On 15 January 2015 at 16:49, Jens Bauer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
It seems I've found it...
http://wiki.dlang.org/Bare_Metal_ARM_Cortex-M_GDC_Cross_Compiler
-It also seems I have to use gcc-4.9, as the gcc-4.8 branch does not seem to
exist in the git repository ?
On 14 January 2015 at 07:30, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2015-01-13 22:31, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure when it was announced, but binutils 2.25 has been
released! There's a small reason for excitement as it is the first to
On 14 January 2015 at 09:53, ponce via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 14:08:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I've started writing a weekly D newsletter. Here's the first issue, any
feedback welcome!
On 13 January 2015 at 10:51, Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 07:30:22 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 00:22:33 UTC, Mike wrote:
I have a suggestion for any compiler implementers: How about a
On 12 January 2015 at 23:28, Manu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Awesome. Really looking forward to this! :)
On 13 January 2015 at 03:12, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2 January 2015 at 14:19, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote
On 13 January 2015 at 22:07, Paul O'Neil via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
This looks great!
Does this mean anything with respect to getting better demangling in GDB?
This was first written for GDB (announced at DConf 2014) but without
the template
Hi,
I'm not sure when it was announced, but binutils 2.25 has been
released! There's a small reason for excitement as it is the
first to come with D demangling support in the GNU toolchain.
Unfortunately, I forgot to send in patches that actually document
it! So for the moment, it's a
On 13 January 2015 at 21:39, Kiith-Sa via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 21:31:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure when it was announced, but binutils 2.25 has been released!
There's a small reason for excitement as
On 12 January 2015 at 08:46, Mike via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 12 January 2015 at 05:59:36 UTC, NVolcz wrote:
Can this be done in D? How easy is it? What about the runtime?
On 11 January 2015 at 10:48, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Over the last few days, I have been getting weird errors from various
programs I run on Windows 7. Programs would just fail, or produce corrupt
output (I'm looking at you, Windows Moviemaker).
I
On 2 January 2015 at 14:19, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 1 January 2015 at 18:40, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:56:16AM +1000, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Does anyone know how to fix this? Can we please do so? It's
On 11 January 2015 at 16:23, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 16:13:01 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
There are very few monopolies in software, essentially none nowadays.
:D :D :D :D :D
I have not laughed so hard for quite a while. Modern IT
On 10 January 2015 at 20:15, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 1/10/2015 9:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/10/15 9:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/10/15 8:15 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
In any event
On 8 January 2015 at 21:16, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 1/8/15 11:48 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:50:10 -0800
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
On 1/8/15 9:16 AM, Kiith-Sa wrote:
This is a problem
On 9 January 2015 at 00:32, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 1/8/2015 8:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:31:37 Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 6 January 2015
On 9 January 2015 at 11:29, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 9 January 2015 at 11:22, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 16:13:24 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote
On 6 January 2015 at 23:24, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Hello,
Exciting times! DConf 2015 will take place May 27-29 2015 at Utah Valley
University in Orem, UT.
Awesome, that runs over my birthday (28th). My friends and family
On 8 January 2015 at 11:08, Johanna Burgos via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Your Mission
Provide server administration to our data centers
Provisioning new servers, imaging, monitoring, and other daily routines
Daily monitoring and maintenance of servers
On 7 January 2015 at 12:00, via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 11:46:19 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
That is where the value-for-money factor comes in. I cannot see any
traction occurring in Joakim's badly thought out idea unless
On 7 January 2015 at 12:35, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.4248.1420631820.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I'd say bug in dmc.
Yeah I'm thinking so, fun. It looks like dmc sets up the code
On 7 January 2015 at 02:08, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 06/01/15 07:14, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I don't think such people matter, ie they're a very small but vocal
minority.
Also, these people are deeply irrational, as every piece of
On 7 January 2015 at 05:27, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Is there something wrong with this code or have I found a dmc bug?
I'd say bug in dmc.
On 5 January 2015 at 09:23, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.4141.1420448690.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
void foo(int bar, ...)
{
va_list* va = void;
va_list[1] __va_argsave;
va
On 5 January 2015 at 08:28, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
David Nadlinger wrote in message
news:qlzdmlnzlklofmlkq...@forum.dlang.org...
It is. It breaks vararg cross-platform compatibility (e.g. Linux x86 vs.
Linux x86_64) and GDC/LDC will never need it.
On 5 January 2015 at 11:21, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.4143.1420452193.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
That depends on how we agree to go forward with this. From memory, we
each do / did
On 5 January 2015 at 12:11, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.4146.1420457999.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
That is correct for user code, but not druntime C bindings.
GDC can compile the test
On 5 January 2015 at 12:13, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Daniel Murphy wrote in message news:m8dv1g$1cg4$1...@digitalmars.com...
