On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 17:20:36 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
How about Javascript or JSASM? So we can write D on the
browser?
You mean asm.js.
I will hook up emscripten soon. However the biggest issue is
porting the runtime to javascript.
On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 18:47:54 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 10:39:15 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
New backend why ?
Because I want to code a backend.
I want output C or maybe even Cool ...
generating UML via a backend would also be nice.
Congrats on the project - v
My sdc32-experimental has now limited support for :
* foreach on forward-ranges
* inference of purity
* checking the returnType of main
currently it CANNOT generate 32bit code anymore ...
I want output C or maybe even Cool ...
What's benefits this would give?
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 09:29:10 UTC, Suliman wrote:
What's benefits this would give?
apart from the hack-factor a backend that generates _nice_ C-code
is a really
usefil thing to have.
For example if you want to program microcontrollers in D.
New backend why ?
On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 10:39:15 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
New backend why ?
Because I want to code a backend.
I want output C or maybe even Cool ...
generating UML via a backend would also be nice.
Updated fork again.
-m32 and -m64 switches work properly now.
sdc32 uses a the same default outputFile as dmd does.
Soon to come :
- ArrayLiterals
In planning :
- a new backend ;D
- Source-to-Source transformations
I just updated my fork.
https://github.com/UplinkCoder/sdc32-experimental
* test0037 passes now
meaning that alias works in more cases
* I implemented foreach for Arrays
though since ArrayLiterals are currently not supported this is
not too helpful.
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014 at 17:02:28 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014 at 16:54:47 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you referring to things
like pragma msg?
to things like mixin(mixin(`writeln (Hello World);`);
```
bool foo() { ... }
template bar(bool
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 23:16:45 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
jsonRunner really runs fast ... io overhead really makes a
diffrence
Correction I just checked the old runner and I found out the
following:
sdc runs 7.5 times faster if all sourceFiles are compiled
together.
(as dub does)
the
On 2014-08-04 04:19:01 +, deadalnix said:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 22:48:35 UTC, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
Also, it looks by using your fiber based scheduler that you can
naturally parallize compiling. Have you investigated that at all?
Obviously, yes. But that is quite tricky to
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014 at 11:56:28 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
On 2014-08-04 04:19:01 +, deadalnix said:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 22:48:35 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
Also, it looks by using your fiber based scheduler that you
can naturally parallize compiling. Have you
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014 at 16:54:47 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you referring to things like
pragma msg?
to things like mixin(mixin(`writeln (Hello World);`);
```
bool foo() { ... }
template bar(bool cond)
{
static if (cond)
enum bar = int a;;
On 2014-08-05 17:02:27 +, Dicebot said:
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014 at 16:54:47 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you referring to things like pragma msg?
to things like mixin(mixin(`writeln (Hello World);`);
```
bool foo() { ... }
template bar(bool cond)
{
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 22:48:35 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
On 2014-08-01 05:00:53 +, deadalnix said:
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello,
I am happy to announce that my 32bit version of sdc compiles
the whole testsuite including mixins.
the only
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:49:09 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
it must have a commit I have squashed.
I do this quite often since sometimes I commit stuff that causes
my build to fail :p
btw, please, don't do that. just revert commits,
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 11:19:01 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 22:48:35 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
On 2014-08-01 05:00:53 +, deadalnix said:
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello,
I am happy to announce that my 32bit version of
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 11:37:26 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 11:19:01 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 22:48:35 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
On 2014-08-01 05:00:53 +, deadalnix said:
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 11:31:10 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:49:09 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
it must have a commit I have squashed.
I do this quite often since sometimes I commit stuff
On Saturday, 2 August 2014 at 22:48:35 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
Also, it looks by using your fiber based scheduler that you can
naturally parallize compiling. Have you investigated that at
all?
Obviously, yes. But that is quite tricky to get a deterministic
result due to compile time
On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 11:37:26 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Any idea what the significant bottlenecks are / what dmd is
much faster at?
No idea. I'd like to know, but ultimately, supporting more of D
is more important than being fast right now.
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 03:27:58 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
I got that error recently. It is an LLVM bug and upgrading LLVM
should do the trick.
in my case it was nothing with LLVM. sdc-32 needs dmd-2.065, and i'm
using dmd-2.066-master.
