On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 21:01 +0200, Eli Marmor wrote:
> Omer Zak wrote:
>
> > ...
[... snipped ...]
> Oh, it was me...
>
> It seems that your hearing is better than anybody else ;-)
To fix the record: it was actually Shlomi Fish's hearing, not mine.
Omer Zak wrote:
> ...
>
> As someone pointed out in the General Assembly, netiquette is against
> E-mail messages saying only "I agree with him". Therefore, traffic in
> netiquette-abiding mailing lists consists mostly of several colors of
> disagreement with the status quo.
Oh, it was me...
I
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 11:46 +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Goals of Hamakor? Putting the
> political process back into control?":
> > Even having representatives sitting on the advisory board of another
> > organizat
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Goals of Hamakor? Putting the
political process back into control?":
Even having representatives sitting on the advisory board of another
organization causes Hamakor to assume more roles than the minima
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Goals of Hamakor? Putting the
political process back into control?":
> Even having representatives sitting on the advisory board of another
> organization causes Hamakor to assume more roles than the minimal ones
> of money m
I think you should make a difference between shares and advisory board.
Hamakor was offered shares in Vaya.
Hamakor was not asked to seat in any advisory board.
--
Ori Idan
Omer Zak wrote:
>Even having representatives sitting on the advisory board of another
>organization causes Hamakor to assu
Even having representatives sitting on the advisory board of another
organization causes Hamakor to assume more roles than the minimal ones
of money management and focal point for Public Relations & External
Politics. This would, for example, force the board to decide who will
be Hamakor's represe
I agree with that.
ElyOn 12/20/05, guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 09:32 +0200, Alon Altman wrote:> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:> > > We also have to ensure that Hamakor's official positions are made
> > > unattractive to p
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 09:32 +0200, Alon Altman wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
> > > We also have to ensure that Hamakor's official positions are made
> > > unattractive to power-hungry politicians.This means, for example, that
> > > the Hama
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 09:32 +0200, Alon Altman wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
> > We also have to ensure that Hamakor's official positions are made
> > unattractive to power-hungry politicians. This means, for example, that
> > the Hamakor board should think twice before accepting t
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Omer Zak wrote:
We also have to ensure that Hamakor's official positions are made
unattractive to power-hungry politicians. This means, for example, that
the Hamakor board should think twice before accepting the share in the
Vaya Research Institute. It is OK and necessary t
Events in the Dec 18th General Assembly and before it convinced me that
the politics in Hamakor is getting out of control.
Political process has its place when resources are scarce and need to be
allocated. Then the various stakeholders need to reach an agreement how
to divide the scarce resource
12 matches
Mail list logo
