chill wrote:
> Yep, there's a lot of it about. It shouldn't be a reflection on either
> of you. Remember the old saying: "Men marry women with the hope they
> will never change. Women marry men with the hope they will change.
> Invariably they are both disappointed."
>
> Good luck.
A bit of
Thanks for the kind thoughts guys. The reason I am so reluctant and sad
is I actually really like my wife and honestly don't want us to break
up. I saw the kids moving away as an opportunity to spend more time
together and rekindle our relationship which has become colder and more
distant;
My experience:
Bought our first Squeezebox Duet in 2008 for the living room, connected
to my Naim amp. This prompted me to buy a NAS (Synology DS107) to run
LMS (then SqueezeboxServer) and learn a whole lot about Linux and
networking!
Bought our second Squeezebox Duet in 2009 for the kitchen.
I think everybody is using the Spotify plugins these days. It is more
than £$10 a month of effort to get free Spotify playing through
Squeezebox. I have the family package of 5 accounts for £15. Only one is
available through Squeezebox it works very well.
Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk
garym wrote:
> Sonos server is essentially built into each unit. The files have to be
> served from somewhere locally, but that can be a NAS or some sort of
> drive attached to a router, etc. I assume this is the main reason that
> Sonos is not willing to update their software in any
ad6922 wrote:
> I was going on the same path last year to look for alternatives for
> squeezebox as the LMS-software on my QNAP nas had security breaches.
>
> In the end I went for a rpi2 with max2play.com. As it is a rather cheap
> alternative I wanted to give it a try.
>
> By now, it's not a
Atlantic wrote:
> So, if you only need to access your LMS Web UI, you can do that from
> your work computer's browser, using port 443. Port 443 will not be
> blocked.
>
> eg: http://[your url if you have a suitable DNS record, or your IP
> address]:443
>
> You will ALSO need to set up your
Roland0 wrote:
You can use 8080, then. However, make sure your LMS server is actually
reachable from outside your home network (in most home setups, it
isn't)
Additionally, note that port 9000 is for the web interface - if you want
to stream audio, you'll need another port
I already do
pinkdot wrote:
Find a port that isn't blocked?
They all seem to be blocked! (other than 80 and 8080). Rather than
test the whole range of 60,000 odd, do you know any likely candidates
that might be open that my router won't be needing?
Thanks!
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
Hi folks. I am trying to connect remotely from work to my LMS server on
my home network which uses the port 9000. However, most outgoing ports
are blocked here. Is there any way round this?
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
SQUEEZEBOXES:[/B] TWO SB DUETS (LIVING ROOM AND KITCHEN) AND A
garym wrote:
Yes, I thought the LogiMusic streaming service was a strong message
that this was April Fools!
More a wish list than an April fools day joke eh Gary? ;)
For me, now that I can make a pretty decent headless player with a
Raspberry Pi, I2S DAC and a pretty case - all for less
dafiend wrote:
Currently in the same boat as you. I'm using Poweramp, but I don't think
its UI is particularly logical or appealing. I'm putting my hopes (and a
few $$$) into 'mobile foobar2000' (http://mobile.foobar2000.com/).
IMO, foobar2000 is the best player on the desktop by far. So
I am looking for a music player with music selection and playlist logic
as close as possible to Squeezebox - particularly Orange Squeeze. In
fact, if Orange Squeeze could index and play the music on my 64GB
microSD card then I would be a happy bunny.
I currently use Poweramp but get very
See my Sig - kitchen setup. Sounds nice but not loud. Should be fine for
a workshop. BW make some of the best sounding small speakers. Way
better than the Diamonds.
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
SQUEEZEBOXES:[/B] TWO SB DUETS (LIVING ROOM AND
SamS wrote:
Has anyone thought about using an Intel fanless NUC as a software
player?
http://www.fanlesstech.com/2014/04/intel-releases-its-fanless-nuc.html
A bit more expensive than a Raspberry Pi solution, but maybe not
extraordinarily so? And I'm thinking it would be more flexible,
SamS wrote:
All very good points! I was thinking I could get into a NUC (incl
memory, small SSD, Linux etc.) for under $250. But, as you stated, it
borders on overkill.
