Confirmed by Logitech.
Battery and Remote are optional.
and includes (presumably for all of the devices once the software is
released) the ability to post info to Facebook
http://www.logitechsqueezebox.com/products/squeezebox-radio.html#tab2
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
Paul Webster;454312 Wrote:
Confirmed by Logitech.
Battery and Remote are optional.
and includes (presumably for all of the devices once the software is
released) the ability to post info to Facebook
http://www.logitechsqueezebox.com/products/squeezebox-radio.html#tab2
It can display
tipsen;451247 Wrote:
You could have used NET::UDAP instead of buying a controller.
Exactly. I know that now that's why I sold the controller. The receiver
is a nice unobstrusive box on my hifi. That is the main reason I didn't
get the Sonos - the receiver is just too ugly, big and white.
--
upstatemike;451228 Wrote:
The setup is the main thing... in your case what happens if you change
your network configuration? Do you buy another controller so you can
change the settings on your reciever and then sell that controller on
Ebay as well?
Agreed. I thought the strategy in the
I just want to chime in here, I've had a duet and 2 receivers since the
month they were released.
Although I have run into various issues (rhapsody problems anyone?) I
have found the receivers to be incredibly stable. It was the controller
that would act up periodically. But the receivers are a
I thought it was more like the Nokia - although I still haven't seen one
in the Nokia shop
http://dabdig.blogspot.com/2009/01/nokia-enters-internet-radio-device.html
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
http://www.lastfm.com/user/BondJamesBond
Paul Webster;451133 Wrote:
I thought it was more like the Nokia - although I still haven't seen one
in the Nokia shop
http://dabdig.blogspot.com/2009/01/nokia-enters-internet-radio-device.html
Was speaking form a looks perspective, but yes from a functional (and
design) perspective it is
amcluesent;450439 Wrote:
Duet Receiver - ?
Into the dumpster! And we will never mention it again :)
Just out of interest what are the problems with the receiver? I ask
because I bought the Duet receiver, found I couldn't set it up and had
to buy the Duet controller. Now that it's setup the
Troutmaster;451186 Wrote:
Just out of interest what are the problems with the receiver? I ask
because I bought the Duet receiver, found I couldn't set it up and had
to buy the Duet controller. Now that it's setup the controller is on
ebay but I am happy with the receiver. Although the output
Any speculation on price for this? I'd have one for the bedroom for sub
£100
--
dave77
dave77's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=26269
View this thread:
Troutmaster;451186 Wrote:
Just out of interest what are the problems with the receiver? I ask
because I bought the Duet receiver, found I couldn't set it up and had
to buy the Duet controller. Now that it's setup the controller is on
ebay but I am happy with the receiver. Although the output
Troutmaster;451186 Wrote:
Just out of interest what are the problems with the receiver? I ask
because I bought the Duet receiver, found I couldn't set it up and had
to buy the Duet controller. Now that it's setup the controller is on
ebay but I am happy with the receiver. Although the output
tipsen;451247 Wrote:
You could have used NET::UDAP instead of buying a controller.
Indeed, and keep in mind the SBR was never intended for use without a
SBC.
It is no different than those cordless phone systems where you buy
the main base station and then buy as many cordless satellite phone
upstatemike;451228 Wrote:
.. Either way, it is time to end the SBR and replace it with
something that can take standard network configuration settings.
They've had this for years.SB3/Classic. :)
--
toby10
toby10;451275 Wrote:
They've had this for years.SB3/Classic. :)
Exactly... dump the SBR/Duet and do a bundle price with the Contoller
and the SB3/Classic (or SB Touch). Having a non-display device that
requires a contoller to configure it is fine IF you actually provide the
screens to
upstatemike;451298 Wrote:
Exactly... dump the SBR/Duet and do a bundle price with the Contoller
and the SB3/Classic (or SB Touch). Having a non-display device that
requires a contoller to configure it is fine IF you actually provide the
screens to expose all of the configuration settings.
toby10;451344 Wrote:
Like they say, you can never please everyone. :)
IMHO, leave it as it is and pay the $70 premium of an SB3 vs SBR.
Bundling an SBC with every SD player doesn't make sense to me, nor do I
think it would sell much as a SBC+SB3 bundle as most would be content
with the
toby10;451344 Wrote:
Like they say, you can never please everyone. :)
IMHO, leave it as it is and pay the $70 premium of an SB3 vs SBR.
Bundling an SBC with every SD player doesn't make sense to me, nor do I
think it would sell much as a SBC+SB3 bundle as most would be content
with the
Upsate: Ah, gotcha. I did not know static IP's could not be done even
with a SBC. I've only ever used DHCP via router so I've not had to mess
with static IP's.
