Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2015-01-07 Thread PasTim
I also just play local FLACs and don't use streaming services much except the BBC and occasionally other radio stations. If I wanted to use one or more streaming services such as Qobuz, Spotify etc I'd have to pay for that anyway, well over £100 per year each. I probably wouldn't want to pay

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2015-01-07 Thread jimwillsher
I listen 90% of the time to my own music libray (10,000 FLAC files) and 10% of the time to BBC via one of the 3rd party plugins. I have never used mysqueezebox.com nor any other online service. I'm not interested in Spotify or anything like that. Provided any repalcement could handle the above,

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2015-01-06 Thread jarome
erland wrote: Short term: Related to this, would you be willing to pay an annual or one time fee if you would be sure it would make it possible for you to continue using your Squeezebox hardware with current or similar features ? I'm just asking because I think it's unlikely that

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2015-01-06 Thread JJZolx
The thing with mysqueezebox.com providing access to streaming services is that it's a proxy authentication service for music services with contracts with Logitech to allow Squeezebox access. A pay service attempting to provide that same service would be redundant unless it, too had some sort of

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2015-01-06 Thread eschurr
me, too. eschurr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2007 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96191 ___ discuss mailing list

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2015-01-06 Thread SlimChances
I listen primarily to my own library so I don't think I would pay for unnecessary services Logitech Media Server Version: 7.9.0 - 1412783275 @ Fri Oct 10 04:00:09 UTC 2014 Operating system: Debian - EN - utf8 Platform Architecture: x86_64-linux Perl Version: 5.18.2 -

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2014-12-06 Thread PasTim
Take a look at squeeze2upnp. It's still in beta form, but I've been using it for some time. If you rely on LMS, don't need multi-system synchronisation, and have UPnP amplifiers, it's well worth trying. See https://github.com/philippe44/LMS-to-uPnP LMS 7.9 on VortexBox Midi, Xubuntu 14.04,

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-22 Thread fewleh
erland wrote: I'm not that worried, we are probably talking about at least 2 years in the future, probably longer, I'm fairly sure the market will find a solution suitable for our needs by then. It might not be Squeezebox hardware but as long as it offers similar features most of us will be

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-22 Thread Julf
fewleh wrote: Sorry, I'm totally new to the squeezebox arena and this thread has made me very confused. I just bought a slim devices squeezebox, and was thinking of getting a few more.. but what is this about the servers dying? What does it mean to an end user? Will I no longer be able to do

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-22 Thread garym
Internet radio where you can directly enter URL (which is true for 99% of my use case) will work after mysb.com goes away. garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-09 Thread TheLastMan
maggior wrote: So, when the time comes I need to move on and only a closed system is available and it does everything I need to do well, I'll be OK with that. I'm interested to see what develops over the next year. My only problem with Sonos is that they don't have *' Triode'

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-09 Thread SBGK
TheLastMan wrote: My only problem with Sonos is that they don't have *' Triode' (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?53229-Announce-BBCiPlayer-Plugin-(UK-only))* on their development team! His BBC iPlayer and Spotify plug-ins are the two most used plug-ins on my Squeezeboxes. In

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-09 Thread TheLastMan
SBGK wrote: keep an eye on the squeezelite thread, seems to be evolving rapidly. Thanks for the heads up. Had not spotted that thread before. The guy is obviously a genius! I was aware that I could install a software player on a mini-PC, and that one comes bundled with Vortexbox anyway. I am

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-09 Thread erland
TheLastMan wrote: I was aware that I could install a software player on a mini-PC, and that one comes bundled with Vortexbox anyway. I am not looking for the eptiome of small and cheap. I am quite happy to install Vortexbox on something like a Zotac atom based mini-PC if necessary,

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-09 Thread TheLastMan
Thanks for the detailed feedback Erland, interesting to see what motivates you guys. I will keep an eye on Squeezlite. Most of the issues appear to be around making it work on low power devices. If it works easily with something like a Zotac Zbox then I will probably go that route in the

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-09 Thread erland
TheLastMan wrote: The big challenge will be keeping LMS working once Logitech turns off the MySB servers. Any chance of that? Or would it be curtains for the Squeezebox? I'm not that worried, we are probably talking about at least 2 years in the future, probably longer, I'm fairly sure

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-08 Thread jsmithlon
For me the most unique feature of the SB system is that it can synchronise between rooms or play different music in different rooms. Which other system can do that except the Sonos which is much more expensive than the SB?

