And if possible, how to disable statistics completely and safely? Without the
"0" trick, that leads getting;
"Jul 12 02:20:55 mail dovecot: auth: Error:
net_connect_unix(/var/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: No such file or directory
Jul 12 02:20:55 mail dovecot: auth: Error: stats:
Hi.
I'm using Dovecot on OpenBSD OS. "dovecot --version" reports: 2.3.20
(80a5ac675d) and this is my configuration file: https://termbin.com/m4to
How to properly set the statistics for the version I use? I have both "service
stats" and "service old-stats" and i
Sean Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/07/2023 5:33 pm, novoMedia via dovecot wrote:
> > I am not exactly sure what hosts have to do with this. The must-staple
> > extension is a (cryptographically ensured) flag that is 'ingrained'
> > into a certificate. It tells a client to only a
ot; I mean figuratively. I have no say
over the development of Dovecot. I'm just a user like almost everyone
else on this list.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
_______
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@d
On 11/07/2023 5:33 pm, novoMedia via dovecot wrote:
I am not exactly sure what hosts have to do with this. The must-staple
extension is a (cryptographically ensured) flag that is 'ingrained'
into a certificate. It tells a client to only accept the certificate
if a valid and recent OCSP
ges of the 'must-staple' extension? Just because Thunderbird or
Outlook does not support it? What does John Doe using Chrome have to do
with Thunderbird/Outlook?
I am not trying to be obnoxious here but this point is crucial do
understand: Lack of OCSP in Dovecot has security implications f
in
the loss of a valuable security feature.
b) Issue must-staple certificates without an OCSP response in Dovecot,
thereby breaking the TLS RFC (and “hope for the best” on the client
side…).
or c) use must-staple on a host-by-host basis
Question) Do any popular email user agents validate
Currently, Dovecot does not offer any support for OCSP, leaving system
administrators with a dilemma: choosing between security or compatibility.
- What is OCSP?
OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol) is a network protocol used to
check the validity and revocation status of digital
On 7/6/2023 10:30 AM, joe a wrote:
On 7/6/2023 9:34 AM, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote:
On 6/7/23 20:49, joe a wrote:
On 7/6/2023 8:12 AM, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote:
On 6/7/23 19:15, joe a wrote:
If your example was meant to show the correct way, I cannot see any
difference
On 7/6/2023 9:34 AM, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote:
On 6/7/23 20:49, joe a wrote:
On 7/6/2023 8:12 AM, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote:
On 6/7/23 19:15, joe a wrote:
If your example was meant to show the correct way, I cannot see any
difference between that and what my posted config
On 6/7/23 20:49, joe a wrote:
On 7/6/2023 8:12 AM, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote:
On 6/7/23 19:15, joe a wrote:
If your example was meant to show the correct way, I cannot see any
difference between that and what my posted config shows other than
the sequential (contiguous?) in your
auithentication method only.
Jeremy
--
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
...
While this may be more properly asked on the postfix list,
ll /var/spool/postfix/private/
shows, among other things:
srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jul 5 21:50 dovecot
srw--- 1 postfix postfix 0 Jul 5 21:37 dovecot-lmtp
Is that correct
On 7/6/2023 1:09 AM, Paul Kudla wrote:
just an fyi
postfix runs it's own authenticaion especially with virtual users
please note below is based on pgsql but the concept is the same for
passwd - have not used that for a while
simply put virtual users both with postfix & dovecot works
On 7/5/2023 11:26 PM, jeremy ardley via dovecot wrote:
On 6/7/23 10:17, joe a wrote:
Greetings from a new dovecot user.
Have setup dovecot on openSuse 15.4 with postfix as the MTA. Both are
the latest version in that distribution.
Simple virtual user setup using /etc/dovecot/passwd
just an fyi
postfix runs it's own authenticaion especially with virtual users
please note below is based on pgsql but the concept is the same for
passwd - have not used that for a while
simply put virtual users both with postfix & dovecot works way better
with a pgsql database run
On 6/7/23 10:17, joe a wrote:
Greetings from a new dovecot user.
