#8898 is a simple bug fix with tests for DateTime fields with
required=False, which currently fail to validate in the admin because
the `required` validation is being bypassed when using
SplitDateTimeWidget with DateTimeField (which seems questionable to
begin with).
I'd set it to ready for
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:20 +0530, Amit Upadhyay wrote:
> [So far using non
> db based session backend, and allowing delete for auth_messages from
> "GET machines" and living with "a message appears more than once" is
> what I am doing].
By the way, for something like sessions, the scaling
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Amit Upadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Question: 1. is the expectation that GET request should only do SELECT
> reasonable? 2. if 1, then should django enforce it?
Clarification, enforce is ambiguous:
Question2.1. django, core and contrib apps shipped with
Usecase: for scaling a website(bottlenecked on database), one of the
first thing to do after caching and other optimizations is to split
requests to go to master/slave replicated database servers. One way of
doing it is based on request.METHOD[1], GET requests going to slave,
and POSTs going to
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not really sure, nor am I the one to make such a decision, but I
> wonder if perhaps something like this hasn't been included because of
> issues with Google's licensing.
That's exactly why: Google Maps aren't free
Hi,
> That's exactly why: Google Maps aren't free to use in
> non-publicly-accessible areas. Like, say, an admin interface.
>
I'm not sure if this is really the case. The Google Maps API FAQ[1]
says this about the topic:
> As long your site is generally accessible to consumers without
> charge,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I can see the generic desirability of GET requests not making
> database writes there are always going to be exceptions. Let's not
> pursue this as a purist goal, but rather for the sound pragmatic reasons
> that
Hi Guys,
Is there a reason why InMemoryUploadedFile does not proxy readlines as
well from StringIO? seems like it should (especially if using PIL
directly from the uploaded file)
bo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
It seems that what you may want is something like
http://softwaremaniacs.org/soft/mysql_replicated/
(its in Russian that i cannot read and one of the links has the
source :)
master slave DB engine (for Mysql)
I modified it to force a master call for everything that was not a
"SELECT" in the
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, for something like sessions, the scaling solution is not to
> use server-side storage at all for the session data. Typically sessions
> don't actually hold that much data and even in cases like, say, a
>
I'm not really sure, nor am I the one to make such a decision, but I
wonder if perhaps something like this hasn't been included because of
issues with Google's licensing. Of course, not everyone is using
GeoDjango in a commercial setting, so your code's still useful.
Perhaps you could post it on
I suppose I can log both a ticket and place it on djangosnippets.org.
Thanks
On Oct 15, 4:39 pm, "Benjamin Wohlwend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > That's exactly why: Google Maps aren't free to use in
> > non-publicly-accessible areas. Like, say, an admin interface.
>
> I'm not sure if
Amit Upadhyay wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Amit Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>>> This is not about specs or what is allowed, rather what is there in
>>> actual django. And about implementation goals for django. It is
>>> possible to have
Hi
I see that only open street maps are supported by GeoDjango in
django.contrib.gis.admin through the OSMGeoAdmin class which inherits
from GeoModelAdmin. I have discovered that changing this to use Google
Maps is a matter of modifying the template files in contrib/gis/
templates/gis/admin and
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 10:12:35 Amit Upadhyay wrote:
> My wish for django would be, either 1. a position that other than
> the Session, there is no data changes by entire django if request
> method is GET. or 2. a wiki/doc page explaining what all database
> changes that can happen as part
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is not desirable to have Django try to enforce this, since GET
> requests are allowed to have side effects, just not side effects that
> "have the significance of taking an action other than retrieval" [1].
This is not
Amit Upadhyay wrote:
> This is not about specs or what is allowed, rather what is there in
> actual django. And about implementation goals for django. It is
> possible to have a django(core+contrib apps shipped with django) with
> only SELECT queries in response for GET request. So far I have
>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Amit Upadhyay wrote:
>> This is not about specs or what is allowed, rather what is there in
>> actual django. And about implementation goals for django. It is
>> possible to have a django(core+contrib apps shipped with
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:20 +0530, Amit Upadhyay wrote:
[...]
> One way of
> doing it is based on request.METHOD[1], GET requests going to slave,
> and POSTs going to master.
