/www/board-discuss/msg03358.html
Kind regards,
Cor Nouws
--
The Document Foundation - Chairman Membership Committee
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- twitter : cor4office
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help
can be resolved in time.
If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to ask the
Membership Committee in private at electi...@documentfoundation.org
Happy voting!
Cor Nouws
--
The Document Foundation - Chairman Membership Committee
http://nl.libreoffice.org
twitter : cor4office
Florian Effenberger wrote (30-11-13 09:26)
thank you very much, and congratulations on your appointment to the new
role!
Thanks!
I would hereby like to ask you in public whether you accept your new
role as Chairman of the Membership Committee.
Yes I do. I'm glad to be able to serve the
and signing.
Good news indeed - thanks!
Cor
--
- Cor Nouws
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how
but I'll add my two cents.
Florian, incredible work, incredible colleague. You're always cool
headed, encouraging, and hard working.
Sure, let me rise this flood :)
So high, that other board members get their share too ;)
Cor
--
- Cor Nouws
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- The Document Foundation
), the logo
(4) and I guess and maybe also for the document part of the logo(3)
?
I would be supportive of that request.
Thans you for that.
Can this mail-exchange be the start for the board to handle it in a meeting?
Cheers,
Cor
--
--
- Cor Nouws
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- The Document
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (06-09-13 22:15)
For Info:
[...]
A looks ok, modulo the grainy font edge due, I suspect to the logo
being a png and not a svg
Thanks you for the remarks Norbert. You're fully right. I should have
explained more clearly that it's a rough draft ;)
--
- Cor Nouws
) ?
If there's need for any further info or such, pls let me know.
Thanks for your time kind regards,
Cor
--
- Cor Nouws
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member
libreoffice-trainingcenter_naming_logo_proposals.odg
Description: application
Florian Effenberger wrote (02-08-13 10:33)
Since that approval, our generous donors have provided more funds,
offering further possibilities for TDF to invest in tasks deemed important.
Thanks to all our supporters!
Proposal: Set up an extended budget with a total amount of 100.250 €,
--
- Cor Nouws
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http
Hi GwenDragon,
GwenDragon wrote (10-04-13 20:43)
i reported at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35538
but no fix or replie since months.
no fixes for these bugs?
Sorry to read that. Alas it's reality that not all bugs get fixed or get
fixed soon.
What often helps, is if you are
Thorsten Behrens wrote (28-03-13 19:57)
Robinson Tryon wrote:
We're looking to purchase some swag and goodies for the contest. Some
of the ideas we've come up with have included:
- T-Shirts
- Mugs
- Posters
- Pens
- Pins
- Patches
- Hoodies
- Laptop cases
Great! If you get designs finalized
Hi Joel,
Joel Madero wrote (29-03-13 17:59)
At that cost maybe we can give a sticker to everyone who participates?
Let's say it's 50 people (very very optimistic), it might be less than
$25 to get them a sticker.
And once we ship, we send some more. Always good for everyone to have
one at
Hi Robert,
Robert Boehm wrote (08-02-13 18:26)
release. So far so good...this is a good releasenot aware of any
bugs affecting
[...]
But this 4.0 seems to me to be the best initial release yet
Thanks to everyone!
Thanks for your encouraging and positive feed back.
I hear similar
Hi Georgio,
Giorgio Migliaccio wrote (07-02-13 09:07)
We’re using LibreOffice (since v2.x up to 4.0 beta) inside our
product LetterSketch, which was started 7 years ago. [...]
Good to read from you, after we've met in Gouda, last year!
[...]
Is there any kind of suggestion you can give us
Wishing you all the best for 2013: love, joy, happiness, inspiration for
your work and fun in building and sharing good things in life.
Cor
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- www.librelex.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
Hi Immanuel,
Thanks for your initiative and input for this!
Immanuel Giulea wrote (29-12-12 22:04)
What are the plans on CIMS for LO 4.0 ?
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.0#Core
I've some documentation from some years back. Will try next weeks
(overloaded, sorry) to see
Hi all,
Florian Effenberger wrote (17-12-12 14:03)
The Document Foundation hasreceived the following two proposals
for hosting the LibreOffice Conference 2013, ...
