[slim] Logitech Squeezebox Classic (P/N 830-000012) for sale (UK)

2021-12-29 Thread Londonist
Hi there, I've just listed my Classic on eBay: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/133978177346. Happy to take offers from this forum via PM. Jon Londonist's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=71517 View

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-22 Thread fletch
slartibartfast wrote: > Have you ever known any tech support to be good? They generally aren't > remotely technical and follow a script. The only tech support worth the > name is from engineers who know the products inside out. > > Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk Once in a while I will

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-22 Thread fletch
ftlight wrote: > Yes, unfortunately there are actually very few devices that the hub can > control by either IP or Bluetooth. This page lists them: > https://atlantic-cable.com/Ephemera/Broadsides/index.htm > > However, if you can work with IR, it's a very flexible system. I have > one in my

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-22 Thread NFLnut
ftlight wrote: > Yes, unfortunately there are actually very few devices that the hub can > control by either IP or Bluetooth. This page lists them: > https://atlantic-cable.com/Ephemera/Broadsides/index.htm > > However, if you can work with IR, it's a very flexible system. I have > one in my

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-21 Thread slartibartfast
fletch wrote: > > > Support thought they remote was broken and told me to send it back. > > The remotes are great once setup.. just the setup software and their > tech support is very poor. > Have you ever known any tech support to be good? They generally aren't remotely technical and

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-21 Thread ftlight
NFLnut wrote: > I bought a hub/remote system from Best Buy a few weeks ago when I heard > the news. Had been on the fence for a couple of years. So far, I am not > impressed (but I may just not understand yet how the system works) as > very LITTLE of what I need to control is centralized where

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-21 Thread fletch
I also bought a backup from Best buy. I had the "lower end" smart model on both my main tv and bedroom tv. That one was no longer available new so I went the other route and went with high end model, The Elite. It's nice but it's overkill and I ran into some bugs with the setup software that

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-21 Thread NFLnut
I bought a hub/remote system from Best Buy a few weeks ago when I heard the news. Had been on the fence for a couple of years. So far, I am not impressed (but I may just not understand yet how the system works) as very LITTLE of what I need to control is centralized where I can run IR extenders

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-17 Thread earthbased
Logitech...where innovative products go to die. After Logitech bought the Canadian company Harmony, they screwed up the programming software making the UI harder to use and constant USB cable problems. I would have to provide tech support to my brother and friend because it was so hard to

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-05-12 Thread RonM
I got my remote and dont know why I didn't do it years ago. Makes life simpler. I see Walmart Canada sells them in their website, or rather a website merchant does. About 50% premium over the list price. Says it isn't in manufacturer's packaging to save shipping space. Allegedly "new

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-24 Thread RonM
RonM wrote: > I'd been meaning to get a Harmony remote for some time, especially as > the power button on the remote for my older Sony Receiver has been > giving out and would cost a fair bit to get a dedicated replacement. So > was pissed-off when I found they were discontinuing. > > I did a

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-23 Thread RobbH
The US closeout site Woot (a division of Amazon) has a few Harmony remotes listed today. https://electronics.woot.com/plus/logitech-remotes Unfortunately, I think they only sell to the "lower 48" US states. LMS 8 nightly running on Raspberry Pi OS. Mostly virtual players, occasionally with

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-20 Thread fletch
RonM wrote: > I'd been meaning to get a Harmony remote for some time, especially as > the power button on the remote for my older Sony Receiver has been > giving out and would cost a fair bit to get a dedicated replacement. So > was pissed-off when I found they were discontinuing. > > I did a

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-19 Thread RonM
I'd been meaning to get a Harmony remote for some time, especially as the power button on the remote for my older Sony Receiver has been giving out and would cost a fair bit to get a dedicated replacement. So was pissed-off when I found they were discontinuing. I did a search locally (Toronto

