Re: [DMM] [IANA #1303225] [Errata Verified] RFC5555 (3463)

Hi Sabrina, We will review this and get back to you. Thanks Sri On 2/16/24, 4:42 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sabrina Tanamal via RT" mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of iana-mat...@iana.org > wrote: Hi Eric, all, (resending this message) Should this errata

Re: [DMM] DMM WG Adoption Poll (2) for "Mobile User Plane Evolution" - draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolution-06

Sorry for the long delays on this adoption call. From the feedback, it appears there is some support, but also some concerns and objections. There is some good amount of feedback which needs to be taken into consideration before the draft can be adopted. When making the determination on the

Re: [DMM] DMM WG Adoption Poll (1) for "Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane" - draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07

Thank you for all the feedback. Based on the responses, we believe there is interest from the working for taking up this work. We did not see any strong objections, or concerns for taking up this work. We will therefore adopt draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07 as the baseline document. We the

Re: [DMM] Is IPv6 UDP checksum deployment impact an input to 3GPP?

Dear All – Please let us know your thoughts on the following. Regards Sri Dear DMMers, During IETF117 DMM meeting, we had a report of the IPv6 UDP checksum deployment impact in the following I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-murakami-dmm-udp-checksum-impact-gtpu/ In the meeting

Re: [DMM] Is IPv6 UDP checksum deployment impact an input to 3GPP?

Hi Bechet, Yes. This thread was initiated on my behalf. I will be the sole responsible chair driving the discussions on this thread. Regards Sri From: dmm on behalf of Behcet Sarikaya Reply-To: "sarik...@ieee.org" Date: Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:25 AM To: Satoru Matsushima Cc: dmm

Re: [DMM] Emergency 911 Services over Wi-Fi

Hi David, Thanks a lot for the feedback. I agree with the two key problems you have identified. It is indeed about network selection; it is about temporary access and also about using emergency service configuration for use with the default dialer. * Network attachment. The solution

[DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 116

Folks - If you have any topics to present, please send a request to the chairs with the topic name and other details. Thanks Sri On 3/3/23, 3:06 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" mailto:age...@ietf.org>> wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.

Re: [DMM] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

point addressed. I.e., the remaining points are still unaddressed and must be resolved (they are easy to resolve anyway). Regards -éric On 10/01/2023, 19:53, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" mailto:sgund...@cisco.com> <mailto:sgund...@cisco.com <mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>>>

Re: [DMM] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Eric, Many thanks for your review. I am responding to one of your DISCUSS comments, which is your observations on the Shepherd note. The initial note, based on the established consensus at that time, was to keep the document as a Proposed Standard. Shepherd note included the justification for

[DMM] FW: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23.txt

Thank you Pablo and authors for posting the new revision with the suggested changes. I will let our AD know about the new version. Regards Sri On 12/8/22, 8:07 AM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A new version (-23) has been submitted for draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane:

[DMM] Document Status Change - draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-21

Dear DMM WG Members: A quick update on the status of this document. Based on the feedback resulting from IETF Last Call, 3GPP-IETF Coordination team, 3GPP CT Chair and few others, we have decided to move this document (SRv6 for Mobile User Plane - draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane) on

Re: [DMM] Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks

Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks Hi Sri in-line Well here and hope you are too – been too long David From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Date: Tuesday, 15 November 2022 at 05:22 To: Lake, David (PG/R - Comp Sci & Elec Eng) Cc

Re: [DMM] Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks

Hi David, Hope you are doing well! Thank you for your feedback. Please see inline From: David Lake Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 1:22 AM To: Sri Gundavelli Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks Hi Sri Thank you for the very interesting presentation

Re: [DMM] WG Meeting - Agenda Topics

This is what we are tracking. Please let us know if we missed any requests. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-114-dmm/ On 7/10/22, 8:15 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" wrote: If you have any topics to present, please send us a note. Sri

[DMM] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gundavelli-dmm-device-identifier-00.txt

Appreciate any feedback on this draft. Sri On 7/11/22, 2:40 PM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-gundavelli-dmm-device-identifier-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Sri Gundavelli and posted to the IETF repository. Name:

[DMM] WG Meeting - Agenda Topics

If you have any topics to present, please send us a note. Sri On 7/1/22, 2:15 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request.

