2011/1/6 Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com
Nobody told me, that's the problem, i have been asking a lot about that,
and
nobody seems to be interested, nor knows anything. So that's why I'm
wondering why. I think that is the future, there will be less and less fat
client apps, and more and more
On 6 January 2011 06:30, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe integrating Thunderbird would be more a marketing move than
anything else, but marketing is very effective!!! So that's why I think it
would be great if Thunderbird could be integrated automatically with LO. As
I said
Shouldn't we file these wish list items somewhere and if so where?
On 1/6/11 10:00 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 6 January 2011 06:30, Jaime R. Garzagar...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe integrating Thunderbird would be more a marketing move than
anything else, but marketing is very effective!!! So
On Jan 5, 2011, at 20:02 , BRM wrote:
I think such a project would have to focus really on Windows and perhaps Mac.
Most Linux systems use package management software, often vary different.
Some
(e.g. gentoo) do not have a GUI interface at all.
And honestly, the only place this is really
source ones.
There is no reason to limit people to just Thunderbird.
Ben
- Original Message
From: Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 2:04:18 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc
I agree with you totally
I 2nd your Mac comments. What i find impressive is how they work really
well for those that like 3rd party apps like myself Thunderbird
interfaces really nicely with the other mac apps that were mentioned below.
On 1/6/11 11:47 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Jan 5, 2011, at 20:02 , BRM wrote:
I
On Thu Jan 06 2011 02:28:26 GMT-0800 (PST) Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Shouldn't we file these wish list items somewhere and if so where?
You can always create an account on the wiki and create a list.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Main_Page there is an area called
Crazy Ideas within
i think it would be great to have a HTML5 LO, which will only need a
browser. The could be installed locallz or on a server. There would only be
need for one version that supports the 4 major browsers.
At least we should start with a ODF reader, it doesn't have to be a plugin,
it can be a HTML5
Hi Jaime,
At 17:52 6/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
i think it would be great to have a HTML5 LO, which will only need a
browser. The could be installed locallz or on a server. There would only be
need for one version that supports the 4 major browsers.
Are you aware of WebODF
Well for a reader is not such a big deal if it's HTML5 or nor, but if there
were a Office Suite, like Microsoft Docs Google Docs, that should be in
HTML5! But apparently no one has started such a thing and no one seems to be
interested. IBM is working on one and Oracle is already offering one, at
2011/1/6 Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com:
I'm wondering why libre office is not interested
in developing an HTML5 complete office Suite.
Who told you that? An html5 app based on LibO does not exists yet,
that's clear, but that does not mean it will never be one. LibO is a
FOSS project, the only
Nobody told me, that's the problem, i have been asking a lot about that, and
nobody seems to be interested, nor knows anything. So that's why I'm
wondering why. I think that is the future, there will be less and less fat
client apps, and more and more browser based apps. The main reason is
If we are looking to promote this to corporations it will need to have
one, and we could give them the option to install one. A home user might
opt out of installing it if they don't want an email client
On 1/5/11 3:22 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
At 00:19 3/01/2011, Jonathan Aquilina
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
If we are looking to promote this to corporations it will need to have
one, and we could give them the option to install one. A home user might
opt out of installing it if they don't want an email client
Right - well, it depends to
What about bundling it with the downloadable installer?
On 1/5/11 5:32 PM, drew wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
If we are looking to promote this to corporations it will need to have
one, and we could give them the option to install one. A home user might
opt
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:32 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
If we are looking to promote this to corporations it will need to have
one, and we could give them the option to install one. A home user might
opt out of installing it
project, or another entity all-together (FreeDesktop.org might be the best
organization to handle it.)
- Original Message
From: Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 11:43:52 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working
eagles051...@gmail.com
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:19:31 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc
One problem would be Linux i think with this approach. Instead of making
a bundle for each specific distro i think we would have the package
managed by TDF, or by someone else entirely, like
FreeDesktop.org.
Ben
- Original Message
From: Jonathan Aquilinaeagles051...@gmail.com
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 12:19:31 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc
One problem would
I believe integrating Thunderbird would be more a marketing move than
anything else, but marketing is very effective!!! So that's why I think it
would be great if Thunderbird could be integrated automatically with LO. As
I said before, a sort of container that can select the applications ti be
I agree with you totally here Jaime.
