jp73;647568 Wrote:
I hope not, this will only make the serversoftware heavier, and create
more problems, they need to get a squeezeserver version that is simple
and does what it needs to do for the squuezeboxes
It will be like windows bloatware (no offence windows users :-))
I agree,
toby10;644777 Wrote:
So much so that it looks like the next major release of SBS will be
renamed LMS and will probably tie in with video products, Revue and
others. ;)
I hope not, this will only make the serversoftware heavier, and create
more problems, they need to get a squeezeserver
kmr;644618 Wrote:
With regards to 7.6, I have no idea if it will turn out to be a disaster
or not for the Squeezebox line [...]There have been other painful
slimserver/squeezecenter/squeezeboxserver
releases in the past. My personal low was with 7.4. Yes, 7.6 is a
little rough around the
Personally I have the impression that 7.6 was the retiring CEO's
farewell gift to Logitech!
FWIW: we learned about the CEO leaving only hours before you did. And
surely days after we released 7.6.
--
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
The ongoing 7.6 fiasco set me thinking. Just what is the connection
between this Forum and Logitech? Just seems that some posters here
seem to have 'insider' knowledge, and certainly the Logitech support
staff often direct queries here.
Ok, here's my attempt of a reply:
These forums were
castalla;644561 Wrote:
An official release usually implies that it won't totally reduce
the end-user's system to chaos. If it does, then a rapid retraction
and apology is in order together with clear instructions on how to
recover from the ruins of chaos!..
You have to also
The ongoing 7.6 fiasco set me thinking. Just what is the connection
between this Forum and Logitech? Just seems that some posters here
seem to have 'insider' knowledge, and certainly the Logitech support
staff often direct queries here.
I think some clarificaton of any 'relationships' would be
castalla;644551 Wrote:
The ongoing 7.6 fiasco set me thinking. Just what is the connection
between this Forum and Logitech? Just seems that some posters here
seem to have 'insider' knowledge, and certainly the Logitech support
staff often direct queries here.
I think some clarificaton
Thanks.
The total lack of any responses to posts on the Logitech Forum to the
7.6 mess suggests to me that they are either in shock or denial.
I don't take kindly to responses which claim greybeard status and
implicitly question 'What you complaining about, whippersnapper ... ?'
If you are
castalla;644561 Wrote:
If you are so experienced in beta testing how the heck did you not
advise that an official release of 7.6 should be delayed?
There was no opportunity given. In the past a release candidate was
proposed and time was given to highlight possible issues. AFAICT 7.6
was
Thanks.
Explains some of the issues
Personally I have the impression that 7.6 was the retiring CEO's
farewell gift to Logitech!
--
castalla
castalla's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15624
castalla;644576 Wrote:
Personally I have the impression that 7.6 was the retiring CEO's
farewell gift to Logitech!
I think it's much more likely that the departing CEO doesn't know what
a Squeezebox is. Or at least what it does.
--
aubuti
These forums were the original Slim Devices forums and were taken over
by Logitech when they purchased Slim Devices in 2006. They've been kept
going mostly by members of the Squeezebox development team since then.
As the Squeezebox development team has dwindled so has Logitech's
participation in
castalla;644561 Wrote:
The total lack of any responses to posts on the Logitech Forum to the
7.6 mess suggests to me that they are either in shock or denial.
Logitech is a big company who doesn't prioritize talking to customers
in public. Not much different than other big companies. Apple
erland;644611 Wrote:
Logitech is a big company who doesn't prioritize talking to customers in
public. Not much different than other big companies. Apple silently
denied the iPhone antenna problem for months, and similar scenarios can
probably also be seen on a lot of other big companies.
kmr;644618 Wrote:
erland, with all due respect, I think you're barking up the wrong tree
with respect to the iPhone's so-called antenna problem. There were
pretty conclusive demonstrations by Apple and third parties that just
about any phone can be held in such a way to block parts of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