Re: [DMM] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane

and review this feedback carefully and work out the proposed changes, if any. Thanks for all the feedback. Authors – Please post a revised document with any additional changes/edits/ based on the LC feedback. Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Frida

[DMM] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane

Folks: We have issued a WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane in April of last year. Based on the feedback and the comments from the WG, we chose to hold the document so the authors can resolve the identified issues from that LC. The authors have worked with the reviewers and have revised

[DMM] Agenda Topics

WG: If you have any topics to present, please send us a note. Currently, we have three agenda topics, and can take few more. Sri On 10/15/21, 3:34 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the

Re: [DMM] Comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

Working Group - Thank you for all the feedback and the lively discussions on this LC. Thank you for that. At the same time, we do want to structure these discussions, as it is all over the place. Few points: 1. Any comments on the technical approach, clarifications and things which are in

Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

Authors: Can you please summarize the discussions and identify the open issues, or areas of non-agreement that have come up as part of this WGCLC Thanks Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

The WGLC is now closed. Thanks for all the feedback. We believe, there is general consensus to move the document forward. There were also few concerns expressed and that we will discuss with our AD, and make sure they are reflected in the shepherd notes. Thanks for all the feedback. Authors:

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

protocols, we (the IETF) have objected. And for good reasons. Therefore, we owe other standards bodies the same respect. We should not produce standards (this is a standards track document) that modify other bodies architectures. Yours, Joel On 4/7/2021 1:35 PM, Sri

[DMM] IPR poll on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

all authors of the document. The DMM list is added in CC for the sake of transparency. Thanks Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 10:35 AM To: "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-upla

[DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

Working Group: As we discussed in the last IETF meeting, we are issuing WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. I am very pleased with the quality of this document. The authors have

Re: [DMM] Call for Agenda: IETF110 DMM

Hi Miya, Yes, we need some review feedback, before we can initiate any adoption call. Please present this in the WG meeting and we can ask some folks to sign-up for reviews. All – Please review and post your feedback on the WG mailer. Sri From: Miya Kohno Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2021

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

the feedback. Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 10:43 AM To: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review th

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

my support as co-author (I have been off for some days, just realized now the closure of the poll) In any case I agree on and remark the need of making documents consistent across WGs. Best regards Luis El mié, 20 ene 2021 a las 19:43, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) (mailto:40cisco@dmar

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review the feedback. * Chairs From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:56 AM To: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a W

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

decide to do that work here, or in some other group and that’s based on AD/Chair inputs and on the review expertise that is needed for this work completion. -Chairs From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM To: dmm Sub

[DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Folks: The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG meetings. There have been good amount of discussions in the mailers and there is some level of interest for the work from the community.

Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Hi Uma, Thanks! Sure, we will initiate the adoption call. Sri From: dmm on behalf of Uma Chunduri Date: Sunday, December 20, 2020 at 12:00 PM To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109 Dear Chai

Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Thanks Pablo for taking capturing the meeting minutes. https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-109-dmm# WG - Please review Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Friday, November 13, 2020 at 7:00 AM To: dmm Subject: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been

[DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Please review the agenda for IETF 109. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/agenda-109-dmm-00.txt Satoru & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

i, We would like to ask a 10 mins slot to update the WG for the to be published draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility (08 version - would be done on 11/02). The changes are mostly to address the recent comments received in the list. -- Uma C. On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 3:49 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgund

[DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Folks - We have the meeting scheduled for Nov 17th. Please send any topics that you want to present. Sri On 10/23/20, 2:16 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session

Re: [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-07.txt

WG – Please provide your inputs on this document. Authors have presented this earlier and like to get some feedback. Sri From: dmm on behalf of Uma Chunduri Date: Friday, October 16, 2020 at 11:42 AM To: dmm Cc: "Luis M. Contreras" , Praveen Muley , Jeff Tantsura , Richard Li , Sridhar

Re: [DMM] RFC 8885 on Proxy Mobile IPv6 Extensions for Distributed Mobility Management

Nice! Congrats to all the authors and the WG. Sri On 10/9/20, 3:07 PM, "dmm on behalf of rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org" wrote: A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8885 Title: Proxy Mobile IPv6 Extensions for

[DMM] IETF 107 - DMM Working Group Session Cancellation

Dear All, Due to some travel restrictions that in are place from my employer, and as well from Satoru’s employer, we had to cancel our travel to Vancouver. In discussions with our AD, we have jointly decided to cancel the DMM Working Group meeting for IETF107. Apologies for the late

Re: [DMM] IETF106 - Call for Agenda Items

Thanks Hannu for the information. Working group needs to review this input. Also, I agree with you that the document may have to reflect the SDO’s current view on this work. Sri On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 6:04 AM Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) mailto:hannu.fli...@nokia-bell-labs.com>>