On 01/06/2011 07:30 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
I believe integrating Thunderbird would be more a marketing move than
anything else, but marketing is very effective!!! So that's why I think it
would be great if Thunderbird could be integrated automatically
On 1 January 2011 18:43, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an equivalent
program such as outlook.
Why waste time and effort on this when there are other perfectly valid
alternatives? Evolution, Thunderbird for open
Please don't top-post in an inline thread...
On 2011-01-01 2:42 PM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 20:36, Lee Hyde anub...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, an integration add-on for Thunderbird (and any other e-mail
clients or contact managers with an add-on architecture) would be a far
On 2011-01-01 9:54 PM, todd rme wrote:
Isn't this what freedesktop.org standards are for? A standard for
spell checking libraries (I mean the library of words, not the
software library) shared across all open-source programs would be
very useful. Such a thing has already been proposed:
Please don't top-post in an in-lined thread. Thanks.
On 2011-01-02 1:18 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
On 1/1/11 8:36 PM, Lee Hyde wrote:
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless
like Outlook or Evolution to LO. You just have to allow
Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
besides email people want a calendar as well as a to do list as well
functionality wise, which Thunderbird seems to lack.
On 1/1/11 8:36 PM, Lee Hyde wrote:
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like
Ian Lynch wrote:
On 1 January 2011 18:43, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an equivalent
program such as outlook.
Why waste time and effort on this when there are other perfectly valid
alternatives?
What do other devs think about including something as mentioned below
somehow in regards to a mail client alternative to MS outlook?
On 1/2/11 7:49 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an
You mention other projects why not package other projects as options for
instance during install. User is presented with a list of options for
instance thunderbird for email etc?
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Zaphod Feeblejocks zapho...@gmail.comwrote:
The Go-oo homepage also says Going
On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:16:06 -
Zaphod Feeblejocks zapho...@gmail.com wrote:
The Go-oo homepage also says Going forward, the Go-oo project
will be discontinued in favor of LibreOffice. Does that mean
that LibreOffice is driven by Novell too?
Ways to resolve this include:
- Open
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an equivalent
program such as outlook.
There are one of three ways it can be done.
1) fork something like evolution which has all that done and integrate it
into the LO suite
2) or install software that already exists in the open source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 01.01.2011 19:43, schrieb Jonathan Aquilina:
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an equivalent
program such as outlook.
There are one of three ways it can be done.
1) fork something like evolution which has all that
I remember my days of working for an outfit that used Outlook and MS
products. I looked into Outlook for myself. I was not amused.
Years later I turned to Linux, and the particular distribution I chose
installed Evolution by default. I looked into it. I was not amused.
So I tried uninstalling
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like
Outlook or Evolution to LO. You just have to allow Thunderbird to
connect to it, and people can make their own choice as to whether they
want all the other bells and whistles.
But why only for Thunderbird?
Why not make an open container (or just modularize the existing one with a
well defined interface) to will allow any application to use the resources
(e.g. dictionaries) and have full integration with all LO resources?
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 20:36, Lee Hyde
VERY GOOD! No, I didn't really mean to restrict it to Thunderbird.
It's just what I'm most familiar with. Certainly, if there are other
email readers that have capabilities that can be linked into LO those
links should be explored.
Craig
Tyche
On 01/01/2011 12:42 PM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
But
My point is that if they are stand alone,they should still be able to share
seamlessly the resources, like the dictionary, spell check, even PDF export,
I'm not sure if Thunderbird uses one. But the important thing is to give the
feeling that they work integrated. Not only to the E-Mail client,
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
But why only for Thunderbird?
Why not make an open container (or just modularize the existing one with a
well defined interface) to will allow any application to use the resources
(e.g. dictionaries) and have full
Jaime i only said Thunderbird cuz that's the client i use. there are
tons of others.
Todd i totally agree a standard needs to be reached. like there is the
ODF format a standardized dictionary format would be a great idea.
On 1/2/11 3:54 AM, todd rme wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:42 PM,
besides email people want a calendar as well as a to do list as well
functionality wise, which Thunderbird seems to lack.
On 1/1/11 8:36 PM, Lee Hyde wrote:
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like
Outlook or Evolution to LO.
40 matches
Mail list logo