I am still very much interested in a Hifiberry + SPDIF card + proper
case + piCorePlayer, however I am in the US, so I
SamS wrote:
Thanks for all the great info. Per a message earlier in the thread, the
Wolfson is not supported by the piCorePlayer? What software player
would you use instead?
I think ideally, I'd want piCorePlayer running on a Pi + Hifiberry Digi
+ case. If someplace sold all of that
donmacn wrote:
thanks guys,
I have a spreadsheet too - with all the MAC addresses, IP addresses,
device names and so on - it's not that I'm hopelessly disorganised!:D
Just to recap though on some things above. I did set the router DHCP and
static ranges to avoid conflicts, but I'm
lrossouw wrote:
You kind of painted yourself into a corner here. You have complicated
requirements, particularly point 2.
I see 3/4 options:
1) If you let 2 go I would suggest something like plex server on linux.
I think it has DLNA features but it doesn't have the complicated
I am about to buy one of my sons a Raspberry Pi kit with case, WiFi and
PSU with the project to build himself a PiCorePlayer based Squeezebox
clone - he has been lobbying for a Squeezebox for his bedroom or the
kid's den for a while. This is not hi-fi so he will just be using the
audio out from
True static IP addresses are set on the device, not on the router. These
must not be set with IPs that are inside the router's DHCP pool.
IP addresses attributed to particular devices on the router are
reserved out of the DHCP pool and will not be allocated to any other
device. It is really
Yes, you need Premium for both the Logitech app and the Triode plug in.
Sent from my GT-I8190N using Tapatalk
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* Two SB Duets (Living room and kitchen)
*Server:* Synology DS111 (2TB) NAS running LMS 7.7.2
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL
th00ht wrote:
After Logitech gracefully has killed Squeezebox I wonder where to get a
decent Duet or just a receiver. Do they still produce and ship them?
The short answer is no.
However, there are software solutions out there now that allow you to
use almost any computer as a player that
P Nelson wrote:
As a project manager, I set my goals and scope early. I then ask if the
requested change is scope creep. Is the Sata connector or other recent
requests scope creep?
Others have answered your substantive points, but I totally agree with
the above point. In any project
I don't tend to make playlists that i keep forever, but I do like to
make playlists on the fly as I am listening - and then bin the list at
the end.
However I have always had problems with all controllers, hardware or
apps, where if you accidentally press the track button instead of
calling up
TheLastMan wrote:
Off topic for you, but the most useful thing for us would be a
smartphone app which allowed the user to sync/cache music files and
playlists from the LMS server to storage on the phone over wi-fi (for
off-line use). At the moment I use OrangeSqueeze/SqueezePlayer to play
erland wrote:
For those of you who are living together with a spouse or kids, I'd like
to understand a bit better how you would like to use local music
libraries in the future. Ignore what's supported in LMS and Squeezebox
today and instead think about how you would like it to work in the
To db122
Small suggestion. Had you given any thought to making it easier to call
up the Lyrics tag? I am in the process of adding lyrics data to all
my music (automated using Foobar) and at the moment I have to press and
hold on the album art to call up a list of items. Viewing the lyrics
tag
NeilF wrote:
OK. Having a couple of problems with the app :(
I'm using this on a 10 android tablet.
_*1._Navigating_lists*_
When confronted with a list of thousands of artists, albums or tracks,
you obviously want to be able to scroll quicky. I find the tiny scroll
widget on the
Reading this thread has made me more and more convinced that I am going
to try and hang onto my squeezeboxes for as long as I can keep them
functioning.
Although I recommend Sonos to my friends, it is only because they cannot
miss what they have never had.
My only anxiety is how I will keep it
ciarpame wrote:
Installed DSbridge on Windows 7 32bit and it worked at first try, very
easy. My LMS is 7.7.2 running on Arm-based readynas.
On LMS I can see artist and track title but not track duration (track
it's just an infinite stream, as playing a web radio) and not cover
art.