Have setup dovecot on openSuse 15.4 with postfix as the MTA. Both are
the latest version in that distribution.
Simple virtual user setup using /etc/dovecot/passwd
Dovecot seems to be working and all the defined users
Greetings from a new dovecot user.
Have setup dovecot on openSuse 15.4 with postfix as the MTA. Both are
the latest version in that distribution.
Simple virtual user setup using /etc/dovecot/passwd
Dovecot seems to be working and all the defined users are authenticating
well enough
to be pretty easy, as are most things after you
figure them out.
I am running a separate instance of dovecot for each submission port,
587 and 465. In each of the instance config files, I removed the userdb
and passdb stanzas and replaced them with a single passdb stanza as
documented in auth
connection , probably to exploit some
vulnerability in SSL1,2 and 3 in case of success )
dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Connection closed: SSL_accept() failed:
error:0A00010B:SSL routines::wrong version number (disconnected before auth was
ready, waited 0 secs): user=<&
secured
Best regards,
Eirik
_______
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
say "auth failed."
elyograg@bilbo:~$ sudo grep Inactivity /var/log/mail.log | grep -v "auth
failed"
Jun 18 04:20:18 bilbo dovecot:
imap(elyog...@elyograg.org)<412591>: Disconnected:
Inactivity - no input for 1800 secs in=38963 out=457431 deleted=0
expunged=0
-custom.conf file myself. You won't find it in a
standard fail2ban install. It is my way of achieving the config I want
without changing the main .conf files. This makes upgrades a lot cleaner.
I believe dovecot does have a bug here. My user that shows those failed
auth messages has not been
From: pe...@netsecpt.pt
> Hi , i am having an issue with dovecot , in log files of imap inactivity
> lines have the word included "auth failed" , witch is not true , what happens
> next is that fail2ban is looking for that word too in log file of dovecot
> ,and when
look
too , but then 1 week ago i had to reinstall the mail server again due to a hdd
failure , since iphone was conected to my lan using wifi then i got in mail
server my public ip , this was the reason why auth failure was in log file ,
inactivity was probably because those clients hang too
On 6/16/23 10:53, pe...@netsecpt.pt wrote:
Hi , i am having an issue with dovecot , in log files of imap inactivity lines have the
word included "auth failed" , witch is not true , what happens next is that
fail2ban is looking for that word too in log file of dovecot ,and whe
Hi , i am having an issue with dovecot , in log files of imap inactivity lines
have the word included "auth failed" , witch is not true , what happens next is
that fail2ban is looking for that word too in log file of dovecot ,and when it
finds it it bans my public ip address .
Is
Paul thx for your time and help!
After a long time of testing i noticed something... probably a small thing
for a dovecot expert...
The seen mails of the old server have a ",S" at the end of the filename.
The seen mails of the new server have a ",:2,S". If I rename the mai
ther single header to let postfix filter for that (by header_checks
FILTER) and choose the right relay host based on the information set in
the new header - but currently I don't need that.
Thx everybody so far!
--
Cheers
spi
_______
dovecot mailing list --
g if it's a vacation response or not. But if you ask Wietse
on the postfix-us...@postfix.org list he would know if there are any
workarounds to do what you want.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local?
Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for
a...@aaa.com, allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com, and users login as
a...@aaa.com on IMAP to check their mail?
That would work if users only had one alias, but they don't
ord scheme. Maybe I'll just finish it. Time is my issue!
(Yes, it'd be better to have it seamlessly integrated into the IMAP protocol,
but don't forget that you'd need the *MUAs* to start supporting it as well
before the general public will ever even learn about the new feature ...)
Yes, ag
Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local?
Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for
a...@aaa.com, allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com, and users login as
a...@aaa.com on IMAP to check their mail?
That would work if users only had one alias, but they don't - they have
Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local?
Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for
a...@aaa.com, allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com, and users login as
a...@aaa.com on IMAP to check their mail?
That would work if users only had one alias, but they don't
Am 09.06.23 um 20:13 schrieb dovecot--- via dovecot:
postfix (*) presents the right "rcpt to a...@aaa.com" to the milter filter,
but sieve only sees the internal b@bbb.local.
Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local?
Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and re
postfix (*) presents the right "rcpt to a...@aaa.com" to the milter filter,
but sieve only sees the internal b@bbb.local.
Why convert/alias a...@aaa.com to b@bbb.local?
Why not setup dovecot to have a mailbox and receive mail for a...@aaa.com,
allowing sieve to run for a...@aaa.com,
responses correctly?
I did some more digging in my "mail process chain":
incoming mail --> postfix (*) --> milter --> postfix --> lmtp/dovecot
--> sieve
postfix (*) presents the right "rcpt to a...@aaa.com" to the milter filter,
but sieve only sees the internal b@bb
Also came to mind that if you have the maildirs in place, you can just point
dovecot to those maildirs, there is no need to import/convert them.
Aki
> On 09/06/2023 14:08 EEST Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Yes, the trick is to use doveadm sync/backup, not do
I don't get them imported
properly all mails are displayed as unseen. i tried with simple
pasting and the doveadm import command. Is there a trick to preserve the
flags? Maybe it is because the old dovecot server uses short username
without the @ and the domain name and the new one uses
ported properly all
> mails are displayed as unseen. i tried with simple pasting and the doveadm
> import command. Is there a trick to preserve the flags? Maybe it is because
> the old dovecot server uses short username without the @ and the domain name
> and the new one uses the mail a
it is because
the old dovecot server uses short username without the @ and the domain
name and the new one uses the mail address to identify the user.
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:26 PM aki.tuomi via dovecot
wrote:
> Please see https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/migrating_mailboxes/
>
a white-list of the
ONLY accounts that can relay; NOTHING ELSE can relay. ... THAT would do
it! But no! Neither in Postfix nor dovecot is there such a thing!
I'm afraid that that's not *entirely* true ... :
/etc/postfix# grep senderauth main.cf
smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/senderauth
On 9/6/23 09:17, Richard Troy wrote:
However if your dovecot SASL is broken, say always permitting access
with or without correct password, then there will be a problem
I DID find a discrepancy: smtpd_helo_restrictions did NOT have
permit_sasl_authenticated. I made the change, of course
Useful, thanks. ... May I then presume that port 587 should be going
to Dovecot only and not Postfix? Otherwise, how was I supporting users
with this configuration:
No, you should not assume port 587 (or port 465) goes to Dovecot.
Postfix has enough smarts to handle the authentication
However if your dovecot SASL is broken, say always permitting access with or
without correct password, then there will be a problem
I DID find a discrepancy: smtpd_helo_restrictions did NOT have
permit_sasl_authenticated. I made the change, of course and with that
done, am now going
The problem will likely be postfix.
I actually doubt it but am VERY grateful for this remark:
However if your dovecot SASL is broken, say always permitting access with or
without correct password, then there will be a problem
IT COULD BE?!
I don't know (or maybe recall ATM) enough
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023, dove...@x9p.org wrote:
Logs?
Send the relevant logs so people can analyze the problem.
...The logs in full are HUGE, but I have some excerpts - Hope I caught the
right stuff! I'll send along soon.
Richard
___
dovecot
On 9/6/23 07:25, Richard Troy wrote:
The relaying only started and stopped when Dovecot was turned on or off.
Isn't it true that Dovecot performs an authentication function for
inbound connect requests, the successful of which then may use the
submission mechanism from what Postfix takes
The relaying only started and stopped when Dovecot was turned on or off.