Druntime and phobos rely on va_list converting to void*. Should this
a) be allowed on platforms where va_list is a pointer
On 5 January 2015 at 13:37, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Daniel Murphy wrote in message news:m8dv49$1cgs$1...@digitalmars.com...
And what about explicit casts?
Oh yeah, and how does __va_argsave work, why do we need it?
Looking at the druntime and
On 5 January 2015 at 14:46, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 01/05/2015 02:59 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
Do you feel the current posting on the Wiki accurately best reflects
what work needs to be done on this project.
Yeah, it's pretty good.
I've thrown
On 5 January 2015 at 17:44, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote in message
news:mailman.4157.1420479008.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
For consistency? I would go with (c) as va_list could be anything,
even a struct (PPC
On 4 Jan 2015 08:35, Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
This is an idea I've been kicking around for a while, and given the need
for commercial support for D, would perhaps work well here.
The notion is that individual developers could work on patches to fix
bugs or
On 4 January 2015 at 14:50, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 4 January 2015 at 11:17:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 08:35, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
This is an idea I've been kicking around
On Saturday, 27 December 2014 at 09:53:42 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
For a more practical example, I've added an example jit
compiled brainf*** interpreter.
https://github.com/ibuclaw/gccjitd/blob/master/tests/brainf.d
Another practical example has been published which implements a
made up
On 1 Jan 2015 18:46, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 29/12/14 05:13, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I did want to say something about this. I've given a close read to the
Lost a
new commercial user this week thread, through and
On 2 January 2015 at 13:33, Don via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 08:52:47 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Xinok wrote in message news:pbjttgrpwhsffoovp...@forum.dlang.org...
I'm wondering if there's any added benefit to implementing these as
On 1 January 2015 at 18:40, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:56:16AM +1000, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Does anyone know how to fix this? Can we please do so? It's been a
problem for like 5 years it seems.
It's a bit insane that we
On 1 January 2015 at 22:40, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 01/01/15 15:43, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Oh yeah, and a massive one that I've discussed with Ethan and I think
he's discussed with you; DMD likes to use the x87 in win64 builds...
On 31 Dec 2014 15:00, Craig Dillabaugh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 December 2014 at 14:55:00 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 December 2014 at 14:20:28 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Here's to an awesome 2015!
Blwyddyn
On 30 Dec 2014 03:40, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/29/2014 3:37 AM, Kingsley wrote:
I'm interested in coming to the next D conference. Please let me know if
there
is anything I can do to help out. I've been working on IDE support for
intellij
On 30 Dec 2014 08:59, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 30 Dec 2014 03:40, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/29/2014 3:37 AM, Kingsley wrote:
I'm interested in coming to the next D conference. Please let me know
if there
is anything I
On 28 Dec 2014 21:25, bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw:
1.086s: bfgccjitd-runtime-O2
1.139s: bfgccjitd-runtime-O1
2.759s: bfgccjitd-O1
3.646s: bfgccjitd-O2
4.959s: bff-O2
Five times faster than bff is a lot :-)
On 29 December 2014 at 03:52, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/28/14 6:43 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 27 December 2014 at 02:21, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/25/14 5:18 PM, Mike Parker
On Saturday, 27 December 2014 at 10:47:55 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Iain Buclaw:
For a more practical example, I've added an example jit
compiled brainf*** interpreter.
https://github.com/ibuclaw/gccjitd/blob/master/tests/brainf.d
Here I have put a little program you can use as performance
On 28 December 2014 at 10:24, bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw:
Sure, what is that supposed to do?
Iain.
To print a classic image of the Mandelbrot Set (but Codepad seems down
currently).
Bye,
bearophile
Thanks - turns out
On 24 Dec 2014 22:20, Vic via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://teespring.com/d-lang-sv
Non profit, I hope other follow suit.
I like the sentiment, but I think I'd prefer my own designs. ;)
Iain.
For a more practical example, I've added an example jit compiled
brainf*** interpreter.
https://github.com/ibuclaw/gccjitd/blob/master/tests/brainf.d
Also will be adding instructions on how to build the libgccjit
frontend later this week - if you haven't already worked it out
from the gccjit
On 23 Dec 2014 13:30, CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 11:53:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 10:52:58 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
clip
Consider both things like
On 26 Dec 2014 07:25, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:25:16 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
I found a little interesting difference between ldc, dmd and gdc today.
