On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 14:16:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
How do they count? -- Andrei
apparently just using github for Go and a completely different
ranking for every other language.
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 17:54:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 12:32:32 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
[...]
Mostly because there is no real visible direction towards
making D a competitor that directly addresses specific needs of
web programming.
[...]
And
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 09:05:22 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
The core problem is that the Rust community has resources to do
things like:
https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/announcing-the-community-subteam/2248
whereas D seems not to. Go, like Rust, gets marketing budget
both directly and
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 10:40:25 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[...]
I do not know about others, but I am using XP, and have no plan
to move to something else any time soon. However, I am using it
rarely, in a VM, whenever I need
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 06:50:28 UTC, Charles Hawkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 03:31:37 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 03:29:14 UTC, Charles Hawkins
wrote:
[...]
Try to compile with either ldc or gdc and the -g flag, it
should give you a backtrace. dmd seems
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 07:52:10 UTC, Charles Hawkins wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 06:54:57 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 06:50:28 UTC, Charles Hawkins
wrote:
[...]
you can instruct dub to use other compilers with the
--compiler option
valid options
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 17:05:41 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 16:27:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 13:52:19 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
[...]
And how does it introduce a hidden performance issue. You'd
end up with some template bloat, but
On Sunday, 21 June 2015 at 23:02:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
1. Leave it undefined, like the STL does. Probably this is too
extreme.
I don't think this is too extreme at all. If std.collections is
slow, nobody will use it.
If you don't believe me, go to code.dlang.org and ctrl+f json
I never seem to use them for anything, has anyone else done
anything interesting with them?
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 03:29:14 UTC, Charles Hawkins wrote:
Thanks, Adam. I'm coming from OCaml and haven't seen a seg
fault in years. Didn't recognize it. :D Hopefully I can
figure it out from here.
Try to compile with either ldc or gdc and the -g flag, it should
give you a
On Saturday, 20 June 2015 at 05:55:07 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 15:54 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
Russel, do you have numbers for ldc by any chance? Thx! --
Andrei
Single data point only, and I need to check this, but:
Loop: 1.44s
Reduce 1:
I recently read this facebook post on their future implementation
in their Folly library.
https://code.facebook.com/posts/1661982097368498
This made me slightly envious. Thoughts on a D implementation?
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 08:08:08 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 10:36:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
As Tim Bray, of all people, wrote a couple years ago, this
Titanic is losing to native mobile apps and it's only a matter
of time till it's sunk:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 13:20:04 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 10:27:58 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
What you've forgotten is to turn on your optimisation flags.
Even DMD gets the first 2 vaguely right with -O -inline -release
gdc is able to vectorize all 3
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 18:55:52 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 06/18/2015 12:41 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure I can commit to any guarantees, at least not on
the level of a primary release czar anyway, but I'd be
willing to pitch in when needed as a secondary or
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 14:30:59 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:14:28 +, Etienne wrote:
[...]
i never talked about binaries. what i'm talking about is that
dub is not a package manager at all.
how can i get a list of available packages? how can i search by
package
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 17:41:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 11:00:37 UTC, ketmar wrote:
they will never stop, won't they? modern web: building piles
of shit on top of piles of shit. (sigh)
Indeed.
«Even before browsers ship native support for
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 20:53:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/18/2015 7:04 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Now I get
Loop: 3.14s
Reduce 1: 4.76s
Reduce 2: 5.12s
I expect that at the moment, range+algorithms code will likely
be somewhat slower than old fashioned loops.
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 09:05:27 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 18:35:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
With this we revoke Martin's role as release czar. His github
access will remain the same for the time being.
I'm speechless.
+1
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 10:36:16 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 08:05:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
[...]
Sigh, another attempt to sneak native code into the browser,
rather than just admitting that the web stack blows. I have to
admit I was hopeful about NaCl, but it
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 10:27:58 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On a given machine, the code:
double sequential_loop(const int n, const double delta) {
auto sum = 0.0;
foreach (immutable i; 1 .. n + 1) {
immutable x = (i - 0.5) * delta;
sum += 1.0 / (1.0 + x * x);
}
return 4.0 *
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 17:18:42 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 03:05:06 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/14/2015 4:03 AM, ketmar wrote:
honestly, if i'll want to have a limited language, i'll take
Go.
Go doesn't have conditional compilation.
you got it!
removing a power
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 06:26:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
last I read was after dconf,
seems martin created a PR to branch 2.068, so I guess Soon.
