On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 16:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Virtual by default will not change. Being able to negate the
final: label is nice to have but not a must. Adding a keyword
for that doesn't scale - it would mean we'd need to add one
keyword to undo each label.
Andrei
On 6/15/14, 12:30 AM, Tove wrote:
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 16:49:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Virtual by default will not change. Being able to negate the final:
label is nice to have but not a must. Adding a keyword for that
doesn't scale - it would mean we'd need to add one keyword
On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 18:25:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/14, 6:34 AM, Dicebot wrote:
It was decided and 100% certain - virtual is not going in.
Need to
remove it from DMD before this release is out.
Yes please. -- Andrei
Since we didn't seem to have a pull request for
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:00:39 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 6/13/14, 10:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/13/2014 12:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Being able to negate the final:
label is nice to have but not a
On 6/14/2014 5:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
and it becomes a question of whether the familiarity of using
virtual instead of !final or final(false) (or whatever we come up with) is
worth adding another keyword
FWIW, I don't think virtual is all that valuable as a
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 03:52:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/14, 8:49 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/12/2014 11:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/12/14, 7:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
It
1. allows escaping final, which we can't do without it or an
equivalent
2. does
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message news:lndq8q$obh$1...@digitalmars.com...
You did say that something with the same effect as 'virtual' was going
in.
No.
I am certain either you or Walter did in the last 'final by default'
discussion.
Please no new keyword for what can be done
On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 22:25:23 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 18:25:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/14, 6:34 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 02:01:24 UTC, Brian Schott
wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a
keyword
On 6/13/14, 8:49 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:lndq8q$obh$1...@digitalmars.com...
You did say that something with the same effect as 'virtual' was
going in.
No.
I am certain either you or Walter did in the last 'final by default'
discussion.
Walter
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:49:32 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Virtual by default will not change. Being able to negate the final:
label is nice to have but not a must. Adding a keyword for that doesn't
scale - it would mean we'd need to add one keyword to
On 6/13/2014 12:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Being able to negate the final:
label is nice to have but not a must. Adding a keyword for that doesn't
scale - it would mean we'd need to add one keyword to undo each label.
No it doesn't mean that. virtual is very well established
On 6/13/14, 10:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/13/2014 12:49 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Being able to negate the final:
label is nice to have but not a must. Adding a keyword for that doesn't
scale - it would mean we'd need to add one keyword to undo each label.
No it doesn't mean
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 17:12:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:49:32 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Virtual by default will not change. Being able to negate the
final: label is nice to have but not a must. Adding a
keyword for
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 20:29:46 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 17:12:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:49:32 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Virtual by default will not change. Being able to negate the
final:
Steven Schveighoffer:
To that end, I thought we were moving towards a more scalable
solution: like !final or final!false or final(false), which
could be nice for metaprogramming.
This is a small problem:
void foo(in int x) {
auto y = x;
y++; // error
}
The current solution is
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 20:52:17 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 20:29:46 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 17:12:44 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:49:32 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Virtual by default
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 02:01:24 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a
keyword in D.
See:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/584
It was decided and 100% certain - virtual is not going in. Need
to remove it from DMD
On 6/12/14, 6:34 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 02:01:24 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a keyword
in D.
See: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/584
It was decided and 100% certain - virtual is not
On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 18:25:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/14, 6:34 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 02:01:24 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a
keyword
in D.
See:
On 6/12/14, 3:25 PM, Kapps wrote:
On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 18:25:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/12/14, 6:34 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 02:01:24 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a keyword
in D.
See:
On 6/12/2014 8:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't think it's that important. And definitely there's no ignoring
going on. There are plenty of things that are plenty more important,
Wait, so now we're rejecting work that isn't at the right priority
level? Some people did seem to find
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:lncrb0$31ec$1...@digitalmars.com...
It was decided and 100% certain - virtual is not going in. Need to
remove it from DMD before this release is out.
Yes please. -- Andrei
You did say that something with the same effect as 'virtual' was going in.
On 6/12/14, 5:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/12/2014 8:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I don't think it's that important. And definitely there's no ignoring
going on. There are plenty of things that are plenty more important,
Wait, so now we're rejecting work that isn't at the right
On 6/12/14, 7:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote in message
news:lncrb0$31ec$1...@digitalmars.com...
It was decided and 100% certain - virtual is not going in. Need to
remove it from DMD before this release is out.
Yes please. -- Andrei
You did say that something with
On 6/12/2014 11:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/12/14, 7:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
It
1. allows escaping final, which we can't do without it or an equivalent
2. does exactly what everybody expects
3. is already implemented
4. looks much nicer than your proposal
Why not just leave it
On 6/12/14, 8:49 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/12/2014 11:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/12/14, 7:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
It
1. allows escaping final, which we can't do without it or an equivalent
2. does exactly what everybody expects
3. is already implemented
4. looks much
On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 at 04:17:04 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 6/10/14, 10:01 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a
keyword in D.
See:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/584
The branch will not be created until 30
On 6/11/14, 2:23 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I'll be there to test and bug report ! Thank for being the release
lieutenant.
In my world a lieutenant is absolutely useless. Given the tutelage and
guidance of solid staff non-commissioned officer, some day they will
become productive members of the
On 11 June 2014 14:19, Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 6/11/14, 2:23 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I'll be there to test and bug report ! Thank for being the release
lieutenant.
In my world a lieutenant is absolutely useless. Given the
On 6/11/14, 11:24 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 11 June 2014 14:19, Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 6/11/14, 2:23 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I'll be there to test and bug report ! Thank for being the release
lieutenant.
On 6/11/2014 9:19 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 6/11/14, 2:23 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I'll be there to test and bug report ! Thank for being the release
lieutenant.
In my world a lieutenant is absolutely useless. Given the tutelage and
guidance of solid staff non-commissioned officer, some day
On 11 June 2014 17:56, Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 6/11/14, 11:24 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 11 June 2014 14:19, Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a
keyword in D.
See: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/584
On 6/10/14, 10:01 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a keyword in D.
See: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/584
The branch will not be created until 30 June. I trust that this will be
sorted out by then.
34 matches
Mail list logo