Since
castalla wrote:
Just add http://opml.radiotime.com as a Favourite - you get a decent
version of Tunein that way (without Tunein presets 'tho).
Excellent, thanks Castalla and Erland, that at least is one issue
sorted.
My own contribution:
HARMONIUM
[image:
http://www.delhimusics.com/exotichub/cotion/imguplod/tvr-mangini/harmonium-14.jpg]
originally an Accordion in a box. In other words a squeezbox in a box!
Otherwise +1 for SlimBox, although that is possibly a bit close to
SlingBox
CharlieG wrote:
I liked Phoenix Music Streamer...until I realized the acronym would be
PMS :)
Having Music Streamer in the name might help with marketing in the
long term tho.
The last few posts remind me of a Douglas Adams's Hitch Hiker story that
humans are the descendants of exiled
erland wrote:
If there is a designer reading this thread, I'd really love a nice case
designed for it which we could order through http://www.shapeways.com/
or similar sites.
Prototypes only I presume? Seeing as this will essentially be a small
black box with no display or control
JJZolx wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I see little reason to build a
displayless SB replacement without an internal DAC and analog out.
Otherwise, the only thing it such a device might have over the current
DIY solutions built on PCs with USB output is a high quality S/PDIF
out.
maggior wrote:
So, when the time comes I need to move on and only a closed system is
available and it does everything I need to do well, I'll be OK with
that.
I'm interested to see what develops over the next year.
My only problem with Sonos is that they don't have *' Triode'
SBGK wrote:
keep an eye on the squeezelite thread, seems to be evolving rapidly.
Thanks for the heads up. Had not spotted that thread before. The guy
is obviously a genius!
I was aware that I could install a software player on a mini-PC, and
that one comes bundled with Vortexbox anyway. I am
Thanks for the detailed feedback Erland, interesting to see what
motivates you guys. I will keep an eye on Squeezlite. Most of the
issues appear to be around making it work on low power devices. If it
works easily with something like a Zotac Zbox then I will probably go
that route in the
A (very) minor irritation for me is that Squeeze Player will start up
randomly for no obvious reason. Usually I am away from home so not using
any of the three SqueezeBox controller apps I have installed, or any
other music apps (Last.fm, Poweramp, Spotify) yet Squeeze Player will
start up and
I am probably being totally dense and missing the blindingly obvious,
but I cannot find a button for the + context menu anywhere?
This is available on the browser interface, the hardware Controller and
Squeeze Commander but I cannot find it on Orange Squeeze. It is a
notable absentee on the
kidstypike wrote:
Just press and hold for a second or two on any Artist, Album, Track, or
Album art.
Ah...
I knew it must be there somewhere!
I have turned on the context sensitive tips until I get used to it.
Love the interface by the way, very intelligent use of the space in
portrait mode.
andynormancx wrote:
[snip]
The Sony is indeed a bargain, but there -are- reasons it is much cheaper
than the iPod (beyond purely Apple's higher profit margins).
When it comes down to it the iPod touch isn't really competing with the
Sony. People who want a 32GB MP3 player/Internet device
Just got a glimpse of the future, and it is phone shaped.
I have been a bit late to the smartphone market. I have an old 2nd
generation iPod Touch but it was a bit sluggish with apps so did not
really go far down that route.
My cell phone contract came up for renewal and I needed to economise
bhaagensen wrote:
Oh, and several other things such that your home is left without a
music-system when your phone=you is not available for music-playback :)
Also Im not reading you clear when you on one hand say you understand
Logitech for leaving a product one can get for free, and on the
Mick Seymour wrote:
Do the tracks have replay gain data in them? LMS can only use it if the
information is there. It isn't something the player does AFAIK.
When the file is encoded replay gain (RG) data has to be added for the
system to work. I use dBPoweramp with the RG plug-in when ripping
bhaagensen wrote:
Yes, I think I'm with you. Though I think you are overlooking one
important aspect the Squeezebox-brand [had...].