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-19 Thread Paul Webster
gordonb3 wrote: > Never really understood why LMS requires me to connect to a Logitech > account as well That can be disabled by you. Although if a lot of people did it then Logitech may well decide that there is no longer a justification for keeping mysqueezebox.com running and so all of the

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-19 Thread gordonb3
Pretty fond of the Hub I got running for controlling TV, set-top box and Dune media player. I am somewhat annoyed though about the fact that it requires internet access to allow LAN access through the phone app and home automation services. Never really understood why LMS requires me to connect

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-18 Thread Tony T
Just read this in Wired: How the Smart Remote Lost Its Way https://www.wired.com/story/logitech-harmony-smart-remote-lost-its-way It mentions a guy that repairs Harmony Remotes: https://www.harmonyremoterepair.com/#/ Tony SBTouch SBRadio

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-17 Thread fletch
danco wrote: > Yes, I think you are right, and the One For All may have been a mistake > for the reasons you give. Unfortunately it came in one of those plastic > containers that have to be destroyed to get into them, so I can't return > it. > > But it only cost a few pounds, so no great

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-17 Thread Fahzz
Come on everybody-it could be a lot worse. Logitech could be dropping other things if you catch my drift. I don't want to say it out loud. Living Room: Pi3 w/Allo Digione Player (Wired), Max2Play w/LMS Server 8.0 and SqueezeLite Pioneer Elite VSX 80, Parasound 2125 v2 KEF LS50's, Paradigm SE

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-17 Thread danco
Franck@ wrote: > I continue to be very sad after Logitech's decision to stop selling the > Harmony remote. > > I quickly looked at the One For All site, but I'm afraid it might not be > a real alternative. Unless I'm mistaken, there are no remote controls > with screens. > > Nothing better

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-17 Thread Franck@
I continue to be very sad after Logitech's decision to stop selling the Harmony remote. I quickly looked at the One For All site, but I'm afraid it might not be a real alternative. Unless I'm mistaken, there are no remote controls with screens. Nothing better than the screen to make the use

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-16 Thread fletch
Tony T wrote: > Check other retailers. I got my backup at Best Buy in the US Yea I canceled my used Amazon backup when I saw ebay had new ones from BB. They don't have my exact model so got to decide between the companion and elite

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-16 Thread danco
florca wrote: > I was a bit surprised by this, as my OFA remotes have all included > factory codes for Humax PVRs. I think the answer is that for some reason > they now categorise them under "Sat / DVB-T", and a quick look on their > web support code-search pages ( 'HERE' >

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-16 Thread florca
danco wrote: > At that price it is worth getting and just seeing how it works. I have > just got one. I see that the devices it has codes for include VCR but > not a PVR (mine is a Humax Fox T2). But I am sure the JP1 forums will > give instructions for those. I was a bit surprised by this, as

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-16 Thread danco
florca wrote: > Maybe a lone dissenting voice, but I never really got on with my Harmony > remote. After struggling to get it working in the way I wanted I ended > up buying some One-for-All (UIC) remotes which can be very flexibly > re-programmed / hacked using a home made adaptor and "JP1"

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-16 Thread mamema
i have a Harmony 1000 on the shelf. Didn't know what to do with it as my setup changed to iphone/ipad mamema's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=44662 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-15 Thread Tony T
RonM wrote: > I don't have a harmony remote but the eulogies tell me I should get one. > The only ones I can on Amazon are used/vg, is it worthwhile to take the > risk? Sold by a third party, but actually shipped by Amazon. > > R. Check other retailers. I got my backup at Best Buy in the US

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-15 Thread RonM
I don't have a harmony remote but the eulogies tell me I should get one. The only ones I can on Amazon are used/vg, is it worthwhile to take the risk? Sold by a third party, but actually shipped by Amazon. R. LMS on a dedicated server (FitPC3) Transporter (Ethernet) - main listening, Onkyo

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-12 Thread Michael Herger
I wonder how long they'll continue to sink those costs with no revenue from sales (however small that was). Bad press/image doesn't come for free either!... ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-12 Thread ftlight
tw99 wrote: > I wonder how long they'll continue to sink those costs with no revenue > from sales (however small that was). It's been seven years since they discontinued the Smart Radio, and here we all are still.