Isn't it true that Dovecot performs an authentication function for
inbound connect requests, the successful of which then may use the
submission mechanism from what Postfix takes to be an internal
connection to send
background will surely help:
A 27 or so year old Fedora / Postfix / Dovecot site I built had a
major disaster in January and I've not yet been able to fully recover
because Dovecot has let the damned spammers in again and again and
again and again! OH, sure, I got it down to a trickle
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Sean Gallagher wrote:
It feels like you are conflating Dovecot with Postfix. Dovecot doesn't
actually "relay" anything. (ignoring sieve and submission proxy). Relaying is
the job of the "Mail Transfer Agent" or MTA. This is often Postfix but
Dovecot
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023, Antonio Leding wrote:
Just curious - the first thing the hit me was “27 or so year-old…”
Fedora was released 19 years ago and Dovecot 20 — what am I missing? And are
you saying this box has been unchanged since ’03?
Hi Antonio,
I had a lot of that in the eamil
It feels like you are conflating Dovecot with Postfix. Dovecot doesn't
actually "relay" anything. (ignoring sieve and submission proxy).
Relaying is the job of the "Mail Transfer Agent" or MTA. This is often
Postfix but Dovecot could probably work with just about any
standa
Just curious - the first thing the hit me was “27 or so year-old…”
Fedora was released 19 years ago and Dovecot 20 — what am I missing?
And are you saying this box has been unchanged since ’03?
- - -
On 8 Jun 2023, at 15:36, Richard Troy wrote:
Hi All,
This is my first posting here
Hi All,
This is my first posting here, and maybe I should have found this WAY back
in January, '23, if not LONG before. I want to be but I find it difficult
here to be brief. ... Surely background will surely help:
A 27 or so year old Fedora / Postfix / Dovecot site I built had a major
Please see https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/migrating_mailboxes/Aki
Original message From: tseeger...@gmail.com Date: 6/8/23
16:10 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Migration dovecot server
with local users to dovecot with virtual
mailboxes Hello, we
Hello,
we are using a dovecot server with NIS, we want to transfer it to a new setup.
As backend a mysql server will be used in the future.
My problem is, if I just copy the maildir or use "doveadm import" all mails are
flagged as "unseen". How can i preserve the flags?
in postfix or for user
authentication in dovecot). Emails for a...@aaa.com get stored in the
b@bbb.local mailbox.
Postfix uses an external relay to transfer emails from a...@aaa.com.
Sending and receiving emails works as a charm.
In received emails I see headers for
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: b
Hi Ralf,
We had the same problem few months back and i remember that was the
action we took to mitigate the issue. I will state our dovecot `s
submission proxy relevant config and hope that it will help.
```
auth_mechanisms = plain login
submission_max_mail_size = 3072
Hi,
I have a problem with dovecot indexer-workers starting at the same time
everyday and using too much disk io and cpu.
I have limited indexer-workers to 2, but i am not sure this is the
solution.
Can you help me to configure this automatic reindex to be in the night
for example.
Best
> On 25/05/2023 02:01 EEST Computerisms Corporation
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Dovecot Gurus,
>
> I have been playing around with the submission service. I have managed
> to get all the things working that I want working with two exceptions.
> I have not found (or
Hi Again,
Second; I am wondering about the possibility of having multiple
submission_relay_host entries. For example if I have dovecot submission
services running on my standard port 587 and 465 connect to a relay on
the same box through localhost, but could I have another submission
Hi Dovecot Gurus,
I have been playing around with the submission service. I have managed
to get all the things working that I want working with two exceptions.
I have not found (or possibly I have overlooked) solutions in the
documentation or discussions on the 'net.
First; I would like
EGroupware GmbH [www.egroupware.org]
Handelsregister HRB Kaiserslautern 3587
Geschäftsführer Birgit und Ralf Becker
Leibnizstr. 17, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Telefon +49 631 31657-0
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send
Have you tried adding the line below to your submision config?
submission_client_workarounds = whitespace-before-path___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 19 May 2023 09:53:02 +0200, Ralf Becker via dovecot stated:
>Am 17.05.23 um 20:03 schrieb dovecot--- via dovecot:
>>> Dovecot ... submission server works well with all sorts of clients,
>>> but Outlook.
