On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 11:18 +0100, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
[ . . . ]
> In Mercurial (and AFAIK Git), branches and repositories are
> completely different concepts. A repository is a folder on your hard
> drive. A branch is a history line inside a repository so it's not
Definitely, this is
Russel Winder wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:43 -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>> Russel Winder, el 28 de enero a las 11:30 me escribiste:
> [ . . . ]
>>> Bazaar does indeed have revision numbers per branch. Note that branch
>>> and repository is a different concept in Bazaar, unlike Git and
>
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:43 -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Russel Winder, el 28 de enero a las 11:30 me escribiste:
[ . . . ]
> > Bazaar does indeed have revision numbers per branch. Note that branch
> > and repository is a different concept in Bazaar, unlike Git and
> > Mercurial where they ar
Russel Winder, el 28 de enero a las 11:30 me escribiste:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> [ . . . ]
> > > Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice
> > > that
> > > Hg seems to have i
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Robert Clipsham" wrote in message
> news:ihnk80$fsf$1...@digitalmars.com...
> > On 25/01/11 22:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort. I
> >> never
> >> said anything like that. I keep saying over and over and
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:48:28 +0200, Don wrote:
Yes, in theory that's true. In practice, I don't believe it.
Just because you're using a DVCS doesn't mean you have no project
organisation whatsoever. There's always going to be a repository that
the release is made from.
Git was written spe
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:48:28 +0200, Don wrote:
No. Just one repository number, and one revision number. You just need
to be sensible in how the clone numbers are assigned. That's easy.
Basically every repository has a number of clone numbers it can assign.
Every clone gets a subset of that ra
Am 28.01.2011 12:30, schrieb Russel Winder:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[ . . . ]
Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice that
Hg seems to have it, but Git doesn't appear to be par
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice that
> > Hg seems to have it, but Git doesn't appear to be particularly interested in
> > it.
>
> I
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Bill Baxter" wrote in message
> news:mailman.977.1296083661.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>> Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
>>
>> Is that the kind of thing you're wanting?
>>
>
> Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Bill Baxter" wrote in message
> news:mailman.977.1296083661.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>>
>>Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
>>
>>Is that the kind of thing you're wanting?
>>
>
> Yea, and that's pretty much th
"Bill Baxter" wrote in message
news:mailman.977.1296083661.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>
>Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
>
>Is that the kind of thing you're wanting?
>
Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice that
Hg seems to have it,
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:22:34 +0200, Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I don't think
ever happens in practice!
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Kagamin" wrote in message
> news:ihp46m$b3$1...@digitalmars.com...
> > Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> >
> >> official public repo: r184
> >> official public repo: r185
> >> ...etc.
> >>
> >> Versus:
> >>
> >> 9f4e5ac4f0a3
> >> 13cf8da225ce
> >> ...etc.
> >>
> >> I don't know
Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
"""
changeset: This field has the format of a number, followed by a colon,
followed by a hexadecimal (or hex) string. These are identifiers for
the changeset. The hex string is a unique identifier: the same hex
string will always refer to the same change
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.974.1296080574.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 13:54:04 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
>> news:op.vpxphnlmtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
>>
>> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 2
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 13:54:04 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
> news:op.vpxphnlmtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
>
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:46:44 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> Are you deliberately missing that point?
> >
> > I think everyone's jus
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpxqmbpftuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:22:34 +0200, Don wrote:
>
>> Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don wrote:
>>>
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *complete
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpxqfimjtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> "Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
>> news:op.vpxo9jz4tuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
>>> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0200, Nick Sabalau
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpxphnlmtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:46:44 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Are you deliberately missing that point?
>
> I think everyone's just annoyed how you're fiercely defending an idea that
> has a single advanta
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:22:34 +0200, Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I don't think
ever happens in practice!
What about the Linux ker
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpxo9jz4tuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
2. 35912 and 35780 are obviously related to each other in a certain
way.
I
can tel
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpxo9jz4tuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> 2. 35912 and 35780 are obviously related to each other in a certain way.