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 11:07:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 07:53:16 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I thought it was because I was weird and I use gold as my
linker, but ld.bfd produced the same results. The most I could
find in bug reports was someone complaining it
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 07:53:16 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I thought it was because I was weird and I use gold as my
linker, but ld.bfd produced the same results. The most I could
find in bug reports was someone complaining it used to work but
the consensus was that it never did?
Atila
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 10:07:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
(3)
After some more thought, I agree with this. std.container could
just be warned against using in favor of std.collections.
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 06:08:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
...
2. I've never used std.container, it looks incomplete.
On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 15:04:05 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
http://beta.forum.dlang.org/
Many major and minor improvements.
Some major ones:
- dlang.org theme, fully responsive and mobile-friendly
- keyboard navigation in all views
- automatically saved post drafts
- get notified of
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:33:52 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:26:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 11:05:36 UTC, ketmar wrote:
p.s. i.e. it boils down to simple thing: Walter don't like
it. period.
any rationalizing of that is pointless.
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 10:16:18 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:58:12 +, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 08:52:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 18:50:33 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Yes, and it's an obvious issue. Some of the most frequently
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 08:52:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 18:50:33 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Yes, and it's an obvious issue. Some of the most frequently
requested things are real tuple syntax, pattern matching, etc.
Short of getting these into D itself(good luck,) any
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 10:35:55 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 08:45:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
The tiny subset of numerical linear algebra that is relevant
for graphics (mostly very basic operations, 2,3 or 4
dimensions) is not at all representative of the whole.
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 16:37:19 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I'm trying to mod dmd, and I'm totally confused about what's
goin on.
-some things are allocated with 'new' and some are allocated
with 'mem.malloc'
-most things don't ever seem to be freed
-no RAII is used for cleanup
-no clear
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 14:46:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Yes, C++ templates are a hard nut to crack, if D had added
excellent pattern matching to its meta programming repertoire
the I think this would be enough to put D in a different league.
https://github.com/solodon4/Mach7
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 10:03:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 08:59:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I wouldn't have thought that not moving to 2.067 would be a
hold-up (there
is nothing in that release that blocks building DDMD as it is
*now*).
The biggest problem is
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 00:24:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/13/15 4:16 PM, ZombineDev wrote:
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:48:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/13/15 3:14 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Andrei, have you considered creating additional
std.allocator.impl
package and
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 16:53:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 06/07/2015 02:27 PM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
Phobos is awesome, the libs of go, python and rust only have
better
marketing.
As discussed on dconf, phobos needs to become big and blow the
rest out
of the sky.
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:43:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/15 5:58 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
std.(experimental.)logger has been in phobos for one release.
The idea
was to mature stuff in experimental for one release and then
have a vote
on inclusion into phobos as
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 16:22:15 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
proper reference counting would be trivial to implement with
a real macro system.
BTW, its been 8 years since the dconf macro talk ;)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/dconf2007/WalterAndrei.pdf
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 17:33:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/13/15 9:22 AM, weaselcat wrote:
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 15:43:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/15 5:58 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
std.(experimental.)logger has been in phobos for one
release. The
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 20:57:14 UTC, bitwise wrote:
What is the rationale for not allowing multiple version
conditions?
Example:
version(iOS || Android) {
pthread_create(...)
}
else version(Win32) {
CreateThread(...)
}
I wasn't able to find the conversations on this.
I heard
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 07:20:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-11 16:08, weaselcat wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 14:07:10 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
--parallelRuns multiple compiler instances in
parallel, if
possible.
After rereading your
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 12:48:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 12:47:36 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
[...]
I regret getting involved in an OS holywar. Sorry, I'm done
with this thread.
fedora debian
vim emacs
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 10:54:46 UTC, Chris wrote:
Has anyone run into problems with D on AMD processors? I'm
talking about Windows 7 on a HP625 laptop in particular.
Can you be any more specific? What kind of problems?
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 12:00:17 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/12/15 1:00 AM, Mattcoder wrote:
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 04:51:29 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The cost is really minimal if you are serious. A Mac Mini
costs $500
new, and you get Xcode free.
I don't want to be
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 19:36:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
It is good though that they've finally relaxed their stance a
bit on what's now being called side-loading (or as I've
called it since the 1980's, Running my own freaking software
on my own freaking machine). Now it appears MS has
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 10:17:26 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 09:14:00 UTC, Chris wrote:
Now, now. It is true that bad and frustrating experience with
other languages drove me (and probably others) to D.
Suggesting that a language like D is based on
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 08:54:54 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 22:01:22 UTC, Dennis Ritchie
wrote:
No bounds checking of arrays.
Huh? Whatever gave you that impression?
