Yes, it must be a misconfiguration but I cannot find it. I have grep-ed
/etc/postfix for all instances of localhost and there is nowhere an instance of
localhost.com...
Also, I have /etc/hosts with "127.0.0.1 localhost" and main.cf:"myhostname =
mydomain.com" and "mydestination = localhost,
I am getting this error
imap-login: Disconnected: Connection closed: SSL_accept() failed:
error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:
SSL alert number 46 (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=69.142.122.175,
lip=209.160.65.133, TLS handshaking:
Jason Hirsh via dovecot skrev den 2024-06-06 03:20:
Is there anyway I can remove Dovecot from my server and reinstalll it?
It is so messed up I don’t care about losing data
reinstall will make the same install problem fails
i often joke about precompiled problems :)
more help show logs
Sorry, forgot to change the To: field :/
Pete.
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Pete Long
> Subject: Re: EXPUNGED Folder Always Visible
> Date: 6 June 2024 at 09:43:50 BST
> To: Robert L Mathews
>
>
>
>> On 5 Jun 2024, at 19:18, Robert L Mathews via dovecot
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun
Seems like Postfix is trying to send emails to r...@localhost.com
instead of root at the localhost.
localhost.com @ 74.125.224.72 does not have port 25 open which is why
the connection times out.
On 6/5/2024 2:22 PM, GDS via dovecot wrote:
Hello all, I am seeing hundreds of lines like the
> On 06/05/2024 1:22 PM MDT GDS via dovecot wrote:
>
> Hello all, I am seeing hundreds of lines like the one below in my mail.log
> from this specific IP address, which belongs to Google. Is there a way to
> determine why this "deferred (delivery temporarily suspended)" is happening?
>
> Jun
Hello all, I am seeing hundreds of lines like the one below in my mail.log from
this specific IP address, which belongs to Google. Is there a way to determine
why this "deferred (delivery temporarily suspended)" is happening?
Jun 5 19:09:32 arthemis postfix/error[86771]: 5D9D148296D:
to=,
On Jun 5, 2024, at 12:21 AM, Pete Long via dovecot wrote:
> After a restart of Dovecot, I see this in the logs:
>
> Jun 05 08:12:07 imap(pete)<19761>: Error: Mailbox Deleted
> Messages: Lazy-expunge transaction failed: Mailbox Deleted Messages: UID=1
> 67: lazy_expunge: Couldn't open expunge
> On 4 Jun 2024, at 18:56, Robert L Mathews via dovecot
> wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2024, at 8:40 AM, Pete Long via dovecot wrote:
>>
>> I'm having a bit of a time trying to get the EXPUNGED mailbox to not display
>> when any mail is moved or deleted.
>
> You should make the name start with a
On Jun 4, 2024, at 8:40 AM, Pete Long via dovecot wrote:
>
> I'm having a bit of a time trying to get the EXPUNGED mailbox to not display
> when any mail is moved or deleted.
You should make the name start with a dot like ".EXPUNGED" to hide it from
normal folders. See the "example
Hi all,
I'm having a bit of a time trying to get the EXPUNGED mailbox to not display
when any mail is moved or deleted.
Here's what I'm running:
Operating System = Debian 11.9
Dovecot = 2.3.13
MUA = Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\)
Here is the information I think is relevant:
# cat
Hi,
we've found an issue with sieve plugin. When script includes two missing
optional scripts, it causes crash.
For reproducing the issue, script names must belong to same hash table
node, so either two scripts with same name or scripts where 'hash(name)
% table->size' results in same
Worked like a charm. Thanks!
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
> On 01/06/2024 19:47 EEST se--- via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Tried all kinds of user setup, and read what I found on different foras, but
> still get:
>
> "Debug: open(/proc/self/io) failed: Permission denied"
>
> Is anyone able to spot the misconfig?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
Hi!
First
Tried all kinds of user setup, and read what I found on different foras, but
still get:
"Debug: open(/proc/self/io) failed: Permission denied"
Is anyone able to spot the misconfig?
Thanks in advance!
This is my dovecot -n:
# 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole
Hello,
dovecot sieve sends vacation replies with an empty FROM: field by
default. Sadly my provider rejects such emails.
