Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance

2007-01-18 Thread Robert Ladden
Robert Ladden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Hello all, I got a frequency counter and set the oscillator using C6 within a few Hertz of 5645. That resulted in a lot of carrier. So into a dummy lo

Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance

2007-01-10 Thread w1id
But I am > >concerned that I needed to turn C6 to its extreme. I also note that the > >carrier is completely gone. I also discovered that the spot signal is > >gone. It is just a teeny noise on LSB and a very very weak carrier on USB. > >Not really usable. It did genera

RE: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance

2007-01-10 Thread Rodger Singley
@www.zerobeat.net > Subject: Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance > > > Robert Ladden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang > -- > Hello again, > > After more testing, I must be wa

Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance

2007-01-10 Thread Garey Barrell
Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Bob - The first thing to do is get the Carrier Oscillator at least "near" the correct frequency. If you have a "modern" receiver with digital readou

Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance

2007-01-10 Thread Robert Ladden
is gone. It is just a teeny noise on LSB and a very very weak carrier on USB. Not really usable. It did generate a signal before I did all this. So did I do good? Or does this rig need a lot more tweaking? 73, Bob Ladden WA3WQB K2CU's original message follows: RE: [drakelist] T-4XC Carri

Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance

2007-01-10 Thread Robert Ladden
Robert Ladden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- I want to thank all of you for your advice. Even though I followed the instructions to adjust C6 for no carrier, it is more complicated than that. I o

[drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance

2007-01-09 Thread Robert Ladden
ot more tweaking? 73, Bob Ladden WA3WQB K2CU's original message follows: RE: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance Question Robert Schenck Mon, 29 Dec 2003 05:09:54 -0800 HI Mike, Welcome to the world of the Drake equipment! There ar ethree adjustkments that you ahev to do to correctly balan

Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance Question

2003-12-29 Thread Mike Warner
Thanks Robert and thanks to all who responded to my question. Obviously there is much experience and knowledge in this group. 73 de N3XPD Mike Robert Schenck wrote: HI Mike, Welcome to the world of the Drake equipment! There ar ethree adjustkments that you ahev to do to correctly balance the car

RE: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance Question

2003-12-29 Thread Robert Schenck
HI Mike, Welcome to the world of the Drake equipment! There ar ethree adjustkments that you ahev to do to correctly balance the carrier. They are C6, Carrier frequency trim, R21, carrier balance, and C17 Carrier balance/phase. You should firest check that the carrier frequency trim is correct

Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance Question

2003-12-28 Thread Mike Warner
Gary, Thanks fro the reply, Ok, that explains the ball bearing unit and I counted the pot at ~10 turns to where I felt the torque change so it seems ok. I am still confused by the procedure in the manual. On the schematic I see three adjustable components around the carrier oscillator. R-21 and

Re: [drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance Question

2003-12-27 Thread Gary Poland
Mike, The pot has a ball reduction drive and is multiturn. It will slip when it reaches the limits..this is normal. Tune the T4XC up on 20 meters as an example, plug in a mic, turn the MIC GAIN fully CCW, and key the mic. Tune in the 20 meter transmit frequency on another receiver ( or a scope co

[drakelist] T-4XC Carrier Balance Question

2003-12-27 Thread Mike Warner
Hello to all on the list, I recently cleaned all of the switches and pots in my T-4XC and as a result I disturbed the setting of the carrier balance pot (R-21). I am having some trouble understanding the procedure that is in the manual . It states to adjust this pot for minimum S meter on another