Hello
I added the topic about ticket [1] to the board meeting agenda.
[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/3133
Regards
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 4:08 AM Jorge Sanz via Discuss <
discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> On 2024-01-30 10:58, Alexander Kmoch via Discuss wrote:
> > Dear Jorge,
> >
> > tha
Hello friends and neighbours,
we Finns use our list sometimes to spread informataion on our national
events and also international events.
We have today board meeting for national OSGeo society this topic will
be on agenda.
I guess that Estonian Discourse will get some Finns there too 😉
Best
On 2024-01-30 10:58, Alexander Kmoch via Discuss wrote:
Dear Jorge,
thanks a lot for info, much appreciated. I have an OSGeo login and I
am able to create a ticket.
If I understood you correctly, then [2] is the more general
discussion, but I could open already a ticket for Estonia, referenc
Dear Jorge,
thanks a lot for info, much appreciated. I have an OSGeo login and I am
able to create a ticket.
If I understood you correctly, then [2] is the more general discussion,
but I could open already a ticket for Estonia, referencing [2] saying
Estonia would like a QGIS Estonia Discour
On 2024-01-30 8:15, Alexander Kmoch via Discuss wrote:
Dear OSGeo admin team,
we from Estonia haven't had a mailing list before and wanted to
consider to apply for a qgis or osgeo mailing list for Estonia. Now
with the Discourse option, we would be really keen to get a QGIS
usergroup forum f
Dear OSGeo admin team,
we from Estonia haven't had a mailing list before and wanted to consider
to apply for a qgis or osgeo mailing list for Estonia. Now with the
Discourse option, we would be really keen to get a QGIS usergroup forum
for our Estonian community.
How can we "apply" ?
Best,
I am all for opening up the conversation and adding additional
interfaces to participate, but pleas without messing up or breaking the
existing discussion channels.
Am 01.01.24 um 16:28 schrieb Sandro Santilli via Discuss:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 04:16:03PM +, Cannata Massimiliano via Dis
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:08:08PM +0100, Sandro Santilli via Discuss wrote:
> see if they are able to create a new thread by email, for example.
Answering myself I was able to create new threads by email, just
writing to @discourse.osgeo.org
--strk;
_
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Anna Petrášová wrote:
> > Thank you, that's really helpful to know. I wonder if this "mailing list"
> > behavior could be set as a default for the migrated users.
>
I think by default new users, get emails of categories they watch unless they
turn t
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Anna Petrášová wrote:
> Thank you, that's really helpful to know. I wonder if this "mailing list"
> behavior could be set as a default for the migrated users.
I also wonder if the "mailing list behaviour" is good enough, but this
we can tell by testing it,
iling list into the new group to expedite things.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Anna Petrášová
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 2, 2024 1:12 PM
> *To:* Regina Obe
> *Cc:* Sandro Santilli ; Bruce Bannerman <
> bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com>; OSGeo Discussions <
&g
people in your
old mailing list into the new group to expedite things.
From: Anna Petrášová
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 1:12 PM
To: Regina Obe
Cc: Sandro Santilli ; Bruce Bannerman
; OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
In case we
In case we decide to migrate, I was wondering what kind of effort is
required from a current mailing list (mailman2) user to switch to discourse
if they want to keep using it as a mailing list. E.g., would they need to
login first (potentially create a new account?) and then set anything from
the d
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 09:52:35AM +1100, Bruce Bannerman via Discuss
> wrote:
> >Apart from these few emails telling me that a move to something called
> >Discourse is happening, I have not seen any discussion on our lists
> >explaining the pros and cons of such a move.
> >I find
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 04:16:03PM +, Cannata Massimiliano via Discuss
wrote:
> it is a factual observation that there has been a sensible decline in the
> engagement of people in OSGeo...
> Not in the conferences presences but in the remote collaboration and
> development...
This is a ver
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:46:24PM +0100, Markus Neteler via Discuss wrote:
>
> With an upgrade from mailman-2 to mailman-3 we could also have a
> searchable archive.
> See for example
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/
> which looks much more modern than mailman-2 on OSGeo.
Unfortunatel
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Jorge Sanz via Discuss wrote:
> Hi Vicky, allVicky, can you please confirm ...
Just to point out one (only one) of the problems I mentioned in my
previous email about using email over other systems: the mail from
Jorge above arrived to me (and all other su
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 09:52:35AM +1100, Bruce Bannerman via Discuss wrote:
>Apart from these few emails telling me that a move to something called
>Discourse is happening, I have not seen any discussion on our lists
>explaining the pros and cons of such a move.