* Milan, Italy
* Montreal, Canada
[...]
In the meantime, we invite the community to discuss with
the proponents on our discuss
Eike Rathke wrote (11-12-12 17:58)
Looking at my already stuffed calendar I suggest next week Monday 17th
or Tuesday 18th.
OK for me.
And for the others ?
We can have an irc meeting with as many as possible - and if needed
consult via mail with more.
Cheers,
Cor
--
- Cor
-
Hi all,
For those interested in helping a bit out with the 4.0: we have a
LibreOffice 4.0 Test Marathon from December 14 - 19:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Test_Marathon_LibreOffice_4.0
I hope to see many of you there :-)
Kind regards,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Weigel wrote (06-11-12 11:33)
I have several users, also heavily complaining about the new
AutoFilter. In fact, for the very most use cases the new AutoFilter
is much more time consuming than it was before.
The new one is getting better. See
Stefan Weigel wrote (06-11-12 12:04)
Thanks. type-ahead at least would be a big improvement. However,
one has still to uncheck all and to click OK. Formerly this all
was only one click.
I know that last time that I looked at it, there were some problems with
key bindings.
E.g. Alt-A for All
Hi all,
Thanks for working on this!
Lucian Oprea wrote (27-09-12 15:29)
The idea to start with fewer boards is very good. In the future, if
needed you can create new categories and forums and move there specific
messages.
One could also think that a special category makes it more attractive
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this page needs URGENT updating... Not only it says that the
previous (and buggy) version 3.6.0 is Our latest, feature rich version
which obviously is not true, but also that version 3.5.5 is the Previous
version
Hi all,
Just as I did wrote in a post yesterday evening to some other lists, I
would like to nominate myself for a seat to the Membership Committee
elections.
I've been a (deputy-)member of this committee and I would like to have
the opportunity to continue my contribution there.
I'm one of
Hi Carlo,
Carlo Strata wrote (16-08-12 18:44)
I think we must follow a more conservative way promoting the download
and the installation of 3.6.x version *at the moment.*
[...]
What do you think about?
I'd rather put energy in improving, than in re-doing the discussion we
had before (for n
Hi All,
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote (13-08-12 15:21)
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to
Hi Pedro,
Pedro wrote (10-08-12 21:03)
[...]
However the ONLY download visible in the Download page is 3.6.0 (it takes 4
or 5 pages in not so obvious links to get to version 3.5.5
Good catch, as we call that. Thanks.
I've added a link to the release notes page, linking to download-more
page,
Hi all,
This is a first mail to inform you that we will have a LibreOffice 3.6
Bug Hunting Party, next week: July 6
More info here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Party_3.6.0
(subject to slight changes of course)
Official announcement will be out tomorrow, but pls feel
Hi all,
For those that are able to come to Utrecht next Saturday:
there will be a LibreOffice meeting!
It is from the Dutch Language group (so Flanders and The Netherlands)
and we do both hacking in code and work on documentation.
And often we also meet old friends from the OOo-time there.
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-06-12 13:27)
we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests”
that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will
any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1.
I thought we had introduced the
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (23-05-12 16:47)
To go back to the original issue:
Hé, that was mine ;-)
1/ I have no problem with TDF developing alternative way to
'recognize' people. But that is more a Internal Marketing/Community
Management topic than a MC topic.
My idea is the
Hi all,
When inviting people in the Dutch language community to consider
membership of TDF, two items showed up.
1. Not all active people are familiar enough with the beautiful English
language to feel comfortable to use the application page ( related info).
has partial translation been
Hi all,
When inviting people in the Dutch language community to consider
membership of TDF, two items showed up.
1. Not all active people are familiar enough with the beautiful English
language to feel comfortable to use the application page ( related info).
has partial translation been
Hi all,
Thanks for the thoughts...
Charles-H.Schulz wrote (22-05-12 18:43)
I'll try to go back to the initial two questions. The first one, the one
of the language, is an important one. To my very own surprise (and
partial misunderstanding) we have lots of enthusiastic volunteers who
*do and
hi Pedro, all,
Pedro wrote (17-05-12 12:28)
IMHO after several releases it is possibly time to slow down a bit and
concentrate on Quality instead of Quantity...