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-08 Thread ScottRennie
jsmithlon wrote: For me the most unique feature of the SB system is that it can synchronise between rooms or play different music in different rooms. Which other system can do that except the Sonos which is much more expensive than the SB? I am exactly the same

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-08 Thread aubuti
jsmithlon wrote: Which other system can do that except the Sonos which is much more expensive than the SB? I think Meridian Sooloos can do that. And it's much much more expensive than Sonos! aubuti's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-08 Thread maggior
jsmithlon wrote: Which other system can do that except the Sonos which is much more expensive than the SB? To answer your question, there is no other product out there at the moment. Regarding the expense of Sonos, it's not as bad as it used to be. The players are expensive and then you

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-08 Thread erland
maggior wrote: Regarding the expense of Sonos, it's not as bad as it used to be. The players are expensive and then you had to add the cost of the controller. With iOS and andriod devices being quite prevelant, you don't need that any more, so the cost of the controller isn't a factor

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-08 Thread maggior
erland wrote: Agreed, price isn't an issue, honestly it has never been, if I compare what I've payed from my music collection and other audio equipment, Sonos devices for a few rooms always have and still is nothing in comparison. [...]but I've decided to wait and see what the market

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-07 Thread AndreE
NFLnut wrote: QFT The only iDevices that I own are the 1st gen click wheel and the 1st gen iPod Touch. And I have rarely used them. iTunes however, is THE single worst piece of software I have ever used! I have zero interest in proprietary, crippled hardware that I cannot customize and

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-07 Thread Julf
AndreE wrote: The funny thing is that we are more in the minority. The minority is sometimes right; the majority always wrong. - George Bernard Shaw :) Julf's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-07 Thread ad6922
I love Squeezebox and it's products I love the apple products. Proprietary and open next to each other. Apple, because it just works SB because it fills my total home with music ad6922's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-05 Thread NFLnut
Julf wrote: I am glad that solution works for you, but the reason most of us are still part of this forum and community instead of hanging out in the Apple fanboy groups is that we either prefer the superior functionality the SB system gives us, or that we resent the gilded iCage apple

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2013-01-04 Thread mkanet
I currently use a customized version of Softsqueeze; which integrates perfectly in my SageTV Media Center software. So, I basically have universal radio, digital cable TV DVR, bluray which are all integrated into one Server-client system. So, instead of having 4-5 different set-top-boxes

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-30 Thread dminches
garym wrote: As long as mysb.com stays alive Can't you run things in your house without mysb.com? Even though I have 2 touches and a transporter I really don't know what role mysb.com plays. I am running LMS on my Synology NAS and just use the various SBs with a remote.

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-30 Thread garym
dminches wrote: Can't you run things in your house without mysb.com? Even though I have 2 touches and a transporter I really don't know what role mysb.com plays. I am running LMS on my Synology NAS and just use the various SBs with a remote. of course. I can play my own music files and

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-28 Thread garym
Mnyb wrote: I'm more for a centralised server and distributed players solution A sort of 'slim' devices approach? ;-) garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-28 Thread CharlieG
Mnyb wrote: I'm more for a centralised server and distributed players solution +1 garym wrote: A sort of 'slim' devices approach? ;-) Indeed :) CharlieG's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-28 Thread Mnyb
garym wrote: A sort of 'slim' devices approach? ;-) Yea I've heard of those... ;) Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-27 Thread Gadgety1
pallfreeman wrote: XBMC has squeezebox plugins. The controller/artwork display is OK, but the player is just a squeezeslave. The showstopper for me was that it grabs the audio output and doesn't integrate nicely with the psychedelic visualiser. If that worked I'd probably be using it instead

