On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 16:52:06 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 16:23:05 UTC, Tim wrote:
The visitor can already be `extern(D)`. Only member functions
overriding those in the base class need to be `extern(C++)`.
Other member functions can then use paratemers,
On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 21:55:31 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 19:50:02 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://gist.github.com/mdparker/f28c9ae64f096cd06db6b987318cc581
There was a side discussion about how the `extern(C++)`
interface affects dmd-as-a-library.
On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 10:21:04 UTC, João Lourenço wrote:
[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustlings
[2] https://github.com/iK4tsu/dlings
[3] https://github.com/crazymonkyyy/dingbats
Maybe you can find some inspiration from our D summer school
exercices[1][2]. Many of them are
On Sunday, 5 February 2023 at 16:15:38 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
We had three participants in SAOC 2022. You may have noticed
their periodic updates in the General forum. Keeping the
community informed through those updates is one of the
requirements of the event each year. They also have to
On Friday, 15 July 2022 at 05:46:53 UTC, StarCanopy wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 July 2022 at 07:12:25 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
This is not something a user is going to be affected by. But
it will make it much easier for the compiler/druntime devs to
do work. DMD and druntime are very strictly coupled and
On Tuesday, 12 July 2022 at 03:36:42 UTC, StarCanopy wrote:
On Saturday, 9 July 2022 at 22:24:45 UTC, max haughton wrote:
Say thank you to Iain, Mathias, Vladimir, and Martin.
This will make D better. More details to come.
I'm ignorant. Why is this significant?
This is not something a user
On Sunday, 10 July 2022 at 17:17:30 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Saturday, 9 July 2022 at 22:24:45 UTC, max haughton wrote:
Say thank you to Iain, Mathias, Vladimir, and Martin.
This will make D better. More details to come.
Does this mean that druntime for LDC and GDC were also moved
into the
Hello everyone,
It is my pleasure to announce that the winners of the 2nd
bugzilla cycle of the year are:
1. BorisCarvajal - 370 points
2. MoonlightSentinel - 135 points
3. FeepingCreature - 120 points
Congratulations!
The cycle standings are here:
On Tuesday, 17 May 2022 at 16:36:34 UTC, Kenny Shields wrote:
Hello,
I've been building a game engine in D for the past 2 and a half
years and have finally reached a point where it's usable in
day-to-day game development. Earlier this year I decided to
make a simple shooter game to serve as
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022 at 21:31:44 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
For me the bug that is potentially limiting me (design wise)
is: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21416
#dbugfix
Good stuff moving forward and that tool looks interesting to
try out.
Potential fix:
Hello everyone,
I am happy to announce that this bugzilla rewarding cycle winners
are:
1. MoonlightSentinel 830 points
2. ljmf00270 points
3. aG0aep6G 240 points
The prizes that the winners will be getting are 100$, 50$ and 25$
Amazon eGift cards. Congrats!
The
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 14:35:08 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Thursday, 16 September 2021 at 11:56:21 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/09/16/bugzilla-reward-system/
From the post:
The scoring is designed to reward contributors based on the
importance of the issues
On Friday, 17 September 2021 at 01:07:09 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 9/16/21 4:56 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> This was Razvan Nitu's baby from conception to implementation
Thank you, Razvan! Great job and a great article.
Thank you, Ali!
What I missed in the article is whether we are going to
On Friday, 27 August 2021 at 07:45:42 UTC, M.M. wrote:
On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 14:33:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Very nice event and blog.
Thanks!
I wonder about the hackathon: did you, Razvan et al.,
pre-selected a list of bugzilla issues to work on?
We do have a keyword,
On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 14:28:52 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 May 2021 at 12:58:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/05/18/a-pull-request-managers-perspective/
Ths emphasizes the fact that druntime needs more love.
That conclusion is given along with these
On Sunday, 31 January 2021 at 00:45:18 UTC, Ahmet Sait wrote:
Hi everyone!
It's that time of the year again. Google announced that
mentoring organizations can now apply for summer of code in
their blog:
On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 11:33:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm very, very happy that I can finally announce the news. Some
of you may recall the job announcements I put out on the blog
back in September [1]. Symmetry Investments offered to fund one
full-time, or two part-time, Pull
On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 at 07:38:01 UTC, JN wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 at 00:35:07 UTC, user1234 wrote:
[...]
One thing I always feel this forum is missing is a section for
work in progress projects, even if they never end up anywhere.
Right now people are shy about their
On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 at 10:40:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/27/2020 3:07 AM, Johannes Loher wrote:
This is a very specific situation. There are a lot of teams /
developers
that do not work in this manner. I don't know the numbers so I
will make
no statement about what is more common
On Thursday, 27 February 2020 at 22:29:41 UTC, aberba wrote:
There's this ongoing open source game framework by Ikey. I knew
him to be a diehard C guru (from the Solus Project) but is now
rocking D, hence Serpent.
Check is out and support if you can, please.