A suggested contradiction between quality and new functions is an
artificial (which has been explained over and again ;-) and has
Pedro wrote (19-05-12 23:49)
A user who is already on ANY mailing list has already taken more steps than
the gross majority
[...]
In the Netherlands we added the info as one of the few FAQ's that is
clearly linked from the 'Get support' page.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Florian Effenberger wrote (20-05-12 10:39)
Hi,
Marc Paré wrote on 2012-05-20 06:57:
Do you find yourself contributing to LibreOffice's lists and helping
users in various ways? If you do, or, if you would like to do this in a
constructive way, you may qualify to become a member of the TDF
Hello Pieter,
Pieter E. Zanstra wrote (18-05-12 16:09)
In the process of commenting it would be good that people who
actively respond to a reported bug, also add their email address.
[...]
This is done automatically (anyway in my settings/preferences) when I
add a comment.
--
- Cor
-
Pedro wrote (18-05-12 11:50)
Resetting the user profile is hardly a fix. I think the correct name is
workaround.
Ah yes. If I've seen it correct, recently some extra checks were done in
the code to prevent some troubles.
However, it is a regularly popping up problem since the later versions
Hi Charles,
Thanks for working on your ideas!
Charles Jenkins wrote (16-04-12 16:15)
Would a bug bounty work well for this type of feature? I'm nervous about
doing that, because I wouldn't want to shell out money for features that
don't actually work or don't end up making into the real
Hi all,
Marc-André Laverdière wrote (13-04-12 13:46)
As the dev team has been trying to shrink the LO suite, and remove a
lot of bloat accumulated over the years, this is something that could
slash a lot of the footprint.
The email is a very tiny Python component :-)
One of the concerns I
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote (13-04-12 14:02)
The File-Send-Document As Email already calls random email clients as
in the default email client.would it be that hard to replace the
smtp function with a call to the DEFAULT mail client? (I know nothing
about coding.)
With the mail
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote (13-04-12 15:35)
Yes, but that is what an email client does, not a word processor
Then how to do all this from your word processor on any system ..?
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote (13-04-12 15:37)
OK, keep this functionality.
;-)
But LO MUST keep a record of the emails sent in some way - it doesn't at
the moment, which is not a good thing. That is my main objection - if
this function was passed through an email client there would be a
Hi Kazar,
Thanks for posting here, of course your bug report, and sorry that you
got annoyed.
adept techlists - kazar wrote (14-02-12 05:52)
I noticed a problem in a 3.5 RC 1, I was able to reproduce it every time
[...]
(bug 45247)
Rainer is our most active QA volunteer.
His comment states
Florian Effenberger wrote (06-02-12 18:09)
sorry to be so pushing here, but if possible by any means, I'd like to
start voting this week, since we're really late already.
So, if nobody objects with serious concerns and a concrete (!) proposal
what to change and who (!!) does the work, I'd like
Hi all,
I just came across an (bit) older link for a nice 'bounty':
So if someone has time/possibilities:
http://gun.io/open/25/
Kind regards,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
Hi Florian, *,
Florian Effenberger wrote (28-01-12 22:49)
as you might have spotted, today we issued the proposals for this years'
LibreOffice Conference. Berlin and Zaragoza (in alphabetical order) have
sent in their applications and are therefore candidates for this years'
location.
Do I
Hi Florian,
Florian Effenberger wrote (31-01-12 17:52)
we have discussed that in the past, with various arguments, but in the
end decided to have the 2013 application to end in August, before this
years' conference. [...]
OK, sorry that I didn't remember that.
No need for me to open that
Marc Paré wrote (24-01-12 10:36)
This third option seems to make the most sense. As you imply, the most
active members would then be included in the vote.
I agree, but of course we say 'active people' here.
As this is a form of filtering of our mailing lists active
contributers, we could
Florian Effenberger wrote (24-01-12 11:26)
I think this would exclude a fair amount of contributors. Many of e.g.
the code contributors are not members, but indeed do a very valueable
work. Excluding them from voting sounds wrong.
