Hello Patrick,
Can I ask if there are any plans to contribute back the forked geoserver and
geotools parts?
Brad
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
?:-)
Sergio Acosta y Lara
Departamento de Geomática
Dirección Nacional de Topografía
Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Públicas
URUGUAY
(598)29157933 ints. 20329/20330
http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/
De: Discuss en nombre de Hogan, Patrick
(ARC-PX)
Enviado: miérco
Brad,
If the primary entity advancing GeoServer (Boundless?) would like to work with
us, we would be delighted to coordinate that contribution.
-Patrick
(650) 604-5656 (o)
(650) 269-2788 (c)
-Original Message-
From: br...@frogmouth.net [mailto:br...@frogmouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, Fe
Wow, that looks so good!
Great work, Jorge.
Kind regards,
Marc Vloemans
> Op 14 feb. 2018 om 07:20 heeft Jody Garnett het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Wow - that looks much better, I did not know about the j/k/o navigation so I
> am not bothered by it not working well.
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
Actually, that would be the GeoTools and GeoServer Programme
Steering/Management committees, both of whom welcome contributions -
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/contribute.html &
http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/introduction/gettinginvolved.html
There are several comp
NASA is working to advance GeoServer to accommodate GeoPackage.
We are certainly glad to share ALL of our work in order to benefit GeoServer
and the larger community.
For that to occur, if GeoTools is interested in coordinating with us to
accomplish that, we would be delighted.
-Patrick
(650)
You know that the latest GeoServers use GeoPackages as core datastores? See
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Crazy-idea-what-about-GeoPackage-straight-in-core-for-2-12-td5329361.html
for the discussion.
But please do pitch in with both GeoServer and GeoTools dev we always
welcome new developers
Our GeoPackage work to facilitate that via GeoServer is extensive and carefully
architected. And we’ve discovered some other good things that would certainly
advance GeoServer.
https://github.com/NASAWorldWind/WorldWindServerKit
NASA is prepared to work with someone close to GeoServer for these
Switching this to the GeoServer Devel list.
We always encourage people to discuss major changes to GeoServer to discuss
them here before they start as there is a much better chance of it being
accepted into the code base and to avoid over lapping and wasted work.
Patrick, please let us know what
Ian,
Got some deadlines these next couple days, hopefully our team will get to your
request later this week.
But it is all there to see on the Github website, with the primary effort being
an ‘easy install’ of GeoServer and ‘great packaging’ of GeoPackage. ☺
I’m sure anyone qualified, and look
Just so we’re clear – the geopackage stuff in WWSK is a fork of (i.e. copy
from) the community modules in geotools and geoserver. For example, see
https://github.com/NASAWorldWind/WorldWindServerKit/blob/develop/worldwind-gs-geopkg/src/test/java/gov/nasa/worldwind/gs/geopkg/GeoPackageGetMapOutput
Brad,
Life is work! We have not suggested “changes. . .just be taken from WWSK.”
We have done quite a bit of work to get GeoPackage working with GeoServer. I
believe it is good work.
We are glad to work with someone who would like to take the lead in benefitting
from our experience and incorpo
OK. So the answer to my original question of " Can I ask if there are any plans
to contribute back the forked geoserver and geotools parts?” that NASA does not
currently plan to do so.
I’m sure the GeoServer and GeoTools communities would be happy to work with you
(see http://docs.geotools.
Brad,
As I tried to make clear from the beginning, we are very glad to contribute, by
providing ^supported^ access to our experience going down the GeoPackage road.
We just need someone else taking the lead. If our experience, on full display,
can be of help, we are most glad to coordinate in t
Patrick,
Please don’t misunderstand – I’m happy that NASA does great things with open
source.
I did have a quick look at the difference on the GeoTools GeoPackage fork, and
it looks like there are some useful fixes in GeoTools that WWSK doesn’t have,
and some fixes in WWSK that GeoTools
15 matches
Mail list logo