>> I
>> can tell just buy glancing that 35912 is a little over 100 c
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I don't think
ever happens in practice!
What about the Linux kernel? There's Linus's git repo, and lots of repos
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:46:44 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Are you deliberately missing that point?
I think everyone's just annoyed how you're fiercely defending an idea that
has a single advantage (terseness - I consider hashes unique in practice),
but a whole slew of disadvantages, and
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
2. 35912 and 35780 are obviously related to each other in a certain
way. I
can tell just buy glancing that 35912 is a little over 100 commits after
35780. And I can immediately tell that they're both *far* newer than,
say, 243. And
"Kagamin" wrote in message
news:ihp46m$b3$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> official public repo: r184
>> official public repo: r185
>> ...etc.
>>
>> Versus:
>>
>> 9f4e5ac4f0a3
>> 13cf8da225ce
>> ...etc.
>>
>> I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far mo
"Kagamin" wrote in message
news:ihpjji$115f$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> official public repo: r184
>> official public repo: r185
>> ...etc.
>>
>> Versus:
>>
>> 9f4e5ac4f0a3
>> 13cf8da225ce
>> ...etc.
>>
>> I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> official public repo: r184
> official public repo: r185
> ...etc.
>
> Versus:
>
> 9f4e5ac4f0a3
> 13cf8da225ce
> ...etc.
>
> I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far more
> readable, far more descriptive, and actually possible to reason about. Su
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 21:24 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Ulrick mentioned that history rewriting is "encouraged under some particular
> circumstances". What circumstances would those be?
Rebasing/rewriting of private, never published repositories is
absolutely fine, and is encouraged
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:10:08 +0200, David Wang wrote:
And I use git to download the source from github.com for "druntime".
But I found that in it subdirectory "import", there is only contain
"std" and
"object.di", missed the "core" subdirectory for druntime.
Why?
Or, the "core" subdirectory
== Repost the article of Kagamin (s...@here.lot)
== Posted at 2011/01/26 07:31 to digitalmars.D.announce
>Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>> official public repo: r184
>> official public repo: r185
>> ...etc.
>>
>> Versus:
>>
>> 9f4e5ac4f0a3
>> 13cf8da225ce
>> ...etc.
>>
>> I don't know about other people
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I don't think ever
happens in practice!
What about the Linux kernel? There's Linus's git repo, and lots of repos
maintained by others (e.g
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> official public repo: r184
> official public repo: r185
> ...etc.
>
> Versus:
>
> 9f4e5ac4f0a3
> 13cf8da225ce
> ...etc.
>
> I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far more
> readable, far more descriptive, and actually possible to reason about. Su
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 20:33:35 Don wrote:
> Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
> >> everything works just as well as with SVN, the only difference being
> >> that y
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
everything works just as well as with SVN, the only difference being that
you need to remember to specify which repository you're talking a
As far as I can tell hg stores both a commit number and a hash, e.g.:
> D:\dev\projects\project>hg log -r :
changeset: 0:08d729df85c9
user:Andrej Mitrovic
date:Fri Dec 22 00:07:02 2010 +0200
summary: bla bla
changeset: 1:61cfebefee15
user:Andrej Mitrovic
date:
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpwco52etuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:40:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Well, normally there's at least *some* repository that's remotely
>> accessible, otherwise nobody would (or even could) be doing any cloning
>
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpwb01qttuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:24:56 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's just my inexperience with DVCSes, but everything in there
>> seems
>> like the sort of thing I would consider much better off accom
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:40:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Well, normally there's at least *some* repository that's remotely
accessible, otherwise nobody would (or even could) be doing any cloning
or
pulling or pushing (and you'd be left with a single-user private SVN with
better merging).
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:24:56 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Maybe it's just my inexperience with DVCSes, but everything in there
seems
like the sort of thing I would consider much better off accomplished by
just
simply creating a new branch that re-applies changesets from an existing
branch
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 18:24:56 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
> news:mailman.950.1296005459.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>
> > On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 16:50:03 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> "Ulrik Mikaelsson" wrote in message
> >> news:mailma
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpv8w0pctuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:28:22 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort.
