Russel Winder wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:43 -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Russel Winder, el 28 de enero a las 11:30 me escribiste:
[ . . . ]
Bazaar does indeed have revision numbers per branch. Note that branch
and repository is a different concept in Bazaar, unlike Git and
Mercurial
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 11:18 +0100, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
[ . . . ]
In Mercurial (and AFAIK Git), branches and repositories are
completely different concepts. A repository is a folder on your hard
drive. A branch is a history line inside a repository so it's not
Definitely, this is not
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
[ . . . ]
Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice that
Hg seems to have it, but Git doesn't appear to be particularly interested in
it.
I
Am 28.01.2011 12:30, schrieb Russel Winder:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalauskya@a.a wrote:
[ . . . ]
Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice that
Hg seems to have it, but Git doesn't appear to
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:48:28 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
No. Just one repository number, and one revision number. You just need
to be sensible in how the clone numbers are assigned. That's easy.
Basically every repository has a number of clone numbers it can assign.
Every clone gets a
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com wrote in message
news:ihnk80$fsf$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 25/01/11 22:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort. I
never
said anything like that. I keep saying over
Russel Winder, el 28 de enero a las 11:30 me escribiste:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
[ . . . ]
Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice
that
Hg seems to have it, but
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:22:34 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.977.1296083661.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
Is that the kind of thing you're wanting?
Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice that
Hg seems
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.977.1296083661.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
Is that the kind of thing you're wanting?
Yea, and that's pretty
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.977.1296083661.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
Is that the kind of thing you're wanting?
Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
official public repo: r184
official public repo: r185
...etc.
Versus:
9f4e5ac4f0a3
13cf8da225ce
...etc.
I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far more
readable, far more descriptive, and actually possible to reason about. Sure,
the
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I don't think ever
happens in practice!
What about the Linux kernel? There's Linus's git repo, and lots of repos
== Repost the article of Kagamin (s...@here.lot)
== Posted at 2011/01/26 07:31 to digitalmars.D.announce
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
official public repo: r184
official public repo: r185
...etc.
Versus:
9f4e5ac4f0a3
13cf8da225ce
...etc.
I don't know about other people, but I find the
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:10:08 +0200, David Wang osx.da...@live.com wrote:
And I use git to download the source from github.com for druntime.
But I found that in it subdirectory import, there is only contain
std and
object.di, missed the core subdirectory for druntime.
Why?
Or, the core
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
official public repo: r184
official public repo: r185
...etc.
Versus:
9f4e5ac4f0a3
13cf8da225ce
...etc.
I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far more
readable, far more descriptive, and actually possible to reason about. Sure,
the
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote in message
news:ihpjji$115f$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
official public repo: r184
official public repo: r185
...etc.
Versus:
9f4e5ac4f0a3
13cf8da225ce
...etc.
I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far more
Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote in message
news:ihp46m$b3$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
official public repo: r184
official public repo: r185
...etc.
Versus:
9f4e5ac4f0a3
13cf8da225ce
...etc.
I don't know about other people, but I find the former to be far more
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
2. 35912 and 35780 are obviously related to each other in a certain
way. I
can tell just buy glancing that 35912 is a little over 100 commits after
35780. And I can immediately tell that they're both *far* newer than,
say,
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:46:44 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Are you deliberately missing that point?
I think everyone's just annoyed how you're fiercely defending an idea that
has a single advantage (terseness - I consider hashes unique in practice),
but a whole slew of
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I don't think
ever happens in practice!
What about the Linux kernel? There's Linus's git repo,
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpxo9jz4tuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:43:11 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
2. 35912 and 35780 are obviously related to each
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:22:34 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
I think this is a fallacy. It only applies if you
(1) *completely disallow* any centralisation -- which I don't think
ever happens in
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpxphnlmtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:46:44 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Are you deliberately missing that point?
I think everyone's just annoyed how you're fiercely defending an idea
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpxqfimjtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpxo9jz4tuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpxqmbpftuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:22:34 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:33:35 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
I think this is a
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 13:54:04 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpxphnlmtuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:46:44 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Are you deliberately missing that point?