[DMM] Fwd: Minutes for DMM at IETF 106

Thank you David. Very much appreciated. WG: Please review and provide any edits. Sri Begin forwarded message: From: David Allan I mailto:david.i.al...@ericsson.com>> Date: November 20, 2019 at 10:13:35 AM GMT+8 To: "dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>" mailto:dmm@ietf.org

[DMM] FW: IPR Statement RE: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07

Authors/WG: Please review this IPR disclosure, and provide your feedback on the mailer. Sri On 11/18/19, 12:10 AM, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" wrote: Dear chairs, There has been an IPR disclosure for this draft. This IPR has not been reflected in the draft tracker. Please

Re: [DMM] IETF106 - Call for Agenda Items

Agenda is now posted. Please review. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-106-dmm/ Presenters: Please send your slides by Sunday, 17th Nov, 6PM SGT. Satoru & Sri From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Satoru Matsushima mailto:satoru.matsush...@gmail.com>> Date: Monday,

Re: [DMM] Document Action: 'On Demand Mobility Management' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.txt)

Congrats Danny, Seil and all. Thanks for all your efforts. Sri On 8/6/19, 1:55 PM, "The IESG" wrote: >The IESG has approved the following document: >- 'On Demand Mobility Management' > (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.txt) as Informational RFC > >This document is the product of the

[DMM] IETF 105: DMM Meeting Minutes

Thanks to David I Allan & John Kaippallimalil for the excellent note capture. Please let us know if we need to make any corrections. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/minutes-105-dmm-00 Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] New chair addition for dmm

Welcome Satoru-san. This is great news. Looking forward to working with you. Sri Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 24, 2019, at 9:31 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > > Hi all, > I would like to announce the appointment of Satoru Matsushima as a new > co-chair for the dmm working group. Sri and

[DMM] IETF 105: DMM Working Group Meeting - Agenda

Please see the agenda for the DMM Working group meeting. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/agenda-105-dmm-00 Presenters: Please send your slides by Sunday 9 PM EDT. Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] IETF105 - Call for agenda items

aft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05 > >Best regards, >--satoru > >2019/07/08 22:41、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) のメール: > >> Gentle reminder. Please send your requests by 11th of July. >> >> >> Sri >> >> >> On 6/30/19, 10:02 AM, "dmm

Re: [DMM] IETF105 - Call for agenda items

Gentle reminder. Please send your requests by 11th of July. Sri On 6/30/19, 10:02 AM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" wrote: >Folks: > >We are planning to have a f2f DMM WG meeting at IETF-105. It is currently >scheduled for Wednesday, 24 July 2019, Morni

[DMM] IETF105 - Call for agenda items

Folks: We are planning to have a f2f DMM WG meeting at IETF-105. It is currently scheduled for Wednesday, 24 July 2019, Morning Session I 1000-1200. If you have any topics to present, please send your request to the chairs (as a response to this email) with the following information. >>Topic

Re: [DMM] IETF104 DMM WG meeting minutes

ted resources/slice. A more extensive Q in writing :) Thanks, marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Mittwoch, 27. März 2019 06:02 To: dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> Subject: [DMM] IETF104 DMM WG meeting minutes Thank you Miya-san. Fo

[DMM] IETF104 DMM WG meeting minutes

Thank you Miya-san. Folks - Please review the below meeting minutes, and propose any corrections. https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/notes-ietf-104-dmm?useMonospaceFont=true Sri From: "Miya Kohno (mkohno)" Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 11:41 AM To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)&qu

[DMM] IETF104 Agenda

Agenda is now posted. Please check and let us know if we are missing any requests. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-104-dmm/ > ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

[DMM] FW: IPR Disclosure InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc. s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif

Folks - Please checkout this IPR declaration from InterDigital. Sri On 3/18/19, 9:44 AM, "dmm on behalf of IETF Secretariat" wrote: >Dear Carlos J. Bernardos, Antonio de la Oliva, Fabio Giust, Juan-Carlos >Zúñiga, Alain Mourad: > > >An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft

Re: [DMM] IETF104 - Call for agenda items

Thanks for sending the requests for presentation slots. We will finalize the agenda and post it next week. Sri On 2/14/19, 8:05 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" wrote: >Folks: > >If you need a presentation slot for the next IETF-104 meeting in Prague, >pl

[DMM] IETF104 - Call for agenda items

Folks: If you need a presentation slot for the next IETF-104 meeting in Prague, please send your request to the chairs (as a response to this email) with the following information. The deadline for presentation slots is the 28th of Feb, 2019. >Topic Name: >Presenter Name: >Time: >Draft

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11

Thanks for all the feedback. Authors: Please post a revised document, addressing all the comments that you have received. Sri From: Sri Gundavelli mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM To: "dmm@ietf.org" mailto:dmm@ietf.org>> Subject:

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11

in conjunction with the dmm document. The notion of a "home network" need not be preserved, and instead we have scalable de-aggregation. Please have a look (as I did for the dmm doc) and post comments or questions. Thanks - Fred From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavel

[DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

and Sri > > > >> >>> 2018/12/14 15:14、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) のメール: >>> >>> Folks – Sorry for the delay on this. Given the number of support votes >>>for the company I am affiliated with, I thought it would be best for my >>>co-chair D

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

l-15. There was no need for that!) > >It looks not accurate view of the latest discussion in 3GPP CT4. CT4 >agreed not to introduce any NEW identifiers to indicate network slice for >5GC and its transport. Existing identifiers can be expected for that >purpose in user plane. &

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Folks - Sorry for the delay on this. Given the number of support votes for the company I am affiliated with, I thought it would be best for my co-chair Dapeng reviews this feedback, and in consultation with the AD, makes the decision on this. We will close it soon. Sri From: Sri Gundavelli

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Thanks for all the feedback. The adoption call is now closed. We will review the feedback and decide on the next steps. Sri From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sri Gundavelli mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 10:42 AM To:

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Gentle reminder. The below adoption call will close next week, the 4th of December, 2018. Please provide your feedback. Sri From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sri Gundavelli mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 at 4:34 PM To:

[DMM] IETF 103 - Meeting Minutes

Thank you Satoru-san and Pablo. Please review and let us know if there are any corrections required. http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-103-dmm?useMonospaceFont=true ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org

[DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Folks: During IETF 102 and 103, the authors of the document, draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis.txt have provided the overview of this document. The chairs felt there is good amount of work that went into the document and the analysis has value. The document quality is very high. There was also

Re: [DMM] draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif ready for WGLC in my opinion

Great feedback. This really helps. We want to publish quality documents, unless we hear that from the WG, we cannot move forward. We absolutely need substantial review feedback, and not a mere "looks good" comment. Good to hear that draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif is in a good shape. We will issue

Re: [DMM] Slides - DMM: IETF 103

WG: You can access the DMM WG presentation slides at the below link. Presenters - Please check your slides and let us know if you find any errors. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/session/dmm On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) mailto:sgund...@cisco.com

[DMM] IETF103 - Call for agenda items

Folks: The DMM working group is planning to meet in Bangkok, on Thursday, Nov 8th, 2018, for a 2.5 hour session (subject to change). The IETF 103 Preliminary Agenda has been posted and you can see it at, https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/agenda.html If you need a presentation slot,

[DMM] FW: New Liaison Statement, "LS OUT on User Plane Analysis"

Thank you Shunsuke for your comments. Folks - Please review the new liaison request from CT4 (posted last week) and send your feedback to the DMM mailer. Sri On 8/6/18, 11:52 PM, "Shunsuke Homma" wrote: >Dear 3GPP CT4 folks, > >The authors appreciate the kind review and beneficial feedback

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 3:56 PM >To: dmm@ietf.org >Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) >Subject: Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on >User Plane Protocol in 5GC" > >I am in support of it too. > >Cheers, >-- Jordan > >> I agree

[DMM] Meeting Minutes - IETF 102

Thank you Satoru-san for taking the notes. Folks - Please review and suggest any important corrections. http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-102-dmm?useMonospaceFont=true Regards Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

ny additional information. Also please provide any evaluation criteria that could help us in progressing our work to support 5G." Kalyani -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 11:51 AM To: Arashm

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

Kalyani -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 11:51 AM To: Arashmid Akhavain mailto:arashmid.akhav...@huawei.com>>; dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> Subject: [E] Re: [DMM] New Liaison

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

on different >solutions. That's why I really like what >draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-00 is trying to do. > >Cheers, >Arashmid > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] >> Sent: 08 July 2018 19:29 &

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

ed >in for the last while. > >I agree, we do want to keep it simple, but the POCs can certainly add to >the strength of the LS. > >Regards, >Arashmid > >-Original Message- >From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] >Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

as seen from the attached >meeting Invitation. > >Attached is the meeting agenda - Input LSs will be processed on Monday >July 9th from 9:00 - 11:30 AM. > >Regards, >Kalyani > > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundave

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

Folks - Here is the response in pending state. We are holding for WG feedback. If you have any objections too this, please let us know by 13th of July, 2018. https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1586/ Sri On 7/6/18, 11:25 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" w

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

rding >the technical details of different candidates." > >So, what happens next? We wait for their reply? > >Cheers, >Arashmid > >> -----Original Message- >> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >> (sgundave) >> Sen

