On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 07:17:22 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
D does not support Windows XP.
If you absolutely require it, you will have to contact Walter
about support.
Let me care about it ;)
I just need help with the TLS :)
On 10/03/2017 8:06 PM, M-exe wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 06:46:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 10/03/2017 7:41 PM, M-exe wrote:
I found that D is great language, but for my own reasons I'm trying to
use it without TLS at all.
Can the TLS directory be avoided? (compiling on windows)
I
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 06:46:03 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 10/03/2017 7:41 PM, M-exe wrote:
I found that D is great language, but for my own reasons I'm
trying to
use it without TLS at all.
Can the TLS directory be avoided? (compiling on windows)
I mean, can it avoided without losing
On 10/03/2017 7:41 PM, M-exe wrote:
I found that D is great language, but for my own reasons I'm trying to
use it without TLS at all.
Can the TLS directory be avoided? (compiling on windows)
I mean, can it avoided without losing GC and main language features?
I found out that also when with -vt
I found that D is great language, but for my own reasons I'm
trying to use it without TLS at all.
Can the TLS directory be avoided? (compiling on windows)
I mean, can it avoided without losing GC and main language
features?
I found out that also when with -vtls there is no output, there
is T
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 01:17:57 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 01:13:26 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 00:48:39 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Don't know the history, but as recently as a week ago Andrei
has argued against such behavior has balkanizing t
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 01:13:26 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 00:48:39 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Don't know the history, but as recently as a week ago Andrei
has argued against such behavior has balkanizing the community.
What behavior? Anyway my question is answered, t
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 01:13:26 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
What behavior? Anyway my question is answered, thanks :)
What behavior is a rhetorical question, meaning that I don't
really want it to be answered 0;)
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 00:48:39 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Don't know the history, but as recently as a week ago Andrei
has argued against such behavior has balkanizing the community.
What behavior? Anyway my question is answered, thanks :)
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 00:42:35 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 23:55:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Just wrap it in a @trusted function.
I knew this answer already of course ;) but I take it as
implying that there is no other way.
Actually I really wonder why std.stdio
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 17:48:04 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
Andrei's 2010 book states that the default safety level can be
changed from @system to @safe by means of a -safe command line
switch, in the case of the DMD compiler. Now I've tried it and
it's not recognized.
Was this feature remove
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 23:55:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Just wrap it in a @trusted function.
I knew this answer already of course ;) but I take it as implying
that there is no other way.
Actually I really wonder why std.stdio.readln() itself is not
flagged @trusted. I wouldn't think
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 23:50:04 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
The same way as T.foo() is lowered to foo(T) if no such member
is defined inside the type.
No.
But wrapping in a struct with alias this lets you extend them
pretty easily too.
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 22:53:59 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
And more generally, is it possible to get user console input in
a @safe way?
Just wrap it in a @trusted function.
The same way as T.foo() is lowered to foo(T) if no such member is
defined inside the type. It would allow me to extend 3rd party
types with operator notation without wrapping them.
After trying and reading the specification, looks like nuts, but
just wanted to confirm. Thx
I was surprised by a compiler message saying that
std.stdio.readln() (and specifically the overload without
arguments) is not safe but @system.
Actually I was using it only to pause execution until the user
presses Enter. So how else could I do this within a @safe
environment?
And more gene
On Thursday, March 09, 2017 18:48:22 Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 18:32:41 UTC, tcak wrote:
> > Is there any way to get list of public methods of a struct?
>
> You can loop through __traits(allMembers, YourStruct) and check
> protection, type, etc.
>
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 18:32:41 UTC, tcak wrote:
Is there any way to get list of public methods of a struct?
You can loop through __traits(allMembers, YourStruct) and check
protection, type, etc.
__traits(getMember, YourStruct, "some name") gets one method in
particular. allMembers re
Is there any way to get list of public methods of a struct?
I looked at both "traits" and "std.traits".
getVirtualFunctions and getVirtualMethods are closest I guess,
but they don't seem like general purpose due to "Virtual" part.
(Wouldn't it work if a method was final?)
I saw "FieldNameTup
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 17:48:04 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
Was this feature remove on purpose? I could imagine that.
Yes, you instead mark individual things @safe (or you can do a
@safe { functions here } group or @safe: at the top of a scope).
this kinda sucks but alas.
Andrei's 2010 book states that the default safety level can be
changed from @system to @safe by means of a -safe command line
switch, in the case of the DMD compiler. Now I've tried it and
it's not recognized.
Was this feature remove on purpose? I could imagine that.
The default safety keeps
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:40:13 UTC, Suliman wrote:
How should I write to file result without \r\n\ symbols?
auto x = content.matchFirst(bigCodeBlock);
File f = File("foo.txt", "w");
f.write(x);
Just
f.write(x[0]);
to write out the whole hit instead of the collection of
references.