And it's not logic: the conference is not meant for members
Hi Bob,
Robert Boehm wrote (24-01-12 16:06)
Hi...just a general question as I test LO 3.5: Ever since LoDEV versions of
3.5 I cannot find the general FONT section in options for setting the
default FONT which is easily found in all older versions.
Did it move or is it omitted for some reason?
Hi Nino,
Nino Novak wrote (20-01-12 18:50)
Cor, couldn't you make the links in the blog article clickable?
Good idea (for next time ;-) - bit back log with the mail ..)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Hi all,
Just in case you missed this:
http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2012/01/17/tdf-announces-the-second-bug-hunting-session-to-put-first-release-candidate-of-libreoffice-3-5-on-the-test-bench/
... don't miss the next weekend :-)
Greetings,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Hi *,
I'd like to ask reimbursement for part of my FOSDEM-spendings.
Estimates are € 150,-.
As may be known, I assist with marketing and will promote /speak about QA.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to board-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
H Fernand,
Fernand Vanrie wrote (05-01-12 12:32)
Do not know if this is the good list ?
For discussion? Yes.
It can not be a big problem to make PDF a acepted graphic format for LO.
(PDF insert as a picture)
If that is true: it maybe can become an easy hack?
These day's PDF is a
Erich Christian wrote (30-12-11 11:45)
I'd go for a change, neither elderly people nor 'youngsters' associate
anything useful with the symbol. Having asked my teenagers (13, 16, 19)
who are familiar with computers ever since, they cannot remember floppy
although I've been using some until a
Pedro Lino wrote (15-12-11 23:57)
the page still mentions Beta0.
Can someone fix that, please?
Will be done later Pedro, when all mirrors are ready.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
Cor Nouws wrote (16-12-11 08:22)
Pedro Lino wrote (15-12-11 23:57)
the page still mentions Beta0.
Can someone fix that, please?
Will be done later Pedro, when all mirrors are ready.
Well, done it anyways.
However, I have no idea how I have to change the V-icon to a i or ?-icon.
Someone
Florian Effenberger wrote (15-12-11 00:41)
- So, whatever I do, someone will be upset.
Poor them ;-) No serious, I don't think people involved in this
discussion will be really upset. Maybe slightly disappointed. But hey :-)
- I myself would like to keep reply-to mangling as is, as I have
Hi Pedro, *,
Pedro Lino wrote (10-12-11 12:46)
So, what should we do to each group of bugs? Anyway, I'm not sure
whether there are how many bugs in each group, or even there is any
bug in some group. Maybe we need separate discussion?
It is already for some time now, that there is need for
Thorsten Behrens wrote (30-11-11 14:48)
At any rate, here's the ultimate answer in this whole
reply-to-munging debate (for who ever is amenable to technical
argument):
Me thinks there's different habits, skills, expectations with devs and
non-devs (to put it black white)
Since I have no
Andrea Pescetti wrote (11-11-11 09:40)
Mine is -1 to be read as: I would be in favor of an own URL with own
branding but the same database as http://user.services.openoffice.org
since this would be best for users (and, honestly, more comfortable for
me and many other volunteers!) at the moment.
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti wrote (11-11-11 10:38)
On 08/11/2011 Cor Nouws wrote:
For some time, I could personally live quite well with a forum that is
clearly, visibly, independent serving LibreOffice and other suites.
Since suggestions made in that direction seem to be more political than
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (09-11-11 14:35)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Andre Schnabelandre.schna...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Thorsten, *
Datum: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:08:21 +0100
Von: Thorsten Behrenst...@documentfoundation.org
[...]
We would like to ask all successful candidates to formally
Hi *,
Cor Nouws wrote (29-10-11 00:16)
Now I wonder: what about the future of forums for LibreOffice?
It looks convenient to have all at one place. On the other side:
LibreOffice will grow to be different more and more. Different code
base, more functions.
So apart from that it is maybe
Hi Florian,
Florian Effenberger wrote (08-11-11 15:33)
of course, there is no need to hurry, but why not start (in case we
want to go for it) now, so we have enough time to evaluate and
decide?
Yes, not doing things in a rush is good.
What I was referring to: if there is less need to hurry,
Florian Effenberger wrote (07-11-11 12:11)
Ok. So I take it that you propose Simon and Norbert as seat holders,
which means we have one deputy role open at the moment?
