[DMM] Revised white paper for optimized mobile user plane solutions for 5G

Here is the revised version of the white paper based on the comments received on last week's call. - Architecture diagrams for roaming and non-roaming scenarios as well as non-roaming architecture for multiple PDU sessions and concurrent access to 2 data networks - UPF and

Re: [DMM] review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt

>Let me think just an example, if a SMF sees an IPv6 address as an UPF address, is actually an IPv6 segment ID of a TE path through several IPv6 routers and links, a southbound could be PCEP but not limited. >BGP-LS should work to disseminate that segment and FPC may

Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Alexandre Petrescu < alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le 07/02/2018 à 18:29, Tom Herbert a écrit : > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Alexandre Petrescu < >> alexandre.petre...@gmail.com > >> wrote: >> >> >>

Re: [DMM] [E] [Ila] Non-mobility functions in Uplane [was Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt]

Response inline. -Original Message- From: ila [mailto:ila-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 3:53 AM To: Bogineni, Kalyani Cc: i...@ietf.org; dmm Subject: [E] [Ila] Non-mobility functions in

Re: [DMM] [Ila] [E] Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt

Satoru: Comments inline. -Original Message- From: Satoru Matsushima [mailto:satoru.matsush...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 3:25 AM To: Bogineni, Kalyani Cc: i...@ietf.org; dmm Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: review comments

Re: [DMM] review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt

Hello Uma, > > When it comes to service function type UPF, you name it. Following draft > exhibits how service chain can be done by SRv6: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-chaining-00 > > [Uma]: I presume this is on N6 interface once de-capsulation is done at >

[DMM] Non-mobility functions in Uplane [was Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt]

Kalyani, # Subject changed. > > Maybe you can see SRv6 mobile uplane as a set of SRv6 functions like a SRv6 > profile for mobile with some augment. > > When it comes to service function type UPF, you name it. Following draft > exhibits how service chain can be done by SRv6: > [KB] I think

Re: [DMM] [Ila] [E] Re: review comments on ] draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt

Hello Kalyani, > > When you see UPF specifically it should be controlled by SMF through N4, they > are not the UPFs. > But you might see them as UPFs if a SMF doesn’t control them directly but the > SMF can put the sessions to it through some other means. > 3GPP SA2 has studied on that case

Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt

Le 07/02/2018 à 18:29, Tom Herbert a écrit : On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Alexandre Petrescu > wrote: Le 06/02/2018 à 05:52, Lorenzo Colitti a écrit : On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Tom Herbert