I
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.974.1296080574.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 13:54:04 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
Mercurial gives every revision two numbers:
changeset: This field has the format of a number, followed by a colon,
followed by a hexadecimal (or hex) string. These are identifiers for
the changeset. The hex string is a unique identifier: the same hex
string will always refer to the same
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Does Git really not have real revision/changeset numbers?
[.]
Not that I've actually used DVCSes much yet, but my understanding
Lutger Blijdestijn lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Does Git really not have
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:ihne76$4cp$1...@digitalmars.com...
Lutger Blijdestijn lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
everything works just as well as with SVN, the only difference being that
you need to remember to specify which repository you're talking about
whenever you
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Lutger Blijdestijn lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:ihkub8$1ia4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpvv5sn8tuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
everything works just as well as with SVN,
On 25/01/11 21:08, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ahh, that's not remotely what I was hoping it was. Everything is all
relative to the current version which means that *every* time you commit,
*every* changeset gets completely renamed (HEAD@{5} becomes HEAD@{6}, etc),
and there doesn't appear to be any
Lutger Blijdestijn lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ihnh65$ak4$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Lutger Blijdestijn lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ihn21d$2esd$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
David Nadlinger
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Not just what repository, but what clone of the repository! It's
explained in http://hginit.com/05.html. The number only makes sense for
the clone of the repository you're working on right now - basically you
can't tell that number to anyone, because it might mean
Robert Clipsham wrote:
As an aside, I applaud the move to git, much needed! I may be advocating
hg here, but I'm no purist, I'm perfectly happy to jump camp depending
on what the developers are using... And git is a huge improvement on SVN :D
The tipping point for me was noticing that while
On 1/25/11 11:28 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
For all the nay-sayers to numbers in revisions - unless you're working
on huge projects with lots of developers,[…]
Erm, no offense intended, but »lots« seems to be pretty much everything
above a single one for me – as soon as you'll use Mercurial
On 25/01/11 22:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort. I never
said anything like that. I keep saying over and over and over and over and
over and over and over.changeset number **PLUS WHICH REPOSITORY (and
maybe branch, depending how
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
...
You can't expect other people to piece together how the
revision number has come to be, that is extremely brittle.
They don't need to piece it together because you can just say...
...which repository you're talking about.
...which repository you're talking
On 25/01/11 22:48, Walter Bright wrote:
Robert Clipsham wrote:
As an aside, I applaud the move to git, much needed! I may be
advocating hg here, but I'm no purist, I'm perfectly happy to jump
camp depending on what the developers are using... And git is a huge
improvement on SVN :D
The
Lutger Blijdestijn lutger.blijdest...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ihnkgk$g8d$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
...
You can't expect other people to piece together how the
revision number has come to be, that is extremely brittle.
They don't need to piece it together
That's the same exact concept, isn't it? My understanding is that a clone of
a DVCS repository *is* a distinct DVCS repository. So, yea, like I said, you
have to specify which repository. The common dev repository. The main
stable repository. The only shared repository this small project
Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com wrote in message
news:ihnk80$fsf$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 25/01/11 22:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort. I
never
said anything like that. I keep saying over and over and over and over
Ulrik Mikaelsson ulrik.mikaels...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.949.1295999711.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Again, version-number + repo is not 100% when history-rewrite is possible.
History-rewrite is new to me. Does that just mean branching off from a
past revision?
Robert Clipsham wrote:
You have much to learn young Padawan! May the source be with you.
^^
Fixed that for you.
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 16:50:03 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ulrik Mikaelsson ulrik.mikaels...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.949.1295999711.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Again, version-number + repo is not 100% when history-rewrite is
possible.
History-rewrite
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:28:22 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
That's the same exact concept, isn't it? My understanding is that a
clone of
a DVCS repository *is* a distinct DVCS repository. So, yea, like I said,
you
have to specify which repository. The common dev repository. The
main
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.950.1296005459.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 16:50:03 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ulrik Mikaelsson ulrik.mikaels...@gmail.com wrote in message
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpv8w0pctuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:28:22 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
I don't understand why you think I'm claiming anything of the sort.