Summarized in ldc it does not allow you to have multiple
On 20 Dec 2014 20:40, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
FWIW, I'd like to thank you for taking the time (and putting up with some
undeserved abuse for it) to write about your experience in trying to get
other people to adopt D. For some they might be known issues,
On 26 Dec 2014 09:45, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 26/12/2014 10:30 p.m., Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 26 Dec 2014 07:25, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com mailto:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote
On 25 December 2014 at 16:49, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 24/12/14 15:35, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
besides, it's not always possible to use GDC or LDC, as they tend to be
off by at least one frontend/phobos version, or have some
On 24 December 2014 at 04:49, Vic via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 22:11:35 UTC, Xinok wrote:
I'm going to make a stark proposal to the you all, the community and all D
users as whole. I wish for us to set an ultimate goal to be made top
On 23 December 2014 at 18:26, Kingsley via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Hi,
I've created this meetup group for any London based D enthusiasts to meet up
and get excited about D.
I'll also demo my intellij plugin for D at the first meetup which I've
On 23 December 2014 at 07:28, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 07:21:20 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Maybe you could set up a qemu-arm chroot?
Probably I should. Didn't bother originally because ARM support is not part
Hi,
Apparently I've never announced this here, so here we go.
I have written, and started maintaining D bindings for the GCCJIT
library, available on github at this location:
https://github.com/ibuclaw/gccjitd
What is GCCJIT?
---
GCCJIT is a new front-end for gcc that aims to provide an
On 22 December 2014 at 11:45, logicchains via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 21 December 2014 at 09:48:24 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 21:47:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I did notice this:
I updated the ldc D compiler earlier today
On 22 December 2014 at 13:45, via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 12:43:19 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 22 December 2014 at 11:45, logicchains via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sunday, 21 December 2014
On 22 December 2014 at 20:52, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/22/2014 9:40 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
By this time last year, dconf 2014 preparations were already under way but
I
haven't heard anything this year. Is another one planned?
Yes. Still
On 22 December 2014 at 17:01, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 22 December 2014 at 13:45, via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 12:43:19 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 22 December 2014 at 11:45, logicchains via
On 23 Dec 2014 07:15, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 11:45:55 UTC, logicchains wrote:
I installed the new Arch Linux LDC package but it still fails with the
same error: /usr/lib/libldruntime.so: undefined reference to `__mulodi4'
On 20 Dec 2014 17:45, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Just wondering what the general sentiment is.
For me it's these 3 points.
- tuple support (DIP32, maybe without pattern matching)
- working import, protection and visibility rules (DIP22, 313, 314)
-
On 17 December 2014 at 17:50, Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 15/12/2014 19:39, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
If you put your git repo online somewhere, I wouldn't mind pulling from
it and pushing to Phobos as PRs. It's much more convenient than
On 12 Dec 2014 17:15, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/12/2014 04:47 PM, Joakim wrote:
I asked about this on github but didn't get a good answer, so I'm asking
here. What's with all the repeated OS blocks in druntime?
No, you don't want to accept
On 12 Dec 2014 21:50, Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 15:47:09 UTC, Joakim wrote:
It seems like pointless repetition and there are many more examples of
this, as I keep running into it when adding bionic/Android support. Martin
On 11 December 2014 at 08:24, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/10/2014 11:34 PM, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 12/11/14, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Glad to
On 10 December 2014 at 14:16, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:24:56 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 10:24:53 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 08:43:49 UTC, Kagamin
On 10 Dec 2014 18:30, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 06:15:48PM +, Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 16:56:24 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
In D, this should be akin
On 9 Dec 2014 07:00, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 21:04:17 UTC, John wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 19:35:54 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
think of them as beta quality!
You may have to either pause when
On 9 Dec 2014 00:50, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 15:44:55 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I want to do a C backend first.
Building an LLVM Backand out of that is a small step.
There is already a very popular C to C
On 9 December 2014 at 19:15, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:08:35PM +0300, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
09-Dec-2014 20:54, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d пишет:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:16:56PM +0300, Dmitry Olshansky
On 8 December 2014 at 19:35, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 17:26:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 16:28:24 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
First two videos are up
think of them as beta
On 4 December 2014 at 13:47, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
It's an argument for Java over Python specifically but a bit more
general in reality. This stood out for me:
!…other languages like D and Go are too new to bet my work on.
On 8 December 2014 at 16:06, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 12/05/2014 09:15 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
I didn't notice a D meetup group in SF. Is anyone else in here
interested in doing something like this once a month?
We could have a video cast
On 7 Dec 2014 10:40, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 2014-12-07 01:49, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I have std.simd sitting here, and I really want to finish it, but I
still don't have the tools to do so.
I need, at least, forceinline to complete it,
On 26 November 2014 at 21:00, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 08:06:01PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
So my computer died on me again last week and I had to buy new
hardware. I was forced to update the software to run
On 28 November 2014 at 06:40, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
weaselcat wrote in message news:rnlbybkfqokypxlgf...@forum.dlang.org...
I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future
fall under?
Generally 'future
On 25 November 2014 at 19:08, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Johannes Pfau wrote in message news:m5288s$l8$1...@digitalmars.com...
