Re: ANN: Django website redesign launched

Dear Django community, I would like to congratulate you very much for this. I'm very pleased to see that the work in Django is much better presented to the world, which I think we all agree is an important component of the project. Generally speaking, I like very much the overall look and feel

Re: Internationalise GET parameters?

prove things that much. > > Marc > On 28 Nov 2014 13:36, "Florian Apolloner" <f.apo...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:17:15 AM UTC+1, Jorge C. Leitão wrote: >>> >>> IMO, this lies on the assum

Internationalise GET parameters?

Hi, I'm came across to the situation where, for URL cleanness, See Cool URIs don’t change , by World > Wide Web creator Tim Berners-Lee, for excellent arguments on why URLs > should be clean and usable. I wanted to internationalise its parameters. E.g.

Re: Great Wall of DEP

In my opinion, it may be too soon to make an evaluation of DEP. Most importantly, it has to be put in context to what happened/is happening: - there was a security release - there was a fix to the security release - there is a version of Django to be released with *considerable* new features,

urls in {% blocktrans %} fails silently.

Hi all! Currently, for adding an url to a blocktrans, we need: {% url "home" as home %} {% blocktrans with the_url=home %} ... {% endblocktrans %} (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/i18n/translation/#blocktrans-template-tag) However, this is not equivalent to use {% url "home" %}

Django-picklefield apparently not being maintained.

Hi there. First of all, I've just read these rules and I want to apologize for my behavior on this mailing list. I'm sorry for my behavior, specially in

Odd behavior on proxy models should be on documentation

Hi there. I was working with proxies models and I found an odd behavior on a QuerySet, and I ask here whether it should be documented. Consider the following code: from django.db import models #from model_utils.managers import InheritanceManager class Generic(models.Model): pass #

Re: Proposal of new feature: handler to HttpResponseNotAllowed (status 405)

It is unfortunate that I didn't found this on documentation. Thanks for the clarification Tom. Cheers, Jorge On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 1:33:24 PM UTC+2, Tom Evans wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Jorge C. Leitão > <jorgeca...@gmail.com > wrote: > > Django a

Proposal of new feature: handler to HttpResponseNotAllowed (status 405)

Django allowsusers to define handlers to some exceptions, most notably http404, server error (status 500) and permission denied (status 403). I here propose this feature to be extended to

Patch submission on ticket 20122

I've just submitted a patch (under username "littlepig", if possible I would change it to "jorgecarleitao") to ticket 20122 but I don't know what I have to do on the ticket in order to draw attention of a developer (besides adding "has patch"). Am I

Why apps have to have unique names? [related with subapps and name collision]

Hi. The motivation to this question is that if I want to implement "copies" of an app within an website (for instance, a stackoverflow-like where each app is a Q for its own, but with modifications on templates, urls, etc.), as far as I'm understanding: (1) each "copy" has to change its name,

Re: Proposal/Discussion: url and template search using the directory structure of apps within django sites

my proposals... change these 4 or 5 lines. Cheers, Jorge On Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:50:34 PM UTC+2, Yishai Beeri wrote: > > Hello Jorge, > > On Thu, 30 May 2013 12:42:20 +0300, Jorge C. Leitão > <jorgeca...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Russell Keith-Magee. >

Re: Proposal/Discussion: url and template search using the directory structure of apps within django sites

k. Russell Keith-Magee, I hope this (rather long) explanation provides in-depth justifications on why this modification is important and relevant to real problems. Cheers, Jorge On Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:17:49 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 29, 201

Re: Proposal/Discussion: url and template search using the directory structure of apps within django sites

Hi Shai Berger and thanks for your quick response. Regarding your criticisms, On Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:54:40 AM UTC+2, Shai Berger wrote: > > Actually, Django doesn't. That is, an app is a Python package, and Python > packages can be nested, so you can have app 'b' within app 'a', and in >

Proposal/Discussion: url and template search using the directory structure of apps within django sites

Hi there. Django allows the possibility of putting apps within apps to improve structure of the code and increase portability. I find this absolutely genial. However, I find this feature quite limited by 2 key issues that are not compatible with this spirit, namely template "finder" and url