Can somebody please look at 'this thread'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?104732-Daphile-Erland-s-License-Manager-Spicefly-Sugarcube-not-working-as-intended)
and shed some light on my issue?
Main System: Touch; Marantz SR-5004; TMA Premium 905; TMA Premium 901;
BK Monolith+ FF;
So Pippin, how close are we with Sirius? Is it possible? Thanks.
Ikabob
Squeezebox Touch w/LMS V7.7.3; Benchmark DAC1 USB;Marantz Pre-amp; SAE
Amplifier;ESS Heil Speakers(main listening speakers plus various
additional speakers).
Multiple players: SqueezeBooms,SqueezeRadios; SB3;
Whatever direction it takes, we'd let you know here.
We are indeed still in discussions.
---
learn more about iPeng, the iPhone and iPad remote for the Squeezebox
and
Logitech UE Smart Radio as well as iPeng Party, the free Party-App,
at penguinlovesmusic.com
*New: iPeng 9, the Universal App
Ikabob wrote:
> So Pippin, how close are we with Sirius? Is it possible? Thanks.
I would think that any negotiations with SiriusXM would require non
disclosure until final. So it is highly doubtful that ickStream can
comment here or elsewhere. I'd take no news as potential good news
until we
Thank you.
Seriously, I am anxious to get SiriusXM back. Sorry I am so impatient.
Ikabob
Squeezebox Touch w/LMS V7.7.3; Benchmark DAC1 USB;Marantz Pre-amp; SAE
Amplifier;ESS Heil Speakers(main listening speakers plus various
additional speakers).
Multiple players:
bernt wrote:
> Yes, I can do ip-restriction, but still, why does Squeezelite behave
> strange over ssh?
>
> I can also use vpn-passthrough and use Vortexbox as a vpn server. I did
> look at it a long time ago and it seemed a bit complicated to setup on
> Vortexbox. In that case it would be nice
mherger wrote:
> But imagine you're the owner of a
> massive infrastructure (many dozens of servers) to keep a dead product
> running. It's only cost, no income any more. Now there's a 3rd party
> who's asking you to keep that infrastructure alive to support _their_
> products. How much
d6jg wrote:
> Over a standard VPN (lan2lan ipsec & pptp) squeezelite works fine. You
> say you have iPeng working using the SSH tunnel - are you using bitrate
> limiting in iPeng ? I am wondering if the SSH overhead is simply too
> great for FLACs ?
>
> On vpn passthrough I think what Jan is
bernt wrote:
> Both flac and bitrate limiting was working fine over ssh in iPeng.
If you can't get a proper VPN going and given that iPeng works I'd
suggest leaving that running via the SSH tunnel (as I assume you want to
be able to use that anywhere) but as far as streaming at work using
d6jg wrote:
> If you can't get a proper VPN going and given that iPeng works I'd
> suggest leaving that running via the SSH tunnel (as I assume you want to
> be able to use that anywhere) but as far as streaming at work using
> squeezelite is concerned why don't you just set up explicit port
>
d6jg wrote:
> Makes me want pop downstairs and ask the Audiofools if they can hear the
> difference between an SSD & Sata drive.
I can easily hear the difference between an SSD and HDD - an SSD makes
no mechanical noise at all.
Mind you, if there is music playing it will drown out the noise
On these forums do Advanced Search for "siriusxm", there are numerous
posts about this very issue with some workarounds (but not pretty).
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this
But a real company can probably solve that ( or buy a solution from you
) how about if another company showed up at logitechs door saying we
want to market a squeezebox can we join the club :) it has to be some
kind of business deal with my squeezebox com and al . There are already
some that do
d6jg wrote:
> On vpn passthrough I think what Jan is suggesting is a separate vpn
> router inside your network. You could put openVPN onto Vortexbox but
> there doesn't appear to be a very good howto anywhere that I can see.
yapp.
Its not a wise decision to use something else on your firewall.
mherger wrote:
But imagine you're the owner of a
massive infrastructure (many dozens of servers) to keep a dead product
running. It's only cost, no income any more. Now there's a 3rd party
who's asking you to keep that infrastructure alive to support _their_
products. How much money would you
Mnyb wrote:
> But a non techie friend of mine setup a sonos play 3 the other day
> striagth from the iPad app with no knowledge of it whatsover ...
This is the core of the issue. The Squeezebox ecosystem is complex
because it is so flexible.
Sonos is simple to operate because it's a closed
So a takeover of squeeze to widen the audience slightly may include more
expenses than the server park . Some massive spurt of new development ,
the best system can be better . Mass market would expect it to adjust
tags rip CD's have a music download shop etc and all streaming services
.
so it's
mherger wrote:
>
> And these new owners would be willing to pay for an infrastructure which
>
> for the time being would be serving 99%+ of customers they will never
> see a cent from?
>
Sounds like the normal dot-com business plan, doesn't it? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false
d6jg wrote:
> The squeezelite answer is possibly 3483 UDP - just read elsewhere that
> iPeng doesn't need it but other players do - I expect you haven't
> forwarded it have you?