No, unfortunately not. The module where the template is instantiated
needs to be the 'main' module. Or rather toObjfile must
On 16 November 2014 13:39, FrankLike via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Many old projects need move from x86 to x64,but the 'length' type is
size_t,it will change on x64,so a lot of work must to do.but I find some
info which is help for d:
On 14 November 2014 20:27, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 14 November 2014 at 20:19:56 UTC, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Really? I say this all the time. (OK, maybe not so much over the last
5 or so months :)
Yeah, and if I remember
On 15 Nov 2014 21:05, GreatEmerald via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 15 November 2014 at 18:36:28 UTC, Jordi Sayol via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Meanwhile there is not an RPM package for phobos 2 shared library, I
think you can spread it together with your library:
On 14 November 2014 06:21, Joakim via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 13 November 2014 at 13:59:32 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
On Thursday, 13 November 2014 at 08:50:29 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
So, how to write a source-to-source compiler from CS to D…? ;-)
I
On 25 October 2014 17:14, Trass3r via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Yes it's clearly stated on the ABI page (and sane).
Nobody ever noticed cause it's hard to spot this in assembly.
But it was very salient and disturbing in llvm IR.
Really? I say this all the time. (OK,
On Tuesday, 11 November 2014 at 20:20:26 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 11.11.2014 08:36, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi,
I find myself wondering what do people use to inspect the GC
on a
running process?
Last night, I had a look at a couple of vibe.d servers that
had been
running for a little
Hi,
I find myself wondering what do people use to inspect the GC on a
running process?
Last night, I had a look at a couple of vibe.d servers that had
been running for a little over 100 days. But the same code, but
one used less (or not at all).
Given that the main app logic is rather
On 1 November 2014 11:31, anonymous via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 at 09:03:42 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
as i can guess, the bug is in evaluating left part of '=' operation
before the right part.
I don't know how D defines this,
On 1 November 2014 11:56, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 11:31:51 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I don't know how D defines this, and I couldn't find anything but
a forum discussion [1] (which I didn't read
On 1 November 2014 09:03, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Hello.
let's run this code:
info.list[idx] = saveIt(info, count-1); //!!!
You could use:
emplace(info.list[idx], saveIt(info, count-1));
On 1 November 2014 12:39, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 12:34:50 +
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 1 November 2014 09:03, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Hello.
let's run
On 1 November 2014 13:05, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 12:58:26 +
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Or how about: Every side effect is evaluated LTR. So whatever you do,
don't have LHS-altering side-effects
On 1 November 2014 14:19, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 13:56:49 +
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
if such assigns will be forbidden for any arrays... this is even worse.
what? your shiny language can't do
On 26 Oct 2014 08:05, Mike via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
wrote:
On Sunday, 26 October 2014 at 07:08:21 UTC, Mike wrote:
I tried this on my Linux desktop, and while everything compiled and
linked without errors, it resulted in a segmentation fault at runtime. But
where I have
On 19 Oct 2014 09:40, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 23:10:15 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 08:22:25 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Besides, the code uses x + 1, so the code is already in
On 16 Oct 2014 23:01, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:53:40 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I had planned to use GDC/LDC too, but GDC is 2.064
GDC is 2.065.
And soon to be 2.066 as soon as I apply the
On 17 October 2014 09:53, Chris via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 22:01:37 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:53:40 +
Chris via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I had planned to use GDC/LDC too,
On 16 October 2014 22:00, bearophile via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Just found with Reddit. C seems one step ahead of D with this:
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2014/10/16/gcc-undefined-behavior-sanitizer-ubsan/
*cough* GDC *cough* :o)
On 17 October 2014 16:08, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 10/17/14, 2:53 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 16 October 2014 22:00, bearophile via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Just found with Reddit. C seems one step
On Sunday, 12 October 2014 at 19:20:49 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
I've been recently trying GDC out to compile some D code and
i'm running into the problem of differing function signatures
in core modules.
For example:
stack.d:79: error: function core.memory.GC.calloc (ulong sz,
uint ba =
On 10 Oct 2014 01:35, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 October 2014 at 07:40:14 UTC, eles wrote:
Of course it does not increase the probability to get a tails.
Actually, it increases the probability that you'll get heads again.
On 10 Oct 2014 17:35, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 10/10/2014 8:15 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
const is used both as a storage class and as a type constructor, and is
distinguished by the grammar:
const(T) v; // type constructor, it affects the type
On 9 Oct 2014 09:55, Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
Kenji just proposed a slightly controversial pull request so I want to
reach out for more people to discuss it's tradeoffs.
It's about deprecating function qualifiers on the left hand side of a
function.
801 - 900 of 1154 matches
Mail list logo