>I find this lack
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 at 09:57, Jorge Sanz via Discuss <
discuss@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Vicky, all
>
> Vicky, can you please confirm that Discourse can be used from email so
members of migrated lists like QGIS-Fr can keep interacting with the
community on the new system from their mails as be
2023 9:52 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
Hi Jody,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 9:31 PM Jody Garnett wrote:
Vicky,
Is there any more information on what is being offered here?
I have not used discourse very much. What do you mea
/qgis-fr-user/5
>>>>> [2] https://discourse.osgeo.org/c/sac-global-category/sac/13
>>>>> [3]
>>>>> https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/about-the-osgeo-site-feedback-category/1
>>>>> [4] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2008loc/
>>>>>
>&g
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 10:55 AM Luca Delucchi via Discuss
wrote:
...
> I'm also quite new to Discourse but For what I can see with the discourse
> instance of OpenStreetMap where the
> Italian OSM community created a category for Italian discussion there are
> only pros to have Discourse i
Il ven 29 dic 2023, 16:38 Jody Garnett via Discuss
ha scritto:
> Vicky is just the messenger, and may of caused some confusion when
> describing a new service the system admin committee has brought online.
> There no move planned; just some new software has just been installed and
> is available
From: Discuss
mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org>> on
behalf of Vicky Vergara via Discuss
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 9:52 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing l
; I was lurking in the sys admin chat as I was working on the osgeo sign up
> form. Mailing lists are not going away, but I am unclear at what is being
> offered.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 8:01 AM Eli Adam wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a
Obras Públicas
URUGUAY
(598)29157933 ints. 20329
http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/
De: Discuss en nombre de Cannata Massimiliano via Discuss
Enviado: viernes, 29 de diciembre de 2023 8:43:03
Para: Bruce Bannerman; discuss@lists.osgeo.org
Asunto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse
: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
Dear all,
My 2cents...
Discourse seems an appealing solution for query and answer but I agree with
Bruce that before we move we should have a nice open discussion, since it's not
gonna be the magic stick...
I've seen the platform us
geo.org>> on
behalf of Vicky Vergara via Discuss
mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 9:52 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org>>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
Hi Jody,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 9:3
not add dicourse?
Thanks, Eli
From: Discuss <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Vicky Vergara via Discuss <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 9:52 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions <discuss@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to di
;>>>
>>>>> I was lurking in the sys admin chat as I was working on the osgeo sign
>>>>> up form. Mailing lists are not going away, but I am unclear at what is
>>>>> being offered.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
I am unclear at what is
>>>> being offered.
>>>> --
>>>> Jody Garnett
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 8:01 AM Eli Adam
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>
going on. It looks like discourse options
>>>> are being added. This raises questions about mailing lists. 1. Are
>>>> mailing lists going away? 2. Can projects choose to keep just the mailing
>>>> list and not add dicourse?
>>>>
>>>>
dicourse?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Eli
>>> --
>>> *From:* Discuss on behalf of Vicky
>>> Vergara via Discuss
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 26, 2023 9:52 PM
>>> *To:* OSGeo Discussions
>>> *Subject:* Re: [O
>> *From:* Discuss on behalf of Vicky
>> Vergara via Discuss
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 26, 2023 9:52 PM
>> *To:* OSGeo Discussions
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration
>>
>> Hi Jody,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2
bout the trust levels)
Regards
Vicky
> Thanks, Eli
> --
> *From:* Discuss on behalf of Vicky
> Vergara via Discuss
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 26, 2023 9:52 PM
> *To:* OSGeo Discussions
> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse
Hi Jody,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 9:31 PM Jody Garnett wrote:
> Vicky,
>
> Is there any more information on what is being offered here?
>
> I have not used discourse very much. What do you mean by having a category
> Can you be more clear about migrate and mirror.
>
Category, is like the one you
Hello all
We are ready to migrate mailing lists to discourse,
* Have the mailing list migrated completely to discourse
* Have a mirror of the mailing in discourse
* Have a category on discourse and not have a mailing list
* Opt to not migrate or mirror the mailing list
A comprehensive list of mai
Hi all,
After a while without too much administration on the nabble archives
I've offered myself with Mat Loskot as backup admin to update and
polish the status of nabble archives.
Thanks to Eli and others I've just set up a bunch of mailing lists
- libLAS, PDAL and GeoMOOSE projects
- Dutch and
On 11-05-26 04:31 PM, Tim Schaub wrote:
OpenLayers is in a bit of a mess with regard to mailing lists. We have several
@openlayers.org addresses that non-members should be able to write to. These
addresses could be consolidated (to one address in my opinion), but they
include things like places t
OpenLayers is in a bit of a mess with regard to mailing lists. We have
several @openlayers.org addresses that non-members should be able to
write to. These addresses could be consolidated (to one address in my
opinion), but they include things like places to send in CLA, ask for
trac/subversi
40 matches
Mail list logo