Namely a unique status as a high-fidelity, high-quality, feature rich
(almost complete), very reasonably priced streaming solution.
[snip]
As I said I
ModelCitizen wrote:
Well I'm 52. :-)
Ah, but obviously young at heart!
(so am I by the way)
I've had iPhones for a few years now, and also have a Google Nexus 7. My
wife (whose phone I borrow as and when) has an HTC desire and son an
iPod.
We use iPeng on the Apple devices (although the
ModelCitizen wrote:
Well I'm 52. :-)
...and the Touch is just a bit of a white elephant (makes a nice clock
though).
Not sure what you mean by that. Are you saying that you no longer use
it as a streamer? Or just that just the screen is superfluous?
If my amplifier and speakers are static
ModelCitizen wrote:
Both of my Controllers are bricks. Won't charge. I've changed the
batteries but they just run out and never recharge. The bases are OK and
so are the devices. The connections between them make. It's baffling.
That's a shame. When I drop mine into its dock the screen
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96660
Question:
Labarum wrote:
Not going there - it's rip off country.
I agree, despite owning some fantastic Naim amps. Streaming is computer
technology - there is nothing mystical about it that needs hi-fi
expertise. Buy one of their DACs if you wish, or an amp with an inbuilt
DAC, but just plug a SB
banned for life wrote:
Keep in mind that the life span of a lithium ion battery begins with
it's manufacture, not when you start using it. To prolong the life of
the spares, fully charge them and then discharge to about 40% and then
store in a cool place. Repeat this process now and then.
After much deliberation and reading of this forum - my strategy is to
continue to use my SB Receivers and Controllers until either they break
or Triode's Spotify and BBC iPlayer plugins stop working. By that time
I am hopeful that there will be a decently functional alternative.
I cannot see a
johnas wrote:
Sonos has discontinued their dedicated controller. The cr200 suffered
from widespread touch screen failures (see their forums).Two families I know
with Sonos systems have long since replaced any
controllers they had with apps on their iPads. Neither regrets the move.
Two others
Agent Smith wrote:
How long have you had your Squeezeboxes for?Duet since 18 March 2008 which is
a tad under 4.5 years. Second receiver
added August 2008.
How long do you reckon they'll last before a chip burns up or it just
stops powering on for no apparent reason?Not a clue. Hopefully
garym wrote:
I hope I last 10 years. ;-)
Ditto! That brought me right down to earth with a bump Gary. Puts all
this Squeezebox nonsense in its proper context.
Carpe diem and all that...
TheLastMan's Profile:
agillis wrote:
VortexBox has 5 built in players so there is no need for hardware
players. I can keep my system running forever.
How well do Vortexboxes Synchronise with each other?
And will they do gapless playback?
If you only have one soundcard, how do the 5 players work?
Mnyb wrote:
Controllers battery is not very long lived , luckily it is the same as
some popular Harmony remotes , so it won't get out of stock for a while
, some chargers for controllers also have a connection problem. Newer ones
don't, and it is possible to bend contacts in the dock to
mherger wrote:
Would TinyLMS in the touch work without mysb.com? Would I then be
able
to use services like WiMP or spotify?
No, all services still depend on mysb.com
--
Michael
Minor correction, you could use Spotify (Premium) with Triode's plug-in,
but the official app would no
JJZolx wrote:
I'm probably forgetting a few things, but:
- much better sound quality than a PC's onboard audio, without a
pressing need for an external S/PDIF or USB DAC
- better S/PDIF, with lower jitter
- MUCH better audio syncing with other Squeezeboxes
- IR remote
mherger wrote:
Minor correction, you could use Spotify (Premium) with Triode's
plug-in,
but the official app would no longer be available.
He was asking about TinyLMS (embedded on SB Touch). In this case
Triode's
plugin isn't an option.
--
Michael
Ah, I understand now,
mherger wrote:
It'll be what it'll be.