Currently I'm not able to follow any discussion on numbers, but it would
be my suggestion to accept Drew his kind offer to
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (07-11-11 12:47)
anybody here who can contribute deeper knowledge how WINDOWS adds more
programs to the Open With context menu list? That would be useful if
for example) you want to use LibO as an alternative editor for .doc
documents and similar, without fix
Hi Drew,
Thanks for suggesting to help in the MC and your answer on Michaels
questions.
drew wrote (05-11-11 21:31)
Howdy Micheal, et al,
I believe that I bring a number of personal attributes that fit quite
well to such a task.
As far as I have had contact with you over the past years,
Andrea Pescetti wrote (06-11-11 11:18)
And branding can be
adapted too, and possibly made dependent on the URL.
Ah, that is interesting (I only have knowledge of office suites you know
;-) )
But technology is
really easy in this case: the main issue, as I wrote, is political.
Isn't
Hi Sjonnie,
sjonnie wrote (04-11-11 15:39)
back to my original point: i was only asking to put somewhere obvious on the
website that there is a problem with JRE and 1.7.0.
Are you sure? I read i think it is only fair to warn people with a 64
bit OS that we do not function well on a 64 bit
Hi Bernhard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote (29-10-11 01:24)
After quite an amount of time and a lot of work for LibreOffice and
OpenOffice.org before I have to tell you that I'll have to stop my
activities in this great community.
Thanks for working with us - I'm glad that I learned to know you
Hi Italo,
Italo Vignoli wrote (29-10-11 11:26)
LibreOffice is going forward and bringing new features to users, with an
increasingly different code base. OOo is going backwards, [...]
From what I've seen the past year, I am not positive too about OO,
especially not compared to LibreOffice.
Hi Dennis,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote (29-10-11 20:47)
I am also not aware of any discussion that was antagonistic to TDF
whatsoever among those involved with finding a resolution for the
migration of the OOo Forums to a reliable hosting. The key objection
was to preserve and continue that
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti wrote (29-10-11 01:11)
I believe that in general fragmenting support is not a good idea, unless
it is really needed.
Me too - though there are some nuances.
I write about this in some other mails.
Regards,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe
Hi David,
David Nelson wrote (08-10-11 16:38)
2011/10/8 Jesús Corriusje...@softcatala.org:
In my opinion, I don't think it's best for the project to put some of
the most skilled developers to work in documentation, when other
developers can also do this task perfectly well.
It is precisely
Hi David,
David Nelson wrote (09-10-11 13:30)
I don't see anything incongruous about asking a candidate in the Board
of Directors election about what commitments he might be willing to
take on if elected. In fact, what else are you supposed to ask of
candidates?
Taking care for
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (09-10-11 14:25)
Trying to extract election promises out of some people, on ground
completely unrelated to the office they seek, is not going to get you
there.
Correct.
I would assume (have seem some mails swiftly after posting my initial
contribution to this thread)
David Nelson wrote (09-10-11 14:55)
Norbert, it would be good if you read things carefully and accurately.
Cor, it would be good if you did not jump to conclusions.
David, it would be good if you just understood the point ;-)
Norbert and Cor, it would be polite and in keeping with the
Italo Vignoli wrote (02-10-11 22:20)
On 10/02/2011 08:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
2. I have an offer. What formatting by senders will most powerfully
serve those on [libreoffice-accessibility]? What do those with access
limitations confirm to be the best that works for all of them?
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote (01-10-11 03:17)
The OASIS ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 has been successfully
advanced to an OASIS
Standard,http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201109/msg00010.html.
Thanks for and congratulations with this good news!
--
- Cor
-
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote (30-09-11 03:46)
After all that + discussions on the -user list it seems that LO doesn't
really care to provide any specific rules/regulations/FAQ regarding
Top/Interspersed/Bottom posting on any of their lists.
[...]
Has not yet been forgotten.
But to manage
Hi Thorsten, *,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (22-09-11 10:28)
[...]
The generic english pages will not be affected by this proposal.
