Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-19 Thread Dejan Lekic
I understand that, I'm just asking the people that deal with this to contact me and propose a resolution. I have a feeling it should be vice-versa. They do not care whether DMD is in their repository or not. It is us, the community, who needs this. :) So, we should be us who are in contact

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-19 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/19/2014 1:59 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote: I understand that, I'm just asking the people that deal with this to contact me and propose a resolution. I have a feeling it should be vice-versa. They do not care whether DMD is in their repository or not. It is us, the community, who needs this. :)

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-19 Thread Dicebot
On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 at 19:23:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: I don't even know who to talk to. Well first you should think of solution to propose. You are not hoping to convince them to ignore the license, aren't you? :)

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-18 Thread Sönke Ludwig
Am 18.02.2014 00:17, schrieb Andrew Edwards: @Sönke Ludwig, please verify that this is fixed and update issue accordingly: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12137 Confirming the fix. Status has already been updated by Martin Nowak.

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-18 Thread Dejan Lekic
To avoid confusion: It is not Fedora people who are not willing to help. Problem is with mirrors. Imagine personX or companyX decides to become mirror of distribution which has DMD in their official repository. Before they sync Fedora packages, they have to ask permissions of all DMD (and

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-18 Thread Jonathan Crapuchettes
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:17:43 -0500, Andrew Edwards wrote: First I would like to say thanks to Martin Nowak, Kenji Hara, Jordi Sayol and Brad Anderson for their support. Their efforts directly impact my ability to prepare the releases and they work tirelessly to ensure that it happens. RC1

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-18 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/18/2014 10:47 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote: To avoid confusion: It is not Fedora people who are not willing to help. Problem is with mirrors. Imagine personX or companyX decides to become mirror of distribution which has DMD in their official repository. Before they sync Fedora packages, they

dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-17 Thread Andrew Edwards
First I would like to say thanks to Martin Nowak, Kenji Hara, Jordi Sayol and Brad Anderson for their support. Their efforts directly impact my ability to prepare the releases and they work tirelessly to ensure that it happens. RC1 is available for review: All Systems:

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-17 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/17/2014 3:17 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote: First I would like to say thanks to Martin Nowak, Kenji Hara, Jordi Sayol and Brad Anderson for their support. Their efforts directly impact my ability to prepare the releases and they work tirelessly to ensure that it happens. Awesome! Thanks and

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-17 Thread Dejan Lekic
Andrew Edwards wrote: First I would like to say thanks to Martin Nowak, Kenji Hara, Jordi Sayol and Brad Anderson for their support. Their efforts directly impact my ability to prepare the releases and they work tirelessly to ensure that it happens. RC1 is available for review: All

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-17 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/17/2014 5:26 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote: Speaking about Fedora, DMD will never get into their official repository. I've spoken to them. Even the RPMFusion guys were sceptical. Reason is simple, every new mirror would need to request permission from Walter to distribute DMD backend. Ask them to

Re: dmd 2.065 rc 1

2014-02-17 Thread Joakim
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 at 01:26:52 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote: Andrew Edwards wrote: First I would like to say thanks to Martin Nowak, Kenji Hara, Jordi Sayol and Brad Anderson for their support. Their efforts directly impact my ability to prepare the releases and they work tirelessly to