On 2014-08-01 05:00:53 +, deadalnix said:
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello,
I am happy to announce that my 32bit version of sdc compiles the whole
testsuite including mixins.
the only there are only 6 tests still failing
2 of them are dependent on
On 2014-08-01 05:00:53 +, deadalnix said:
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello,
I am happy to announce that my 32bit version of sdc compiles the whole
testsuite including mixins.
the only there are only 6 tests still failing
2 of them are dependent on
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:39:15 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
can't link it. GNU/Linux, x86, latest DMD from git.
lib/libd.a(semantic.o): In function
hmm it looks like you are not linking llvm in ...
do you use the most recent version from my sdc32-experimental
repo ?
please not that the dub build is broken because i can't get the
link order right.
so you have to `make` it :D
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:07:56 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
hmm it looks like you are not linking llvm in ...
but i am. %-) or, better to say, your makefile doing it with
`llvm-config --libs`.
do you use the most recent version from my
please do `git pull` and if the error presists post the full
error-message on dpaste or similar.
Are you on a 64bit system ?
my makesfiles are hardcoded to use -m32
so I guess it will not link with 64bit libs
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:33:05 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
please do `git pull` and if the error presists post the full
error-message on dpaste or similar.
you're welcome.
upgated to git commit 58a36a1acdc6b9a5bcd07edf69b958c3b4ac1657
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:40:31 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Are you on a 64bit system ?
no, i said somewhere in the previous messages that i'm using x86 arch.
%-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 15:26:08 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
yes, just cloned it before sending report.
commit 34fdd6a73e6137173a3840218a76dfd2f6c50d68
Hmm I can't find commit 34fdd6a73e6137173a3840218a76dfd2f6c50d68
...
it must have a commit I have squashed.
I do this
I can say it has nothing todo with llvm (so far)
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:54:42 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
AFAICS this it because you are using dmd-master
if it fails with the dmd-2.065 then I have a real nut to crack
sorry, you are right. downgrading to dmd-2.065 fixes the build.
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 16:31:49 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:54:42 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
AFAICS this it because you are using dmd-master
if it fails with the dmd-2.065 then I have a
Next time you might want to use my jsonRunner
it runs 7.5x times faster than the old one :D
thogh it needs a bit more work
enableing multihtreading and such
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:58:58 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
enableing multihtreading and such
i explititely passes runner.d -j1 (other cores has work to do too %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
first run time ./runner
and then run
sh buildTester.sh ./convtest
and then time ./jsonRunner
i am intressted in your timings
runner d envokes the sdc binary
while jsonRunner is linked with sdc
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:16:50 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
sh buildTester.sh
alas, i have no LLVMArchive, and it refuses to link without it. when i
removed -L-lLLVMArchive, it says that
On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:37:33 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
damn, it's hard to switch between two dmds. ok, i compiled everything,
here's the timings:
./runner 2 /dev/null /dev/null 21.39s user 1.48s system 146% cpu 15.643
total
./jsonRunner
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 22:44:48 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:37:33 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
damn, it's hard to switch between two dmds. ok, i compiled
everything,
here's the timings:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:16:43 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Thanks for your cooperation!
you're welcome. %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 09:02:23 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:39:15 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
can't link it. GNU/Linux, x86, latest DMD from git.
lib/libd.a(semantic.o): In function
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello,
I am happy to announce that my 32bit version of sdc compiles
the whole testsuite including mixins.
the only there are only 6 tests still failing
2 of them are dependent on size_t.siezof beeing 8.
The otherer 4 have to do with
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 18:58:50 UTC, UplinkCoder wrote:
Sorry I think i messed up with my github branches.
until i get it straightend out you can get my local working
source verbatim from
http://www42.zippyshare.com/v/4371099/file.html
I modified the sdc to produce 32bit code if the -m32
make that
I have now setup a repo with my 32bit sdc source.
https://github.com/UplinkCoder/sdc32-experimental
There are NO submodules I dump my source straight in there.
cloning it and calling make should be enough.
Hello,
I am happy to announce that my 32bit version of sdc compiles the
whole testsuite including mixins.
the only there are only 6 tests still failing
2 of them are dependent on size_t.siezof beeing 8.
The otherer 4 have to do with execptoion handling.
please check out the 32-branches
on
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:36:37 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
wow.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 13:36:39 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello,
the only there are only 6 tests still failing
2 of them are dependent on size_t.siezof beeing 8.
Correction I fixed the tests for 32bit
only 4 tests are failing
all of them due to Execptions
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 14:22:43 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:36:37 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
wow.
Well thanks.
please give me feedback if you are using it.
In the next days i'm going to
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:43:56 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
ah. sure i'll try to write you about every bug i found. %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Sorry I think i messed up with my github branches.
until i get it straightend out you can get my local working
source verbatim from
http://www42.zippyshare.com/v/4371099/file.html
I modified the sdc to produce 32bit code if the -m32 argument is
passed to it. 64bit is still the default.
I also
53 matches
Mail list logo
