Art,
your an amazing fellow also. You would change that pic which
has been on your website for 20 years and because of me you
took it off! Are you thinned skin or what? I don't care to check
out your new one.
Like you I paid my $89 for DX4WIN and another $50 bucks for
two additional versions
Potential Updates:
I agree with all Kostas said below. Especially decoders for more digital
modes or the ability to integrate them. A CW decoder would be quite
helpful, I have external one but it is just one more thing to remember to
open and close. I would also like to have much more
To: Ernie w8eh.er...@gmail.com
Ernie and Group,
I run HDSDR and DX4WIN all the time...simply use LPB2, a free software
offered by Larry N8LPYou can have HDSDR, DX4WIN, N1MM and anything
else you want to linked to your rigit works great...
The rest
I think that some of the postings with the subject Updates should really be
posted with the subject Additional features I wish were present.
DX4Win started as a logging program as I recall. Operating was up to the person
who had the amateur license; logging the QSO'S that resulted from the
Paul should put a link on the DX4WIN website for owner's to contribute
their idea's to the Wish List.
I sent an email to Paul 2-3 weeks ago with a suggestion and did not
receive a response so I resorted
to the DX4WIN Reflector to BE HEARD.
Requesting some attention from the owner's of
The bad thing with every com bridge as LPB2 (and many others) is that
create virtual ports to make it possible. Unfortunately I use a Microham
product (mk2r+) and the support says that installing virtual coms is not
a good practice. I have noticed that many virtual coms, slow the
computer and
All,
Great...I think a wish list web page might be a good idea
If the wish list is not acted upon by the developer, will it do any
good?as some have posted, the author of this software has decided
not to respond to emails and this groupand therefore the wish list
web page may
John,
You appear to have issues.
I will not be drawn into a jousting match with someone making cheap shots -
grow up.
BTW, when was the last time you won a Contest and/or had your pic in QST?
N4DSP - Shea, John E
7170 Johns Pointe Court
Liberty, NC 27298
73 Happy New Year to You and Your
Well said, Lou.
I am another early adopter of DX4WIN, from back in the early days of
Windows (3.1?) I started with DXLOG (for DOS) and after a number of
empty promises of a Win version from its developer (who lived 5 miles
from me at the time), I switched to DX4WIN.
There are things DX4WIN
Art,
This gentleman appears to have issues. It's best that
he be ignored.
73/HNY, Bob K8BL
From: n4dsp n4...@triad.rr.com
To: Art - W6KY w...@yahoo.com; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, January 5, 2014 2:34 AM
Subject: Re:
Take a hike Bob.
What does winning contests have to do with requesting a modern version
for DX4WIN?
You say Happy New Year to me and my family?
Take a hike Bob.
On 1/5/2014 1:57 PM, R.T.Liddy wrote:
John,
You appear to have issues.
I will not be drawn into a jousting match with someone
LOL.
Hey Bob,
Can't we all just get along!
LOL
On 1/5/2014 1:59 PM, R.T.Liddy wrote:
Art,
This gentleman appears to have issues. It's best that
he be ignored.
73/HNY,Bob K8BL
*From:* n4dsp n4...@triad.rr.com
Art, Bob, and Zoran,
what was originally an excellent post addressing the need to end the
4 year lapse in updates to the excellent but stagnated DX4WIN program
has been thrown off course by you three.
Another thread has appeared by Hams that are in favor and discussing in
a civil manner the
I have always considered myself as a loyal and satisfied user of DX4WIN! I have
probably been responsible for 25 or more fellow DXers choosing DX4WIN over
other possible logging programs. I dread the thought of ever changing to some
other new method of maintaining the heart of my DX History.
Sir,
It's interesting that you began a thread with empty complaints about
DX4WIN and turned it into rude comments about fellow Hams'
pictures on QRZ.com. Did you realize that YOUR QRZ.com page
says you respond to QSLs by direct mail but you chose to have your
Direct Address WITHHELD?
Hi,
Thank you Bill for a civil restart of this discussion!
