Paul M wrote:
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
you could always buy a support contract, which is entirely different
from buying proprietary software.
sorry, but I think your understanding of
Bill Marquette wrote on 23-3-2008 18:52:
Seeing as how the feature is targeted for 1.3 and we don't have public
1.3 test images (hello, we JUST released 1.2) yet, it will be
difficult for those that have donated to the feature to test that it's
actually been done right. The easiest way for
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Marquette wrote on 23-3-2008 18:54:
PS. It's probably worth noting that I'm also the author of the
existing annoying wizard.
Sorry about that qualification Bill. The fact that it cannot be bypassed
annoyed me,
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
Again, is there any estimate for 1.3?
This is 100% completely open source. The source ported to RELENG_1_2 is
even in the public CVS server in its own branch.
Chris Buechler wrote on 23-3-2008 8:51:
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
Again, is there any estimate for 1.3?
This is 100% completely open source. The source ported to RELENG_1_2 is
even in
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote on 23-3-2008 8:51:
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
Again, is there any estimate for 1.3?
Oh,oh,oh...
I really didn't wanted to fire up such a discussion.
My 2 ct. regarding pfSense, open source and community work:
Open source means for me that for that specific application I can get anytime
the source code to be able to modify it or extend it.
As pfSense base its license on the
Ermal Luçi wrote on 23-3-2008 11:08:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote on 23-3-2008 8:51:
Jan Hoevers wrote:
While not unwilling to donate to projects, this bounty thing is not for
me because of a strict open source policy.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is 100% completely open source. The source ported to RELENG_1_2 is
even in the public CVS server in its own branch. It's just the images
including it are not publicly available. It was back ported as a thanks
to
PS. It's probably worth noting that I'm also the author of the
existing annoying wizard.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Jan Hoevers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote on 21-3-2008 23:22:
For 1.3, Ermal has done a nice job completely rewriting the traffic
shaper to accommodate these kinds of situations and more. The traffic
shaper in 1.2 only works properly with
Ermal Luçi wrote:
Expected behaviour.
Since ALTQ shapes on outgoing that shapes every thing that goes
through the interface where the shaper is enabled.
For 1.2, it should be noted.
For 1.3, Ermal has done a nice job completely rewriting the traffic
shaper to accommodate these kinds of
Expected behaviour.
Since ALTQ shapes on outgoing that shapes every thing that goes
through the interface where the shaper is enabled.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Daniele Guazzoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that although the traffic shaper is configured only between
WAN and
13 matches
Mail list logo