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-27 Thread bigbossman
I've been playing with this for a bit - Antipodes Audio high end vortex box-based server. This has 2tb onboard and can rip to FLAC using its built in blu-ray drive. It sounds excellent and although not inexpensive, I'm considering it as a Touch replacement. It'll also get me away from the usual

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-27 Thread PHiX
Maybe maybe this one can fill the gap... Of course time will tell whether the device can live up to the promising specs known so far... looks like they are aiming for a linux based device and active support from a community. So far I have known Olive as more of an aristocratic company with

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-27 Thread Mnyb
bigbossman wrote: I've been playing with this for a bit - Antipodes Audio high end vortex box-based server. This has 2tb onboard and can rip to FLAC using its built in blu-ray drive. It sounds excellent and although not inexpensive, I'm considering it as a Touch replacement. It'll also get

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-27 Thread vining
bigbossman wrote: I've been playing with this for a bit - Antipodes Audio high end vortex box-based server. This has 2tb onboard and can rip to FLAC using its built in blu-ray drive. It sounds excellent and although not inexpensive, I'm considering it as a Touch replacement. It'll also get

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-26 Thread Steven Moore
I've never bought any music from Apple. I prefer lossless and rip any music I have. You don't have to buy any content from them to use their hardware. The only restriction I find is the types if music and movie files that can be played but that's not a serious limitation.

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-24 Thread toby10
Jokke wrote: My next system could be the YAMAHA CD-N500. Yamaha makes some nice gear, I'm a big fan of their AVR's and own two myself. That said, I'd pass on this unit - pricey, $1200 (MSRP) cd player with networking - no WiFi, need a separate Yamaha WiFi adapter - no Sync, even

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-23 Thread Jokke
My next system could be the YAMAHA CD-N500. YAMAHA promised to support streaming services like spotify on it early next year. And, this unit would fit perfectly with my YAMAHA AS-700 amp. Only, i'm quite satisfied with the Logitech Touch at this moment, except for the spotify application which

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-20 Thread flipside
pippin wrote: Um, why is that? Apple were actually the driving force behind removing DRM from downloaded music so if anybody helped you to actually own downloaded Music, it's them. They forced it on the record companies. Slightly revisionist as apple didn't fight drm to begin with in fact

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-20 Thread pippin
flipside wrote: Slightly revisionist as apple didn't fight drm to begin with in fact they actively embraced it as a way to garner favour with the record companies and gain a monopoly in the audio market, they did start championing it however when other companies started to deliver viable

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-20 Thread igufi
pippin wrote: No, I think you got that one wrong. And who would those competitors delivering DRM free options be? Amazon et al only cam along much later. They _announced_ their services pretty early, claiming to do away with DRM but of the big libraries actually being _available_ iTunes was

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-20 Thread pippin
Yes, but that's what I mean. No matter what your musical tastes are, alternative stuff is not a comprehensive catalog. I was talking about something like covering 50% of the most listened-to stuff or so, something iTunes provides.

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-20 Thread Sakkerju
Would this be any good? Denon DNP-720AE? http://www.denon.co.uk/uk/product/Pages/Product-Detail.aspx?Catid=AirPlayproductsSubId=NetworkAudioPlayerProductId=DNP720AE [image: http://www.denon.co.uk/Assets/Images/Products/DNP-720AE/EL_DNP720AESP_E2_fr.jpg]

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-19 Thread Sakkerju
What would be my choice if all my Squeezebox would fail some day, likely when MySqueezebox.com dies or when SqueezeCenter software will not run on my server any longer? I am thinking of putting a decent USB DAC straight into my NAS port (hopefully supported by software) For instance the

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-19 Thread BoxFreak
When my SB3 dies, I´ll use XBMC-HTPC to replay music. I´m already using it as multi-channel -music player. Android-phone works just fine as remote and music-browser, so no need for TV on when playing music. BoxFreak's

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread erland
eschurr wrote: my main concern is: who will support LMS? lately my LMS scans aren't picking up iTunes playlists, and it may be because of iTunes 11. Who's going to keep LMS alive and well? My crystal ball tells me that the following will happen (sometime in the not too distant future):

