Re: [dwm] screen locker

2008-12-13 Thread Scytrin dai Kinthra
I've been using xss at work for the last 6 months and have had no problems I didn't create myself. I've been trying to find something that will grab keyboard and mouse input, so I can see the desktop and any alerts that may pop up, and have been using xss+xkeygrab. Good stuff, especially when your

Re: [dwm] screen locker

2008-12-13 Thread Thayer Williams
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Neale Pickett wrote: > Since the list is talking about slock, now might be an appropriate time > for me to mention again my xss project: > >http://woozle.org/~neale/src/xss/ > > This provides several single-purpose programs which allow you to build a > screen l

[dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Brendan MacDonell * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 19:42 - > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, henry atting > wrote: >> Patching works without problems but I get this warnings: >> >>dwm.c:1640: warning: 'viewnext' defined but not used >>dwm.c:1657: warning: 'viewprevious' defined but no

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread Brendan MacDonell
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM, henry atting wrote: > Patching works without problems but I get this warnings: > >dwm.c:1640: warning: 'viewnext' defined but not used >dwm.c:1657: warning: 'viewprevious' defined but not used > > And, what should I say, it *is* not used ;) > > henr

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - James Turner * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 18:43 - > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote: >> Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - >> >> > 2008/12/13 henry atting : >> >>> 2008/12/13 henry atting : >> >>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4,

[dwm] screen locker

2008-12-13 Thread Neale Pickett
Since the list is talking about slock, now might be an appropriate time for me to mention again my xss project: http://woozle.org/~neale/src/xss/ This provides several single-purpose programs which allow you to build a screen locker (or just saver) with a shell script. I set mine up to check

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

2008-12-13 Thread James Turner
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:34:28AM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote: > James Turner writes: > > > After taking some time and looking at the different signal headers on > > OpenBSD only #include is required, no need to #include > > which contains additional functions. > > My man page (Linux) says to

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread James Turner
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:09:11PM +0100, henry atting wrote: > Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - > > > 2008/12/13 henry atting : > >>> 2008/12/13 henry atting : > >>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume > >>> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 pa

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

2008-12-13 Thread Neale Pickett
James Turner writes: > After taking some time and looking at the different signal headers on > OpenBSD only #include is required, no need to #include > which contains additional functions. My man page (Linux) says to #include . I don't have any of my books nearby, nor do I have access to any

Re: [dwm] xprop patch

2008-12-13 Thread Frederic Chardon
Hello, It is now useless to close stdin: --- orig/dwm.c 2008-12-13 18:05:32.0 +0100 +++ dwm/dwm.c 2008-12-13 18:09:16.0 +0100 @@ -343,7 +343,6 @@ Arg a = {.ui = ~0}; Layout foo = { "", NULL }; - close(STDIN_FILENO); view(&a); lt[sellt] = &

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 - > 2008/12/13 henry atting : >>> 2008/12/13 henry atting : >>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume >>> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4 >>> codebase. >> >> Mmh, I am not very familiar wi

Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2008/12/13 henry atting : >> 2008/12/13 henry atting : >> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume >> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4 >> codebase. > > Mmh, I am not very familiar with patching, I did it this way: > > , > | do! patch -p1

[dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:17 - > 2008/12/13 henry atting : >> - A `make clean install' does install dwm but it cannot read from stdin >> which prevents me from displaying time and date on the toolbar. >> >>config.h:15: warning: 'readin' defined but not used > > See th

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2008/12/13 henry atting : > - A `make clean install' does install dwm but it cannot read from stdin > which prevents me from displaying time and date on the toolbar. > >config.h:15: warning: 'readin' defined but not used See the README file for an example, the status text is set using xse

[dwm] dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008-12-13 Thread henry atting
Hello, I recently switched from awesome to dwm which gives me my desktop back ;) I am currently using 5.4 from Mecurial. Two questions: - A `make clean install' does install dwm but it cannot read from stdin which prevents me from displaying time and date on the toolbar. config.h:15:

Re: [dwm] dwm on tablet pc

2008-12-13 Thread joten
> I will try to get it > working with devilspie executing a perl script and issuing wmctrl. Dead end. The perl script works, but devilspie is only acting on windows, which are cretaed, but not on those, destroyed, and wmctrl does get a list of windows from the wm, but this list is sorted by creatio

Re: [dwm] dwm on tablet pc

2008-12-13 Thread joten
> getting the buttons working was a bit of a voyage (all 12 mins of > it) : Yes, if the only problem is to get the buttons of the tablet pc working with X, than 12 mins would be far enough. > patch set to do what? I do not have a convertible, therefor no hardware keyboard, but I want at least be a

Re: [dwm] dwm on tablet pc

2008-12-13 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2008/12/12 : >> Try dwm-gtx. Onscreenkeyboards should work with it. :) > Thanks for the hint. I tried your version of dwm, and cellwriter works. > What is the essential part for this to work? > > Getting cw to work is the first step. I also tried the mouse > actions for the bar, which are already

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

2008-12-13 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2008/12/13 Frederic Chardon : > 2008/12/13 James Turner : >> After taking some time and looking at the different signal headers on >> OpenBSD only #include is required, no need to #include >> which contains additional functions. > > Same for FreeBSD (and probably all other *BSD). Would it be poss

Re: [dwm] dwm-5.3

2008-12-13 Thread Frederic Chardon
2008/12/13 James Turner : > After taking some time and looking at the different signal headers on > OpenBSD only #include is required, no need to #include > which contains additional functions. > > -- > James Turner > BSD Group Consulting > http://www.bsdgroup.org > > Hello, Same for FreeBSD (an

Re: [dwm] dwm and dualhead

2008-12-13 Thread stanio
* Mate Nagy [2008-12-10 21:18]: > Not on the V100, and the webcam is from some obscure far > east manufacturer with no website to speak of and no open specs. There > is a halfassed driver project that hasn't made progress in a couple of > years. Have you tried gspcav? http://mxhaard.free.fr/index