On 11/3/2017 2:28 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
How should I compile my program to enable array vectorization?
dmd doesn't do what is known as "auto-vectorization".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_vectorization
What D does is have vector data types, and when those are used vector
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 10:02:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 09:33:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/3/2017 2:28 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
How should I compile my program to enable array vectorization?
dmd doesn't do what is known as "auto-vectorization".
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 10:02:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 09:33:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/3/2017 2:28 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
How should I compile my program to enable array vectorization?
dmd doesn't do what is known as "auto-vectorization".
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 10:07:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 10:02:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
OK, I'm a bit confused here. This gives the impression that the
vectorization happens automatically with array operations:
"Array operations have been
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
This release comes with a new, more compact mangling, templated
vector operations, reproducible dmd builds, and various fixes.
Thanks to everyone involved in this .
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
This release comes with a new, more compact mangling, templated
vector operations, reproducible dmd builds, and various fixes.
Thanks to everyone involved in this .
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 09:33:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/3/2017 2:28 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
How should I compile my program to enable array vectorization?
dmd doesn't do what is known as "auto-vectorization".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_vectorization
What D does
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 09:28:37 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
How should I compile my program to enable array vectorization?
Array operations refers to
https://dlang.org/spec/arrays.html#array-operations.
I have tried dmd -march=native, -march=avx2 as changlog suggest
It's -mcpu= not
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 10:14:27 UTC, Joakim wrote:
See the linked druntime pull, core.simd is only imported for
dmd:
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1891/files#diff-c17bbc97c8719ab709a4a54e2f6924ceR67
Ah, I see. I misunderstood Walter to be saying the user needed
core.simd to
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
This release comes with a new, more compact mangling, templated
vector operations, reproducible dmd builds, and various fixes.
Thanks to everyone involved in this .
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:16:53 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:55:04 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Thursday, 19 October 2017 at 23:29:57 UTC, bauss wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that I have just released Diamond
2.1.0.
There has been a lot of updating to Diamond
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:55:04 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Thursday, 19 October 2017 at 23:29:57 UTC, bauss wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that I have just released Diamond
2.1.0.
There has been a lot of updating to Diamond since last
announced release.
[...]
Looks really
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:41:06 UTC, Gerald wrote:
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
... The new version is much better with only a 6 MB difference
between the stripped and non-stripped versions.
My vibe-d application debug
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 13:47:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
This release comes with a new, more compact mangling,
templated vector operations, reproducible dmd builds, and
various fixes.
Thanks
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:00:38 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
Mike, thanks for the blog post. Few lines about how the name
mangling issue was addressed would've been interesting know on
the blog.
There's a link in the post to the documentation describing the
enhancement. As
On Wednesday, 1 November 2017 at 19:33:15 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/29/2017 9:25 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 23:18:05 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
On 10/24/2017 05:02 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Experimental std.regex.v2 is sadly broken by a recent change
to
On 11/3/17 10:00 AM, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 13:47:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
This release comes with a new, more compact mangling, templated
vector operations,
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to finally officially
announce LDC 1.5. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.075.1.
* Polished LLVM 5.0 support (now also used for the prebuilt
release packages).
* Prebuilt ARM-Linux package available again.
* New
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 13:47:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
This release comes with a new, more compact mangling,
templated vector operations, reproducible dmd builds, and
various fixes.
Thanks
I have SIGSEGV when using DMD and simd types. This code works ok with GDC
and LDC fine, but SIGSEGV with latest DMD (maybe even with previous
versions I do not know)
https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/5476f5bef828
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/3/2017 3:02 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
For clarity, where the changeling says that GDC & LDC use auto-vectorization,
that's actually happening with the array operations and core.simd is not
required, correct?
I think that GDC and LDC do do auto-vectorization, but I haven't verified it
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:35:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.077.0.
This release comes with a new, more compact mangling, templated
vector operations, reproducible dmd builds, and various fixes.
Thanks to everyone involved in this .
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 11/03/2017 05:12 PM, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
This effort should be combined with the current work being done
to http://code.dlang.org/
See also:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:17:04 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to finally officially
announce LDC 1.5. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
Great stuff.
No binary release for FreeBSD though??
:-(
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 23:50:33 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Does `-link-internally` mean that you don't require command
line tool/dev installation for OS X and Windows? That would be
awesome for getting workshops for non-programmers (the
biologists at my Uni) to work.
You still need
Hi all.
Lurking in this forum I had the feeling that lots of D developers
tend to rewrite lots of code that could be found in libraries.
This is not bad per se but I thought that one of the reason could
have been the current process of library discovery.
For this reason I have edited a list
On 11/03/2017 05:12 PM, Fra Mecca wrote:
https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry
This effort should be combined with the current work being done to
http://code.dlang.org/
I hope Martin, Seb, and others that are involved will see this thread.
(Yes, I'm pinging them. :) )
Ali
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:17:04 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to finally officially
announce LDC 1.5. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.075.1.
* Polished LLVM 5.0 support (now also used for the prebuilt
release
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:14:59 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 23:50:33 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Does `-link-internally` mean that you don't require command
line tool/dev installation for OS X and Windows? That would be
awesome for getting workshops for
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 19:46:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/3/2017 3:02 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
For clarity, where the changeling says that GDC & LDC use
auto-vectorization, that's actually happening with the array
operations and core.simd is not required, correct?
I think that GDC
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:16:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This effort should be combined with the current work being done
to http://code.dlang.org/
I'd like to see code.dlang.org to have a new column that
explicitely shows the licence being used, and the capacity to
search/filter by
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:00:38 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
Mike, thanks for the blog post. Few lines about how the name
mangling issue was addressed would've been interesting know on
the blog.
The regarding main PR contains a lot of info:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5855
32 matches
Mail list logo