--
Michael
So there -*will*- be an *it* then! ;)
Just kidding, I understand the constraint you are under and we all
really appreciate your candour and helpfulness in posting to this forum
and don't want to get you into trouble. I hope Logitech
On the presumption that Logitech produces a Touch-like player under the
UE brand (standalone, unamplified, high sound quality, RCA analogue and
digital out, multi-room sync) there is nothing to stop anybody running
both the SB and UE systems side-by-side if necessary. Most amplifiers
have more
nervoteso wrote:
i often listen to deezer, when mysqueezebox will be no more, how could i
do? maybe a new deezer plugin like the spotify one?
The plug-in replacement for streaming apps and internet radio would be
the preferred solution, provided somebody has the desire and expertise
to do the
Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?
It is not dead yet, just has been told it has only two years to live and
that it won't be able to have any more children!
Two years is a long time in technology, not only will new products come
along but Logitech have time to
mrfantasy wrote:
... the important thing is maintaining the Slim protocol and ensuring
new servers and clients can be developed to it.
--MikeWhy? Squeezebox will be a dead system. Other systems will come along
to replace and supersede it, maybe not immediately but within a couple
of years
epoch1970 wrote:
I often wondered about this. So you say the SBs are rarely spotted. Do
you see many Sonos systems (in absolute terms) ?
I have four friends with Sonos and two who bought Squeezebox. Two bought
the Sonos on my recommendation (I was having a hard time with SB at the
time) and
epoch1970 wrote:
Because the slim protocol does work pretty damn well. I for one will not
regress to DLNA or this kind of nonsense. Maybe future versions of
airplay or the elusive android@home protocols will be able to supersede
it.
I haven't lost hope that Logitech will develop the UE
Mnyb wrote:
I know only one person irl that have either , me ? Never seen a live
Sonos system and actually never anyone elses Squeezebox system either .
I'm rudimentary sociable and able to make friends ;) so it is not that
I'm an isolated geek that only know 1 person irl.
It must be
garym wrote:
All of my iphone/ipod stuck in a speaker doc friends are easily
one-percenters. I don't see any correlation between income/wealth and
willingness to invest in quality audio (either now, the 1980s, or the
1960s for that matter).
With the greatest respect, that is rather a daft
jhonsber...@msn.com wrote:
What a coup for Sonos this is gonna be.
Not really, I doubt Sonos have considered SB to be a much of a threat
since the Touch was released. Sonos have pretty much had the field to
themselves. The reviews for the Touch were stellar over here, but I
have never
Letten wrote:
Before mysqueezebox.com came along (as an option for people who didn't
like/need a local server) we did just fine. Why should that not be
possible again?
It is possible if you only play music from your own library, not so
great if you play internet radio or use one of the
Benefactor wrote:
What I mean is extra units you purchased as backups in case one of your
older units fails?
I have two Booms, and a Classic3 that have been running for around 4
years, I guess.
Just picked up a Touch as a backup unit the other day...have no place
to plug it in right
dasmueller wrote:
I for one am a dinosaur and will not willingly go the rental route. I
enjoy the flexibility of being able to do what I wish w the CD/hard
copies or downloaded files that I have. I am not willing to rely on
someone else to provide that flexibility for me. There is too much
I doubt there will be any new and exclusively audio SqueezeBox based
hardware in future. We might see an upgraded version of the Touch
and/or radio but nothing totally new. I think it is most likely,
however, that the Squeezebox branded Radio will go and be replaced
with a much simpler and
maggior wrote:
I read 3 and thought uh, that's the Boom, but then I realized you
meant something you can connect your own speakers too. In the world of
powered speakers, would that really be necessary. Somebody that is
inclined to buy their own passive speakers would also be inclined to
maggior wrote:
Logitech needs to relaunch the Squeezebox line with some new exciting
hardware and marketing support.Yep, that is exactly what they have to do.
They won't though. My
favourite discount hi-fi retailer, Superfi, has just stopped stocking
any Squeezebox stuff. John Lewis used
Usually most consumer users rather than enthusiasts want to keep it
simple. Most of the suggestions here are from rather hard-core users,
as you would expect on a dedicated forum.
