On 8/5/2019 9:05 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 11:19:22PM -0500, Andrew Miskell wrote:
>> On Aug 4, 2019, at 10:13 PM, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 7:10 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
On Aug 4, 2019, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
>>
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 11:19:22PM -0500, Andrew Miskell wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 10:13 PM, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 7:10 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> >> On Aug 4, 2019, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
>
> }} . "problem" mostly being calling it
Iirc, the behavior you are seeing in dig is by design. By default, dig will not
use the search domain defined in /etc/resolv.conf unless you use the +search
option on dig.
That’s why utilities like host and ping, etc work just fine but dig returns a
blank record.
Try using dig +search maroon
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 7:10 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
>
>
> > So what else I can use beside `resolvectl`?
> >
> > | Basically, look at the top of /etc/resolv.conf to see what is handeling
> > it.
> >
> > Ah, thank!
> >
> > $ systemd-resolve --status | tail -11
> > Link 2 (eth0)
> >
>
>> So what else I can use beside `resolvectl`?
>>
>> | Basically, look at the top of /etc/resolv.conf to see what is handeling it.
>>
>> Ah, thank!
>>
>> $ systemd-resolve --status | tail -11
>> Link 2 (eth0)
>> Current Scopes: DNS
>> LLMNR setting: yes
>> MulticastDNS setting: no
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 05:20:43PM -0400, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> Consolidating replies in one email again,
I call that "consolidating" "mixing", "blending", "poluting" :-(
> So what else I can use beside `resolvectl`?
>
> | Basically, look at the top of
Consolidating replies in one email again,
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 3:04 PM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for all your replies.
>
> Sorry I wasn't very clear first as I don't know if anyone would
> read/reply. Here is my reply to you one by one, but at this single
> place.
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019
Actually, run resolvectl status on the Ubuntu box, find your interface name and
see what the DNS servers say they are configured as. They should be your local
DNS server IP.
If not, then something isn’t getting the DNS servers from DHCP. If you’re using
NetPlan (which is the default) check the
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 03:04:26PM -0400, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for all your replies.
>
> Sorry I wasn't very clear first as I don't know if anyone would
> read/reply.
:-/
> Here is my reply to you one by one, but at this single place.
>
> On Sun, Aug 4,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 09:53:29PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/4/2019 9:04 PM, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I wasn't very clear first
> > as I don't know if anyone would read/reply.
Thing to think about
When there is no effort put in the question,
why should there be put
On 8/4/2019 9:04 PM, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for all your replies.
>
> Sorry I wasn't very clear first as I don't know if anyone would
> read/reply. Here is my reply to you one by one, but at this single
> place.
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 1:36 PM Daniel Huhardeaux
Hi,
Thanks a lot for all your replies.
Sorry I wasn't very clear first as I don't know if anyone would
read/reply. Here is my reply to you one by one, but at this single
place.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 1:36 PM Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 06:53:20PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 07:30:17PM +0200, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
> > Le 04/08/2019 à 15:57, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
> > > Ubuntu
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 07:30:17PM +0200, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
> Le 04/08/2019 à 15:57, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
> > Ubuntu based and they all can't utilized the local dnsmasq server that
> > I
Le 04/08/2019 à 15:57, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com a écrit :
Hi,
I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
Ubuntu based and they all can't utilized the local dnsmasq server that
I setup for my LAN, which literally making my local dnsmasq server
useless.
The problem is
What version of Ubuntu? By default they operate a stub resolver but it should
follow the dhcp settings for the network card. It just locally caches dns
queries to speed things up.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 4, 2019, at 09:51, john doe wrote:
>
>> On 8/4/2019 3:57 PM,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 09:57:19AM -0400, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
> Ubuntu based and they all can't utilized the local dnsmasq server that
> I setup for my LAN, which literally making my local dnsmasq server
>
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 09:57:19AM -0400, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
> Ubuntu based and they all can't utilized the local dnsmasq server that
> I setup for my LAN, which literally making my local dnsmasq server
>
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 04:51:54PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/4/2019 3:57 PM, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
> > Ubuntu based and they all can't utilized the local dnsmasq server that
> > I setup for my LAN,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 04:51:54PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/4/2019 3:57 PM, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
> > Ubuntu based and they all can't utilized the local dnsmasq server that
> > I setup for my LAN,
On 8/4/2019 3:57 PM, dnsmasqyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this is not a dnsmasq issue per se, but all my machines are
> Ubuntu based and they all can't utilized the local dnsmasq server that
> I setup for my LAN, which literally making my local dnsmasq server
> useless.
>
> The
21 matches
Mail list logo
