:25 +0300, justme jus...@somewhere.net wrote:
Nekuromento Wrote:
Simen kjaeraas Wrote:
Kevin Bealer kevinbea...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious if the multi-pivot quicksort (I think everyone gets
what I
mean by this? Divide
bearophile Wrote:
C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some more
time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation syntax
because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be improved, but they
are listening to programmes (even if they risk
grauzone Wrote:
justme wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some more
time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation syntax
because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be improved
grauzone Wrote:
BCS wrote:
Hello justme,
bearophile Wrote:
C# will probably not follow the route of stagnation of Java for some
more time, thanks to Mono too. I don't like that string interpolation
syntax because it looks unsafe, and that design of tuples can be
improved
grauzone Wrote:
bearophile wrote:
BCS:
A though on the comma operator: if the comma operator were defined to give
a tuple type and be implicitly castable to any suffix of it's self, then
you could get both the comma expression usage that Walter wants as well as
all the fun things
15 matches
Mail list logo