Unfortunately Sonos has beaten Squeezebox in this particular format
battle. Now when I describe my Squeezebox
I always use the Windows executable for net-UDAP available here:
http://slim2lirc.myown.mailcan.com/udap_shell_1_0_0.exe
This is much more straightforward for those of us with Windows machines
as it does not require the pre-installation of Perl. Launch the exe and
you are straight into a
*Technical question:* does the Squeezebox Receiver have some set
streaming rates? I ask this because I have been trying to optimise the
position of my Receiver relative to my wireless router and using the
Network signal graph utility on the Controller. It seems to me that the
Duet will stream
A common problem for many people using net-UDAP is that the PC (or
laptop) you are using to configure the Receiver has to be in the same
subnet as the Receiver itself. If the PC/laptop is already connected to
a network and the internet then it will not work.
There is some kind of procedure that
zowie wrote:
Aren't they a little taller? They look it from the pic. -Height -
clearance is my problem in switching over from jewel cases. I have
univenture safety sleeves for my cd-r's and they don't fit.
Sorry, just noticed you were replying to me!
They are not noticeably taller. If
the time and aggravation.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
. So I have no choice but to replace with CDs or
downloads.
As they are also old people's chestnuts too, I could probably
download them all free if I wanted to. However I am a law abiding
citizen and will probably just pick them up as second hand CDs where I
can.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http
in the small study in the loft if I need
them. I have put them into sleeves and then small boxes like these:
[image: http://i1159.photobucket.com/albums/p623/Oefinell/Leitz.jpg]
8 altogether which take up almost no space on our study shelves.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
insert either so leave both
together in the loft. I find myself referring to the web when I need
information on a recording these days. Usually a lot more informative
than the sleeve notes.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers
are using a
laptop in a public environment such as a wi-fi hot spot or when you are
collecting your e-mail from a provider that does not pre-scan for
viruses.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS
Spotify to your
Squeezeboxes using DSBridge only works if you have the files in both
the Spotify application folder AND the Flash folder.
It might be that just having the files in your Flash folder, even if
renamed, is enough to get it to work.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
!
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
*Livingroom:* Receiver into Naim
my technophobe wife quickly got
the hang of the sync option after 2 minutes of training (the limit of
her patience with these things!). However she finds swapping between
players with the Controller a bind, so I may have to buy a second one!
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
socistep;691044 Wrote:
Its a shame Mrs TheLastMan won't pick up Squeezecommander or iPeng as
they are really easy for controlling and syncing players!
I know, its strange. She really does prefer hardware buttons to a
touch screen and was contemplating dumping the HTC for a Blackberry
a choice of one or the other according to the
considerations that Erland has listed.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem
views on how Rhapsody compares to Spotify?
Will Logitech Squeezebox be offering a Rhapsody interface for UK
subscribers?
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
be losing their Napster libraries and playlists?
Will the Squeezebox app look any different?
How will us 5-for-5 subscribers who are going to be cut off resubscribe
to the Rhapsody version of Napster?
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two
,
put a CD in their PC or laptop run a *very* simple setup routine and
transfer their music and video. The rest should be pressing buttons.
I would not want such a system, but 95% of the population would prefer
it.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet
? Most don't need or care for it.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem/router, 2 x Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 as
access points
cannot really blame Apple for the fact that Logitech wants
to use its technology.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller + two receivers)
*Server:* Synology DS107+ (500GB) NAS running LMS 7.7.0 on SSODSmod
4.14
*Network:* Netgear DG834GT ADSL modem
are quite scarce in much
of Europe except UK and Germany. For the full list go to
http://www.mysqueezebox.com/appgallery
It also gives you access to a limited amount (2GB) of free music
storage in the cloud via a service called MP3tunes music locker. Go
to
http://www.mp3tunes.com/
--
TheLastMan
nowadays is reliable enough to eliminate the need for the server to be
wired permanently to the router which is too much of a physical tie.
The Radio needs to go touch screen to keep up, but otherwise it is OK.
--
TheLastMan
Matt
http://www.last.fm/user/MJL-UK
*SqueezeBoxes:* SB Duet (Controller
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
