Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-12 Thread Derek M Jones
it is, is not only the methods but the questions asked. -- Hanania -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Flor Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 13:46 To: Hanania Salzer; discuss@ppig.org Subject: RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad Hanania, what

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-12 Thread Clendon Gibson
Errol writes, 1) why supporters of particular approaches to software development are talking past each other and not necessarily hearing what each other are saying? I would hypothesize that it is because they do not understand each other. Computer scientists are trying to solve a very difficult

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-12 Thread Alan Blackwell
A marvellous analysis of the reasons for the mathematical (or formal) versus human orientation in software engineering can be found in Phil Agre's chapter Conceptions of the user in computer system design. So far as I know, his observations regarding the user as human person have not been

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-12 Thread Andrew Ko
, what makes science what it is, is not only the methods but the questions asked. -- Hanania -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Flor Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 13:46 To: Hanania Salzer; discuss@ppig.org Subject: RE: PPIG discuss: When

RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-12 Thread Errol Thompson
In the paper that I mentioned in a previous posting, Wieringa claimed that much of the Software Engineering (SE) research does not apply scientific methods. Not only that I agreed with him, but I claimed that the situation is even worth than that; in many of the SE papers the

RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-12 Thread H.C.Sharp
: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad A marvellous analysis of the reasons for the mathematical (or formal) versus human orientation in software engineering can be found in Phil Agre's chapter Conceptions of the user in computer system design. So far as I know, his observations regarding the user

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-11 Thread John Rooksby
3:45:13 AM Subject: RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad Errol, you say that in the debate over agile methods some people fail toput aside theirown paradigm blinkers and seek to find maybe another framework for evaluating the solution. To continue along your line, I would add that both

RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-11 Thread Hanania Salzer
it is, is not only the methods but the questions asked. -- Hanania -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Flor Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 13:46 To: Hanania Salzer; discuss@ppig.org Subject: RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad Hanania

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-10 Thread Clendon Gibson
PROTECTED] To: discuss@ppig.org Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2007 3:45:13 AM Subject: RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad Errol, you say that in the debate over agile methods some people fail to put aside their own paradigm blinkers and seek to find maybe another framework for evaluating

RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-06 Thread Errol Thompson
discuss: When agile goes bad Errol, wrote: ...Let's stop knocking others because their paradigm of software development doesn't fit ours and look at ways of learning from each other's strengths and seeing our weaknesses. ... Yes, Errol, but that is far from being

RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-06 Thread Hanania Salzer
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Errol Thompson Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 08:02 To: discuss@ppig.org Subject: RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad From a quick look at the article, I would agree with many of its points. However, I would also suggest reading beyond our own domain

RE: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-05 Thread Errol Thompson
Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2007 11:27 p.m. To: discuss@ppig.org Subject: Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/02/2007 01:40:08 PM: I'm confused by the point of these anecdotes

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-04 Thread Ruven E Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/02/2007 01:40:08 PM: I'm confused by the point of these anecdotes. Is there some study that backs up these stories? Without defending the pros and cons of these (so called) agile methodolgies we can stipulate that indeed different orginaztions have

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-02 Thread Jorge Aranda
Ruven E Brooks wrote: For other organizations, with a different set of pathologies, the medicine might be more often fatal than the disease. Ruven, I think this is the key insight of the story. And if you don't mind a shameless plug: in a recent study of seven small companies we found,

Re: PPIG discuss: When agile goes bad....

2007-10-02 Thread Chris Dean
I'm confused by the point of these anecdotes. Is there some study that backs up these stories? Without defending the pros and cons of these (so called) agile methodolgies we can stipulate that indeed different orginaztions have different needs. However, these anecdotes come across as an attack