Gerry VE6LB wrote:
I've been active since 1956 and don't recall where Canada ever
"prevented" US sub band expansion. I don't believe we had the
ability to do that then or now.
"Prevented", as used by Jim N4JA, may be just a slight
over-statement. I would substitute "lobbied strongly and
Title: Message
Joe,
That may be true in the US but in Canada, we can
operate digital anywhere. Can't speak for the rest of the world but I'm sure
there are many other jurisdiction, like SM, that have not mode
restriction.
Gerry VE6LB
al Message -
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jim Abercrombie'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] After effects
Jim,
Most digital operation (except PSK) uses narrow filters.
Moving
Original Message -
From: "Jim Abercrombie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] After effects
I don't see the problem with moving the digitalsw down below 3600. Those
modes are narrow-banded and don't occupy the space a p
; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] After effects
Joe,
There is more than enough "bad form" to go around now.
Might be a thought for digital to move up in all this large amount of space
you mention (3600-4000).
Gerry VE6LB
- Original Message -
From: Joe Subich, W4TV
ECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Abercrombie
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:33 PM
> To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
> Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] After effects
>
>
> I don't see the problem with moving the digitalsw down below
> 3600. Those
> modes are narrow-banded and don't occupy t
I don't see the problem with moving the digitalsw down below 3600. Those
modes are narrow-banded and don't occupy the space a phone signal does.
Neither does CW. For the digital operators I would suggest they narrow up
their I.F.'s to prevent them from copying adjacent signals, after all PSK
o
erry' ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:27
AM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] After
effects
Gerry,
With the
large amount of space between 3600 and 4000 - even though there
will be US
signals there - for the Canadians to move below 3600 would
be ve
At 08:46 AM 10/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering- with a couple years to comment to the
FCC -before- it was adopted, why all the discussion now. I guess
the boat was missed if there were any real concerns.
Technically the proposed rules were open for public comment for a
sixty
Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
GerrySent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:15 AMTo:
dx-chat@njdxa.orgSubject: Re: [DX-CHAT] After
effects
Ron,
All this discussion
centres around US use of the bands. As you push down your phone band, hams
Title: Message
I guess we'll see how it plays out.
Gerry
- Original Message -
From:
Joe Subich, W4TV
To: 'Gerry' ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:27
AM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] After
effects
Gerry,
With the
eau Team
(403) 251-6520
ve6lb (at) rac.ca
www.qsl.net/ve6lb/
- Original Message - From: Ron Notarius W3WN To:
dx-chat@njdxa.org Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:52 AM Subject: Re:
[DX-CHAT] After effects
Good question.
Relatively Simple answers:
(a) this 'omnibus'
) rac.cawww.qsl.net/ve6lb/
- Original Message -
From:
Ron Notarius
W3WN
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 7:52
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] After
effects
Good question.Relatively Simple answers: (a)
this 'omnibus' ruling combined a lot
uldn't happen, and now they have to figure out what to do next.
73
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/10/13 Fri AM 07:46:40 CDT
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] After effects
Just wondering- with a couple years to comment to the FCC -before-
Just wondering- with a couple years to comment to the FCC -before- it was adopted, why all the discussion now. I guess the boat was missed if there were any real concerns.
73,
Duane, WV2B"The reward of a thing well done is to have done it."- Ralph Waldo Emerson
15 matches
Mail list logo