I tried to change this behavior by adding
sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes to the plugin section in
dovecot.conf. But still vacation replies are send with empty
Hi, please see
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/sql/#authentication-sqlAki
Original message From: Jeff P via dovecot
Date: 6/1/24 14:28 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: sasl database Hello,Is there a guide for using a customized SASL
On 01/06/2024 13:22, Jeff P via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
Is there a guide for using a customized SASL database for dovecot?
for example, SQLite.
Thanks in advance.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi
I was looking into Pigeonhole behaviour in the case of managesieve
receiving invalid input either before or after login. I can see that
there are hard coded limits after 3 sequential bad commands prior to
authentication and 20 after authentication.
I was wondering if there is a reason
Hello,
Is there a guide for using a customized SASL database for dovecot?
for example, SQLite.
Thanks in advance.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
On 01/06/2024 20:23, Adam Miller via dovecot wrote:
Thank you!
At the time, I was trying to get the most basic of quotas working which
I have now successfully accomplished! I am happy report that I also
have the warning emails working.
Excellent.
Is it possible that instead of a bash
Thank you!
At the time, I was trying to get the most basic of quotas working which I have
now successfully accomplished! I am happy report that I also have the warning
emails working.
Next, my plan is to figure out a way to write custom HTML warning emails using
the MJML templating engine. My
On 30/05/2024 20:06, Adam Miller via dovecot wrote:
however now I am having an issue trying to get the quota warning emails
to work.
Your original post did not show a "service quota-warning" section where
you tell dovecot what to run, I suggest you fully read everything to do
with quota on
Hi list :)
We want to make some changes to our spam filter, but we first want to
be able to check if what we do does have any effect.
So I was thinking of storing in our statistics if somebody moves an
email to their Junk folder (or even better: vice versa).
I have created the following metric
Thank you for the reply. I was actually able to get it all working however now
I am having an issue trying to get the quota warning emails to work. Not sure
what the deal is but once I have hammered on it enough and it still isn't
working, I will reply to ask for additional help.
As for what
> On 30/05/2024 02:21 EEST Adam Miller via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Ubuntu Version: Linux 6.2.0-1017-aws x86_64 Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS nfs4
>
> Postfix: Version: 3.6.4
>
> Dovecot Version: 2.3.16 (7e2e900c1a)
>
> Pigeonhole Version: 0.5.16 (09c29328)
>
> Rspamd Version: 3.8.4
>
> Protocols:
Ubuntu Version: Linux 6.2.0-1017-aws x86_64 Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS nfs4
Postfix: Version: 3.6.4
Dovecot Version: 2.3.16 (7e2e900c1a)
Pigeonhole Version: 0.5.16 (09c29328)
Rspamd Version: 3.8.4
Protocols: IMAP, LMTP, SMTP
Setup: I have an email server running with virtual domains and virtual
Smtp DATA command after writing "Subject: asd\r\n.\r\n"
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
In below data getting from Postfix. Dovecot imap protocol when fetching mails
returns no data. So program crashing when parsing mbox file.
Mbox file:
"From i...@asd.com Tue May 28 14:53:11 2024
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: t...@example.com
Delivered-To: t...@example.com
Subject: asd
"
Error:
Am 23.05.24 um 22:07 schrieb Scott Q. via dovecot:
Anyone managed to get Dovecot working as smoothly with OAUTH2 as
Gmail has with Outlook ? So that for example when you add the account
up in Outlook it performs all the required steps for saving the
device, getting tokens, etc.
Ideally with
Greetings,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:52:41 +0100,
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> Excluding INBOX from virtual folder seems that allows to avoid the issue.
>
I'd like to confirm that excluding INBOX from virtual folder indeed allows
to avoid that issue.
Any suggestion how can I help to debug
> I thought it was just a lack of skill on my part in finding/making the
> correct configuration.
I am curious about your results, so keep posting! :)
> But what do large email servers that use Dovecot do?
>
> I thought it was an orchestration between OpenLDAP, Postfix and Dovecot
> because
Wow, hard to believe.
I thought it was just a lack of skill on my part in finding/making the correct
configuration.
But what do large email servers that use Dovecot do?
I thought it was an orchestration between OpenLDAP, Postfix and Dovecot because
theoretically LDAP is the best place to
Hi, I have a Dovecot installation (version 2.3.16) with 3 directors and 4
backend servers.
Three backend servers have the director_tag 'new', one has the director_tag
'old'.
The users are on the DB, the director_tag is a table field.
I want to migrate mailboxes from the old backend (Maildir
> On 23/05/2024 04:42 EEST moso.mosoleu--- via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> It shouldn't be impossible, but I've tried countless ways and not even
> ChatGPT 4o was able to help me! :D
>
> I use three LDIF files to get OpenLDAP ready for testing. In the first LDIF I
> just modify the schema to
It shouldn't be impossible, but I've tried countless ways and not even ChatGPT
4o was able to help me! :D
I use three LDIF files to get OpenLDAP ready for testing. In the first LDIF I
just modify the schema to add the associatedDomain attributes (then I could
configure the server to serve more
> On 22/05/2024 19:38 EEST bl0v3 via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Hey I was trying to use dovecot2 with a not libc based memory allocation
> such as scudo or graphene-hardened or graphene-hardened-light but ran
> into the issues I described in
>
>
> https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/313721
Hey I was trying to use dovecot2 with a not libc based memory allocation
such as scudo or graphene-hardened or graphene-hardened-light but ran
into the issues I described in
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/313721
I just wanted to mention this here as well as this behavior may
I answered my own question. Sorry! It's that I'm using the zlib plugin
with maildir. Though I welcome ideas for a smooth transition to a better
quota system that won't demolish large servers as hard as dirsize would.
On 2024-05-20 17:07, jarland--- via dovecot wrote:
I'm currently running
I'm currently running 2.3.21 on this system and here's what I'm seeing
(a bit cut down for excess):
# doveadm quota get -u emailu...@domain.net
STORAGE 1052385
MESSAGE2741
So the storage is roughly more than 1GB according to Dovecot. No change
after quota recalc. But:
> On 05/20/2024 9:43 AM MDT Alexey Krylov via dovecot
> wrote:
>
> Please, send me the link, where I can find the info about configuring
> firing script after dovecot client is disconnected.
>
> I found post-login scripting. Than's cool, but... I need to fire script
> a little bit later.
See
Sirs, good day.
Please, send me the link, where I can find the info about configuring
firing script after dovecot client is disconnected.
I found post-login scripting. Than's cool, but... I need to fire script
a little bit later.
May be I try to build crutches... But I wish with all my heart to
Hello,
I got a lot of fatal errors on differents mailbox after I added the option:
mail_attachment_detection_options = add-flags
Rocky Linux release 8.9 (Green Obsidian)
2.3.21 (47349e2482)
May 16 15:03:00 Panic: imap(u...@domain.com.br)<1669762>:
file imap-sieve-storage.c: line 317
Hello,
similarly the default state_dir = /usr/local/var/lib/dovecot is not compatible
with the default ProtectSystem=full (⇔read-only /usr):
May 20 10:04:44 d dovecot[319843]: master: Dovecot v0.0.0-33124+6b1bcf1bad
(6b1bcf1bad) starting up for imap, lmtp
May 20 10:04:44 d dovecot[319843]:
Hello,
at 6b1bcf1bad1d7, calling
./configure && make install
sets prefix=/usr/local, and thus the default base_dir =
/usr/local/var/run/dovecot. Moreover it installs
/usr/lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service with [Service] ProtectSystem=full.
ProtectSystem=full mounts /usr as read-only, so no
> On 20/05/2024 08:35 EEST Дилян Палаузов via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I installed Dovecot from git 6b1bcf1bad1d78e, copied
> /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/example/config to /usr/local/etc/dovecot and
> called dovecot -F . The system reported
>
> doveconf: Fatal: Error in
Hello,
I installed Dovecot from git 6b1bcf1bad1d78e, copied
/usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/example/config to /usr/local/etc/dovecot and
called dovecot -F . The system reported
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
/usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/auth-system.conf.ext line 11: passdb { } is
On 20/05/24 01:55, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
Am 19.05.24 um 15:29 schrieb Friedrich Kink via dovecot:
chmod 775 /var/log/dovecot will solve the problem. Without execute
permission the process can't access the logfile.
Why on earth does a process supposed to write to a file need
> Am 19.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot:
> > It most certainly isn't. nginx isn't running as root, yet it can log
> > without execution permissions just fine. Absolutely nothing should have
> > execution permissions if they aren't meant to be executed, which should
> > only be
Am 19.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot:
It most certainly isn't. nginx isn't running as root, yet it can log
without execution permissions just fine. Absolutely nothing should have
execution permissions if they aren't meant to be executed, which should
only be true for a
As Alexander wrote - posix behaviour. To change into a directory the directory
itself needs execute permission for owner/group/other (what ever is meant). Not
the file itself. BTW even a chmod 110 /var/log/dovecot (so only execute and no
read/write) would work.
On 19.05.24 16:49, Richard
Am 19.05.24 um 16:02 schrieb Alexander Dallou via dovecot:
Am 19.05.2024 um 15:55 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot:
Am 19.05.24 um 15:29 schrieb Friedrich Kink via dovecot:
chmod 775 /var/log/dovecot will solve the problem. Without execute permission
the process can't access the logfile.
Am 19.05.2024 um 15:55 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot:
Am 19.05.24 um 15:29 schrieb Friedrich Kink via dovecot:
chmod 775 /var/log/dovecot will solve the problem. Without execute
permission the process can't access the logfile.
Why on earth does a process supposed to write to a file need
Am 19.05.24 um 15:29 schrieb Friedrich Kink via dovecot:
chmod 775 /var/log/dovecot will solve the problem. Without execute permission
the process can't access the logfile.
Why on earth does a process supposed to write to a file need execution
permission? This most certainly is very unwelcome
chmod 775 /var/log/dovecot will solve the problem. Without execute permission
the process can't access the logfile.
On 19.05.24 12:25, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
Am 19.05.24 um 04:02 schrieb Peter via dovecot:
> Check the permissions of the entire path, as dovecot:
>
> namei -l
Am 19.05.24 um 04:02 schrieb Peter via dovecot:
Check the permissions of the entire path, as dovecot:
namei -l /var/log/dovecot/error.log
It might be selinux, check your audit.log file, or set selinux to permissive
mode and see if it works:
setenforce 0
This can't be the case, there is no
> Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my
> Archiving.
>
> I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by
> the report-ham.sieve script):
>
> exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham &
>
> Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed
On 19/05/24 04:31, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
I have a mailing server setup based on Debian Stable that uses postfix
(v3.7.10) for SMTP and dovecot (v2.3.19.1 (9b53102964)) for IMAP. I now
wanted to set dovecot to not write to syslog, but to dedicated files in
/var/log/dovecot. While
I have a mailing server setup based on Debian Stable that uses postfix
(v3.7.10) for SMTP and dovecot (v2.3.19.1 (9b53102964)) for IMAP. I now wanted
to set dovecot to not write to syslog, but to dedicated files in
/var/log/dovecot. While everything indicates that this happens successfully as
Thanks a lot Marc.
I actually found something that works for me:
I replaced `sa-learn -u xx --ham`
with
`spamc -u xx -L ham`
Archiving wasn't as fast as simply moving messages, but was considerably
faster - fast enough that no errors on Roundcube are reported.
Best,
Francis
---
Francis
Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my
Archiving.
I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by the
report-ham.sieve script):
exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham &
Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed that archiving got
Hi,
When using the :try tag on the pipe command in the sieve_extprograms plugin
Sieve’s implicit keep is cancelled if the executed command fails. The
specification on
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dovecot/pigeonhole/master/doc/rfc/spec-bosch-sieve-extprograms.txt
states:
“When the ":try"
Have you tried to set the ssl_* parameters as stated in
https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/plugin/sql-mysql?
Am 16.05.24, 12:53 schrieb "Gandalf Corvotempesta via dovecot"
:
Hi all
is possible to tell dovecot to use a mysql connection with SSL ?
My new remote mysql server only
Il giorno gio 16 mag 2024 alle ore 16:35 Stuart Henderson via dovecot
ha scritto:
> Wrong bit of the manual. See the sample dovecot-sql.conf.ext or
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/sql/#id10
Seems much easier with this... I'll try tomorrow
Il giorno gio 16 mag 2024 alle ore 15:58 Aki Tuomi
ha scritto:
> I don't think dovecot will read your .my.cnf̣.
>
> See supported options at https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/plugin/sql-mysql/
Probably "client_flags" is what i need to use but:
1. i don't know the int value for CLIENT_SSL (and
On 2024-05-16, Christopher Wensink via dovecot wrote:
> See here for the documentation for dovecot:
>
> https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/ssl/
Wrong bit of the manual. See the sample dovecot-sql.conf.ext or
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/sql/#id10
Christopher Wensink via dovecot skrev den 2024-05-16 15:34:
See here for the documentation for dovecot:
https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/ssl/
this is not covering database connections
so above is for end-users connections, not dovecot connection to
databases like mysql postgres, or
> On 16/05/2024 16:30 EEST Gandalf Corvotempesta via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno gio 16 mag 2024 alle ore 15:12 Christopher Wensink via
> dovecot ha scritto:
> > Yes.
> >
> > https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.3/en/using-encrypted-connections.html
>
> This is for using ssl with native
Il giorno gio 16 mag 2024 alle ore 15:34 Christopher Wensink
ha scritto:
>
> See here for the documentation for dovecot:
>
> https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/ssl/
This has nothing to do with mysql connection.
What i've asked for is how to tell dovecot to connect to a mysql
server by using
See here for the documentation for dovecot:
https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/ssl/
On 5/16/2024 8:30 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
Il giorno gio 16 mag 2024 alle ore 15:12 Christopher Wensink via
dovecot ha scritto:
Yes.
Il giorno gio 16 mag 2024 alle ore 15:12 Christopher Wensink via
dovecot ha scritto:
> Yes.
>
> https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.3/en/using-encrypted-connections.html
This is for using ssl with native mysql client.
Dovecot uses the native library or has a embedded mysql library ?
because my
Gandalf,
Yes.
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.3/en/using-encrypted-connections.html
It's common practice. From my experience most LAMP stacks are built and
with a web front end that's handling the SSL traffic via apache to
secure the connection between the client browser and the web
Hi all
is possible to tell dovecot to use a mysql connection with SSL ?
My new remote mysql server only allows ssl connections
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
On 15/05/2024 18:27, Douglas Morse via dovecot wrote:
My apologies, a small inaccuracy:
Below where I mention .svbin files being created, I incorrectly described what
is occurring. If the `sieve` is set to the default of users’ home directories
etc., the file `.dovecot.svbin` is created in
Apologies, just to be completely explicit, I should have stated that of course
in every configuration I mentioned the `.dovecot.sieve` file always pointed to
the user’s main sieve script, wherever I may have placed it at the time.
So for example my centralized configuration is as follows when
My apologies, a small inaccuracy:
Below where I mention .svbin files being created, I incorrectly described what
is occurring. If the `sieve` is set to the default of users’ home directories
etc., the file `.dovecot.svbin` is created in the user’s home directory. If
`sieve` is set to the
Hi,
Dovecot version is 2.3.19.1 (9b53102964) running on fully up-to-date Debian 12
(Bookworm) operating system.
For the life of me I cannot figure out how to get sieve scripts working
correctly in a central directory location. Calling them from users’ home
directories works fine (as
Hi,
we have encountered an interesting behavior with users that have their
mailboxes over quota while having sieve-vacation enabled. We do a temp fail, if
a mailbox is over quota.
Problem:
If a remote sender sends an email to such a user (over quota + vacation),
Dovecot directly
Le 09/05/2024 à 12:07, Jean-Max Reymond a écrit :
Hi,
I was running dovecot 2.3.7.2 with ubuntu 20.04
Lastweek, I upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04 and dovecot 2.3.16
My configuration was migrated and all is fine expected the sieve
duplicate. It does notwork and i don't understand why.
sorry for the
ok here are the basics
see example plugins below
plugin {
mail_log_events = delete undelete expunge copy mailbox_delete
mailbox_rename
mail_log_fields = uid, box, msgid, from, subject, size, vsize, flags
push_notification_driver = dlog
sieve =
Op 13-5-2024 om 14:14 schreef Nick Urbanik via dovecot:
On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 14:36 +1000, Nick Urbanik via dovecot wrote:
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 09:42 +1000, Nick Urbanik via dovecot wrote:
Dear Folks,
I am in the process of learning Sieve, and want to be able to keep
an
email in Inbox,
On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 14:36 +1000, Nick Urbanik via dovecot wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 09:42 +1000, Nick Urbanik via dovecot wrote:
> > Dear Folks,
> >
> > I am in the process of learning Sieve, and want to be able to keep
> > an
> > email in Inbox, while also keeping *one* copy in another
> On 9 May 2024, at 19:45, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote:
>
> Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot skrev den 2024-05-09 12:29:
>
>>> If you want to analyze emails, why not do it with scheduled crons
>>> after they are archived?
>
> maybe ask for skip older then one day in here
>
This may help, see the post from 9/9/2021:
https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/issues/1234
On 5/9/2024 2:50 PM, Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot wrote:
On 9 May 2024, at 19:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 09/05/2024 20:15 EEST Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot
> On 9 May 2024, at 19:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
>> On 09/05/2024 20:15 EEST Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot
>> mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering:
>>
>> 1 - Is it possible to configure authentication methods per user? For
>> example,
> On 9 May 2024, at 19:45, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
>> On 09/05/2024 20:15 EEST Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot
>> mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering:
>>
>> 1 - Is it possible to configure authentication methods per user? For
>> example,
On 09/05/2024 20:15 EEST Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot
wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering:
1 - Is it possible to configure authentication methods per user? For
example, oauth2 for most users, but plain for others?
2 - I had a
> On 9 May 2024, at 12:55, dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org wrote:
>
> Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot skrev den 2024-05-09 11:28:
>
>> Actually, I don’t know here if that’s the sieve that’s slowing down the
>> process, or if it is something else.
>> I see that yeah, sa-learn takes a
Hi,
I was wondering:
1 - Is it possible to configure authentication methods per user? For example,
oauth2 for most users, but plain for others?
2 - I had a feeling that when oauth2 authentication fails, dovecot tries to
authenticate via plain with the received token. Doesn’t seem logical, but
Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot skrev den 2024-05-09 12:29:
If you want to analyze emails, why not do it with scheduled crons
after they are archived?
maybe ask for skip older then one day in here
https://github.com/isbg/isbg/tree/master
while roundcube just set the needed flag
Hi,
I was running dovecot 2.3.7.2 with ubuntu 20.04
Lastweek, I upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04 and dovecot 2.3.16
My configuration was migrated and all is fine expected the sieve
duplicate. It does notwork and i don't understand why.
% doveconf -n
# 2.3.16 (7e2e900c1a): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
#
Hi,
I was running dovecot 2.3.7.2 with ubuntu 20.04
Lastweek, I upgrade to Ubuntu 22.04 and dovecot 2.3.16
My configuration was migrated and all is fine expected the sieve
duplicate. It does notwork and i don't understand why.
% doveconf -n
# 2.3.16 (7e2e900c1a): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
#
> On 2024-05-09 12:03, Marc wrote:
> > I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this
> > is an efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for
> > 'auto archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages
> > are being moved by cron jobs, and
=
On 2024-05-09 12:03, Marc wrote:
I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this
is an efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for
'auto archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages
are being moved by cron jobs, and
Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot skrev den 2024-05-09 11:28:
Actually, I don’t know here if that’s the sieve that’s slowing down the
process, or if it is something else.
I see that yeah, sa-learn takes a little while to execute. But maybe
the issue is that Dovecot doesn’t seem to
I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this is an
efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for 'auto
archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages are being
moved by cron jobs, and modification logs are put into their accounts.
> I noticed that my sieve rules are taking a very long time when archiving
> messages. I can see on my logs that every message takes about two-three
> seconds to be evaluated.
>
> I also noticed this happens for a few accounts. Do you know what could be
> causing this?
>
> Best,
> Francis
>
---
Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay
Oslo, Norway
On 2024-05-09 10:11, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 09/05/2024 10:46 EEST Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot
wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dovecot server on Ubuntu 22.04, which works fine with Oauth2.
I am building a new container based on Ubuntu
> On 09/05/2024 10:46 EEST Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Dovecot server on Ubuntu 22.04, which works fine with Oauth2. I am
> building a new container based on Ubuntu 24.04. IMAP seems to work fine with
> plain authentication, but oauth2
Hi,
I have a Dovecot server on Ubuntu 22.04, which works fine with Oauth2. I am
building a new container based on Ubuntu 24.04. IMAP seems to work fine with
plain authentication, but oauth2 fails (Dovecot v2.3.21). Same configuration as
before.
However, I got this message:
May 09 09:41:57
1 - 100 of 83796 matches
Mail list logo