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread menno
Mnyb wrote: It may not be completely trivial to make it run on any linux box in the dockstar case it migth actually be the cpu that is the problem ? don't know if mip server runs on anything but x86 . Ah yes, good point. It was a while ago that I looked into this, and that was actually

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread nekomatic
I keep meaning to write to Rogue Amoeba and suggest that they consider developing their 'Airfoil' (http://www.rogueamoeba.com/airfoil/) product into a music player system that could serve as a Squeezebox replacement - they've got the streaming-audio-over-the-network bit, how hard would it be to

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread pippin
Airfoil is just a hacked version of AirPlay. Can't make a system out of that. pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96191

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread PasTim
I am hoping that by running LMS on a dedicated Linux box that I don't need to update in any way, I can keep LMS running for a long time. My music streaming pre-amp (a Musical Fidelity M1CLic) supports UPnP. However, having spent some time adding extra tags to my music (mainly Work, Movement and

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread Julf
erland wrote: My crystal ball tells me that the following will happen (sometime in the not too distant future): 1. Some critical problem occurs that makes LMS more or less useless for a lot of users 2. One of the following will happen: - Logitech steps up and shows that they really meant

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread Julf
Steven Moore wrote: Moved to Apple TV a while back and don't regret it. I am glad that solution works for you, but the reason most of us are still part of this forum and community instead of hanging out in the Apple fanboy groups is that we either prefer the superior functionality the SB

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread PasTim
Julf wrote: ...we either prefer the superior functionality the SB system gives us, or that we resent the gilded iCage apple forces you into, or both. Both :-) To give you an example there is no way on this earth I am going to give Apple my credit card number just for the privilege of browsing

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread pippin
PasTim wrote: Both :-) from which I might subsequently borrow music, for a fee, but never own it. Um, why is that? Apple were actually the driving force behind removing DRM from downloaded music so if anybody helped you to actually own downloaded Music, it's them. They enforced it on the

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread PasTim
pippin wrote: Um, why is that? Apple were actually the driving force behind removing DRM from downloaded music so if anybody helped you to actually own downloaded Music, it's them. They forced it on the record companies. There are those, the RIAA for instance, who appear to claim we never

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-17 Thread erland
Julf wrote: I think the community alternative is just as likely - either as a fork/development of the current code base, or as a complete rewrite. The actual code is not really the problem (especially if using a real programming language :) ), the hard part is figuring out the protocol, and

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread erland
Mnyb wrote: As avsked can we use individual keys ? No, their licensing explicitly says Don't register for multiple API keys in an attempt to cirumvent rate limits. Of course, if the plugin will be open source, you can always edit the code and change the API key to your own which isn't shared

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread Mnyb
I'm not an so early adopter to the squeeze world and MIP was being abandon even then . So I understands if MIP have problem to gain new users , it a bit of a threshold to get in on it . However if some one writes a smart mix app that's just installs via the plugins menu and just works , I think

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread nelamvr6
For me there is currently no alternative. I have been researching this a bit. Sure, there is Sonos. But Sonos doesn't have a server that runs on Linux, and it doesn't support anything above redbook. So all my 96/24 needledrops would have to be down sampled. Ugh. Not only is that a lot of

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread Mnyb
I have nothing ( not much ) against meridians hifi ,but the sooloos streaming is just to expensive my squeeze stuff does the same and sound the same ( into my meridian hifi ) for a fraction of the cost. Mnyb's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread rolski
Mnyb wrote: sooloos streaming is just too expensive, my squeeze stuff does the same and sounds the samefor a fraction of the cost rolski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23776 View

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread nelamvr6
It looks like Cambridge Audio has a couple of solutions that might work nicely: http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/summary.php?PID=952 http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/summary.php?PID=604 nelamvr6's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread SlimChances
The Cambridge player appears to read NTFS or FAT32 files so it would not work with a Linux system unless you had an NTFS partition with your music files rather than the default EXT4 SlimChances's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread nelamvr6
SlimChances wrote: The Cambridge player appears to read NTFS or FAT32 files so it would not work with a Linux system unless you had an NTFS partition with your music files rather than the default EXT4...in fact I am not sure if it will work with Linux at all looking at the Support page

