Re: [DNG] Systemdconf

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:20:56 -0400 Dan Purgert wrote: > > > > Don't trust anyone over thirty!\ > > > > So, I shouldn't ... trust ... myself thinking that systemd is a good > thing. Got it! This is a buried shovel. If you're under 30, you can't know what this cultural

Re: [DNG] Systemdconf

On 10/18/2016 01:22 PM, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:54:43 -0400 Dan Purgert wrote: On 10/18/2016 07:03 AM, Aldemir Akpinar wrote: [...] Anyways as you've said we're obsolete grey beards :) Greybeard? Maybe (I dunno, never met you ;) ). Obsolete? Hardly. How

Re: [DNG] Systemdconf

On 10/18/2016 01:22 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:54:43 -0400 > Dan Purgert wrote: > >> On 10/18/2016 07:03 AM, Aldemir Akpinar wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Anyways as you've said we're obsolete grey beards >> >> Greybeard? Maybe (I dunno, never met you ).

Re: [DNG] Refracta on Distrowatch

On Tue, 10/18/16, Steve Litt wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] Refracta on Distrowatch To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2016, 12:40 PM On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:30:52 + (UTC) Go Linux wrote: >> >> Here's a suggestion . . . >> >> Why

Re: [DNG] Refracta on Distrowatch

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:30:52 + (UTC) Go Linux wrote: > > Here's a suggestion . . . > > Why don't you roll your own low vision-friendly Refracta! That ain't a half bad idea! > That would > be so easy to do with refractasnapshot I'll need guidance with

Re: [DNG] Systemdconf

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:54:43 -0400 Dan Purgert wrote: > On 10/18/2016 07:03 AM, Aldemir Akpinar wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > Anyways as you've said we're obsolete grey beards :) > > Greybeard? Maybe (I dunno, never met you ;) ). Obsolete? Hardly. > > How else are people

Re: [DNG] Systemdconf

Funny thing, it was same week as Splunk2016, so many systemd haters would be in Orlando, so as not to disturb the Lennart love-fest. SWS On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Dan Purgert wrote: > > > On 10/18/2016 07:03 AM, Aldemir Akpinar wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > Anyways as

Re: [DNG] Systemdconf

On 10/18/2016 07:03 AM, Aldemir Akpinar wrote: > > [...] > > Anyways as you've said we're obsolete grey beards :) Greybeard? Maybe (I dunno, never met you ;) ). Obsolete? Hardly. How else are people gonna learn, if not from the old-timers, because seriously, if pottering et. al. are

Re: [DNG] Refracta on Distrowatch

On Mon, 10/17/16, Steve Litt wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] Refracta on Distrowatch To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Monday, October 17, 2016, 7:14 PM > > A COUPLE OTHER REFRACTA SUGGESTIONS > > The Refracta I installed on

Re: [DNG] Systemdconf

On 18 October 2016 at 13:49, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2016 18 Oct 03:10 -0500, Aldemir Akpinar wrote: > > Apparently systemd is having a conference in a week in Berlin. Looking at > > the schedule ( https://cfp.systemd.io/en/systemdconf_2016/public/ > schedule/0 ) > > is, I

[DNG] Systemdconf

Apparently systemd is having a conference in a week in Berlin. Looking at the schedule ( https://cfp.systemd.io/en/systemdconf_2016/public/schedule/0 ) is, I think, helpful for us to see what's happening in the systemd universe. Also it's not surprising to see that Redhat is the main sponsor. --

[DNG] Devuan 1.0 final release?

Greetings All, By now I'm sure all with an interest in Devuan have seen the review of Refracta that I wrote for DistroWatch. A few of you knew in advance that I was working on this article, and sent me technical tips and advice before it was published. Thank you for this assistance - indeed, it

Re: [DNG] Refracta on Distrowatch

Hi, One thing to suggest is to remember, that there are unfortunate beings, who do not enjoy a normal eye vision, for whom, a fully configurable font rendering is a *must*. It can be the best of existing OSs, if it hurts a user's eyes, they have no other option, other than, to discontinue using