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-12 Thread Tony T
tw99 wrote: > I wonder how long they'll continue to sink those costs with no revenue > from sales (however small that was). Squeezeserver is still up. This Forum is still up. I suspect the Harmony server will be up for a long time (even if they stop updating the database) Tony SBTouch

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-12 Thread tw99
Tony T wrote: > Logitech did say that while no new remotes will be made, that they will > keep the system going, including continuing to update the database. I wonder how long they'll continue to sink those costs with no revenue from sales (however small that was).

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread Tony T
TomAmes wrote: > ...But this time I fear there is no community like all the guys around > here who have kept the Squeezebox system going. > Logitech did say that while no new remotes will be made, that they will keep the system going, including continuing to update the database. Tony

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread TomAmes
Apesbrain wrote: > It's a good product. It fills a specific need. No one else makes a > worthy substitute. Sound familiar? > > Anyway, I bought a backup this morning. Does it ever sound familiar! jfo wrote: > I still use my Harmony 880 which I bought about 18 years ago. They were > a

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread thniels
Where Harmony really excels for us, is when we have things that don't really talk to each other. For instance, we have a Harmony Hub control TV, Bluray and a Mu-so. The Mu-so is connected to the TV for sound. Because our TV doesn't communicate well over HDMI ARC, we have Harmony control the

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread pbroughton
I also have two Harmony units, but continue to prefer the JP1 remotes, the 8820 cited above was/is really the most perfect remote in the hand, almost as good as the TIVO remotes. But 1000% more useful. The RCA RCRP05BR and the Inteset 4 in 1 are also excellent. I even have a few URC-6131s,

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread peterw
florca wrote: > I never really got on with my Harmony remote. After struggling to get it > working in the way I wanted I ended up buying some One-for-All (UIC) > remotes which can be very flexibly re-programmed / hacked using a home > made adaptor and "JP1" software. To be honest I've no idea

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread alfista
Franck@ wrote: > The creation of "activities" is great and essential. This avoids having > to juggle multiple remote controls Exactly! My Harmony controls TV, AVR, satellite receiver, Squeezebox and an HTPC running Kodi. Aboslutely seamless. Extra comfort points for using RF between remote and

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread chill
Another vote for the One-For-All remotes. I've never owned or used a Harmony, so I don't know what I'm missing, but I have a couple of One-For-All 8's which work very well. They have a learning function, and the JP1 software allows me to backup/clone/restore a fully configured remote very

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread florca
Maybe a lone dissenting voice, but I never really got on with my Harmony remote. After struggling to get it working in the way I wanted I ended up buying some One-for-All (UIC) remotes which can be very flexibly re-programmed / hacked using a home made addaptor and "JP1" software. To be honest

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread Tony T
Franck@ wrote: > This is very, very bad news! All the multimedia systems of my family and > friends are controlled by these remote controls (Harmony 6xx). > > The creation of "activities" is great and essential. This avoids having > to juggle multiple remote controls (TV, amplifier, multimedia

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread Franck@
Paul Webster wrote: > I thought it was only bad news when one breaks and you cannot get a new > one - until then there is no change ... and Logitech even saying that > they will still add IR codes for new devices that have to be controlled. Yes, at this moment nothing changes: it still works.