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread Steven Moore
Moved to Apple TV a while back and don't regret it. The sb2 is in the drawer now waiting for the call from a tech museum or given other posts perhaps ebay. Atv for me works great with very little problems and the sound is great. It's a pity that sb's software for me anyway got very unreliable and

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread SlimChances
nelamvr6 wrote: I don't think that's right. Both of those devices support UPnP, and they say right on the front page they work with NASs. If I set up XBMC on my Linux box, why wouldn't it work? Where did you read about those restrictions? Support page

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread nelamvr6
The Cambridge Audio Stream Magic 6 can be got at Big River for $999, eligible for Prime Delivery: http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-Audio-Stream-Upsampling-Nework/dp/B00804T7LQ/ref=sr_1_18?s=electronicsie=UTF8qid=1355688731sr=1-18keywords=cambridge+audio That puts it squarely in competition with

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread nelamvr6
SlimChances wrote: Support page http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/support_products.php?PID=604Title=Support There does not seem to be any supporting documentation for Linux but perhaps you are right Looking in the NAS guide it appears directed to Windows users but I am not familiar with NAS

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread SlimChances
My mistakeI run XBMC on my Win 7 machine for an HTPC ,but you are right XBMC will work on Linux system also SlimChances's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=165 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread nelamvr6
SlimChances wrote: My mistakeI run XBMC on my Win 7 machine for an HTPC ,but you are right XBMC will work on Linux system also Isn't it a relief to know that we have options? :D Logitech/UE may yet come out with a product that makes these discussions moot, but I'm still pissed off that

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-16 Thread eschurr
my main concern is: who will support LMS? lately my LMS scans aren't picking up iTunes playlists, and it may be because of iTunes 11. Who's going to keep LMS alive and well? i'm heartbroken over the news about Logitech not supporting the SB anymore (i can't find anything official about that

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread menno
mherger wrote: - The free TEN API access is limited: they only allow a certain number of queries per minute (20, upgradeable to 120). FWICT these are shared among all installations using the same API key, and they explicitly forbid using multiple API keys to work around this issue. OTOH

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread pippin
You can use MusicIP on Linux, I do that. Have a look at wiki.slimdevices.com pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96191

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread Mnyb
menno wrote: The TEN API sounds promising. Is there anything stopping each user using their own API key? The reason I dont use MusicIP is because it needs to run on Windows and my system runs on Linux (DockStar) Cheers, Menno The mip server runs fine on Linux (Clear OS in my case )

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread Michael Herger
The mip server runs fine on Linux (Clear OS in my case ) however the desktop app to analyse the files needs windows . Ahm... nope. I'm running both on my Linux box, even run the UI using X Window from my Mac. But it's fiddly. If there is anything to test I could volunteer as crash test

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread Michael Herger
The TEN API sounds promising. Is there anything stopping each user using their own API key? Don't register for multiple API keys in an attempt to cirumvent rate limits. http://developer.echonest.com/docs/v4 -- Michael ___ discuss mailing list

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread mherger
Mnyb wrote: The mip server runs fine on Linux (Clear OS in my case ) however the desktop app to analyse the files needs windows I'm running both on my Linux box, though technically the UI presentation layer would run on my Mac through X Window. As for the TEN API: I just got news that some

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread cparker
Hi guys Might be slightly going off topic :) But there is a Linux GUI and there is also GenPUID which can be scripted, so you dont need to have Windows. 14076 Cheers +---+ |Filename: linux-gui.jpg

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread sander
cparker wrote: Might be slightly going off topic :) But there is a Linux GUI and there is also GenPUID which can be scripted, so you dont need to have Windows. My problem is the last version of genpuid 1.4 can only update the Windows version of the database (1.9) so it's only good for

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread SlimChances
I have been running MIP on Ubuntu using WINE emulator with success. Allows for fingerprinting/archiving SlimChances's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=165 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread aubuti
menno wrote: The reason I dont use MusicIP is because it needs to run on Windows and my system runs on Linux (DockStar) To echo the point of others, many of us run MusicIP just fine on many flavors of *nix. You don't even need to run it on a Windows emulator like WINE (mine runs fine on

