On Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 19:16:21 UTC, Namespace wrote:
hmm...
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_conv.html#.emplace
constructs an object of non-class type T at that address.
Non-Class. ;)
There's a class overload 3 down
T emplace(T, Args...)(void[] chunk, auto ref Args args) if (is(T
==
https://github.com/hackwaly/pepper-nim
Wonder how hard it would be to get D to do the same, or if it's
worth the effort over trying to adapt LDC output to emscripten.
On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 08:27:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://codecapsule.com/2014/02/12/coding-for-ssds-part-6-a-summary-what-every-programmer-should-know-about-solid-state-drives/
An interesting article. Anyone want to see if there are any
modifications we should make to std.stdio to
On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 23:27:36 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
All I'm saying is that GC.malloc alters global state. I agree
that it's OK to pretend that it doesn't because as long as you
agree not to base things on this knowledge, you are fine
calling pure functions that use GC.
A
On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 07:04:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I find it worrying that so many people attracted to D system
level programming are into games, yet game development needs
are ignored. That can't win.
D is lucky that Rust is annoying, Go is marginal, and Nim is
unknown, so
On Thursday, 23 April 2015 at 18:37:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/23/2015 1:10 AM, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
On 4/22/2015 2:58 PM, bearophile wrote:
D is less stack-friendly than Ada (and probably Rust too),
??
In Ada standard library you have safe fixed-size
stack-allocated
On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 04:54:39 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 April 2015 at 15:36:28 UTC, Jadbox wrote:
What's the best equivalent to Rust's structural enum/pattern
(match)ing? Is it also possible to enforce exhaustive matches?
Basically, I'm curious on what the best way to
On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 19:29:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
D is just another of those “Let's put everything on the
heap”-languages that do then of course need GC.
what's up with people constantly equating garbage collection to
being the same as java?
On Wednesday, 22 April 2015 at 07:08:05 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
Except, as you pointed out, that's not how copyright now works.
The copyright for DMD would only expire 95 years after Walter
dies, regardless of what the copyright notice says.
Shachar
something tells me it will be more
On Tuesday, 21 April 2015 at 15:36:28 UTC, Jadbox wrote:
What's the best equivalent to Rust's structural enum/pattern
(match)ing? Is it also possible to enforce exhaustive matches?
Basically, I'm curious on what the best way to do ADTs in D.
D's ADTs are in std.variant, the equivalent of
On Tuesday, 21 April 2015 at 01:31:58 UTC, TheGag96 wrote:
Hi guys! I had this homework assignment for data structures
that has a pretty easy solution in C++. Reading input like
this...
1 2 3 # $
4 3 * ! #
20 3 / # $ #
62 # $
2 3 8 * + #
4 48 4 2 + / #
SUM # $
1 2 3 4 5 #
R #
@
...where @
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/335b1s/the_new_operator_in_c_6/
of interesting note was the nim sample on how to implement the
same thing in nim in 2 lines of code
template `?.`(a, b): expr =
if a != nil: a.b else: nil
template `??`(a, b): expr =
if a != nil: a else: b
On Monday, 20 April 2015 at 06:23:36 UTC, ketmar wrote:
as Adam didn't post announce for current TWiD, i'll try to do
that
instead, as i like to see that announcements here.
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/apr-19.html
the notable thing is Job Opening part. let's hope that it
will become
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 05:04:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/18/15 3:08 PM, Mengu wrote:
On Saturday, 18 April 2015 at 21:21:42 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/18/15 10:21 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
The tooling for golang is a major reason for it's adoption.
This
tooling
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 19:58:28 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 07:54:36 +, John Colvin wrote:
é might be obvious, but Unicode isn't just for writing
European prose.
it is also to insert pictures of the animals into text.
There's other uses for unicode?
On Saturday, 18 April 2015 at 17:21:28 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
...
Are there any plans for the LDC and SDC team to work together
once SDC matures?