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread Paul Webster
Franck@ wrote: > This is very, very bad news! All the multimedia systems of my family and > friends are controlled by these remote controls (Harmony 6xx). > I thought it was only bad news when one breaks and you cannot get a new one - until then there is no change ... and Logitech even saying

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-11 Thread Franck@
This is very, very bad news! All the multimedia systems of my family and friends are controlled by these remote controls (Harmony 6xx). The creation of "activities" is great and essential. This avoids having to juggle multiple remote controls (TV, amplifier, multimedia player ...) and it

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread bernt
Oh no! The Harmony Companion is second best gadget I ever had. We all know that’s numbers one. Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk SB Touch optical to Hegel H90, Speakers Larsen 4.2 Spare SB3 AirPlay Bridge to Audio Pro A10 Squeezelite-x connected to home LMS with ZeroTier One. SB Radio

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread fletch
While I am new to LMS/Squeezebox, I have had harmony remotes for years. I have a One, a 650 and 2 hubs with the smart remotes . Those hubs are the best $$ I have spent . My fiancé has some disabilities and having one uniform remote for everything makes life much easier for her. I have them

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread jfo
I still use my Harmony 880 which I bought about 18 years ago. They were a Canadian company started around 2001 and had amazing customer service. I recall setting up my Tact digital room correction system, digital amps and other gear over the phone with a tech support person. He accessed my

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread ftlight
paul- wrote: > I figured this day would come. I’ve used them before Logitech bought > the line. Kinda odd when they are really the only player in town > The market is just too small I've been using Harmony a long time too, but most people just have a smart tv with all the apps, no A/V

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread paul-
I figured this day would come. I’ve used them before Logitech bought the line. Kinda odd when they are really the only player in town The market is just too small piCorePlayer a small player for the Raspberry Pi in RAM. Homepage: https://www.picoreplayer.org Please 'donate'

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread Tony T
Also bought a backup today (a 665) Tony SBTouch SBRadio Tony T's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34544 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=114352

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread Fahzz
Apesbrain wrote: > It's a good product. It fills a specific need. No one else makes a > worthy substitute. Sound familiar? Funny guy! Living Room: Pi3 w/Allo Digione Player (Wired), Max2Play w/LMS Server 8.0 and SqueezeLite Pioneer Elite VSX 80, Parasound 2125 v2 KEF LS50's, Paradigm SE

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread Apesbrain
It's a good product. It fills a specific need. No one else makes a worthy substitute. Sound familiar? Anyway, I bought a backup this morning. Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738

Re: [slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread alfista
I bloody love my Harmony Hub, at least when I'm done configuring it because that's an ordeal which perfectly illustrates the vulnerability of hardware that's dependent on cloud services. Hopefully Harmony customers will get the same level of long term support that Squeezebox users have enjoyed

[slim] Logitech is done making Harmony remotes

2021-04-10 Thread Tony T
Logitech is done making Harmony remotes https://www.engadget.com/harmony-remote-rip-020210167.html Official Statement https://support.logi.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/150658341 While Harmony remotes are and continue to be available through various retailers, moving forward Logitech will no

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox Classic - with WI-FI !!!!!

2020-10-10 Thread bpa
The SB Classic can work with no WLAN card. A bad / broken / incompatible WLAN card will stop a SB Class from working. Do NOT flash / reprogram a replacement WLAN CARD 1. Remove WLAN card and connect SB Classic with wired Ethernet to LMS. 2. Check SB Classic powers up and connects to LMS. 3.

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox Classic - with WI-FI !!!!!

2020-10-09 Thread olegnovak67
bpa wrote: > SB Classic uses same firmware with and without WLAN card. SB Classic > firmware is installed and updated by LMS. > > Note sure what you mean by " flashed it with a programmer ". > > When WLAN card fails - usual action is to replace with an identical > model - no need to flash.

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox Classic - with WI-FI !!!!!

2020-10-08 Thread bpa
SB Classic uses same firmware with and without WLAN card. SB Classic firmware is installed and updated by LMS. Note sure what you mean by " flashed it with a programmer ". When WLAN card fails - usual action is to replace with an identical model - no need to flash. Plenty of replacement

[slim] Logitech Squeezebox Classic - with WI-FI !!!!!