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-15 Thread Mnyb
mherger wrote: I'm running both on my Linux box, though technically the UI presentation layer would run on my Mac through X Window. As for the TEN API: I just got news that some of the limitations I was afraid of were removed. There's still a rate limit accessing their API which means

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-14 Thread Michael Herger
See also 'The Echo Nest' (http://the.echonest.com/). Ok, so I did investigate their API a bit (it's extensive!). I do mostly compare with MusicIP (which I've been running for years), as I'd like to have a replacement for smart mixing my own collection. Tests were run on both my dev

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-14 Thread Michael Herger
As you can imagine I have not come to these conclusions without some coding. Now let's hope I'll find some more time over the Holidays to tinker around with this... While I was typing those lines my Transporter was playing tunes based on some Peter Gabriel track I can't remember, mixing in

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-12-14 Thread mherger
See also 'The Echo Nest' (http://the.echonest.com/). Ok, so I did investigate their API a bit (it's extensive!). I do mostly compare with MusicIP (which I've been running for years), as I'd like to have a replacement for smart mixing my own collection. Tests were run on both my dev machine

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-26 Thread Brian Ritchie
I only discovered that SBs are discontinued via an email from Ripcaster suggesting that I trade-up (?) my Transporter to something in the Linn DS range! But I still shiver in horror every time I see the term UPnP: every UPnP device I've tried to use has been awful. There's always some function

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-25 Thread nekomatic
garym wrote: Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_Genome_Project Pandora uses this technology to build their playlists See also 'The Echo Nest' (http://the.echonest.com/). nekomatic's Profile:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-25 Thread Kellen
Such a shame that these products get removed. How much longer will the software be updated for? I was going to buy a Android tablet to remote control my Touch. But now I am concernd that they won't work together in the future due to possibly firmware incompatible reasons. Should I be?

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread DC227
Mnyb wrote: Sorry for being late if you don't want to install certain tweaks of questionable value . You can turn off wifi if your familiar with SSH and have turned on remote access in the Touch . Some familiarity with the vi editor , but just google how to use it and keep commands handy

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread JohnB
PasTim wrote: JohnB's approach is a lot easier to manage (it's just that my brain can't handle Album = Work when it doesn't!). Sorry for this very late comment but I thought it worth mentioning that when I want to play a ripped CD as a 'CD' I use browse the music folders. When I want to

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread PasTim
JohnB wrote: Sorry for this very late comment but I thought it worth mentioning that when I want to play a ripped CD as a 'CD' I use browse the music folders. When I want to play a specific work I can search for it very simply, as I posted. Of course, everyone has their own methods. The

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread Mnyb
JohnB wrote: Sorry for this very late comment but I thought it worth mentioning that when I want to play a ripped CD as a 'CD' I use browse the music folders. When I want to play a specific work I can search for it very simply, as I posted. Of course, everyone has their own methods. The

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread PasTim
Mnyb wrote: An effort to break this meta data paradigms would greatly enhance music listening and exploring , especially if the clues left in one piece of music could lead to another in a natural way ?? As some of us in IT have said The beauty of Standards is that there are so many of them

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread garym
PasTim wrote: Where it would get really clever would be in analysing the music itself and then suggesting relationships to other music. Has anyone ever attempted anything like this? Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_Genome_Project Pandora uses this technology to build their

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread castalla
What I'd like to have is a simple 'Play All Songs/Music' in a given Genre, Artist category. castalla's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15624 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread garym
castalla wrote: What I'd like to have is a simple 'Play All Songs/Music' in a given Genre or Artist category. you can do this now. in LMS go to artist or genre, then click on all songs. And you can have random turned on or off. Also, I do all this with erland's dynamic playlists and sql

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread Mnyb
.and we have music ip and stuff or apple genius but it still fall short Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96191

Re: [slim] Now the Squeezebox is dead, what would your next system be? And why?

2012-09-22 Thread castalla
garym wrote: you can do this now. in LMS go to artist or genre, then click on all songs. And you can have random turned on or off. Also, I do all this with erland's dynamic playlists and sql playlist (for more control and so that I don't accidentally add 50,000 songs to a single

  1   2   3   4   >