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 00:39:03 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:29:45 +1200, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Awesome! Although we may need to undeprecate that feature.
as it is not generating deprecation warning now, it should be
fairly
easy: just reintroduce it into specs. i can see
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 02:42:28 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 00:50:23 +, weaselcat wrote:
maybe I'm dumb in asking this, but if there was already an API
for
allocators in D... why is a std.allocator not being written
ontop of it?
it seems much more elegant to begin with.
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 15:47:10 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 04:05:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/15/15 8:42 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 08:13:20 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
OK, do not expect SDC to compile your code yet, but it got
to a
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 18:37:41 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 12:01:48 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 11:46:09 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Some people - myself included - have already asked Brian to
make DCD read the project's import paths from Dub or
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 12:01:48 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 11:46:09 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Some people - myself included - have already asked Brian to
make DCD read the project's import paths from Dub or
something. At first he claimed this is the editor's job - now
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 09:57:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 09:39:09 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
Nowadays a standard library should include classes or
functions, not only for data structures, algorithms etc., but
also for: GUI cross-platform creation, graphics,
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 15:12:00 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 10:47 AM, weaselcat wrote:
DCD has been usable from vim for a looong time, when was the
last time
you tried?
Dconf 2014.
I'm sure with more elbow grease I could get it to work. But I
shouldn't have to ;)
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:05:32 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/15/15 9:15 AM, rcorre wrote:
For those who don't know, ycmd
(https://github.com/Valloric/ycmd) is an
editor-agnostic completion engine that aims to reduce a lot of
the
duplicate code written for handling
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 14:44:48 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
import std.stdio;
struct Foo {
bool registered = false;
void register(int x) {
writeln(Registering , x);
register = true;
}
}
void main() {
Foo foo;
foo.register(10);
}
register = true
I rather liked the anthropomorphized D that used to be somewhere
on the site.
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 21:27:47 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
To be fair, I've seen a lot of new build systems, but not a lot
of better build system.
I keep coming back to makefile, not because it is good, but
because it is not worse than most of the shit I tried, and at
least it is available
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 23:28:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Good article, discussion is a bit lame.
It's reddit, that's not really surprising.
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 02:12:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/13/2015 4:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/32f4as/why_most_high_level_languages_are_slow/
Good article, discussion is a bit lame.
One of the reasons I've been range-ifying Phobos is
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 02:39:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/13/2015 7:23 PM, weaselcat wrote:
this is essentially fusion/deforestation, correct?
??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_(computer_science)
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 02:45:37 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 02:39:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/13/2015 7:23 PM, weaselcat wrote:
this is essentially fusion/deforestation, correct?
??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation_(computer_science)
my bad,
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 05:57:24 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 12 April 2015 at 19:03:33 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
BTW - since we have linux on ARM, the following may be useful
if you wish to run a D application on your Android mobile
device. No ADB or root required.
On Sunday, 12 April 2015 at 07:12:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Attribute inference works when the source to a function must
exist (i.e. be available to the compiler). Currently, it is
done for template functions and function literals.
At one point, I had implemented it for auto return
On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 10:14:00 UTC, w0rp wrote:
I think the one thing in the DIP I'm not sure of is the
definition of what is a reference counted object.
I believe it's still defined by DIP74?
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP74
On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 10:00:45 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 10 April 2015 at 21:19, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 19:08:13 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
- Move a method to another class located in another module,
while updating
On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 08:35:18 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 15:44:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We hope to do better than Rust. -- Andrei
Hope does not cut it.
A design that breaks down even on a linked list (e.g. you have
to turn to ref-counted
On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 21:47:20 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Option 1 isn't really viable because it turns into a whole
program
compilation model.
How does this differ from e.g, if the function was templated?
On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 21:44:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
No one announced (to me) it's existence. Thanks! I'll be sure
to check it out.
it also integrates DCD(combined with youcompleteme or similar
plugin gives intellisense-like completion,) and dscanner.
On Sunday, 12 April 2015 at 01:29:53 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 22:29:58 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Saturday, 11 April 2015 at 10:27:15 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
if you're using vim-dutyl you could just remap K to :DUjump
or one of the split variants.