2020-10-07 Thread olegnovak67
Good day, everyone . I have such a problem . Logitech Squeezebox Classic with wi-fi capability - the network card burned down - I replaced it and flashed it with a programmer - but I only had the same player at hand but without wi-fi / PROBLEM !!! Need firmware on Logitech Squeezebox Classic -

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-08-21 Thread callesoroe
w3wilkes wrote: > but the one hit wonders don't seem to have that formula for longevity > that we saw in the 60's. You really first know that after 10-20 year….. Callesoroe Living room: Transporter, Tact RCS 2.2X digital preamp, Martin Logan Vista speakers, AMPS(Icepower): Acoustic Reality

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-08-13 Thread w3wilkes
One of the things I look for is bands that are capable of doing whole albums like "Jason Isbell and the 400 Unit". I know we had the "one hit wonders" like "J. Frank Wilson and the Cavaliers", but the one hit wonders don't seem to have that formula for longevity that we saw in the 60's. Main

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-08-13 Thread d6jg
I disagree. The advent of CDs and now streamed albums has brought more tracks per media format than before. Yes there a single track releases but more EPs and albums? VB2.4[/B] STORAGE *QNAP TS419P (NFS) [B]Living Room* - Joggler & SB3 -> Onkyo TS606 -> Celestion F20s *Office* - Pi3+Sreen ->

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-08-12 Thread cathcam
toby10 wrote: > Indeed. You could also bring back cassettes, 8-tracks, HD-DVD, beta > max/VHS, etc… Overtime, I expect to see the end of the album as a concept, and thats more worrying. As streaming services become more embedded and a way for the media giants to maintain a profitable lock on

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-01-21 Thread toby10
earthbased wrote: > Everything has a price. Indeed. You could also bring back cassettes, 8-tracks, HD-DVD, beta max/VHS, etc… Is there a (albeit small) market for them? Sure. But when your competition for the above is CD’s & downloads, Bluetooth & WiFi, streaming, Blu-ray, DVD….. why

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-01-21 Thread Paul Webster
I think that Logitech has stopped selling its AirPlay speaker. So does this mean that it does not have any speakers with TCP/IP in them any more? Paul Webster http://dabdig.blogspot.com Paul Webster's Profile:

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-01-20 Thread pippin
Well, Porsche, to begin with, already no longer exists (as a company making cars) today... --- learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox and Logitech UE Smart Radio as well as iPeng Party, the free Party-App, at penguinlovesmusic.com *New: iPeng 9, the Universal

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-01-20 Thread garym
earthbased wrote: > Porsche should shut down immediately! Porsche and all other auto manufacturers will look much different in the near future (and some will not exist). Younger people are no longer interested in owning cars or the driving experience. They are very happy with mass

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-01-20 Thread earthbased
Mnyb wrote: > I know . Working in a multinational myself :) the top floor does not > really know what to do with smaller products even if they work well in > their niche's and even turn a small profit with reasonable margin . > They just cant fit it into both bussines model and organisation .

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-01-20 Thread earthbased
toby10 wrote: > This has been discussed in here for years, over and over. It will never > happen. It will never be resurrected, nor sold, nor licensed to a third > party, etc.. > It's dead as a viable consumer product offering. Everything has a price.

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2018-01-16 Thread Vegz78
FredFredrickson wrote: > Who thinks Logitech should resurrect the brand and start selling > squeezeboxen again? I do! I would also hope for different brands, with different quality, audiophile and price ranges, and different solutions, with everything from full players like the boom and radio,

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox (non UE) lost Tune-In Station - help

2018-01-09 Thread bpa
Not sure about Android but their Web browser player does not use a standard supported format which means at the moment the station cannot be played on LMS , SB or UE. bpa's Profile:

Re: [slim] Logitech Squeezebox (non UE) lost Tune-In Station - help

2018-01-09 Thread Paul Webster
They are using Cirrus as their streaming service and don't provide a simple streaming URL that LMS/Squeezebox can use. Someone with an Android device should be able to run it through a local proxy to see what it is doing for that ... which might lead to a reusable URL. Paul Webster

Re: [slim] Logitech Radio Menu

2017-11-06 Thread frozzers
pippin wrote: > Well, there is of course the top level menu called „Radios“. > > If you don’t have that one you probably haven’t entered your > MySqueezebox.com account credentials in the server settings. And I think that'll give you the TuneIn Radio option (see my reply in your other thread).