>
> I was under the impression you thought commit numbers somehow magically
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:28:22 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
That's the same exact concept, isn't it? My understanding is that a
clone of
a DVCS repository *is* a distinct DVCS repository. So, yea, like I said,
you
have to specify "which repository". The "common dev" repository. The
"main
st
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.950.1296005459.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 16:50:03 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Ulrik Mikaelsson" wrote in message
>> news:mailman.949.1295999711.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>>
>> > A
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 16:50:03 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Ulrik Mikaelsson" wrote in message
> news:mailman.949.1295999711.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>
> > Again, version-number + repo is not 100% when history-rewrite is
> > possible.
>
> "History-rewrite" is new to me. D
Robert Clipsham wrote:
You have much to learn young Padawan! May the source be with you.
^^
Fixed that for you.
"Ulrik Mikaelsson" wrote in message
news:mailman.949.1295999711.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> Again, version-number + repo is not 100% when history-rewrite is possible.
"History-rewrite" is new to me. Does that just mean branching off from a
past revision? If not, do you have a
"Robert Clipsham" wrote in message
news:ihnk80$fsf$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 25/01/11 22:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort. I
>> never
>> said anything like that. I keep saying over and over and over and over
>> and
>> over and o
> That's the same exact concept, isn't it? My understanding is that a clone of
> a DVCS repository *is* a distinct DVCS repository. So, yea, like I said, you
> have to specify "which repository". The "common dev" repository. The "main
> stable repository". The "only shared repository this small pro
"Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
news:ihnkgk$g8d$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>
> ...
>>
>>> You can't expect other people to piece together how the
>>> revision number has come to be, that is extremely brittle.
>>>
>>
>> They don't need to piece it together because you
On 25/01/11 22:48, Walter Bright wrote:
Robert Clipsham wrote:
As an aside, I applaud the move to git, much needed! I may be
advocating hg here, but I'm no purist, I'm perfectly happy to jump
camp depending on what the developers are using... And git is a huge
improvement on SVN :D
The tipping
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
...
>
>> You can't expect other people to piece together how the
>> revision number has come to be, that is extremely brittle.
>>
>
> They don't need to piece it together because you can just say...
>
> ...which repository you're talking about.
> ...which repository you'
On 25/01/11 22:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort. I never
said anything like that. I keep saying over and over and over and over and
over and over and over."changeset number **PLUS WHICH REPOSITORY (and
maybe branch, depending how th
On 1/25/11 11:28 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
For all the nay-sayers to numbers in revisions - unless you're working
on huge projects with lots of developers,[…]
Erm, no offense intended, but »lots« seems to be pretty much everything
above a single one for me – as soon as you'll use Mercurial li
Robert Clipsham wrote:
As an aside, I applaud the move to git, much needed! I may be advocating
hg here, but I'm no purist, I'm perfectly happy to jump camp depending
on what the developers are using... And git is a huge improvement on SVN :D
The tipping point for me was noticing that while ma
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Not just what repository, but what clone of the repository! It's
explained in http://hginit.com/05.html. The number only makes sense for
the clone of the repository you're working on right now - basically you
can't tell that number to anyone, because it might mean some
"Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
news:ihnh65$ak4$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> "Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
>> news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>>
"David Nadlinger" wrote in message
news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digital
On 25/01/11 21:08, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ahh, that's not remotely what I was hoping it was. Everything is all
relative to the current version which means that *every* time you commit,
*every* changeset gets completely renamed (HEAD@{5} becomes HEAD@{6}, etc),
and there doesn't appear to be any s
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:op.vpvv5sn8tuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
>> everything works just as well as with SVN, the only difference being t
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
> news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> "David Nadlinger" wrote in message
>>> news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>> Does Git really not
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
everything works just as well as with SVN, the only difference being that
you need to remember to specify which repository you're talking about
whenever you give a nu
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:ihne76$4cp$1...@digitalmars.com...
