This has been discussed extensively, both on this list and the ticket
at http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3011
It's been rejected for 1.1 (now is not really a good time to be
proposing features), but you can try mentioning this again when 1.2
planning starts.
-bob
Digging through the (huge) 1.1 milestone list a bit, the following
seem to be closer to improvements than bugs (IMO). If you have any
favorites in here, they should probably be looked at for last-minute
additions to 1.1 beta, or they may be in danger of missing 1.1
entirely:
On Mar 19, 3:42 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <jacob.kaplanm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Bob Thomas <robert.w.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So, if the template tag wasn't hard enough to write, it's not helpful?
>
> Um. That's not what I read from wh
On Mar 19, 2:49 pm, Luke Plant wrote:
> The hard work isn't the template tag, it's:
>
> - tests (the existing ones are in django/contrib/csrf/tests.py)
> - documentation
> - converting the admin (I really think this needs to be done
> before we can check this in,
On Mar 19, 8:17 am, Vitaly wrote:
> I wanted json serialize a tree of django model objects: Schedule ->
> Player -> django.models.User.
> django.core.serializers.serialize does shallow serialization of
> QuerySet but I want a deep one. Next, I looked at QuerySet.values()
>
On Mar 18, 1:25 pm, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Yep, agreed. I plan to replace the content re-writing stuff with a
> template tag which hopefully won't be too nasty. It's just I haven't
> had time yet, and I'd rather fix the security hole now, and improve
> the implementation
Would it be possible to use cron's weekday numbering? Would that make
anyone happy?
0-7, with both 0 and 7 representing Sunday. That would at least avoid
the %7 part of the workaround (from the user's perspective, anyway).
The "Monday as first day" camp could use 1-7 for their week numbering,
There are 3 outstanding tickets for FormPreview that add functionality
that exists in FormWizard. Unfortunately, patches for two of them are
backwards-incompatible changes. Both of the backwards-incompatible
tickers are marked "design decision needed", so . . . here I am,
looking for a decision!
I added a ticket (with patch) for implementing the template tag:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9977
It also adds a CSRF context processor, which is used by the tag.
The diff doesn't look quite right. There obviously needs to be an
empty __init__.py file added to the templatetags folder
On Dec 3, 9:14 am, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> At the moment, once you've factored everything in, I think 'view
> middleware' + template tag is the way to go, with some more custom
> solution for loginCSRF. The SafeForm ends up having an unwieldly
> API, which means it won't
See tickets #2203 and #9366. They're two opposite sides of an issue
that needs to be reconciled somehow, and I figured this list was the
best way to fight it out.
#2203 summary - Date/time formats in the admin interface use the
{DATE,TIME,DATETIME}_FORMAT string from translation files, and fall
>
> - the SafeForm feature (eight +0). Personally, I suspect we
> should stop trying to second-guess form features for a bit, but
> if somebody came up with the perfect code, there's no real
> reason to defer that one (it got 8 +0 votes and nothing else, so
>
12 matches
Mail list logo