Be careful, though, since that can lead to problems. Every time you
write to a master, it takes a finite amount of time
bo wrote:
> It seems that what you may want is something like
>
> http://softwaremaniacs.org/soft/mysql_replicated/
>
> (its in Russian that i cannot read and one of the links has the
> source :)
It has a link saying "English" right on top of the page :-). It's
The built-in behavior for
django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception calls mail_admins
for each internal server error.
So if a very high-traffic view has an internal server error, duplicate
emails will be sent at a very high rate. This isn't usually
desirable...
We worked around this
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I was thinking it would be useful to add a setting like
> EXCEPTION_NOTIFIER = 'path.to.custom.notifier' , where the default
> would look something like this:
>
> def mail_exception_to_admins(request, exc_info):
>
What's the cleanest way to customize the submit buttons that appear on
an admin change_form? If there's a way to override submit_row on
change_form, that would be the simplest approach, I think, but I'm
very much a django beginner so I would appreciate some guidance.
To provide some context,
Hello all,
I just wanted to toss in my own $0.02 for my particular use case and
my experiences thus far. For all around ease, this is a copy of a
comment I made on ticket #1142 yesterday:
What is the current status on this issue? There doesn't appear to have
been any visible movement in
One thing I noticed while running some performance profiling tests a
while ago was that
django.db.models.fields.related._get_related_query_name was being
called approximately a zillion times, as was _curried from
django.utils.functional.
Although _get_related_query_name is very simple (return
This question belongs on the django-users list; in the future, please
keep in mind that this list is for discussion of actually developing
Django itself, while django-users is for discussion of how to use
Django.
--
"Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct -- the best kind of correct."
I see there is a got_request_exception signal already... so one could
effectively do the same thing by adding a signal handler and making
settings.ADMINS the empty list so that mail_admins effectively becomes
a no-op.
Even so, it looks like mail_admins will open a SMTP connection to send
an
> I suppose I can log both a ticket and place it on djangosnippets.org.
> Thanks
This has come up a few times in #geodjango, and I've already written
an example on how to use Google's base layer in the admin. I
distilled it to a few snippets:
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1144/
It's
Oops... my apologies; this is what happens when I open two different
forums in separate tabs!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see there is a got_request_exception signal already... so one could
> effectively do the same thing by adding a signal handler and making
> settings.ADMINS the empty list so that mail_admins effectively becomes
> a
Hi,
As you may guess, I'm a symfony develper and the creator of
FireSymfony. I read here: http://oebfare.com/logger/django-dev/2008/10/1/1/
that there could be some interest in creating a FireDjango or
something similar. If that is the case, just contact me because I
think it could be easy to
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:58 -0700, Jesse Young wrote:
> The built-in behavior for
> django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception calls mail_admins
> for each internal server error.
>
> So if a very high-traffic view has an internal server error, duplicate
> emails will be sent at a very
Hi Malcolm,
Thanks for explaining the rationale behind this. It'd certainly be
possible to do what we want by overriding handle_uncaught_exception in
a ModPythonHandler subclass.
This method has a higher barrier to entry than I'd like, though. For
one, this kind of customization requires
Hi Alvaro,
Actually, I've taken a couple of steps in this direction in some
modifications I've done to Firebug. One thing I did was to POST any
changed CSS (e.g., added rules, changed rules and disabled rules) back
to Django. This has helped me considerably in developing web sites.
I'd like to
Umm ...
Sorry to post that email to the public django-devel list :) I realise
it is not for django usage, but core django development.
It happened by mistake.
Regards
Rajeev J Sebastian.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi Rajeev,
Any help that I can provide, just ask. I think with a JSON object
containing the debug data with some structure expected by FireSymfony,
it should be easy to port it to Django or any other framework.
Regards,
Alvaro
On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Rajeev J Sebastian wrote:
>
>
Did you try subclassing list (& overriding __iter__) for the ADMINS
object?
-rob
On Oct 15, 1:58 pm, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The built-in behavior for
> django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception calls mail_admins
> for each internal server error.
>
> So if a very
Is your suggestion that, since mail_admins happens to be the only
place in Django that uses settings.ADMINS, I could do something like:
class AdminsObject(list):
def __iter__(self):
// do some custom notification
// manually write the friendly 500 error page to the output
stream
38 matches
Mail list logo