> "Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
> news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>>> "David Nadlinger" wrote in message
>>> news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 1/24/11 10:20 P
"Lutger Blijdestijn" wrote in message
news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> "David Nadlinger" wrote in message
>> news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
>>> On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Does Git really not have real revision/changeset numb
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "David Nadlinger" wrote in message
> news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
>> On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Does Git really not have real revision/changeset numbers?
[.]
>>>
>>> Not that I've actually used DVCSes much yet, but my under
"David Nadlinger" wrote in message
news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Does Git really not have real revision/changeset numbers?
>>>
>>>[.]
>>>
>>
>> Not that I've actually used DVCSes much yet, but my understanding is that
>> the same can b
I don't know. I haven't used Hg. However, I have a hard time seeing how
you could have revision numbers like subversion does
Mercurial uses hashes.
For convenience it *additionally* provides consecutive numbers which are
to be used in your own *local repo only*.
On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Does Git really not have real revision/changeset numbers?
[…]
Not that I've actually used DVCSes much yet, but my understanding is that
the same can be set of Hg and yet Hg handles revision/changeset numbers just
fine. The nice things (plural) abou
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> Not that I've actually used DVCSes much yet, but my understanding is that
> the same can be set of Hg and yet Hg handles revision/changeset numbers just
> fine. The nice things (plural) about those is that they're both readable and
> comparable.
Here, how about a quote
On Monday, January 24, 2011 13:20:44 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
> news:mailman.911.1295903507.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>
> > On Monday 24 January 2011 13:04:27 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> "Johannes Pfau" wrote in message
> >> news:20110124163
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote in message
news:mailman.911.1295903507.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> On Monday 24 January 2011 13:04:27 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Johannes Pfau" wrote in message
>> news:20110124163418.3880a154@jpf-Satellite-A100...
>>
>> > OK, here are some revisions:
On Monday 24 January 2011 13:04:27 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Johannes Pfau" wrote in message
> news:20110124163418.3880a154@jpf-Satellite-A100...
>
> > OK, here are some revisions:
> > DMD:
> > 2.051 seems to be revision 1374ba96fa5516d9595fa61b09015197a8b84385
> >
> > Note: The changelog on t
"Johannes Pfau" wrote in message
news:20110124163418.3880a154@jpf-Satellite-A100...
>
> OK, here are some revisions:
> DMD:
> 2.051 seems to be revision 1374ba96fa5516d9595fa61b09015197a8b84385
> Note: The changelog on the website says release date Nov 7 but it's
> more like 20th December.
>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:34:18 -0500, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:21 -0500, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github
== Quote from Johannes Pfau (s...@example.com)'s article
> --Sig_/hgUpRkpzV0eGcapavO0e/z1
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
...
> >All source is included in the compiler. It's simply a matter of doing
> >a dire
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:21 -0500, Johannes Pfau
>wrote:
>
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>> David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for e
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:21 -0500, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads:
Walter Bright wrote:
>David Wang wrote:
>> Dear Walter,
>>
>> I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
>> the latest version on github is the old version.
>>
>> for example:
>>
>> druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
>> Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
>> DMD - Downloa
On 2011-01-24 07:52:24 -0500, Jacob Carlborg said:
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available system for the diverse group of people who work on
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available system for the diverse group of people who work on
it.
BTW, what about the backend in the DMD repositor
On 2011-01-24 10:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2011 01:29:33 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available s
On Monday 24 January 2011 01:29:33 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
> > https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
> >
> > We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
> > be the best available system for the diverse group of
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available system for the diverse group of people who work on
it.
Are we supposed to be able to access this reposi
On Sunday 23 January 2011 21:00:21 David Wang wrote:
> Dear Walter,
>
> I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
> the latest version on github is the old version.
>
> for example:
>
> druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
> Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
> DMD - Down
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads: dmd-2.046
I think the actural latest version
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads: dmd-2.046
I think the actural latest version of D should be 2.051
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to be the
best available system for the diverse group of people who work on it.
87 matches
Mail list logo