Mnyb: Yes, factory reset on SBR to reconfigure network settings. Is
that true if paired with SBC as well? Also, can Net/Udap
toby10;451360 Wrote:
Upsate: Ah, gotcha. I did not know static IP's could not be done even
with a SBC. I've only ever used DHCP via router so I've not had to mess
with static IP's.
Mnyb: Yes, factory reset on SBR to reconfigure network settings. Is
that true if paired with SBC as
toby10;451382 Wrote:
Yeah, I hear ya. Many have asked for a configurable Network Setup
Edit UI for all players within SC. I would love it solely for WPA2
encryption key entry (cut paste). I've passed up a number of
opportunities to bring my Boom to various functions (people ask for it)
Yeah, I hear ya. Many have asked for a configurable Network Setup
Edit UI for all players within SC. I would love it solely for WPA2
encryption key entry (cut paste). I've passed up a number of
opportunities to bring my Boom to various functions (people ask for it)
but I decline if the host
I brought up a new squeezebox receiver on my network last night using an
already configured controller.
I was amazed at how easy it was.
Plugged in the receiver, waited less than a minute.
Checked the player list on the controller, there it was.
Highlighted and selected the new player (
mark wollschlager;451395 Wrote:
I brought up a new squeezebox receiver on my network last night using an
already configured controller.
I was amazed at how easy it was.
Plugged in the receiver, waited less than a minute.
Checked the player list on the controller, there it was.
Matt Wise;451399 Wrote:
Boom is configured by itself (onscreen controls) -- Receiver is the only
product fully-configured by the Controller.
I should add, for completeness, that once configured, all Squeezebox
products are controllable with the Squeezebox Controller. Setup is the
only thing
Matt Wise;451405 Wrote:
I should add, for completeness, that once configured, all Squeezebox
products are controllable with the Squeezebox Controller. Setup is the
only thing that the above relates to.
Ah, well that could be a future feature ( or product ).
Mark.
--
mark wollschlager
2
Reminds me of a Tivoli.
Something like http://www.techgadgets.in/images/tivoli-radio.jpg
--
lrossouw
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/lrossouw)
lrossouw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3416
I think that Logitech think that it is Absolute Greatest
http://dabdig.blogspot.com/2009/08/logitech-squeezebox-radio.html
(tie in for Touch and Baby Boom with upcoming Queen release)
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
http://www.lastfm.com/user/BondJamesBond
New Squeezebox Radio product revealed by engadget:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/21/fcc-reveals-logitech-squeezebox-radio-could-make-all-those-stre/
- Simon.
--
brookheather
brookheather's Profile:
See a bit more of a detailed discussion in 'this thread'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?p=449673highlight=fcc#post449673)...
--
Siduhe
Who am I on 'LAST.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/siduhe)?
-Siduhe Loved Tracks radio got the thumbs up. Feedback included: yeah,
it's good... got
This doesn't appear to be the Touch:
http://www.norman.cx/photos/links/sbrad.jpg
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
andynormancx's Profile:
Ah, got you. Interesting.
--
Siduhe
Who am I on 'LAST.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/siduhe)?
-Siduhe Loved Tracks radio got the thumbs up. Feedback included: yeah,
it's good... got the odd dodgy track tho...- (c) 'ModelCitizen'
(http://www.last.fm/user/Modelcitizen)
Looks a bit like it could be the rumoured baby Boom
CW
--
Chunkywizard
*Squeezebox:* Boom x2 (Lounge and Kitchen) *Squeezecenter:* 7.4-28xxx
for Windows Home Server (HP EX-475 MediaSmart Server with 2GB RAM
upgrade)
*Plugins:* Dynamic Playlists 2.8 | SQL Playlist 2.5 | Music Information
Chunkywizard;450391 Wrote:
Looks a bit like it could be the rumoured baby Boom
With the colour LCD I'm guessing Jive based rather than classic
based.
--
andynormancx
Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !
Ya beat me to it!
Next month is going to be expensive...
But good!!
--
Sike
Sike's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2458
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=66878
andynormancx;450393 Wrote:
With the colour LCD I'm guessing Jive based rather than classic based.
I was referring to the integrated speaker rather than the internal
architecture. I wouldn't be surprised if all these new devices migrated
to a new hardware platform.
CW
--
Chunkywizard
Given the current leaked pictures one would be let to assume that...
SB3 - S-Touch
Boom - Baby Boom (Given the sbrad.jpg it should have integrated
speakers)
SBC - ?
Duet Receiver - ?
--
tamanaco
tamanaco's Profile:
According to the test report:
Squeezebox Radio model X-R0001 is a compact tabletop network music
player and internet radio that lets you listen to virtually any internet
radio station, music service or entire personal digital music
collection. Providing remarkable sound in a compact footprint,
Also shown in the test report is that it was apparently tested with both
an AC adapter and a Battery Power Pack.