(DUddoc also shows the
On Sunday, 12 April 2015 at 01:45:16 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/12/2015 12:35 AM, weaselcat wrote:
How does this differ from e.g, if the function was templated?
It doesn't, if you decide to analyze each imported function to
perform
attribute inference, then that's just like treating all
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 19:48:40 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Using Deadcode, emacs, VisualStudio, sublime.
Please post results. I'm probably the only one using Deadcode
for now though :)
Anyway, for me the more important question is what features of
your IDE/editor makes you stick with it
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 21:20:32 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Assigning a RefCounted is marked @system, pass-by-ref is @safe.
What's missing, you want to be able to use RefCounted in @safe
code? Why
not pass it by value then?
This actually sounds quite logical to me - passing an RC object
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 21:50:13 UTC, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2015-04-10 21:29:19 +, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com said:
On 4/10/2015 2:11 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/09/2015 01:10 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP77
In the first problem example:
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 23:04:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Martin Nowak added recently a nice feature to the Phobos
makefile: by specifying e.g.
make std/stdio.test
only the unittests for std/stdio.d would build and run. This
greatly improves development turnaround for Phobos.
On Friday, 10 April 2015 at 23:29:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/11/2015 01:04 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
What makes MessageBox special?
Andrei
For some reason the linker drags in another copy of the
concurrency
module (part of it to be precise concurrency_329_3ee.o).
That collides
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 11:49:00 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/08/2015 08:32 PM, tcha wrote:
Now with release numbers.
D new - debug - 14.98s, 1782.0Mb
8.53s, 1786.8Mb
D new Gdc - debug - 29.08s, 1663.9Mb
GDC still misses @nogc support.
D new Ldc - 16.99s, 1663.0Mb
18.76s, 1664.1Mb
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 20:00:28 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I can't remember which -O level inlining is enabled, but
there's definitely no need to explicitly ask for it at -O5.
-enable-inlining(enabled at -O2) and -inline do different things
and -inline isn't automatically enabled.
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 19:44:57 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I saw that commit to the benchmark and changed it locally.
They're about the same performance now comparing clang to LDC,
with -inline -boundscheck=off -singleobj flags
Nice.
Also, since an LDC dev might read this - is there a
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 19:17:48 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Not sure, but that may also have been my recent optimizations.
Just tried it with your recent optimizations and it doesn't build
with LDC 0.15.1.
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 19:43:13 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 21:40 schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Am 09.04.2015 um 21:37 schrieb weaselcat:
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 19:35:24 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 21:26 schrieb weaselcat:
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 19:17:48
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 19:35:24 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 21:26 schrieb weaselcat:
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 19:17:48 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Not sure, but that may also have been my recent optimizations.
Just tried it with your recent optimizations and it doesn't
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 20:11:07 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 20:00:28 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I can't remember which -O level inlining is enabled, but
there's definitely no need to explicitly ask for it at -O5.
-enable-inlining(enabled at -O2) and -inline do
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 08:59:04 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
From StackOverflow's 2015 Developer Survey [1]:
For the third year in a row, we asked respondents which
operating system they use the most. Windows maintains the
lion's share of the developer operating system market, while
Mac
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 16:19:15 UTC, André wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 22:58:44 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Hi, I hope nobody minds but I'm just curious as to the
popularity amongst D IDEs for a blog post. Sorry if I forgot
your favorite $editor.
http://goo.gl/forms/MmsuInzDL0
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 16:19:15 UTC, André wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 22:58:44 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Hi, I hope nobody minds but I'm just curious as to the
popularity amongst D IDEs for a blog post. Sorry if I forgot
your favorite $editor.
http://goo.gl/forms/MmsuInzDL0
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 21:29:59 UTC, Nick wrote:
Hi,
Could you make the language reference available for download in
a free e-book format, such as EPUB or FB2?
Some people just don't have any app that reads MOBI or Kindle
format; they are not very common outside some particular
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 22:19:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/8/15 11:50 AM, Dmitri Makarov wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 18:08:36 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
... I also work on a large D project at work ...
