On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 23:02:38 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
Go - they value simplicity and robust run-time (Go's GC breaks
news with sub-milisecond pauses on large heaps). The sheer
complexity of D is enough for it to be a hard sell, D's GC is
coup de grace.
I have never understood
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 16:35:14 UTC, Orkhan wrote:
Hello All!
We have a multiplayer game website which uses D programming
language for server side instant interactions. I need someone
professional who is able to make some changes on request. We
are the company and we will allocate
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 19:00:54 UTC, CRAIG DILLABAUGH
wrote:
Hello D Community
Just coming here to inform everyone that our D application for
GSoC 2017 was sadly rejected. Unfortunately (for me) it is
completely my fault, I failed to fill out one line on one of
the three forms that
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 23:44:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I appreciate how frustrating it must be to have people saying,
'Hey, do this! Do that!' without necessarily volunteering their
own efforts in support, but organizational improvements so very
often fail unless they are eagerly
On 2/8/17 7:27 PM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
a. D is the best
b. We like D
c. I like D and my company allowed me to use D
d. My head like D
e. Because marketing reasons
f. Because my company can be more efficient with D for some tasks then
with any other
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 19:37:20 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 19:00:54 UTC, CRAIG DILLABAUGH
wrote:
Hello D Community
clip
Regards
Craig
Thanks for your effort. If someone else doesn't like it, well,
I guess I don't remember a big competition among
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 20:21:56 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hi Craig,
So sorry to hear that this happened. I know very well from
working with you last year how much care and attention you put
into GSoC, so I can imagine how you must feel right now.
In the circumstances it
Hi Craig,
So sorry to hear that this happened. I know very well from
working with you last year how much care and attention you put
into GSoC, so I can imagine how you must feel right now.
In the circumstances it seems best to focus on: how could we try
to stop something like this
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 16:37:13 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Snaps-v-Flatpaks-Linux-Distros
Please don't ask me to read that dreadful, dreadful website :-\
I have read the blogpost that article summarizes. My own
feelings are:
* short
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 16:30:57 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
Hmm, for whatever reason, Arch still ships 2.16 by default…
Seems to work fine on Ubuntu 16.10, though.
Yes, I'll ping the maintainer about it some time soon. It's
possible they were holding off until after the Ubuntu 14.04
On Friday, 10 February 2017 at 19:00:54 UTC, CRAIG DILLABAUGH
wrote:
Hello D Community
Just coming here to inform everyone that our D application for
GSoC 2017 was sadly rejected. Unfortunately (for me) it is
completely my fault, I failed to fill out one line on one of
the three forms that
Hello D Community
Just coming here to inform everyone that our D application for
GSoC 2017 was sadly rejected. Unfortunately (for me) it is
completely my fault, I failed to fill out one line on one of the
three forms that comprised the application. Even more
frustrating I went online on
Dne 10.2.2017 v 17:30 David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce napsal(a):
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 17:16:35 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
This package should be possible to install on Ubuntu 16.04 or later,
or Ubuntu 14.04, as well as any other distro making available a
recent
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 17:16:35 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
This package should be possible to install on Ubuntu 16.04 or
later, or Ubuntu 14.04, as well as any other distro making
available a recent version of snapd (2.21 or later):
https://snapcraft.io/docs/core/install
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 00:31:17 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
First beta for the 2.073.1 point release.
This version resolves a few regressions and bugs in the 2.073.0
release.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.073.1.html
Please report any bugs at
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 17:16:35 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
This package should be possible to install on Ubuntu 16.04 or
later, or Ubuntu 14.04, as well as any other distro making
available a recent version of snapd (2.21 or later):
https://snapcraft.io/docs/core/install
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 18:27:57 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
The only other real alternative (everyone using it) in my field
was C++, and I have worked in a variety of C++ codebases. For me
it's not a productive language and lead to inflexible programs
1. Why your company uses D?
My company does not use D. If I had the time, I really think I
could integrate D into our build system, probably forcing it a
bit: "Oh and by the way, that new library I wrote happens to be
written in D..." (We have Vala in our build system, how worse
could it
18 matches
Mail list logo