Re: [slim] Logitech Radio Menu

2017-11-06 Thread pippin
Well, there is of course the top level menu called „Radios“. --- learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox and Logitech UE Smart Radio as well as iPeng Party, the free Party-App, at penguinlovesmusic.com *New: iPeng 9, the Universal App for iPhone, iPad and Apple

Re: [slim] Logitech Radio Menu

2017-11-06 Thread alfista
You wouldn't be able to provide a little context? Since there is nothing with just that name, you don't exactly give any information that would help getting a relevant answer. alfista's Profile:

[slim] Logitech Radio Menu

2017-11-06 Thread DrGaryG
Someone mention the Logitech Radio Menu. What is this and how do I find it. Thanks DrGaryG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=62574 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Logitech Transporter out of sync with EMM Labs DAC6e SE word clock

2017-09-28 Thread ballywho
I’ve come to the conclusion that the Transporter’s word clock input (and/or associated software) is simply not functioning correctly, and that there’s nothing wrong with the DAC6. Considering how much I really do love the Transporter, and was just curious about older DACs (even though I didn’t

[slim] Logitech Transporter out of sync with EMM Labs DAC6e SE word clock

2017-09-27 Thread ballywho
Good day ~ I recently purchased an EMM Labs DAC6e SE, and got it hooked up to my Logitech Transporter earlier today. I'm outputting PCM data over AES/EBU and have slaved it to the DAC6e's word clock via BNC. The DAC locks to the signal, reporting no errors on the front panel, but is putting

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-27 Thread DrewSB
cathcam wrote: > Anyone else notice the similarity between the Duet+controller and the > Harmony Pro and the Home Hub... > https://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/harmony-pro?crid=60 > > I wonder if you could use the Harmony Pro as a remote to control a > player or LMS? Yes, it works. I was

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-20 Thread iPhone
cathcam wrote: > I wonder if you could use the Harmony Pro as a remote to control a > player or LMS? . . The Harmony Pro will control most if not ALL Slim Devices that use IR Remote. The Duet IE Receiver/Controller are RF Controlled devices so the Harmony Pro doesn't work with them. *iPhone*

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-20 Thread drmatt
Apesbrain wrote: > I use a Harmony 650 to control a Touch.Via infrared presumably. It would be > interesting to know if there are vestiges of the LMS cli over Ethernet, is the point of the original question if I read it right. Personally I very very much doubt it, but I wouldn't be surprised if

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-20 Thread Apesbrain
cathcam wrote: > I wonder if you could use the Harmony Pro as a remote to control a > player or LMS? I use a Harmony 650 to control a Touch. Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738 View

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-20 Thread andifor
garym wrote: > These last few posts are talking about SONOS, not Sonore. Many (all?) > Sonore products already work with LMS, as they include Squeezelite. Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. andifor's Profile:

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-20 Thread BirdInitials
drmatt wrote: > In broad sweeping terms only.. a lot of time has passed. I've no doubt > the hub has a huge amount more power and features compared to the > duet/receiver. > > > -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- That looks right to me. Another Logitech acquisition (2004, for USD

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-19 Thread drmatt
In broad sweeping terms only.. a lot of time has passed. I've no doubt the hub has a huge amount more power and features compared to the duet/receiver. -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk- -- Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with Debian+LMS 7.9.0 Music:

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-19 Thread cathcam
Anyone else notice the similarity between the Duet+controller and the Harmony Pro and the Home Hub... https://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/harmony-pro?crid=60 I wonder if you could use the Harmony Pro as a remote to control a player or LMS? ---

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-19 Thread cathcam
Ikabob wrote: > I just had an idea that might bring SB owners back into the market > place. I haven't read all the posts on this thread so someone may have > alluded to something like this. But, what if SONOS made their devices > compatible with the Squeezeboxes. I would be very inclined to buy