>>
>
alf Becker via dovecot
wrote:
Dovecot 2.3.20 including it's submission server works well with all
sorts of clients, but Outlook.
Outlook works / can connect to Dovecot IMAP service with same
certificate TLS config, but it fails to connect using SMTPs on
port 465.
Oth
Hello,
I may be mistaken, but I don't see "auth_mechanism = plain login" in your
configuration. It's possible that you are using something different for
authentication, but I don't see it in the configuration.
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 4:04 PM Ralf Becker via dovecot
wrote:
> D
Am 17.05.23 um 20:03 schrieb dovecot--- via dovecot:
Dovecot ... submission server works well with all sorts of clients,
but Outlook.
I thought that was M$ intent. They purposefully design their ecosystem
to not play well with others so the average person will think
something is wrong
Dovecot ... submission server works well with all sorts of clients, but Outlook.
I thought that was M$ intent. They purposefully design their ecosystem to not
play well with others so the average person will think something is wrong with
the competitor's software, give up and just continue
Dovecot 2.3.20 including it's submission server works well with all
sorts of clients, but Outlook.
Outlook works / can connect to Dovecot IMAP service with same
certificate TLS config, but it fails to connect using SMTPs on port 465.
Other clients connect and send mails without problem, also
On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 17:55 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> > On 13/05/2023 17:50 EEST Jim Popovitch via dovecot <
> > dovecot@dovecot.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 16:59 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> > &g
> On 13/05/2023 17:50 EEST Jim Popovitch via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 16:59 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> > > On 13/05/2023 14:38 EEST Tom Reed wrote:
> > >
> > > How to setup dovecot to accept the plus
On Sat, 2023-05-13 at 16:59 +0300, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> > On 13/05/2023 14:38 EEST Tom Reed wrote:
> >
> > How to setup dovecot to accept the plus address?
> > such as user+...@sample.com will be delivered into u...@sample.com
> >
>
> h
> On 13/05/2023 14:38 EEST Tom Reed wrote:
>
>
> Hello
>
> How to setup dovecot to accept the plus address?
> such as user+...@sample.com will be delivered into u...@sample.com
>
> Thank you.
> Tom R.
>
> _________
Hello
How to setup dovecot to accept the plus address?
such as user+...@sample.com will be delivered into u...@sample.com
Thank you.
Tom R.
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
lated to each component of the system:
> if
> > > the system has less components the probability to have issues is
> > > smaller.
> >
> > Yes but this is reasoning backwards, and even then, it is not complete
> because you have multiple layers of security. Eg only dove
ponent of the system: if
> > the system has less components the probability to have issues is
> > smaller.
>
> Yes but this is reasoning backwards, and even then, it is not complete
> because you have multiple layers of security. Eg only dovecot is public
> facing and
t this is reasoning backwards, and even then, it is not complete because
you have multiple layers of security. Eg only dovecot is public facing and can
have an exploit that would be limited to just by os uid environment. If you
are proficient with selinux you could even enhance the os rules for ac
It should also be mentioned that dovecot can act as a SMTP relay in
"front" of Postfix (or any other MTA) and handle the authentication part
of the transaction. This of course implies use of the dovecot
authentication machinery for mail submissions. I don't know much about
it b
postfix can use LDAP for authentication (i.e. SASL) and for
validation("ldap" table).
As best I can tell, postfix cannot use dovecot to validate addresses, if
you want that you will need postfix to talk directly to ldap. GOTCHA:
use the "postconf -m" command to check t
On 2023-05-09 11:14, Marc wrote:
so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as
userdb and
passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL
to
validate user accounts.
Now I added an LDAP backend
>
>
> so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as
> userdb and
> passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL
> to
> validate user accounts.