A local, native-lang NGO, that is in good standing with TDF, and
fulfills the following prerequisites
* has at least three NGO members, that are accepted TDF
NoOp wrote (26-09-11 03:39)
Sure. I'll try to go through them this weekend come up with a list;
starting with those msgs that indicate 'works in 3.3.4 but not in 3.4.3.
...
I've downloaded all of the msgs from the users list will try to
sort/search. It may take a few more days.
Thanks!
Hi Jim,
Jim Jagielski wrote (23-09-11 16:23)
If people feel that it would be helpful to TDF to have a board member
who has a tight relationship with Apache,
Would do no harm of course.
I would accept a nomination if it would be useful.
Thanks for offering, but I think that won't be
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote (21-09-11 05:11)
If 3.4.x then I *highly* recommend trying 3.3.4 instead. To me it seems
that 3.4.x (3.4.3) is full of bugs and should never have been released
at all, particularly with this statement:
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/
quote
LibreOffice 3.4.3 Final
jef.peeraer wrote (20-09-11 10:01)
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Cor Nouws wrote:
Which OOo version were you using there?
3.2.0, i think. There are indeed a lot of bugs concerning printer dialog
(Bug 33245, eg). So i file an extra bug, or just confirm an existing one ?
If it is the same, pls add
jef.peeraer wrote (20-09-11 10:01)
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Cor Nouws wrote:
Which OOo version were you using there?
3.2.0, i think. There are indeed a lot of bugs concerning printer dialog
(Bug 33245, eg). So i file an extra bug, or just confirm an existing one ?
If it is the same, pls add
Hi Jef,
jef.peeraer wrote (19-09-11 11:35)
i try to upgrade all my OOo users to LO, but encounter a serious
problem. i have a template for labels to be printed on a ql-1060 (which
has default labels of 102 mm (4) width). The label format in the template
is user defined, 10,2 cm width and 6 cm
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (13-09-11 22:49)
yes but not _here_
Indeed - see the marketing list ;-)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
Hi Olivier,
Olivier Hallot wrote (12-09-11 17:39)
Couldn't we write just Oh dear, I am unable to find a macro you asked me to
execute!?
Would the following be acceptable:
Error: the macro you are trying to execute
(libName.modName.fnName) could not be found.
Cheers,
--
- Cor
-
e-letter wrote (05-09-11 00:05)
Long-term it does help, in terms of making very clear to the original
poster that the priority is superior performance of LO.
True, but I expect someone choosing for GNU (the OP) to be well aware of
that.
There is no negative attitude towards m$ except your
Hi Russ,
upscope wrote (05-09-11 19:31)
What happened to bug 39903 turned in Aug. 8th. It sure is make life
miserable. Did not exist in old 3.3.2 version and does not go away with
complete reinstall of LibreOffice.
Pls see my comments in the issue.
Regards,
--
- Cor
-
Hi e-letter,
e-letter wrote (04-09-11 10:31)
These typical m$ queries are irrelevant to LO. If you want to create
m$ documents, get money out of your pocket and pay for m$o. If the
expected and desired behaviour occurs with the native odt format, then
LO is good.
Sorry, but I am not so happy
Hello ,
M Robinson wrote (02-09-11 19:24)
LibreOffice 3.4.0
OOO340m1 (Build:12)
I've tried this repeatedly, when I generate lines of text, number them
(F12), delete every other line number, save in Microsoft Word 2007 XML
(*.docx) format the results are always the same when viewed in MS
Hi Gwen,
GwenDragon wrote (31-08-11 13:25)
I reproted the problem in LO bugtracker:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35538
really no ideas for fixing this problem?
Apparently not, until now.
I remember having seen some discussion about a way to solve the issue.
No idea where,
Terrence Enger wrote (25-08-11 17:35)
In general, IMO if you build and test on the master, best for questions
is IRC #libreoffice-dev.
Is that easier for the experts? My experience on the dev
and discuss lists is that the response time is at least as
fast as I would hope for, and faster by
Hi Gary, *,
NoOp wrote (24-08-11 05:17)
You've found YALOB (Yet Another LO Bug); of which there seem to more
more of every day oddly enough with previous OOo files.
And there will be more of them, no doubt.
It was well known, and repeatedly written by OpenOffice.org developers,
that fixing
201 - 300 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