--
dem
Dave
dem's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2504
View this thread:
Duet Receiver - ?
Into the dumpster! And we will never mention it again :)
--
amcluesent
amcluesent's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10286
View this thread:
amcluesent;450439 Wrote:
Duet Receiver - ?
Into the dumpster! And we will never mention it again :)
From what I can gather in this forums I have to agree with you. Notice
that I unbundled the Duet product to avoid confusion.
--
tamanaco
dem;450437 Wrote:
Also shown in the test report is that it was apparently tested with both
an AC adapter and a Battery Power Pack.
Are there any leaked pictures of this Battery Power Pack? Is it a
build-in battery pack or external? In my experience using rechargeable
batteries to listen to
tamanaco;450447 Wrote:
Are there any leaked pictures of this Battery Power Pack? Is it a
build-in battery pack or external? In my experience using rechargeable
batteries to listen to streamed music at a decent volume level over
Wi-Fi for prolonged periods of time is not very practical.
andynormancx;450449 Wrote:
The shot of the bottom of the unit shows a removable door, presumably to
access the battery.
I see...
andynormancx;450449 Wrote:
Don't forget that the Radio will have a small LCD screen, rather than
the VFD on the Boom. The LCD will use a lot less power than
tamanaco;450471 Wrote:
I see...
The LCD or VFD shouldn't be much of an issue as one can always turn the
screen off and still listen to music. Can't say the same thing about the
WiFi connection as constant power is required to drive the Wi-Fi adapter
to download the stream and keep the
andynormancx;450473 Wrote:
My iPhone will stream audio over wifi for 4-5 hours. It has a much
smaller battery than the Radio is likely to have and probably a similar
CPU, though admittedly it doesn't have a 10W amp...
Wow, I'm impressed... My Smartphone only last about 45 Min using Wi-Fi
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:50 AM,
andynormancxandynormancx.3xa2kn1250873...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com
wrote:
My iPhone will stream audio over wifi for 4-5 hours. It has a much
smaller battery than the Radio is likely to have and probably a similar
CPU, though admittedly it doesn't have a
Odd that they call is Squeezebox Radio without including FM - good
chance that it will confuse things in the stores.
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51748
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
http://www.lastfm.com/user/BondJamesBond
Like the Touch, the short term confidentiality letter specifies
September 30 as the official launch.
If the baby Boom, er Radio, has an alarm it could be my new alarm
clock. The Boom is definitely too big for my nightstand bu this could
be about right.
--
4mula1
SqueezeCenter 7.3.3 +
4mula1;450500 Wrote:
If the baby Boom, er Radio, has an alarm it could be my new alarm clock.
The Boom is definitely too big for my nightstand bu this could be about
right.
Yes this would suit me well too. My current bedroom Boom would get
displaced to the kitchen (and benefit from the
ModelCitizen;450504 Wrote:
Yes this would suit me well too. My current bedroom Boom would get
displaced to the kitchen (and benefit from the addition of a cunningly
concealed subwoofer). Great.
It just hit me that this will be even better than the Boom for an alarm
clock because of the
4mula1;450500 Wrote:
Like the Touch, the short term confidentiality letter specifies
September 30 as the official launch.
Like the Touch, that is the date on a submission to a government agency
for its own internal process, and is likely not indicative of anything
else.
--
Goodsounds
Item 3a from the short term confidentiality request is as follows:
We further authorize the release of the above information after the
official product launch scheduled for 9/30/09. Or a period not to exceed
90 days which ever comes first.
--
4mula1
SqueezeCenter 7.3.3 + Solaris 10 x86:
4mula1;450591 Wrote:
Item 3a from the short term confidentiality request is as follows:
We further authorize the release of the above information after the
official product launch scheduled for 9/30/09. Or a period not to exceed
90 days which ever comes first.
Exactly, and consistent with
Goodsounds;450596 Wrote:
Exactly, and consistent with my comment to your similar post in the
other thread. Every agency has an SOP for such things.
Non-disclosure periods with government agencies are VERY common, and
can normally be extended quite easily by a simple request. In many
To put official launch date of 9/30/09 instead of requesting just a
date seems indicative of a hard set date. If they had requested 9/30/09
by itself that gives them a product launch window up until that date.
I'd be happy if that were the launch date that way they will have time
to manufacture
JJZolx;450601 Wrote:
It may be possible to request in the future that the documents be kept
confidential until some later date, but it's got to be a pain in the ass
to monitor all the applications and do that.
Ha. There are many jobs where someone has to monitor a calendar to
insure timely
57 matches
Mail list logo