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-19 Thread Julf
cathcam wrote: > For the most part, all cloud services are the same. Pull you in, lock up > your data, charge to access it, add services to maintain it. Absolutely. Unfortunately most people don't seem to mind these days. > How many companies do you know that offer the right to leave and take

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-19 Thread cathcam
Julf wrote: > The whole SONOS business idea is based on tying you into a closed > system. For the most part, all cloud services are the same. Pull you in, lock up your data, charge to access it, add services to maintain it. How many companies do you know that offer the right to leave and take

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-19 Thread cathcam
mherger wrote: > > > IMHO the LMS based product is becoming more and more of a niche product. > > Who does still curate his own music collection? We do, yes. But who > else? The mass market future is in the cloud, like it or not. As you > said: easy to use. And connected. > > -- > >

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread philippe_44
Julf wrote: > The whole SONOS business idea is based on tying you into a closed > system. It's not ´fully' closed due to it's upnp support. What is really proprietary is their sync system. There is a last improvement I'm thinking of adding that's to manage the Sonos grouping / ungrouping

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread Julf
Ikabob wrote: > what if SONOS made their devices compatible with the Squeezeboxes. I > would be very inclined to buy SONOS products to add to my SB ecosystem. > It might be a profitable venture for SONOS. The whole SONOS business idea is based on tying you into a closed system. "To try to

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread garym
andifor wrote: > Mix-up? Sonos and Sonore are not the same company. Only the first 4 > letters are the same. These last few posts are talking about SONOS, not Sonore. Many (all?) Sonore products already work with LMS, as they include Squeezelite. *Home:* VortexBox 4TB (2.4) > LMS 7.9.1 >

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread andifor
Ikabob wrote: > I just had an idea that might bring SB owners back into the market > place. I haven't read all the posts on this thread so someone may have > alluded to something like this. But, what if SONOS made their devices > compatible with the Squeezeboxes. I would be very inclined to buy

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread garym
castalla wrote: > Just use upnpbridge plugin and Sonos speakers become SB players. good point. Still not sure why I'd spend $300+ for a Sonos speaker to use with LMS, when cheaper/better options are available. *Home:* VortexBox 4TB (2.4) > LMS 7.9.1 > Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio (all

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread castalla
garym wrote: > Their underlying technology is completely different. Why buy SONOS > products to use with other SBs. Just add one of the many inexpensive Pi > microcomputer players to emulate a Squeezebox player. Just use upnpbridge plugin and Sonos speakers become SB players. Touch,

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread garym
Ikabob wrote: > I just had an idea that might bring SB owners back into the market > place. I haven't read all the posts on this thread so someone may have > alluded to something like this. But, what if SONOS made their devices > compatible with the Squeezeboxes. I would be very inclined to buy

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-17 Thread Ikabob
I just had an idea that might bring SB owners back into the market place. I haven't read all the posts on this thread so someone may have alluded to something like this. But, what if SONOS made their devices compatible with the Squeezeboxes. I would be very inclined to buy SONOS products to add

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-12 Thread iPhone
jerrym303 wrote: > My Modwright Transporter has been in a box for six years after moving. > I was thinking it would be hopelessly out of date, but still looks like > it will be useful. I liked the sound. No need to buy a new digital > source for my ripped CD collection when I get the system

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-12 Thread jerrym303
My Modwright Transporter has been in a box for six years after moving. I was thinking it would be hopelessly out of date, but still looks like it will be useful. I liked the sound. No need to buy a new digital source for my ripped CD collection when I get the system fired back up. I tink that

Re: [slim] Logitech should resurrect squeezebox

2017-09-08 Thread sitro0
English first En Français en suivant Hello I do not know if logitech is going to do a squeezebox ressurection but if they want they must first look at what did not work in their financial plans. For me it is essentially the complexity of the product. I remember few years ago when I bought my

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >