On 09/06/2018 03:14 AM, Shane Kerr wrote:
All,
On 2018-09-05 20:45, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of
the IETF.
Title : Reve
I updated this draft months ago, based on feedback from the previous WGLC,
and it expired without comment. I’ve refreshed it, and would like to ask
again for reviews (especially if anything has changed in the past year) and
another WGLC.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdn
On 5/11/17, 1:28 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Vixie"
wrote:
>
>
>John Levine wrote:
> In my experience, without reverse DNS it is essentially impossible
>to have
> mail delivered to the internet at large.
Yes.
>>> since this isn't an ideal or intended state of affairs, let's co
On 5/2/17, 3:16 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Vixie"
wrote:
>
>
>Lee Howard wrote:
>>
>> On 3/16/17, 7:02 AM, "Philip Homburg" > behalf of pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In my experience, without reverse DNS it is essent
On 3/16/17, 7:02 AM, "Philip Homburg" wrote:
>>1. I do not think there is consensus that having PTRs is or is not a best
>>practice, so emphasizing the lack of consensus lets us move on to what an
>>ISP can do, if they care to do anything.
>>The first paragraph has been overhauled to say "While
aft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the
>IETF.
>
>Title : Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service
>Providers
>Author : Lee Howard
> Filename: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt
> Pages :
uot;internet-dra...@ietf.org"
>wrote:
>
>>
>>A new version of I-D, draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-08.txt
>>has been successfully submitted by Lee Howard and posted to the
>>IETF repository.
>>
>>Name: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns
>>Revision:
From: Lee Howard
Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 10:57 AM
To: , Alain Durand
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org"
Subject: [DNSOP] relax the requirement for PTR records?
>
> Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs for their
> customers?
Nope, there is
On 5/13/15, 11:12 AM, "Tony Finch" wrote:
>Lee Howard wrote:
>>
>> Is there consensus now that ISPs don't need to provide PTRs for their
>> customers?
>
>ISPs should delegate the relevant part of the IPv6 reverse DNS tree to the
>customer, so the c
On 5/13/15, 11:05 AM, "Paul Wouters" wrote:
>On Wed, 13 May 2015, Lee Howard wrote:
>
>> Is there consensus now that ISPs don¹t need to provide PTRs for their
>>customers?
>
>No.
>
>As long as the anti-spam meassures include refusing email from IPv6
>
dnesday, April 1, 2015 at 10:05 PM
To: Alain Durand
Cc: Lee Howard , "dnsop@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Alain Durand wrote:
>>
>> 3) There is another solution, that is do nothing, i.e. Do NOT po
;s baked, I think there's consensus.
Thanks,
Lee
On 2/15/15, 11:56 AM, "Lee Howard" wrote:
>Per discussion, I have added the four use cases discussed at a previous
>meeting.
>The "Recommendations" section is now "Considerations and Recommendations."
>
s
applause). Is this document ripe for publication?
Thanks,
Lee
On 2/15/15 11:46 AM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org"
wrote:
>
>A new version of I-D, draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-07.txt
>has been successfully submitted by Lee Howard and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>
>Name:
needed to change eventually.
And here's the RFC saying it's wrong: rfc4120 (from that thread).
Lee
From: George Michaelson
Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 6:07 AM
To: Dan York
Cc: Warren Kumari , Lee Howard , DNSOP
WG
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Using PTRs for security validat
On 11/11/14 9:30 PM, "Warren Kumari" wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
>> Many SSH servers (by default) reject connections from IP addresses
>>without
>> PTRs.
>> This is stupid.
>>
>
>dun't matter if it is stu
Many SSH servers (by default) reject connections from IP addresses without
PTRs.
This is stupid.
I heard applause during the WG meeting in response to these statements;
sounded like consensus to me. I said I would check that consensus on list.
Thanks,
Lee
___
On 10/23/14 5:17 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>
>In message , Lee Howard writes:
>>
>> From: Mwendwa Kivuva
>> Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:23 AM
>> To: dnsop
>> Subject: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service
>>Pr
From: Mwendwa Kivuva
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:23 AM
To: dnsop
Subject: [DNSOP] Draft Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers
> Refering to the draft by Lee Howard
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-dnsop-ip6rdns-00
>
> and given the weakness of
We discussed this in Toronto, and there seemed to be a positive response
to the question, "Is this work we should undertake in
this WG?"
There were two pointers, to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-andrews-dnsop-pd-reverse-02 and to the
Homenet naming work.
I'm editing to add those references; is
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ted Lemon
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:46 AM
> To: Warren Kumari
> Cc: Lee Howard;
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs)
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Finch [mailto:fa...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:06 AM
> To: Ted Lemon
> Cc: Lee Howard;
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs)
>
> Ted Lem
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:23 PM
> To: Lee Howard
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs)
>
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Lee Howard
Thanks for the lively discussion!
Here's what I heard, in addition to several useful, non-controversial text
suggestions:
1. Uses for reverse DNS
a. Several people think it's unnecessary to require PTRs. A few even
think a lack of PTRs might be a good thing (in the case of mail servers
reject
You may remember this draft from a couple of years ago. People keep asking
me what a residential ISP should do for IPv6 PTR records, and I keep
repeating what's in the draft.
The intent is to document existing solutions, since prepopulating PTRs like
we did in IPv4 doesn't work. Last time I broug
I apologize for waiting until the last minute to make updates.
Earlier versions of this draft have been discussed on-list and at the last
two IETF
meetings: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-03
Comments from the last meeting were as follows; I think I have responded to
all of them in the new draf
Thank you, these are excellent suggestions.
In particular, you raise several points that require clarification; I will
try to respond in the near future.
Lee
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
JINMEI
> Tatuya /
> Sent: Tue
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Edward
> Lewis
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:07 PM
> To: Lee Howard
> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; 'Edward Lewis'
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Dynamically Generated
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ted Lemon
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: Lee Howard
> Cc: 'dnsop'
> Subject: [DNSOP] A practical solution for ISP-level support of the reverse
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Edward
> Lewis
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 4:35 PM
> To: fujiw...@jprs.co.jp
> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; ed.le...@neustar.biz
> Subject: [DNSOP] Dynamically Generated PTR, was Re: ... rDNS for
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Douglas
> Otis
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 2:18 PM
> To: Doug Barton
> Cc: dnsop; Shane Kerr
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00
>
> Saying IPv6
> -Original Message-
> From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Mark
> Andrews
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:53 PM
> To: Doug Barton
> Cc: dnsop
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00
>
> Windows already attempts to
31 matches
Mail list logo