I don't know how he does it but
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 17:43:41 UTC, Panke wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 02:52:04 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 February 2020 at 05:59:47 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hello everyone!
In a couple of days we should find out if The Dlang
Foundation was accepted as a mentoring
On Tuesday, 18 February 2020 at 05:59:47 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hello everyone!
In a couple of days we should find out if The Dlang Foundation
was accepted as a mentoring organization for Google Summer of
Code 2020. If we get accepted, I think that we should have a
list of priority projects
Hello everyone!
In a couple of days we should find out if The Dlang Foundation
was accepted as a mentoring organization for Google Summer of
Code 2020. If we get accepted, I think that we should have a list
of priority projects that we should propose to students. I have
started tagging what
On Thursday, 3 October 2019 at 17:30:20 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
On Thursday, 3 October 2019 at 11:21:41 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
[...]
Good to know. May be you could publish the code on
GitHub/GitLab and that could attract interest among people who
care about performance to take a look.
On Thursday, 3 October 2019 at 07:13:05 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
On Friday, 27 September 2019 at 09:26:22 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hello all,
Alexandru Militaru's work "D for a @safer Linux Kernel" [1]
has just been accepted for a poster presentation at APLAS [2].
We hope that this will be
On Friday, 27 September 2019 at 10:39:42 UTC, M.M. wrote:
On Friday, 27 September 2019 at 09:26:22 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hello all,
Alexandru Militaru's work "D for a @safer Linux Kernel" [1]
has just been accepted for a poster presentation at APLAS [2].
We hope that this will be good
Hello all,
Alexandru Militaru's work "D for a @safer Linux Kernel" [1] has
just been accepted for a poster presentation at APLAS [2]. We
hope that this will be good publicity for D,
Cheers,
RazvanN
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weRSwbZtKu0
[2]
On Saturday, 17 August 2019 at 12:04:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks to BOS Platform Korea, the new Bug Bounty system is
live. Anyone willing to seed new bounties or increase the
existing ones is free to do so. We hope to see the number of
bounties grow and a few folks make some money from
Hello,
Edi and myself are glad to announce that the first edition of the
D Summer School that we organized for the students at the
University Politehnica of Bucharest has just ended.
We had 8 practical sessions and a hackathon, during which
students had to work on their project a
On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 12:13:18 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 May 2019 at 10:13:35 UTC, Ethan wrote:
Good news everyone! A Youtube stream will be arriving after
the lunch break.
Cheers for your patience.
Now I get to bring the bad news. There's an issue right now
with
On Sunday, 24 February 2019 at 10:46:37 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Walter and Andrei have requested the Final Review round be
dropped for DIP 1018, "The Copy Constructor", and have given it
their formal approval. They consider copy constructors a
critical feature for the language.
Walter
On Thursday, 13 December 2018 at 10:14:45 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Thursday, 13 December 2018 at 09:40:45 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 10:45:39 UTC, Atila Neves
wrote:
A few things that have annoyed me about writing D lately:
On Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 10:45:39 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
A few things that have annoyed me about writing D lately:
https://atilanevesoncode.wordpress.com/2018/12/11/what-d-got-wrong/
That was a really good blog post, however I am strongly against
the following sentence:
"I think
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 11:12:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 08:45:13 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
/the_dbugfix_campaign_round_1_report/
[...]
It faded out. It went well in the first round, then I got only
a handful in the second round (all from two people), then it
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 15:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I planned an extended vacation with my wife around DConf this
year and, despite my intentions before we left, fell quite far
behind on my D duties. I'm in the process of getting caught up
with everything, and that includes publishing
On Monday, 8 October 2018 at 10:26:17 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 8 October 2018 at 10:14:51 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 09:26:34 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hi all,
I just pushed another version of the DIP in which the major
modifications among otthers are removing
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 09:26:34 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
Hi all,
I just pushed another version of the DIP in which the major
modifications among otthers are removing implicit and use copy
constructor calls in all situations where a copy is made. For
more details, please visit [1] and if
Hi all,
I just pushed another version of the DIP in which the major
modifications among otthers are removing implicit and use copy
constructor calls in all situations where a copy is made. For
more details, please visit [1] and if you have the time, please
offer some feedback,
Thank you,
Hello everyone,
I have finished writing the last details of the copy constructor
DIP[1] and also I have published the first implementation [2]. As
I wrongfully made a PR for the DIP queue in the early stages of
the development of the DIP, I want to announce this way that the
DIP is ready for
Hi all,
I've been documenting how the postblit works [1] and discovered
that it has some major issues when used with qualifiers. I will
try to come up with an alternative design, but until then, anyone
interested please take look and modify/add anything you find
suitable.
Cheers,
RazvanN
On Tuesday, 18 October 2016 at 18:21:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please join me in welcoming Razvan Nitu to our fledgling team
of Romanian graduate students.
Razvan has already some solid industrial experience and has a
broad area of interests such as low-level
41 matches
Mail list logo