Well, if Rust created for huge projects, why these macros? I
fear that macros are simply not
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 09:14:00 UTC, Chris wrote:
Because this hurts some people. The D crowd doesn't snob other
languages, in fact, people here often point at features of
other languages saying Da', can I have this, pleze?.
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 13:35:25 UTC, QAston wrote:
For me simple templates + simple macros are clearer than
complicated templates + ctfe + mixins. There are tradeoffs
there, with ctfe being an optimization at the expense of build
time. On the other hand dmd is much much faster than the
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 14:07:10 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 14:01:12 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi all !
I wonder why there's no option to tell dub split files into
groups of equal size and then run N instances of dmd ?
I think it can greatly reduce compile time.
dub
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 14:01:12 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Hi all !
I wonder why there's no option to tell dub split files into
groups of equal size and then run N instances of dmd ?
I think it can greatly reduce compile time.
dub options are a bit hidden.
dub build --help
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 17:42:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 16:49:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 06/11/2015 07:31 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 11:20:12 UTC, Kagamin
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 08:24:25 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 11-Jun-2015 11:18, w0rp wrote:
A thought just came to me. When I'm implementing foreach for a
container, I'm left with the choice of using a range for a
container or
opApply. I've found often that I prefer the ranges, as
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 07:57:47 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 22:03:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Another option:
void main()
{
auto a2 = new ubyte[5];
But this causes an extra zero-initialization of a2.
just an fyi, gdc optimizes this away(looks like it
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 21:48:33 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:48:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Please kill me now. Dynamic typing is almost always a
_horrible_ idea.
snip
I liked this post very much. I remember thinking how superior
BBC Basic was to other
On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 05:05:47 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/10/15 5:50 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14679
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14680
I did some preliminary investigation, with promising results. I
think we should
last I read was after dconf,
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 07:40:23 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:05 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:25:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 09:23:54 UTC, Chris wrote:
One big difference between the D community and other languages'
communities is is that D people keep criticizing the language
and see every little flaw in every little corner, which is good
and which is why D is the way it is. Other
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 00:57:34 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 20:14:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Contrary to technical official definition, in REAL WORLD
usage, he is BOTH a masuline AND a gender-neutral pronoun. A
few occasional nutbags who deliberately ignore
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 00:50:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14679
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14680
Andrei
dmd's build times are hurt by its current allocation strategy,
tons of pagefaults. I'm actually surprised that ddmd isn't
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 08:57:58 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 19:48:41 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 19:24:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/8/2015 11:17 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Apparently modules have been pushed into a Technical
Specification, and won't
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 09:16:40 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 08:57:58 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 19:48:41 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 19:24:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/8/2015 11:17 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Apparently modules
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 07:51:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I've been wondering for a good while whether it's possible with
what we have. Looks like it is, modulo some gnarly hacks in
introspecting function types.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3394
Destroy!
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 07:58:04 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 22:22:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/8/15 1:25 PM, ponce wrote:
C++'s constexpr looks broken because everything must be marked
constexpre, which defeats the purpose of having compile-time
code
looking
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 07:27:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 06:54:39 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 08/06/15 22:24, Walter Bright wrote:
Unified call syntax. This proposal, by Bjarne, seeks to
unify the
member (x.f(y)) and non-member (f(x, y)) call syntaxes by
allowing
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 17:05:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
...
I think the overall benefit would be from containers, as everyone
uses containers.
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 00:25:07 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
http://dlang.org/spec.html
both links are dead, should I file a bug report?
Apologies, I meant mobi not epub.
http://dlang.org/spec.html
both links are dead, should I file a bug report?
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 00:27:31 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 00:25:07 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
http://dlang.org/spec.html
both links are dead, should I file a bug report?
I reuploaded the website, the links work now. I think Andrei
accidentally pushed a
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
We wouldn't have had a Win64 version of D without DMD.
There's a 64 bit version of LDC-MSVC right on LDC's github page,
does it not work?
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:25:36 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 18:02:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/396c95/of_the_emerging_systems_languages_rust_d_go_nim/
I might've said D, but I don't think it qualifies as
emerging since
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 02:56:26 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 02:25:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/9/2015 6:25 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:21:43 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
We wouldn't have had a Win64 version of D without DMD.
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 05:51:58 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 12:06:52 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 07:00:18 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I'm currently considering (because of dmd, druntime and
phobos) how to strip it down to its bare essentials and have
a
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 10:11:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 08:34:50 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 08:24:24 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Separate compilation prevents compiler from inlining
everything.
only bad compilers
All existing compilers AFAIK. There is
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 18:27:16 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
Phobos is awesome, the libs of go, python and rust only have
better marketing.