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

We plan to send the following response to 3GPP CT4. If you have any quick comments/corrections/suggestions, please let us know in a day. ³ Thank you for your Liaison request (Reference: CP-173160) and for sharing the information on the status of the CT4 study item on user-plane protocol for

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

help. > >Arashmid > >> -Original Message- >> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >> (sgundave) >> Sent: 22 June 2018 12:24 >> To: dmm@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

Folks - Back to this. Any feedback on this? Now that we have waited for some time, I hope we now have a view on this LS. I tend to think we should send a response soon before the July deadline. Sri On 4/16/18, 9:47 AM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" wrote: &g

Re: [DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items

es Draft Reference: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-14 Thanks, Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 18:04 To: dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF102 - Call for ag

Re: [DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items

From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 5:32 PM >To: dmm@ietf.org >Subject: [E] [DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items > >The DMM working group is planning to meet in IETF 102, week of 16th of >July, 2018

Re: [DMM] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-14

Hi Brian, Thanks for the review. Authors: Can you please respond to these review comments and address all the issues? Unless you address all the issues from these IESG initiated reviews, this document is not going any where. Sri On 5/21/18, 7:24 AM, "Brian Haberman" wrote: >Reviewer:

Re: [DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items

on > Architecture > Presenter Name: Shunsuke Homma > Time: 20-30 mins > I-D: draft-homma-dmm-5gs-id-loc-coexistence > > Best regards > > Shunsuke > >> On 2018/05/04 6:32, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: >> The DMM working group is planning to meet in I

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

do not understand. Sri On 5/7/18, 12:25 AM, "Alexandre Petrescu" <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Le 04/05/2018 à 01:43, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : >>>> Well, one can have one own's HA (not cellular network's) to manage the >>>>

Re: [DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items

nd others >Time: 30 minutes >Draft Reference: >draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-solutions.txt > >Kalyani > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 5:32 PM >T

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

this today if you have a MIPv6 client stack, and its already supported over IKEv2/IPsec. Sri On 5/3/18, 7:05 AM, "Alexandre Petrescu" <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Le 03/05/2018 à 15:55, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : >>> It is probab

Re: [DMM] draft-gundavelli-dmm-mfa

Hi Arashmid, Thanks for the review feedback !! I will let Marco respond to this thread. Regards Sri From: Arashmid Akhavain > Date: Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM To: Sri Gundavelli

[DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items

The DMM working group is planning to meet in IETF 102, week of 16th of July, 2018 at Montreal. We currently have requested for one meeting, which is a 2.5 hour slot. We realize in IETF101 we had many items with a fully packaged agenda, and could not allocate enough time for any of the topics. For

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

signed prefixes are dynamically programmed (ignoring other issues), UE’s session always needs to anchored on the same node. Sri On 5/3/18, 12:06 AM, "Alexandre Petrescu" <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Le 02/05/2018 à 16:29, Sri Gundavelli (sgun

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

t; >Le 25/04/2018 à 05:00, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : >> Hi Alex, >> >> I cannot comment on the supported network/service configuration in any >> operator's network. But, I’d think the allocation of stable /64’s is >> similar to static IPv4 (/32) address a

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

ment? (resists re-connection) > >Alex > > >Le 26/03/2018 à 07:14, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : >> Alex: >> >> This is a good point. Yes, there is DHCPv6 prefix delegation support in >> 3GPP architecture for supporting mobile router use-cases. This is >>

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

to:kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com] >> Sent: 16 April 2018 11:26 >> To: Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhav...@huawei.com>; Sri Gundavelli >> (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>; dmm@ietf.org >> Subject: RE: New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

ed to steer the data-path for the session in N3 and N9. > >Does anyone observe any other points? > >Best regards, >--satoru > > >> 2018/04/14 8:05、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>のメール: >> >> Hi Arashmid, >> >> >> I am not s

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

ITU which is also working on NG protocols as >pointed out by some folks at IETF #101. Each SDO >can make use of that information as needed. > >Kalyani > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >S

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

us. They listed a few dates there. The >final deadline is I guess July 2018. >Are we targeting anything earlier? > >Arashmid > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] >> Sent: 13 April 2018 12:47 >> To: A

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

timized-mobile-user-plane >and see if CT4 has comments. We are working on a revision of the document >based on the >comments/feedback received at IETF #101. > >Kalyani > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

rashmid.akhav...@huawei.com> wrote: >Hi Sri, > >Any idea what the plan is once we pass this information to CT4? > >Arashmid > >> -Original Message- >> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >> (sgundave) >> Sent: 12

  1   2   3   4   >