I guess you need 3483 UDP if you can't tell your client the address of
your server.
"To try to judge the real from
Squeezemenicely wrote:
> I think that it would be best to have LMS run all streaming services via
> plugin and completely without mysqueezebox anyway. That way we would not
> have to be scared if someone pulls the plug.
I agree, but unfortunately the streaming services aren't a technical
pinkdot wrote:
> Don't get me wrong here. I don't think it's an issue. As you say, LMS
> behaves fine. But when you use your system like your used to, including
> nas, lms, boxes and apps, network activity and so on, its common
> knowledge your nas will stay awake.
At night there is no network
Shodan wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Recently started with LMS. Like it so far, but ever since using it I
> have the dreaded waking up bug. Every 30 minutes Squeezebox is waking up
> my nas. When I reboot hibernation works flawlessly, but as soon as I
> start using LMS in one way or another I have it
Shodan wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> ... Every 30 minutes Squeezebox is waking up my nas ...
Known 'issue' for years!
https://www.synology.com/en-us/knowledgebase/faq/568
http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewforum.php?f=83
Sorry, but I'm affraid your problem won't be solved here.
-Synology nas DS115 -
Thanks for your suggestions.
'LastFM' (http://www.last.fm/user/ottovonkopp/)
SB Touch Toslink to Audio Pro T20
SB 3 to Audio Pro T3
SB BOOM (R.I.P)
Vortexbox@HP SFF
iPeng
bernt's Profile:
Squeezemenicely wrote:
> Why so complicated? A new company could theoretically buy the concept
> and run their own servers for their customers, or also buy into
> ickstream and then sell hardware.
> The old Logitech customers could/would log itno mysqueezebox.com as
> long as it is alive and if
Hi all.
Recently started with LMS. Like it so far, but ever since using it I
have the dreaded waking up bug. Every 30 minutes Squeezebox is waking up
my nas. When I reboot hibernation works flawlessly, but as soon as I
start using LMS in one way or another I have it waking up my NAS
frequently.
Why so complicated? A new company could theoretically buy the concept
and run their own servers for their customers, or also buy into
ickstream and then sell hardware.
The old Logitech customers could/would log itno mysqueezebox.com as
long as it is alive and if they wanted access to the new
pinkdot wrote:
> Known 'issue' for years!
> https://www.synology.com/en-us/knowledgebase/faq/568
> http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewforum.php?f=83
>
> Sorry, but I'm affraid your problem won't be solved here.
LMS itself behives fine . But be aware of what can cause a wakeupp call
. Any
Shodan wrote:
> Every 30 minutes Squeezebox is waking up my nas.
hmm
squeezebox? posted under General Discussion?
well yeah the short answer is pretty fast.
dont know what you want cause squeezebox is a very very old Version and
what has squeezebox to do with your nas?
I know what could be
Don't get me wrong here. I don't think it's an issue. As you say, LMS
behaves fine. But when you use your system like your used to, including
nas, lms, boxes and apps, network activity and so on, its common
knowledge your nas will stay awake.
-Synology nas DS115 - Logitech Media Server 7.9.0
pinkdot wrote:
> Well, for a workaround, you can easily create a start/stop task in DSM's
> taskmanager :)
Can you do that with packets? That sounds interesting. Do you also no if
you can start stop using ssh commands?? That would be a great solution.
So far I have not been able to find any of
If its support WOL from off state thats another solution I use .
My server isaactually off at nigth (and usually the whole workday ) when
i WOL it boots .
The only issue is that you have to be patient a couple of minute swhile
it boots up .
Shodan wrote:
> Can you do that with packages / programs? That sounds interesting. Do
> you also know if you can start stop using ssh commands?? That would be a
> great solution. So far I have not been able to find any of this with
> google. Starting and stopping certain packages using
mherger wrote:
> > But a real company can probably solve that ( or buy a solution from
> you
> > ) how about if another company showed up at logitechs door saying we
> > want to market a squeezebox can we join the club :) it has to be some
> > kind of business deal with my squeezebox com and al
Shodan wrote:
> Was just hoping I'm overlooking something somewhere.
Well, for a workaround, you can easily create a start/stop task in DSM's
taskmanager :)
-Synology nas DS115 - Logitech Media Server 7.9.0 ('LMS-Repack'
cliveb wrote:
> This is the core of the issue. The Squeezebox ecosystem is complex
> because it is so flexible.
> Sonos is simple to operate because it's a closed system and the users
> get only the facilities that Sonos dictates.
> If the Squeezebox ecosystem were simplified so that it's as
myvinyl333 wrote:
> I installed an LG USB DR ROM Desktop Drive and all worked for several
> days.
> Now I get:
> :_There_is_no_disk_in_the_drive._Please_insert_a_disk_into_drive\Device\Harddisk8\DR8_.
> Operating System: Windows 7
> 'I followed several fixes from past similar issues with no
37 matches
Mail list logo