I was under the impression you thought commit
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 18:24:56 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.950.1296005459.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 16:50:03 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ulrik Mikaelsson ulrik.mikaels...@gmail.com
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:24:56 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Maybe it's just my inexperience with DVCSes, but everything in there
seems
like the sort of thing I would consider much better off accomplished by
just
simply creating a new branch that re-applies changesets from an existing
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:40:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Well, normally there's at least *some* repository that's remotely
accessible, otherwise nobody would (or even could) be doing any cloning
or
pulling or pushing (and you'd be left with a single-user private SVN with
better
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpwb01qttuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:24:56 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Maybe it's just my inexperience with DVCSes, but everything in there
seems
like the sort of thing I would
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vpwco52etuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:40:03 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Well, normally there's at least *some* repository that's remotely
accessible, otherwise nobody would (or even
As far as I can tell hg stores both a commit number and a hash, e.g.:
D:\dev\projects\projecthg log -r :
changeset: 0:08d729df85c9
user:Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
date:Fri Dec 22 00:07:02 2010 +0200
summary: bla bla
changeset: 1:61cfebefee15
user:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
everything works just as well as with SVN, the only difference being that
you need to remember to specify which repository you're
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 20:33:35 Don wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:08:13 +0200, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Browsing through http://hginit.com/index.html, it looks like with Hg,
everything works just as well as with SVN, the only difference being
that you
On Monday 24 January 2011 01:29:33 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available system for the diverse group of people
On 2011-01-24 10:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 24 January 2011 01:29:33 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available system for the diverse group of people who work on
it.
BTW, what about the backend in the DMD
On 2011-01-24 07:52:24 -0500, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
On 2011-01-24 05:26, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to
be the best available system for the diverse group of people
Walter Bright wrote:
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads: dmd-2.046
I
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:21 -0500, Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:21 -0500, Johannes Pfau s...@example.com
wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:34:18 -0500, Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:00:21 -0500, Johannes Pfau s...@example.com
wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found
Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote in message
news:20110124163418.3880a154@jpf-Satellite-A100...
OK, here are some revisions:
DMD:
2.051 seems to be revision 1374ba96fa5516d9595fa61b09015197a8b84385
Note: The changelog on the website says release date Nov 7 but it's
more like 20th
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.911.1295903507.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Monday 24 January 2011 13:04:27 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote in message
news:20110124163418.3880a154@jpf-Satellite-A100...
OK,
On Monday, January 24, 2011 13:20:44 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.911.1295903507.4748.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Monday 24 January 2011 13:04:27 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Johannes Pfau s...@example.com wrote in
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
Not that I've actually used DVCSes much yet, but my understanding is that
the same can be set of Hg and yet Hg handles revision/changeset numbers just
fine. The nice things (plural) about those is that they're both readable and
comparable.
Here, how about a quote:
On 1/24/11 10:20 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Does Git really not have real revision/changeset numbers?
[…]
Not that I've actually used DVCSes much yet, but my understanding is that
the same can be set of Hg and yet Hg handles revision/changeset numbers just
fine. The nice things (plural)
I don't know. I haven't used Hg. However, I have a hard time seeing how
you could have revision numbers like subversion does
Mercurial uses hashes.
For convenience it *additionally* provides consecutive numbers which are
to be used in your own *local repo only*.
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language
We're all learning how to use github, but by most accounts it seems to be the
best available system for the diverse group of people who work on it.
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads: dmd-2.046
I think the actural latest version of D should be
David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads: dmd-2.046
I think the actural latest version
On Sunday 23 January 2011 21:00:21 David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter,
I went to the github and try to download the source, I found that
the latest version on github is the old version.
for example:
druntime - Downloads: dmd-2.042
Phobos - Downloads: phobos-2.046
DMD - Downloads:
78 matches
Mail list logo