We are expecting guests in a little while, so let me be brief:
1. I read the reflector
2. Folks who want to use DXLab please do so!
3. When I saw the enormous of email traffic a few month ago when LoTW had
problems I realized it was
Amen!
-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Ken G Kopp
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 3:24 PM
To: Dx4win@Mailman.Qth.Net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Fwd: Re: Updates on a more positive note!
Well said, Paul !
73!
Ken Kopp
Paul tnx for reply. I appreciate it.
1.Either we like it or not, qrz is a standard. So I believe that dx4win
must support it.
2. Abt 2 rotors. Is difficult someone has one rotor for hf antenna and
one for 6m antenna? This is my case. Computer control of rotors is cheap
today. I bought and
There must be peace, I have tried many log, ur5eqf, N1MM, Swisslog,
winlog32, DXBase, ham radio deluxe, win-eqf and dx4wim among others, and
always return to dx4wim. I do not know why but yes, if I would like the
topic of digital and easiest way to adapt competitions, diplomas or
trophies in each
I agree Kostas.
After 4 years we NOW know , thanks to Paul, there will be NO LOTW
Updates to DX4WIN and additional rig files.
Would like to make a positive suggestion for Paul while he is still
listeningOn the DX4WIN Home Page provide a
Link that allows user's to see what is up and
All,
We have FINALLY heard from Paulthat is a good thingand it sounds
like he has a portion of our wish list.
A few comments though
1. Did you see any inclination or willingness to incorporate them into
DX4WIN?
2. Although it is unlikely he would have every rig produced, it
Hi to all.
I'm a LOTW user since version 5. I think this is the simpliest and
powerfull dx logging program on the air.
But I had to ask a pretty *new* feature: LOTW let you download the list
of QSOs that are used for claim the score... Can you import that file
using their proprietary fields
On 05.01.2014 11:33, n4dsp wrote:
Art, Bob, and Zoran,
what was originally an excellent post addressing the need to end the
4 year lapse in updates to the excellent but stagnated DX4WIN program
has been thrown off course by you three.
Your excellent post was a poorly disguised flaming attempt
With due respect to all little change is going to occur which I am sorry
to say.
We have FINALLY heard from Paul and aware of the direction DX4WIN is taking.
Well boys I have supported Paul and DX4WIN speaking to others informing
them what a great dx logging program it is and quite frankly I
Relative to LoTW improvements: One of the great features of DX4Win is it's
ability to handle multiple logs, whether they are DXpeditions, grid
expeditions or just a club call. Using the Groups and Selections choices,
they can be combined or separated easily. LoTW requires that some of these
I understand in this last email that DX4WIN died about updates, what you
have is what you get. is that, please clearly confirm this. thanks
Sebastián Gámez Hernández
E A 8 O G
73´S
2014/1/5 n4dsp n4...@triad.rr.com
With due respect to all little change is going to occur
Dear Chano,
That is exactly what n4dsp wants you to believe. He wrote many messages
today stating that interfacing to LoTW should be fully automated and that I
should sell the company.
There will be new versions in the future, but I want to figure out what new
features make sense in terms of
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list:
Lou, thanks for the tip about the LPB2 program. I didn't know it was out
there.
I installed LPB2 and it does exactly what I need it to do. I have it
running right now with my Yaesu FT-950, DX4Win, HDSDR and N3FJP contest
program. They all know what the radio is doing now.
Thanks again for
Just as a point of information, the TQSL log signing application has
been completely re-written to make the process more secure and easier to
interface with. This wouldn't affect reading LOTW records, but I
understand it makes the log submission process easier to automate.
Information on
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:01 AM, n4dsp n4...@triad.rr.com wrote:
For starters the steps one has to take to upload a log to LOTW is many and
confusing.
This is well known. I downloaded and installed DXLAB. With two mouse clicks
my log is
uploaded to LOTW. It's amazing. Why can we not have
Hi Dick,
Thank you for your personal note! I copy the reflector on my reply; it may
be educational.
Well I beat you in number of years developing commercial software. (since
1976)
What some, and may you too, do not appreciate is the wide scale of computer
experience DX4WIN users have. In my
32 matches
Mail list logo