Which compiler do you use?
dmd -- Andrei
Is this for
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 21:42:22 UTC, Nick wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 21:34:00 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 21:29:59 UTC, Nick wrote:
Hi,
Could you make the language reference available for download
in a free e-book format, such as EPUB or FB2?
Some
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 23:11:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP77
Deceptively simple solution for a hard problem.
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 23:11:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP77
Can this be clarified a little?
The lifetime of tmp will be the same as that of a temporary with
a destructor.
Does that mean the lifetime of tmp is tied to the scope of the
function being called,
Hi, I hope nobody minds but I'm just curious as to the popularity
amongst D IDEs for a blog post. Sorry if I forgot your favorite
$editor.
http://goo.gl/forms/MmsuInzDL0
thanks : )
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 00:10:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 22:58:44 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Hi, I hope nobody minds but I'm just curious as to the
popularity amongst D IDEs for a blog post. Sorry if I forgot
your favorite $editor.
http://goo.gl/forms/MmsuInzDL0
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 21:09:32 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 20:20:06 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
I have read that std.json is pretty slow compared to other
languages json parsers and I'm about to do a whole stack of
json parsing and was wondering if anyone has got any
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 02:13:42 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I've spent the better part of yesterday and today debugging a
complex matter involving pointers, reduced to this:
../dmd/src/dmd -conf= -I../druntime/import -w -dip25 -m64 -O
-release -main -unittest
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 08:08:26 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 05:10:21 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 02:23:47 UTC, MarisaLovesUsAll
wrote:
Hi!
Today I met one guy on the internet, he said that he will use
D only if standard library will not require
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 09:24:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
If the latter is obsolete, it should perhaps be updated to
point to the newer one. The svn one is the first google hit for
Derelict.
Top 3 results for me for `dlang derelict` are all his github
page/projects, did you just google
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 09:50:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/4/2015 2:34 AM, weaselcat wrote:
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 09:24:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
If the latter is obsolete, it should perhaps be updated to
point to the newer
one. The svn one is the first google hit for
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 10:26:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/4/2015 3:04 AM, weaselcat wrote:
PR?
Exactly!
The idea is that GPUs can greatly accelerate code (2x to
1000x), and if D wants to appeal to high performance computing
programmers, we need to have a workable way to program
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 02:59:46 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 4/04/2015 3:49 p.m., Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home_new.html
Honestly, I don't think anyone has even tried to create
bindings. Let alone use it.
Although I think there are OpenCL bindings
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 22:05:33 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 09:15:01PM +, weaselcat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:45:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
The reliance on GDC/LDC to produce
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 02:23:47 UTC, MarisaLovesUsAll wrote:
Hi!
Today I met one guy on the internet, he said that he will use D
only if standard library will not require Garbage Collector (in
case of total GC disabling).
So what's the current status of GC in Phobos? :^)
I've heard there
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:45:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
The reliance on GDC/LDC to produce production-level
binaries(i.e, optimized) and the actual people working on them
really is worrisome. If Iain or Kai decided one day to leave
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 20:10:45 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 4/3/2015 9:41 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:07:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/3/15 3:10 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
I agree. We just
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:07:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-04-03 20:06, Atila Neves wrote:
Interesting.
It's true that it's not always faster to compile each module
separately,
I already knew that. It seems to me, however, that when that's
actually
the case, the practical
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:55:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:25:51 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 17:10:31 +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 16:41:14 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 15:07:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/3/15 3:10 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It would be great to have dmd on embedded platforms.
