Triaged
---
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26680 - more than one row returned by
a subquery used as an expression (duplicate)
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23518 - Subquery does not respect
explicit __exact (fixed)
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26681 -
On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 2:53:32 PM UTC-7, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While writing some horrific code [1] related to the development server’s
> auto-reloading, I realized that its design is fundamentally flawed and I
> think that we should reconsider it.
>
> The current
Details are available on the Django project weblog:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2016/jun/04/bugfix-release/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On 06/04/2016 12:38 PM, Carl Meyer wrote:
> I just realized that I think something's gotten lost in this thread:
> Josh's original point was about requiring pytz _if you want timezone
> support_ (that is, if USE_TZ=True). That would I presume involve raising
> ImproperlyConfigured (or maybe having
I just realized that I think something's gotten lost in this thread:
Josh's original point was about requiring pytz _if you want timezone
support_ (that is, if USE_TZ=True). That would I presume involve raising
ImproperlyConfigured (or maybe having a site check raise an error?) if
USE_TZ=True and
Adding pytz to install_requires might not contribute to a bug fix or new
feature right now, but it does remove a point of confusion from the docs. I
think it also reduces friction in getting Django up-and-running, which
seems valuable for Django users and Django contributors.
PJJ
On 06/03/2016 03:55 PM, Philip James wrote:
> Is there consensus on making pytz required? (I, personally, am in favor,
> since I too can't remember the last project I did that didn't need it.)
>
> If it's required, should it be vendored?
-1 on vendoring pytz. I think it's fine to just make it a
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Aymeric Augustin
> wrote:
>
> That doesn’t sound optimal because pytz’ release cycle is tied to the TZ
> database’s cycle, which is different from Django’s.
IMO just stick pytz in install_requires and be done with it. It’s a
> On 04 Jun 2016, at 00:55, Philip James wrote:
>
> If it's required, should it be vendors?
That doesn’t sound optimal because pytz’ release cycle is tied to the TZ
database’s cycle, which is different from Django’s.
--
Aymeric.
--
You received this message