On 2016-12-13 09:20, Adam Wilson wrote:
ld: in
../../.dub/packages/botan-1.12.8/botan/.dub/build/full-unittest-posix.osx-x86_64-dmd_2072-0D593375D53C36354213ADF6E4F6A036/libbotan_base.a(unique_40d1_3b6.o),
in section __TEXT,__textcoal_nt reloc 2: symbol index out of range for
architecture
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-12-12 08:07, Adam Wilson wrote:
On OSX you need to use LDC or the linker will fail.
What linker errors do you get using DMD?
ld: in
On 2016-12-12 08:07, Adam Wilson wrote:
On OSX you need to use LDC or the linker will fail.
What linker errors do you get using DMD?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Adam Wilson wrote:
Adam Wilson wrote:
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted,
and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and
Adam Wilson wrote:
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly,
those
rikki cattermole wrote:
On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly,
those
are not primary
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/12/16 8:15 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello DLang,
I wanted to announce that I have completed the bulk of the work on my
Cryptography library for D, SecureD. I was inspired to do this project
by Stan Drapkin and his Inferno.NET project, however, the two projects
On 11/12/16 8:15 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello DLang,
I wanted to announce that I have completed the bulk of the work on my
Cryptography library for D, SecureD. I was inspired to do this project
by Stan Drapkin and his Inferno.NET project, however, the two projects
NOT compatible.
[snip]
Let
On 14/11/2016 9:31 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those
are not primary concerns when dealing with
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those
are not primary concerns when dealing with Cryptograpy libraries.
Well, Apple
On 2016-11-12 21:50, Adam Wilson wrote:
I choose OpenSSL because it's a well respected, highly trusted, and it
is available everywhere. I despise the license and the API. Sadly, those
are not primary concerns when dealing with Cryptograpy libraries.
Well, Apple abandoned it years ago because
Suliman wrote:
It would take some research, but the native Botan library makes heavy
use of C++ templates
There is native lib https://github.com/etcimon/botan
Some people with whom I talked said that botan is too low level for them
and it's hard for them to use it. So your lib maybe very good
It would take some research, but the native Botan library makes
heavy use of C++ templates
There is native lib https://github.com/etcimon/botan
Some people with whom I talked said that botan is too low level
for them and it's hard for them to use it. So your lib maybe very
good wrap on top of
Suliman wrote:
Is its possible to make its wrap on botan instead of openssl? Some of
developers have problems with openssl because it's require openssl lib.
But botan is more native but much more lowlevel. So its hard to use.
It might be possible. But it would not be without difficulties. It
Is its possible to make its wrap on botan instead of openssl?
Some of developers have problems with openssl because it's
require openssl lib. But botan is more native but much more
lowlevel. So its hard to use.
15 matches
Mail list logo