I agree. We just don't have the champion for that yet. --
Andrei
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:45:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
The reliance on GDC/LDC to produce production-level
binaries(i.e, optimized) and the actual people working on them
really is worrisome. If Iain or Kai decided one day to leave
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 01:03:14 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 23:59:52 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 23:47:48 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 22:46:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 23:47:48 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 22:46:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:45:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
The reliance on GDC/LDC to produce production-level
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 21:55:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 1 April 2015 at 04:17, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 23:53:07 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 18:20:05 UTC, cym13 wrote:
I found this repository
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 12:09:25 UTC, w0rp wrote:
Of course, why be clever here at all and do such things? It's
an editor problem. Write the full import lines out, and if you
hate typing out the path each time, use tricks in your editor
to make that easier, or use an IDE.
no
this is
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 23:44:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/2/15 4:39 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision
document. We're
staying the course with one important
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 23:44:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/2/15 4:39 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision
document. We're
staying the course with one important
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 23:39:53 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 22:44:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's the end of Q1. Walter and I reviewed our vision document.
We're staying the course with one important addition:
switching to ddmd, hopefully with 2.068.
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 22:49:55 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/31/2015 08:20 PM, cym13 wrote:
https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks
We made a massive jump towards the upper ranks.
#4 ¹
https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks/tree/master/brainfuck#user-content-benchmark-benchb
#2
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 01:32:43 UTC, Cassandra Nix wrote:
New questions are sorry, but I have a few minor problems. Where
can I find / install these dependencies?
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent_pthreads
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl
/usr/bin/ld: cannot
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 04:32:26 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 04:11:02 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
was it a conscious decision to make the AA [] operator not
work like map/etc in C++?
What do you mean?
accessing a non-existing element in C++'s map/unordered_map
On Thursday, 2 April 2015 at 03:55:53 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/02/2015 03:35 AM, weaselcat wrote:
the benchmark pointed out two sore areas in D(AA and
std.json,) would be
nice to see AA get updated as I often completely avoid using
the
built-in AA.
I filed two ERs already, both are
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:31:18 UTC, novice2 wrote:
I am sorry for so dumb question, but:
when peoples talking about D and speed,
then they always say mark method final.
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
afaik there's no reason the compiler couldn't infer it for
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 22:15:42 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 04/01/2015 10:31 PM, novice2 wrote:
Can DMD compiler do it itself, as one of optimizations?
You could do it as part of LTO or whole program optimization.
It requires another compiler/linker phase, so it's not easy to
achieve,
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 02:17:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
...
forgot to label second test, it's the brainfuck one.
p.s., D loses because of AA slowness.
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 23:53:07 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 18:20:05 UTC, cym13 wrote:
I found this repository (reddit!) that hosts common benchmarks
for many languages such as D, Nim, Go, python, C, etc... It
uses only standard structures not to influence the
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 04:49:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 02:25:43 +, Random D-user wrote:
GC because of some low-end machines. Memory is really cheap
these days
and pretty much every machine is 64-bits (even phones are
trasitioning
fast to 64-bits).
this is the
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 18:20:05 UTC, cym13 wrote:
I found this repository (reddit!) that hosts common benchmarks
for many languages such as D, Nim, Go, python, C, etc... It
uses only standard structures not to influence the benchmark.
https://github.com/kostya/benchmarks
dmd in
On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Trying on a different beefier machine with 2.066 and 2.067
release versions installed:
1mm allocations:
2.066: 0.844s
2.067: 0.19s
10mm allocations
2.066: 1m 17.2 s
2.067: 0m 1.15s
So numbers were ballpark right before, and
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 15:32:25 UTC, Columbus wrote:
I'm not so much into the D Projects, but am familiar with the
concepts of the language.
I want to use D as the language of a hobby operating system.
There isn't much documentation about doing so, and the question
already got asked: When D
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 12:04:22 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 07:29:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, March 28, 2015 14:19:46 Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Thank you. I need to learn std.algorithm better.
Don't we all. Part of the
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 18:41:17 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 11:19 -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[…]
My brain still thinks in terms of loops.
The excellent influence of functional programming on imperative
programming is implicit iteration and
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 23:28:50 UTC, w0rp wrote:
Seriously though, allocating a bunch of memory until you hit
some maximum threshold, possibly configured, and freeing
unreferenced memory at that point, pausing compilation while
that happens? This is GC. I wonder if someone enterprising
was this ever solved?
I did some research and saw static immutable ones suggested a few
times, but they can't be chained AFAIK.
201 - 300 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