RefCounted is ok
If GC methods it calls are legal during collection.
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:23:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:14:28 UTC, Suliman wrote:
But now output is:
[["```\r\nvoid foo()\r\n{\r\n\twriteln(\"ppp\");\r\n}\r\n```"]]
But I do not \r\n\ symbols...
That's just the writeln array formatter. The matchFirst
f
Unique is probably not good for database connection: you then
can't have connection in two variables, also if it holds a
reference to GC-allocated memory, it can't be put to GC-allocated
memory, since when that GC-allocated memory is collected, Unique
will try to destroy its possibly already fr
On 10/03/2017 5:14 AM, Suliman wrote:
Adding "r" helped:
auto bigCodeBlock = regex(r"`{3}[\s\S]*?`{3}");
But now output is:
[["```\r\nvoid foo()\r\n{\r\n\twriteln(\"ppp\");\r\n}\r\n```"]]
But I do not \r\n\ symbols...
\r\n is Windows new line characters.
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 16:14:28 UTC, Suliman wrote:
But now output is:
[["```\r\nvoid foo()\r\n{\r\n\twriteln(\"ppp\");\r\n}\r\n```"]]
But I do not \r\n\ symbols...
That's just the writeln array formatter. The matchFirst function
returns an array of hits (that allows captures, btw you m
Adding "r" helped:
auto bigCodeBlock = regex(r"`{3}[\s\S]*?`{3}");
But now output is:
[["```\r\nvoid foo()\r\n{\r\n\twriteln(\"ppp\");\r\n}\r\n```"]]
But I do not \r\n\ symbols...
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 15:22:00 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 10/03/2017 4:17 AM, Suliman wrote:
I would use dpaste and write a quick script but here is where
I think
your problem is:
regex("/.*/g")
It should be:
regex(".*", "g")
As per[0].
[0] http://dlang.org/phobos/std_regex.htm
On 10/03/2017 4:17 AM, Suliman wrote:
I would use dpaste and write a quick script but here is where I think
your problem is:
regex("/.*/g")
It should be:
regex(".*", "g")
As per[0].
[0] http://dlang.org/phobos/std_regex.html#.regex
Sorry, but what regexp are you talking? There is nothing l
I would use dpaste and write a quick script but here is where I
think your problem is:
regex("/.*/g")
It should be:
regex(".*", "g")
As per[0].
[0] http://dlang.org/phobos/std_regex.html#.regex
Sorry, but what regexp are you talking? There is nothing like:
`regex("/.*/g")` in my code...
On 10/03/2017 3:50 AM, Suliman wrote:
I wrote two regexp:
auto inlineCodeBlock = regex("`(.*?)`"); // --> `(.*?)`
auto bigCodeBlock = regex("/`{3}[\\s\\S]*?`{3}/g"); // -->
`{3}[\s\S]*?`{3}
First for for selection inline code block. Second for multi-lin
I wrote two regexp:
auto inlineCodeBlock = regex("`(.*?)`"); // --> `(.*?)`
auto bigCodeBlock = regex("/`{3}[\\s\\S]*?`{3}/g"); // -->
`{3}[\s\S]*?`{3}
First for for selection inline code block. Second for multi-line:
#Header
my h
On 09/03/2017 11:52 PM, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 10:44:00 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 09/03/2017 11:19 PM, WebFreak001 wrote:
...
Import libs like static libraries adhere to the same specs of PE-COFF
versus OMF.
So if you want things to work without much hassle, he
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 10:44:00 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 09/03/2017 11:19 PM, WebFreak001 wrote:
...
Import libs like static libraries adhere to the same specs of
PE-COFF versus OMF.
So if you want things to work without much hassle, hello -m64!
Thanks, adding `--arch=x86_msc
On 09/03/2017 11:19 PM, WebFreak001 wrote:
I tried using core.sys.windows.winldap (winldap.h) but I get linker
errors when I try to run my code. I tried copying Wldap32.lib from my
Windows Kits folder but then optlink always says Error 43 Not a Valid
Library File.
I simply use `dub test` to comp
On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 10:24:24 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 at 12:06:48 UTC, dummy wrote:
Just thought. I do want to know. :-)
As far as I know is,
* LDC2 woring on NDK(yah!)
* Native OpenGLES:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Build_LDC_for_Android#Build_a_sample_OpenGL_Android
I tried using core.sys.windows.winldap (winldap.h) but I get
linker errors when I try to run my code. I tried copying
Wldap32.lib from my Windows Kits folder but then optlink always
says Error 43 Not a Valid Library File.
I simply use `dub test` to compile, adding `"libs": ["Wldap32"]`
only a
38 matches
Mail list logo