As discussed on dconf, phobos needs to become big and blow the
rest out of the sky.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP80
lets get OT, please discuss
I
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 18:27:16 UTC, Robert burner Schadek
wrote:
Phobos is awesome, the libs of go, python and rust only have
better marketing.
As discussed on dconf, phobos needs to become big and blow the
rest out of the sky.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP80
lets get OT, please discuss
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 08:24:24 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
Separate compilation prevents compiler from inlining everything.
only bad compilers
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 05:25:21 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:08:47 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/6/15 10:00 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 7/06/2015 4:55 p.m., ketmar wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 21:30:02 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
so in the end, after endless
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 01:39:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 00:05:58 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
can we discuss the downside of making phobos huge?
I actively avoid adding phobos libs to my projects because it
bloats my binaries and increases compile times by massive
On Sunday, 7 June 2015 at 04:55:52 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 21:30:02 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
so in the end, after endless talking how separate compilation
sux and
everyone should do one-step combined compilation, separate
compilation
wins. it's funny how i'm always
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 10:00:17 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 5/06/2015 8:28 p.m., Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 06:42:06 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
And shouldn't the CI be doing regression testing already?
The autotester runs the unit tests that are in druntime,
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 22:07:48 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 5 Jun 2015 20:55, Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 29/05/2015 19:35, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
This isn't the first time I've seen this, in basically
every benchmark
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 at 01:13:38 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 20:18:59 UTC, tcak wrote:
I am looking at the main page of dlang.org, and really there
is no page to warm up a new comer to D language. Sure, there
are book links, details of language as D Reference etc, but
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 09:27:49 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:48:03 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:44:28 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Stream?! I had to search for it, only found the HP Stream
model, running a full Windows 8.1 OS, not a
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:44:28 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Stream?! I had to search for it, only found the HP Stream
model, running a full Windows 8.1 OS, not a browser pretending
to be an OS.
--
Paulo
Yes, and that full Windows 8.1 OS makes it run 2-3x slower than
equivalent hardware
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 08:34:22 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 04:36:31 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
chromebooks weren't even really usable until the latter half
of 2013/start of 2014 when Acer/HP/Dell/Toshiba/etc all got on
board and it stopped being just Samsung making them.
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 06:00:42 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 20:51:36 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 08:23:08 UTC, Manu wrote:
Curious to know if anyone here uses Premake, or cares...?
would care more if it had ninja support, ninja is vastly
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 09:21:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 07:05:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It is impossible for C++ to compile faster than D by design.
Any time it seems so you either aren't comparing same thing or
get misinformed. Or do straightforward
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:25:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:06:39 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
it can get even better if you properly modularize your
projects instead of having 1-2 files that build slow, which
causes a lot of waiting.
Yes, sure. You can
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 18:41:47 UTC, Tim Keating wrote:
For immutability support, of all things:
http://blogs.unity3d.com/2015/06/02/how-we-do-fast-and-efficient-yaml-merging/
Seems someone over there is a D fan.
D's immutable, pure, etc are among the 'killer features' of D, in
my
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 15:40:55 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
My original statement was obviously exaggerated, I would not
put up with days-long compile times, I'd find another way to do
development. But compile time is not as important to me as it
is to others.
-Steve
I think if
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 08:23:08 UTC, Manu wrote:
Curious to know if anyone here uses Premake, or cares...?
would care more if it had ninja support, ninja is vastly superior
to makefiles when using a meta buildtool system.
premake's use of lua trounces the awful cmake DSL.
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 21:00:47 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Largest I've found so far is Phobos (90k SLOC according to
dscanner), which I have to write a build description for. I
really want to get some memory and speed stats and compare the
current state of affairs with using Ninja on it.
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 23:04:30 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 06/02/2015 05:44 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Thankfully mobile OSes and desktop app stores seem to be on
the right
track to kill this.
http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2015/05/web_vs_native_l.html
+1billion
My god it's
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 18:20:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 17:54:38 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I was being deliberately quizzical because there are different
takes on
what you would call simd in the language, what set of types
are available
to you, what intrinsics
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 11:26:06 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 10:18:59 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:44:24 +, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Thankfully mobile OSes and desktop app stores seem to be on
the right
track to kill this.
yet they pushing cromeos and
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:15:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, 31 May 2015 at 03:03:22 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
so is std.xml the exception? How many other parts of the
standard
library are like that?
A few, but not many. Mostly, it's stuff that was done for D1 or
very early D2
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 03:41:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 22:38:47 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
They're insanely popular, especially in educational
environments. They do everything 98% of modern computer users
do, which is generally check email, browse facebook, and use
1 - 100 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
