I had a problem in using django 1.7.
Example:
class ModelA(models.Model):
fielda = models.CharField(max_length=10)
class ModelsB(models.Model):
modela = models.ForeignKey(ModelA)
fieldb = models.CharField(max_length=10)
when I query like " modela_instance.modelb_set()', I will get
By using the API correctly:
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.7/topics/db/queries/#backwards-related-objects
Also, this mailing list is not the correct place to ask these questions,
you're looking for
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.7/internals/mailing-lists/#django-users
On Fri, Oct 17,
Hi Taenyon,
This list is for development on Django itself.
I see you've also asked the question on the `django-users` mailing list,
which is the right mailing list for your question.
You'll want to follow up any further questions on the `django-users` thread
rather than this one.
All the best,
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 20:31 +0200, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
> Feedback is welcome, especially on sections I've described as "done" in the
> update.
The FAQ section says that template context processors isn't going to be
supported for context processors.
The context processors return a dictionary
Hi Anssi,
On 17 oct. 2014, at 14:49, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
> The FAQ section says that template context processors isn't going to be
> supported for context processors.
Indeed, at this time, my theoretical position is not to enforce such an API
and leave it up to
On 10/16/2014 09:41 PM, Wayne Ye wrote:
> HI Carl and Ramiro,
> Thank you both very much for tracking this issue!
>
> Actually I am a junior Django developer (but has nearly 10 years exp on
> ASP.NET and RoR), I am eager to contribute to the Django project! If
> this issue has not yet been
I'd like to kickoff the discussion on the timetable and process for the 1.8
release. I am also volunteering to be the release manager.
First, a retrospective on the 1.7 release with planned release dates and
(actual):
Jan. 20: alpha (Jan. 22)
March 6: beta (March 20)
May 1: RC (June 26)
May
I was wondering when this discussion was going to happen - it's good to see
some dates finally proposed, thanks Tim.
The LTS proposal is a good one. It should give people enough time (6
months) to jump to the next LTS release. I also think that 1.8 should be a
good candidate for LTS.
If you are upgrading from 1.4, I would recommend going step by step through
each intermediate Django version. I don't believe trying to upgrade
straight away to 1.8 would be easier. I'd encourage anyone on 1.4 to start
doing intermediate upgrades soon, so if there are still undetected
Thanks Shai! That trick helped me a lot. I eventually managed to add
migrations successfully using this trick and some manual adjustments to the
migration files.
I'm optimistic that things will flow more easily from now on. Migrations is
such an awesome addition to django, but I have to admit
10 matches
Mail list logo