>
> Now I added an LDAP ba
t; scope=2 deref=0
filter="(&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=mor...@example.com))"
Why is dovecot still using the default filter setting even though my config now
looks like this:
hosts = openldap:1389
base = ou=users,dc=example,dc=com
auth_bind = yes
auth_bind_userdn = uid=%n,ou
The question about best practices was more a conceptual one. Should dovecot and
postfix talk independently to the LDAP database? Or should dovecot be the
gateway for postfix to get the information out of the LDAP database?
Just my 2 cents, id have postfix talk directly to LDAP to see
s. I already followed that guide.
>
> The question about best practices was more a conceptual one. Should dovecot
> and postfix talk independently to the LDAP database? Or should dovecot be the
> gateway for postfix to get the information out of the LDAP database?
>
> Cheers,
Thanks for the hints. I already followed that guide.
The question about best practices was more a conceptual one. Should dovecot and
postfix talk independently to the LDAP database? Or should dovecot be the
gateway for postfix to get the information out of the LDAP database?
Cheers,
Moritz
s=posixAccount)(uid=mor...@example.com))"
Why is dovecot still using the default filter setting even though my config now
looks like this:
hosts = openldap:1389
base = ou=users,dc=example,dc=com
auth_bind = yes
auth_bind_userdn = uid=%n,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com
pass_attrs = \
=user=%
> On 08/05/2023 23:06 EEST Marc wrote:
>
>
> >
> > so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as userdb and
> > passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL to
> > validate user accounts.
> >
> > Now
On 5/8/23 23:06, Marc wrote:
so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as userdb and
passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL to
validate user accounts.
Now I added an LDAP backend and would like to use that for Dovecot and
Postfix. My first approach
On 08-05-2023 16:43, Moritz Pflanzer wrote:
Hi all,
so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as userdb and
passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL to validate user
accounts.
Now I added an LDAP backend and would like to use that for Dovecot
>
> so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as userdb and
> passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL to
> validate user accounts.
>
> Now I added an LDAP backend and would like to use that for Dovecot and
> Postfix. My first a
Hi all,
so far I had a setup where Dovecot was using a passwd file as userdb and
passdb. Postfix was then authenticating with Dovecot via SASL to validate user
accounts.
Now I added an LDAP backend and would like to use that for Dovecot and Postfix.
My first approach was to change the passdb
On 2023-04-23 11:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
dovecot--- via dovecot skrev den 2023-04-23 20:25:
I tried to enable it on postfix smtp_sasl_auth_enable, but it is was
not advertise.
That is because "smtp" is not the same as "smtpd".
http://www.postfix
Shawn -
You had mentioned in another email (somewhere) that were hopefully going
to do a write-up of setting up Solr 9.x with Dovecot. Any chance you've
had time for that ?
Thanks -
On 2022-09-30 1:52 pm, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/27/22 19:32, Nathanael Anderson wrote:
>
[...]
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
As Benny already wrote: delete them from your main.cf as port 25 should not
be used for authentication.
2. postconf -M
[...]
smtps inet n - - - - smtpd
[...]
-o smtpd_client_restrictions
_sasl_authenticated reject_unauth_destination
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
smtpd_timeout = 30s
smtpd_tls_cert_file = $tcert
smtpd_tls_key_file = $tkey
smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt
strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes
tcert = /etc/letsencrypt/live/www.zystro.xyz
HI Benny,
master.cf already have enteries for 465 and 587 as I followed the guide.
Noted and thank you.
Regards,
-badli
From: Benny Pedersen
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023, 02:54
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: dovecot sasl with postfix, smtp auth
Hi Badli,
On 23.04.23 05:15, Badli Al Rashid wrote:
Anybody got any ideas ?
please post the output of:
1) postconf -n
2) postconf -M
Regards,
Markus
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le
dovecot--- via dovecot skrev den 2023-04-23 20:25:
I tried to enable it on postfix smtp_sasl_auth_enable, but it is was
not advertise.
That is because "smtp" is not the same as "smtpd".
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sasl_auth_enable
port 25 should n
301 - 400 of 59905 matches
Mail list logo
